Various methods of large scale population influencing

Below is a forward by scientist Allen Barker on the subject of various large scale population influencing technologies. His excellent site is at:

 http://www.datafilter.com/mc

Which has been awarded as a USA Today Hotsite at:

 http://www.usatoday.com/tech/2002/04/29/hotsites.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[This is a repost of a reply to an article of mine at
 http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=jHaeb.37473%24pP6.2916%40newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net
titled "more acoustic psycho-correction info." I sent this
reply article earlier, but somehow it never made it to Google.
So I am reposting it.]


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: more acoustic psycho-correction info
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 02:34:04 GMT
From: Allen L. Barker
Organization: No Dismay
Newsgroups: alt.mindcontrol,alt.politics.org.cia,soc.rights.human,alt.politics.org.covert


In the previous article, we saw Valley and Aquino refer to
psyops in the media combined with what I call wide-field
mind control methods (like ELF EM waves). These sort of systems
are called wide-field because they are not selective to any one
or few individuals, but rather influence many people over a
geographic area. (Weak fields and acoustic methods like
infrasound would tend to influence smaller areas. And how about
just acoustic earth vibrations? I recall reading a library book
years ago about "fiddling for worms" and how you could actually
communicate with such methods.) Any possible mental influence of
HAARP types of systems, for example, would almost surely be
wide-field.

With wide-field techniques the effects are typically subtle --
though that is often an operational requirement rather than a
physical one. You do not want a million people to notice and get
furious at the manipulation. But the power of such techniques
comes precisely from the large-scale nature of the influencing.
If you can influence a million people just a little bit, in a way
they do not notice, that may affect the society more than just
strongly influencing a few (at least in some senses, and assuming
that the "few" were chosen randomly rather than specifically
targeted for their real or potential influence).

For more on wide-field influencing, see, for example,
 http://www.datafilter.com/mc/wideFieldMC.html

Currently the media propaganda system is still the main means of
control over the US population (unfortunately often in league with
corruption and abuses, and against the Constitution). But other
techniques have been developing rapidly, over many years. Valley
and Aquino seem to describe a hybrid system. Why should control
freaks with fascist tendencies use just one means of control, when
several can be used simultaneously?

Just to get people thinking about this sort of manipulation I will
give an illustrative example. First, I'll include another excerpt
from the Valley and Aquino paper. Then I will quote some of the
excerpts from the previous article. Finally, I will suggest an
example manipulation system. I only suggest such things to warn
people and make them aware of the possibilities. If you do not
know to be vigilant about something then you really cannot be
vigilant about it. This is not new news to the professional
manipulators, but may be to the amateurs and hobbyists, and
certainly is to most ordinary citizens. Hiding the information is
no longer an option, though, so be aware. Keep your mind alert,
and do what you can.

[...]

Psychotronic research is in its infancy, but the U.S. Army
already possesses an operational weapons systems designed to do
what LTC Alexander would like ESP to do -- except that this
weapons system uses existing communications media. It seems to
map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change
them in accordance with U.S. national interests. It does this on
a wide scale, embracing military units, regions, nations, and
blocs. In its present form it is called Psychological Operations
(PSYOP).

[...]

Allen L. Barker wrote:
>
> From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory
>  http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/files/Mind-Control/Technology/mindwar1.txt
>
> by Colonel Paul E. Valley
> with Major Michael A. Aquino
>
> [...]
>
> This, however, is only the sociological dimension of target
> receptiveness measures. There are some purely natural conditions
> under which minds may become more or less receptive to ideas, and
> MindWar should take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric
> electromagnetic activity (12), air ionization (13), and extremely low
> frequency waves (14).
>
> [...]
>
> 14. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) waves: ELF waves up to 100 Hz
> are once more naturally occurring, but they can also be produced
> artificially (such as for the Navy's Project Sanguine for
> submarine communication). ELF-waves are not normally noticed by
> the unaided senses, yet their resonant effect upon the human body
> has been connected to both physiological disorders and emotional
> distortion. Infrasound vibration (up to 20 Hz) can subliminally
> influence brain activity to align itself to delta, theta, alpha,
> or beta wave patterns, inclining an audience toward everything
> from alertness to passivity. Infrasound could be used tactically,
> as ELF-waves endure for great distances; and it could be used in
> conjunction with media broadcasts as well. See Playfair, Guy L.
> and Hill, Scott, The Cycles of Heaven. New York: St. Martin's
> Press, 1978, pages 130-140.

Suppose we postulate a particular wide-field technique which is
capable of influencing a good-sized segment of the population in a
limited way. Say that it extends over maybe the East Coast, or a
few states, or maybe just a large or small city. Suppose that it is
only capable of generating weak forms of what might be considered
"positive, friendly" feelings as well as "negative, hostile"
feelings. (Actually, either one alone would suffice.) For example,
suppose some ELF or ground wave signal of a particular frequency or
modulation were capable of doing that.

That is the supposition for this example, and it is not an
unrealistic one. Any sort of wide-field technique capable of such
limited influencing would suffice.

Now, every night at 6:30pm many millions of Americans tune in
to the evening news. Even just assuming a single major network,
it is still millions of people. This is a common, collective
signal that millions of people receive. It is put together by
the news teams, and has whatever content they decide on.

This news show is also common to those controlling the
hypothesized influencing system, i.e., they can watch it too.
Some of the news stories will conform to the agenda of those
running the influencing system, and so will get a "positive,
friendly" wide-field beam to enhance their reception in the
minds of the millions in the audience. Some of the stories will
not conform to the agenda of the influencers, and so will receive
the "negative, hostile" influencing.

Being a wide-field system, even those not watching the particular
news show will also be influenced. But presumably the influencing
will average out over whatever other random things they were doing.
And of those many millions watching the show, millions will be
influenced, if only in a subtle way.

What if this is repeated night after night? It need not be
confined to just one network, either. Over time it would slowly
influence the political opinions of the population. Even live
broadcasters would be affected, as would the opinions and
feedback the network news shows received ("that piece made me
feel horrible").

Again, I am not saying that this particular manipulation happens
now, only that it could. (As of now the propaganda content alone
already has a very strong effect.) The very fact that such an
example is technologically plausible, even with 1950s technology,
is important to be aware of. And it is only one example of many.
For example, there are many ways that local TV and radio signals
themselves can be modified to embed subliminal messages. Such
signals in the current state of the art are advanced far beyond
just a simple popcorn container inserted in a frame. This insertion
can also happen at the level of the transmission, not just at the
signal origin (see Commando Solo). A hostile agent, foreign or
domestic, can do it without necessarily infiltrating the TV or
radio station with psyop agents.

How can such signals be detected? With the example above you would
have to be monitoring the precise EM frequencies (or whatever other
method is used), correlate it to the news broadcast, and know the
physiological effect it would have. In the subliminal manipulation
example it would require knowing what sorts of subliminals to look
for and where to look.

Who is responsible for looking for such things? What happens if
they are detected? In the current US it seems that almost no one
is looking out for the ordinary citizens. Maybe the influencers
who were caught would just be blackmailed into influencing for the
sake of the organized criminals who caught them. How can we trust
agencies which still conceal mind control operations of decades
ago, some of which have even been at least partially exposed and
documented (with citizen victims still in the population)?
Credible victim claims of ongoing abuses and experimentation are
still ignored or worse, using various shameful cover lies such as
the Soviet-style abuse of the psychiatric system.

You apparently cannot get the public outraged even at possible
infringements of their basic, fundamental rights (for example
their right to vote on fraud-resistant voting machines). That is
the propaganda system in its "sin of omission" mode. Can you get
people to care that their own brain processes can be and may well
be manipulated against them?

Let me end by reminding people of the mathematical definition of
risk. It is the probability of an event multiplied by the loss
that would be incurred if the event occurred. You may think that
the probability of such events as described in this article are
low (though in a general sense they are really not that low, and
many are taking place already). But no one can deny that the
loss which would be incurred would be colossal. It could be the
loss of freedom and liberty itself. This is a serious risk that
needs to be taken seriously.


--
Mind Control: TT&P ==>  http://www.datafilter.com/mc

Προσθήκη σχολίου σε αυτό το άρθρο