|
GLOBAL: BIOTECH
Monsanto is pulling out of GM wheat12 May 2004 09:21 GMT
Since the early 1990s, before there was even any GM plant growing in a field, consumers in Europe said that they did not want GM food. Companies like Monsanto, however, went ahead, trying to sell products against the explicit wishes and needs of consumers. Monsanto's main products are the herbicide 'Roundup' and crops resistant to it. Consumers have nothing to gain from it and for farmers it's finally becoming obvious that there isn't much to gain in the long run either. As a matter of fact, GM rape seed (canola) has become a threat to the Canadian agricultural economy. Monsanto is sueing farmers like Percy Schmeiser for patent violation, while the company can't even keep their own seed un-contaminated. The GM herbicide resistance is now found in at least 90 percent of the certified (and supposedly GM free) seeds in Canada - and double and triple herbicide resistant crop plants become a major problem to all farmers. But Monsanto went ahead... trying to test and introduce GM wheat. In Europe even stricter labelling rules came into force on 18 May 2004, and wheat field trials (as well as many others) were destroyed. The picture is as clear as always: European consumers do not want GM crops. The message reached farmers in the US and Canada. Europe is the biggest export market for North American wheat, especially for bread. The export market would break down overnight. Already, now, producers in Europe have been seeking alternative wheat supplies from Australia and Eastern Europe. |
Monsato stops GM canola in Australia
clara 14.May.2004 06:53
and while they are on it... Monsanto also Monsanto has pulled the plug on its GE canola breeding programs in Australia following a series of
state moratoriums on the practice.
Fine...
Fucking Anonymous 16.May.2004 03:11
You people are so fucking retarded. You want to starve to death, fine. Thin the herd. Darwin ensues. Remember kids, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. Everything you have eaten for years has been through some kind of process of one form or another. If you want to be picky about what food to put in your bodies, well you have that right. But don't be making that decision for someone else, especially when all your arguments are so much sanctimonious bullshit it makes the Bush Administration look like sweet-tempered psalm singers.
Woo! Another victory for hysteria over science!
Rayonic 17.May.2004 13:30
Man, I guess the rest of the world is way ahead of the U.S. and Canada when it comes to stifling science and progress. They have such a religious zeal to "protect" people from GM foods that they're happy to embrace food shortages and environmental degradation.
Don't relax yet: Big EU Politbiuro decision Wed 19 May 2004
someone 18.May.2004 18:11
EU faces GMO decision day, green groups to protest
Reuters, 05.17.04, 1:38 PM ET
BRUSSELS, Reuters (May 17) - The EU is set to remove its blanket ban on new types of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) this week, ending five years of legal limbo and soothing trade relations with the United States, diplomats said on Monday.
The EU executive Commission [ed. aka Politbiuro] will vote on Wednesday on whether or not to allow a new GMO, BT-11 maize made by Swiss firm Syngenta , into the 25-nation bloc's market to be sold as tinned sweetcorn on supermarket shelves.
"I'm sure they (the Commission) would not have proceeded to a vote...if there was a major risk (of rejection)," an EU diplomat told Reuters.
But passions run high and the victory may be pyrrhic.
Over 70 percent of European consumers are hostile to biotech food, according to a Commission poll. Supermarkets and food manufacturers have responded to consumer opinion, avoiding produce containing GMOs.
Green members of the European Parliament will picket the Commission headquarters during the meeting to protest against dropping the ban, arguing that such a move would ignore public opinion.
The genetically modified maize would be for human consumption. It would not be planted in the ground.
The enlarged 30-member Commission can take the decision under its own initiative after EU states failed to agree.
But a positive outcome on Wednesday would only represent a partial lifting of the ban as cultivation of new biotech crops is not seen in the foreseeable future.
It would not cut much ice with the United States either, added diplomats, seeing no end to the Washington-led trade suit against Europe for barring new GMOs over the past five years.
SCEPTICAL STATES
The de facto moratorium was put in place in the late 1990s as fears mounted over the the damage genetically modified crops could cause to the environment and the risks biotech food posed for human health.
In the intervening years, the EU -- on the demand of GM-sceptic states such as Italy and Austria -- has put in place a huge array of food safety and environmental legislation to assuage consumer concern.
New EU rules ensuring that all food containing more than 0.9 percent of GMOs must be labelled came into force last month. A strict system tracing GMOs all through the food processing chain was also established.
But green groups say biotech food and genetically modified crops still pose a risk.
"There is nothing to guarantee the safety of GM food, especially with regards to potential allergies (and) the ingestion of pesticides," the Greens said in a statement.
Biotechnology lobby group Europabio said: "If finally the Commission decides to approve the import of Bt-11 sweetcorn, it is doing so on the scientific advice of the European Food Safety Authority."
Copyright 2004, Reuters News Service