US: Repression

Ward Churchill Under Attack

 
Ward Churchill, generally considered a friend of radical and indigenous communities, is under attack for his views and perhaps his race. He is a Native American, contributor to many publications including Z Magazine, and Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado at Boulder where his job is at risk. Under pressure triggered by local press in Denver, and FOX's Bill O'Reilly (excellent article!), he has has already resigned his department chair position. His recent speaking engagement at Hamilton College was cancelled due to security concerns and death threats in response to an essay he wrote several years ago about 9-1-1.

Denver's Rocky Mountain News is currently running a live poll about whether he should resign his professorship as well. Churchill opponents' on-line poll comments are instructive in their anger and ignorance: "He should resign his citizenship" (he's an Indigenous American), and various comments that free speech is ok until it criticizes the US. If the poll comes out against Churchill, it can be used to exert additional political pressure on his employer. The attack against Churchill was fomented by two AM talk radio DJs in Denver and FOX's Bill O'Reilly.

Other articles and resources: [Info on the O'Reilly attack and contact info for taking action | Panel Including Ward Churchill Cancelled in New York (indybay) | Another good one from indybay | Interview with Derrick Jensen | Older Churchill audio Q&A | More audio (2004)]

Ward Churchill, generally considered a friend of radical and indigenous communities, is under attack for his views and perhaps his race. He is a Native American, contributor to many publications including Z Magazine, and Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado at Boulder where his job is at risk. Under pressure triggered by local press in Denver, and FOX's Bill O'Reilly (excellent article!), he has has already resigned his department chair position. His recent speaking engagement at Hamilton College was cancelled due to security concerns and death threats in response to an essay he wrote several years ago about 9-1-1.

Denver's Rocky Mountain News is currently running a live poll about whether he should resign his professorship as well. Churchill opponents' on-line poll comments are instructive in their anger and ignorance: "He should resign his citizenship" (he's an Indigenous American), and various comments that free speech is ok until it criticizes the US. If the poll comes out against Churchill, it can be used to exert additional political pressure on his employer.

The attack against Churchill was fomented by two AM talk radio DJs in Denver and FOX's Bill O'Reilly.

These same DJs were recently critical of Denver's court finding Churchill and other organizers of the anti Columbus Day parade protest innocent. They denigrated jurors and "interviewed" Churchill on their talk radio show and were obviously upset that protestors were found innocent, employing typical aggressive host tactics to silence and misrepresent people who disagree. Shortly after their Columbus Day coverage, they went on the attack against Ward Churchill inflaming listeners with passages from an essay he wrote years ago about September 11 which later turned into the book On the Justice of Roosting Chickens : Reflections on the Consequences of U.S. Imperial Arrogance and Criminality. This timing and common connection through Churchill makes it appear they're attacking those who oppose the Columbus Day parade.

As Churchill explains in a recent press release these DJs and other press are taking him out of context, suggesting he advocates violence against Americans and hates this country (which even if true isn't a crime, and it's worth noting he's a veteran). While his essay's conclusions are stated in ways inflamatory to middle-class white folks, which is nothing new, they are solidly argued, also nothing new. His biggest "crimes" seem to be suggesting US foreign policy is sometimes criminal and that he humanizes people around the world who view that policy from the receiving end.

Professor Churchill's many books on topics from genocide to COINTELPRO to indigenous struggles are invaluable contributions to a radical understanding of our world. He is perhaps best known in the radical community for a pamphlet entitled Pacifism as Pathology Churchill is a long-standing member of the Colorado American Indian Movement and steadfast supporter and organizer of the yearly struggle to stop the state-supported celebration of Columbus.

The talk radio DJs and O'Reilly are still calling for him to be fired. At the Rocky Mountain News in Denver, the live on-line poll is currently running 3:1 against him.

Other articles and resources:

add a comment on this article

Dissent is essential to a democracy

Dr. Patricia Denis Martin 02.Feb.2005 15:25

Dissent is essential to a democracy. If ideas, even those which are unpopular, are not exchanged in the public forum, we no longer have a free society. We cannot stop the public dialogue unless we wish to cease living life in an arena where ideas are most important in the development of our national consciousness. Freedom of speech is guaranteed under our constitution. If you don't like someone's ideas, you always have the option of not listening.

christian system....

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 15:30

...is a vampire beast.

Blessed be.

Chickens and roosting

Pat Kincaid 02.Feb.2005 16:06

He certainly has every right to spew his vitriol. Threats against him should be unreservedly condemned.

In fact, I would welcome it as it is instructive as to the degeneracy of a substantial portion of the 'left' nowadays.

That being said, free speech is hardly a value championed on Indy.

How many times have I read about rallies to prevent KKK-types, or even David Horowitz from speaking?

The chickens have come home to roost. For Churchill and Indy.

Is ADD - A Democratic Decree ?

Zippo 02.Feb.2005 18:04

I guess the poll takers do not want well thought out opinions.

What I offered as a comment :

Ward Churchill is a Professor of Ethnic Studies. He is hired to be a Professor of Ethnic Studies. There is and there will be clashes of ethnicity in this 21st century world that we share. A virtual guarantee of accelerating a problem is to hide and ignore the problem. If the university has a problem with the job that Ward Churchill was hired to do let them fire him; he should not resign.

What appears as filed :

"Ward Churchill is a Professor of Ethnic Studies. He is hired to be a Professor of Ethnic Studies. There is and there will be clashes of ethnicity in this 21st century world that we share. A virtual guarantee of accelerating a problem is to"

One alternative to well thought out opinion is reactionary targeting, in which case Ward Churchill becomes a scapegoat and a victim.

Pat huh?

bonehead 02.Feb.2005 18:29



That being said, free speech is hardly a value championed on Indy.

How many times have I read about rallies to prevent KKK-types, or even David Horowitz from speaking?
The people posting to indy aren't the same as indy. It is true that
most indy supporters probably disagree with KKK and Horowitz, but that
does not suffice to prove your point. Would a pro-Horowitz rally announcement
be removed? (KKK is a trickier case, since the legal concept of hate speech
may be involved).

In fact, I would welcome [Churchill's spew] as it is instructive as to the degeneracy of a substantial portion of the 'left' nowadays.

Churchill critics rarely engage the material further than elementary
name calling and that leaves people uninstructed as to this claimed degeneracy.
What passes for further engagement is usually some variant of "America:
love it or leave it" with still no substantive discussion of issues.
The on-line poll comments are instructive in this regard. What a wonderful
opportunity Churchill/"liberal" critics are wasting to go beyond the juvenile rhetoric.

the framing of this controversy

anonymous 02.Feb.2005 18:33

I am an American Indian, and there are things that Ward Churchill writes and talks about that agree with and would not dispute. However, this mans claims to American Indian ancestry are highly doubtable. Please see this page from the AIM website at www.aimovement.org speaking to this matter:

 http://www.aimovement.org/csi/Churchill/DisrupternotifyChurchill_01.jpg

some people also allege that Ward is a provocatuer and a spy of the Federal Government. That he brings negative attention on real Native peoples and issues. This is in fact the case with this specific controversy. Ward does not speak for native people, only for himself. Bill O'Reilly stated on the O'Reilly Factor yesterday:

"O'REILLY: Yes. You know what this is all about? This is about political correctness once again. That's what this is about. This guy is a native American. He feels that genocide was perpetuated on his race. And therefore, he can hate his country and say anything he wants.

The people bought into this in Boulder. And yes, he's a native American, we're not going to talk about it." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,146031,00.html

This is shedding negative light upon Native peoples and making light of the real history of this country. DO NOT regard this as a good thing. This negative image of American Indian people is being broadcast to millions of intolerant white Americans. This falls in line with the allegations of Ward being a FBI provocatuer. please take a good look at this issue in these terms....and lets hope that Bush administration Indian Policy doesn't take a turn for the worst because of this man.

Pat is correct

Bob 02.Feb.2005 18:33

Pat raises some good points. For example, during the Republican National Convention, indymedia did not want republicans to speak because they did not like the message. They went so far as to harrass delegates and would have shut down the convention if they were allowed. Some on the left are so nutty as to interrupt the Columbus Day parades because they do not want us to see it.

Now they complain about this nut losing his job?! I don't care what he says, but as a Colorado taxpayer, I don't want to pay him to write this rubbish. I will be pressuring my reps to have him removed from the university. He can go into private life and babble all he wants.

govt funding

freeper 02.Feb.2005 18:46

Let's fire everyone paid with taxpayer dollars who offends any taxpayer! That would probably be the whole government including Bush.

Just some sources

Josh 02.Feb.2005 20:24

This is the official AIM position on the professor.
 http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/churchill05.html

There is nothing I could find on the Colorado AIM site.

To my knowledge there is no seperate branch of AIM. Please correct me if I am wrong.

If this gentleman is a phony, we have a duty as revolutionaries to call him on it no matter how much we agree with his policies. If the AIM site is incorrect please let me know how as my resources are limited.

Cautionary point concerning AIM....

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 20:42

There is no offical 'AIM'...this crew have just set themselves up as such!

..it's rumoured also that the main man..shit forget the &^(*^ name is pocketing loadsamoney...from memorabilia sales etc...and not channeling to the eldersinneed or anything.

Anyway, don't reee-ly wanna get into Native American gossip right now.

Reality is not fixed.

Blessed be.

AIM

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 20:47

Native american's unlike the death-occultists of america (etc), believe in and experience, the reality of the living Sacred Mother Witch. They are not atheists (please note!). This applies to 'traditional' (unassimilated) Native America's anyway...well to tribal people everywhere as it goes. Thus they (can) hold some clues to liberation...MOTHER.

christian system IS AN ABERATION!

Jah Live!

(I think you'll find my Aim is good!!)

sometimes people DO push back

al buggari 02.Feb.2005 20:57

heh

Nobody is taking away his right to freedom of speech. He is welcome to strap on a sandwich board sign, stand on a soapbox, and hand out pamphlets on the street corner.

irrelevent

anonymous 02.Feb.2005 21:04

Whether or not this AIM group or that one is the "real" one is irrelevent. What is relevent however is that Ward is representing (whether he wants to or not) Native Americans to the American Right. If someone is gonna be in this position of representing Indian people, it should at least be someone who is actually NATIVE and maybe someone who could represent the diverse spectrum of opinion within Native America...Also, notice that Bill O'Reilly is saying that Ward is a sympathizer of Al Quada. What is happening, is the right wing media is drawing a link between terrorism and Native Activism (even as represented by this white man ward). If anyone is aware of recent battles dealing with grave sites such as that in Port Angeles, WA and the Native victories as of lately, they can see where this "Indians are terrorists" link is potentially extremely detrimental.

Scott

where? 03.Feb.2005 04:40

I really wonder if the only source of information you have on Ward's ancestry is that flyer. And... does Ward have to agree with everything AIM says?

show me more evidence, cause I don't believe you.

NOW HEAR THIS!

King Amdo 03.Feb.2005 10:28

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818365.shtml

Comment on "sometimes people DO push back"

King Amdo 03.Feb.2005 10:47

This phrase summarizes 'rightious (sick) right wing america's' state of ignorance and stupidity. Of course indigenous and tribal people DO push back facsist programmed christian freemason skitzo...this is what makes 'Al Qa'ida/Taliban' such incredible heros (concerning this direct action attack anyway, forgetting for a moment their fascistic 'dreamquest' as a religious movemnet/vison, being anti other tribal ethnic groups).

It is OK and healing to take direct action against these colonialist perverts.

The bottom line is anyway, regardless of anything alse, that the world is overheating as a result of 'westworlds' manic gobbleing up of 'resources'...Overheating at a incresing atan increasing rate.

There's no blagging around this.

Either a breaking of this 'old age' fear abuse power (with actual unbelievably abusive and racist dodge occult foundation....the christina freemason paradigm)....or if the current karma path continues, then purification of this disease by the dieties, in a physical sense....A more detailed explanation of it all....

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

Of course these fascist perverts try and project all this onto 'eco's' trying to panik people or whatever...

You'll learn the hard way I guess. Your karma's fucked america/american's (etc). As the CIA themselves said in a report leaked to at leats the UK obsever, they know that in 5 years time we'll be much much hotter...the amount of energy going into the Earth's life support systems is increasing hugely which will lead to much more chaotic and manic weather and climate.

Don't worry, it will be exciting!

Blessed be.

Allah Akbar.

mp3s of a recent lecture

marco 03.Feb.2005 15:20

last october ward, spoke alongside Derrick Jensen.
Rather than give speeches, these two dynamic
orators agreed to just go right to Q&A after
they were announced.

Wow.

here's parts 1 and 2.

 http://milwaukee.indymedia.org/media/2005/02/202701.mp3

 http://milwaukee.indymedia.org/media/2005/02/202703.mp3

timing

friendandneighbor 03.Feb.2005 15:24

i'm curious whether anyone knows why this has become such an issue just now. Ward wrote about 911 very shortly after it happened and has been saying the same things about it ever since. None of the things he's coming under fire for are new statements... so why is this an issue now, at the beginning of 2005?

why now?

speculation 03.Feb.2005 15:46

Why now is a good question. The main article suggests the recent exoneration of AIM and other protestors who blocked the Denver Columbus Day parade is part of the answer. The two AM talk DJs in Denver who were so upset with the exoneration are also the DJs who are pushing for Churchill, one of the exonerated, to resign or be fired, and virtually right after the trial.

Another path could be the Denver's no-doubt upset Columbus-supporting groups contacting Italian relatives in NY whereupon by accident or design the connection of Churchill in Denver and Churchill at Hamilton College was made and then dissent started. Apparently there are some Italian names in the Hamilton opposition bunch, but that's hardly evidence they're also Columbus supporters or connected with Denver somehow.

If anyone heard the beginning of the O'Reilly attacks, I wonder if he mentioned how he got put onto this story? Being in NY I imagine it was connected with the Hamilton College speaking engagement.

Why Now?

speculation 03.Feb.2005 18:52

The article suggests this attack is in part retribution for the exoneration
of Churchill and ultimately over 200 arrestees who blocked the Columbus Day
parade in Denver this year.

After the verdict, which was quite recent (transformcolumbusday.org), the DJs were enraged and very shortly after that, they became fixated on Ward's old essay.

Additionally, it stands to reason that Denver's Columbus supporters discuss things with Columbus-supporting relatives in NY where Churchill was to speak and put 2 and 2 together. This could have been the cause of the Hamilton College problems and perhaps the path to NY-based O'Reilly too. It would be nice to know.

what Churchill did was NOT dissent

Silent B 03.Feb.2005 19:38

Ward Churchill went way beyond the boundries of sound, constructive, rational dissent. To compare the innocent victims of one of the worst tragedies this country has ever seen to Nazis is outrageously offensive, insensitive and blatantly idiotic. This is worse than when Chomsky accused America of plotting to commit "silent genocide" in Afghanistan. This is worse than when Nicholas de Genova called for "a million Mogadishus." This is proof that the radical left is glad Sept 11, the destruction of the symbols of American capitalism and power, happened, regardless of innocent people killed. I bet he thinks all those 3000 people where white, Protestant, zionist fascists and what not. What about the Latin American immigrant workers who worked in the WTC, trying to make money for their families in Honduras and El Salvador and so on? Where they "little Eichmanns"? And even though %50 of the population hates Bush, you're foolish if you think eben 2% of the population would sympathize with the extremist politics of Ward Churchill and his radical terrorist AIM/Black Panther/Weathermen commrades. If American taxpayers found out their money was being used to fund the extremist politics of the Noam Chomskys, Howard Zinna, Nicholas De Genovas and Ward Churchills that have dominated American public academia. Churchill has no right to accuse the 9/11 victims of being "too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly." Churchill and other hypocritical leftist pricks think that anyone who doesn't agree with them are either ignorant or "little Eichmanns." Well, let these fools butcher history in the private sector, because this "little Eichmann" isn't paying for it.

Yours trully
Silent B

PS When will these clowns realize that America's sanctions didn't kill 500,000 Iraqis? When will they realize that it was Hussein's refusal to accept the terms of the UN Oil For Food Program? When will they realize that their deaths resulted from embezzlement of those funds? When will they realize that had there been no sanctions, those 500,000 probably would have still starved to death since Saddam probably would have used all the oil profits to rebuild his state?

Silence is freedom?

Joshua A. Eaton 03.Feb.2005 19:49

As much as I disagree with the ideas that Ward Churchil expresses in Pacifism as Pathology- and I do disagree with them, vehemently- this sort of censorship and lack of academic freedom in the United States is intolerable. I don't support Ward's views on political violence, at all, but I support his right to hold them, express them, and explore them, as well as any of his other views. And that is what is under attack, not his specific positions.

legitemacy of Wards Identiy

radical dissenter 03.Feb.2005 20:18

Here is a link addressing Wards claims to his identity.

 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0%2C1413%2C36%7E53%7E2689334%2C00.html

He CANNOT prove that he is a Native person, even in terms of lineal decent. Just run a google search on Ward Churchill and include the term 'wannabe' and you will find some Native views on this man. The MNPLS AIM is the original AIM and the CO AIM is a seperate AIM that was started much later that isnt affiliated with the original. I dont know much about the history of how this came about, but Im sure you could google that as well.

I agree with much of what this man says, even the statement that caused this controversy. Most people however aren't aware/smart enough to understand just exactly what he is saying though. However, I do not feel that he represents Native people or has a Native american voice.

Why

Anonymaus 03.Feb.2005 20:43

The Fascists are attempting a takeover. They will use every opportunity to take us as far to the right as possible.

They have gone after high school teachers such as the case of Ian Harvey in Naples, FL. They have made every effort possible to keep us from being seen by this nation and world. They will not stop until we stop them. This has smells of the Reich. We saw this before in the 30's. An act of "terrorism", Personal liberties stripped, preemptive strikes, Shock and Awe (Blitzkrieg). Today's righties don’t have a problem with the tactics of the 30's, just who they were doing it to. Hitler's takeover was not an armed revolution; it came from careful strategy and taking advantage of every opportunity put in front of them.

I need to also point out that I put Democrat politicians in this category of the right, they are probably more dangerous because of their complacency.

This is the right everywhere in the world. Every Religion, Every ethnic group, everywhere.

I can smell the winds of revolution. It is time. We must work and work and work. Write, publish, sing, dance, pray. Do whatever it is that you can do. We need to network more. Make ourselves more visible. Join an affinity group. Just do something. The people of the world are the only ones that can stop this machine. We must support the people of the world that are moving forward and away from this.

some more info

curious party 03.Feb.2005 22:09

Here is some information coming from NDN country regarding Ward Churchill. I urge anyone interested in his background and legitimacy of his voice to read this.....

 http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?feature=yes&id=1096410295

native opinions regarding churchill

anonymous 03.Feb.2005 23:01

people, please see this article....also there is another one on the main page of this site: www.indiancountry.com

These will give you a better idea of Churchills "Indian" point of view

 http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096410293

Indian Country Today: Ward Churchill Isn't An Indian

anon 03.Feb.2005 23:54


Churchill's identity revealed in wake of Nazi comment
Posted: February 03, 2005
by: Editors Report / Indian Country Today
...
Being in the crucible of hostility is not new to the chip-on-the-shoulder
professor, who has become a celebrity for jumping into the polemic melee
over issues big and small, internal and external to the Native world. Even
in the question of personal identity, the professor's position is
controversial. Churchill's Indian status is not verifiable in the usual
ways of checking into tribal membership. We are expansive here from a
national position on recognized and non-recognized tribes, southern nations
and global indigenous people, but the question of relations and proper
belonging in the tribal circles in the United States and Canada is
generally verifiable for Indian observers and such appears to be completely
lacking in Churchill's case. He has claimed membership in the United
Keetoowah Band of Cherokee, but reliable representatives from the tribe
deny Churchill is or ever was, or has blood relatives on their rolls. He
was granted an ''associate certificate'' by a former leader of the tribe
(later impeached) for services supposedly rendered, not due to blood
relations - but even the tribe declines to exactly identify what that means.

Discerning indigenous identity is not an exact science, but it has its
rules. It would not be a primary issue relative to research and writing of
producers from any quarter, except Churchill represents himself as a major
spokesman for Indian people through his participation in a branch of AIM
and his claim to Cherokee origins. So far, nothing whatsoever has surfaced
that gives evidence to Churchill's claims to having Cherokee Indian
origins. Given the intense antagonism and attention focused on Churchill,
his biography in this context is likely to be further scrutinized by the
University of Colorado, the media, and others who were led to understand he
was an American Indian professional at the time of his hiring.

...
We will defend a good Indian argument in these pages any time. But, again,
there is no evidence that Churchill is Indian. Further, Churchill's
statements are obviously devoid of even the most basic humanity that
American Indian peoples hold dear. In no way does his insult reflect the
views of Indian country. To know the response of Indian country to the 9/11
tragedies is to reflect on the humanitarianism shown by Eastern Native
communities: from the Mohawk to the Oneida, the Pequot, Mohegan and many
others who immediately put their people - ironworkers, ferry-boat crews and
medical personnel - into the rescue and recovery operations, to the
California Indian nations that expressed their solidarity with America and
donated generously to the rescue efforts, to the Lakota families who
brought their Sacred Pipe to pray at the site, leaving their quiet
offerings early one dawn. This is always the preferred way of human beings
- to understand the kind of empathy required to belong to the human race is
essential in all political and economic discourse. To call the people who
were murdered on Sept. 11 ''little Eichmanns'' is a hideous expression that
when combined to Churchill's mistaken Native identity can only poison the
public discourse concerning American Indians.

...
Ward Churchill would do himself some good to express a profound apology to
people he has offended and misled. He should also come clean about his
appropriated American Indian identity. This is not advice he will likely
take. Churchill has jumped on the cougar of controversy ever since he came
onto the Indian scene as Russell Means' main speechwriter in the early
1980s. Churchill thrives on riding that controversial cougar, but this time
he poked it in the eye.

Your not listening he has always been a fake and an agent of the FBI

The piercing night 04.Feb.2005 01:10

Prof's Indian roots disputed
By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
February 3, 2005

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is not a member of their tribe.

"He's not in the database at all and is not a member of the Keetoowah," said Georgia Mauldin, the tribal clerk in Tahlequah, Okla.


Advertisement



In his books and articles, Churchill has described himself as a member of the Keetoowah Cherokee tribe in Oklahoma. In past interviews, he's claimed to be one-sixteenth Cherokee.

But the Keetoowah say that's not true.

Attempts to contact Churchill for comment Wednesday on his background were unsuccessful. But Churchill's claim to American Indian roots has been challenged repeatedly by people in that community.

One Montana woman has an especially personal tale of confronting Churchill on his claim to American Indian heritage. She was taking one of Churchill's classes at CU in 1994 when she wrote an article for the Colorado Daily newspaper, saying there was no evidence he had any American Indian background.

"For so long it was whispered on campus that he really isn't an Indian," said Jodi Rave, who studied journalism at CU. "Here you had the director of the Indian studies program and he's not an Indian."

Rave is a Mandan-Hidatsa Indian originally from North Dakota. Today, she is a reporter and columnist with the Missoulian newspaper in Missoula, Mont. She was recently a fellow in the prestigious Nieman program for journalists at Harvard University.

In one of her journalism classes at CU, Rave was assigned to write a profile, and she decided to profile Churchill.

"To have somebody of that stature masquerading as an Indian was intriguing to me," Rave said. "On two separate days I asked him questions. I was up-front in asking him questions (about his background)."

Rave says she discovered that Churchill had enrolled in the Keetoowah tribe under a program initiated by a former tribal chairman that let almost anyone sign up. She says the Keetoowah later discontinued that program and disenrolled the people who had joined under it.

When her article came out, Rave says Churchill was furious and insisted that he did have American Indian lineage.

"He called me and said, 'Jodi Rave, this is your professor and I need to talk to you right away.' He was surprised I had a story published that called into question his identity."

He also defended his American Indian background and said her story was unfair.

Rave said she was enrolled in one of Churchill's classes when the article came out, and her grade went from an A to a C-minus.

She says Churchill can write what he wants, but his claim of American Indian heritage is bogus.

"There's no denying what he writes resonates with a lot of people, but when he says this is something he's experienced as a Native American man, that's fraudulent," Rave said.

The question of who is and who is not an American Indian is a sensitive one in that community. Many Indians resent the idea that only those who grew up on a reservation or have two American Indian parents are real Indians.

"Tracking blood lines is the business of Nazi Germany and South Africa (under apartheid)," said professor George Tinker, who teaches American Indian culture and religious tradition at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver. "That's not an Indian issue at all."

Tinker said that it should be up to the tribes themselves to decide who is an Indian.

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee

• The word A-ni-kee-too-wah-gee ("Keetoowah people") was used by Cherokee speakers to refer to themselves. Kituhwa was the mother town of the Cherokees; its location, probably in present- day North Carolina, is now lost in the past.

• The Keetoowah Society was formed in 1859 by Cherokees transplanted to Okla- homa on the "Trail of Tears" as a way of preserving cultural traditions.

• The United Keetoowah Band is a part of the Tahlequah, Okla.-based Cherokee Nation. It was formed from various Cherokeee subgroups after passage of the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act in 1936, and it was recognized by Congress in 1949.Source: Www.Cherokeeobserver.Org

Ward the COP Bad Jacketting AIM with FBI concocted Eichmann comments

OGITCHIDA AIM 04.Feb.2005 01:14

It is amazing to see that Ward Churchill has once again found his way
into the ANALS of predominantly white controlled media. The man who has
by his own account and resume: been kicked off the Leanord Peltier
Defense Committee by Leanord Peltier himself for participating in a
smear campaign against Dennis Banks and Clyde Bellecourt (co-founders of
AIM), was a writer for the right wing "SOLDIER of FORTUNE" magazine,
taught an orientation class on the American Indian Movement for the
South Dakota State Police during the early 70's,has been condemned by
Bob Brown of the All African Peoples Revolutionary Party,roundly
condemned by "news from Indian country"one of the oldest and most widely
respected Indigenous newspapers in the US, supports the now right wing
Russell Means
(who has recntly endorsed the republican party and annouced he is
opening a liquor store outside Pine Ridge (see associated press Oct
5,1999)to raise money for an Indian alchohol rehabilitation center and
has resigned from the AIM 9 times and has done speaking engagements for
the John Birch society as well as the Reverend Moon(CIA operative since
1952) and who recently refused to be tried in Navaho tribal court for
beating his father in law half to death (said Navaho had no right to try
a Lakota)and Russell is now being called the Eldridge Cleaver or Ron
Caringa (former Panthers who turned into right wing evagelicals) of the
Indian world,Ward and Russ both actively and openly supported the
Contras and do not deny it to this day even though Russ's own brother
Bill was in Managua negtotiating a settlement between the Sandanistas
and the Indian people of the North West coast of Nicaragua and the AIM
and the International Indian Treaty Council both stated clearly that
Russ was acting unilaterally and undemocratically when he did press
conferences with Adolpho Calero (Contra leader) in Honduras, Ward has
never been involved in any major action conducted by AIM, he has made as
an excuse for the Contra support that he thought the Sandanistas were
unfair to the Native population of Nicaragua (so he supports the Contras
who have been documented as killing over 100,000 people who had native
heritage), they continued to support the Contras after the Miskito
people had made a satisfactory settlement to their concerns, Ward is on
an answering machine tape threatening the life of respected AIM leader
and Wounded Knee defendant Vernon Bellecourt, he has never lived in
predominantly native community, he attacked Carol Standing Elk and her
mother at a public event, has condemned John Trudell repeatedly (former
national director of AIM whose family was burned alive during the unrest
of the 70's), no one questions the fact that he received tenure at
University of Colorado faster than any man alive and was made director
of Native studies even faster, has repeatedly condemned the founders of
AIM in his books (which white progressives read as the AIM bible),
followed the Walk for Justice (for Leanord Peltier) across the country
saying Leanord didn't support it (Leonard kicked him off the defense
committee for it), and although he claims to have a nose bleed of Indian
blood he by no means is representitive of any person who has spent any
large part of his life living in any Indian community (yet white people
continue to bring him to their colleges to miseducate them about the
AIM), he has never denied any of these allegations but makes excuses for
them,the left abandoned the true AIM who were fugitives from the
imperialist US government and embraced the drunken movie star andthe
college proffesor (Russ who was the voice in that racist Disney cartoon
Pochahants, the lead Native role in that racist movie Last of the
Mohicans a film about the last man of his tribe risking it all to save
two white ladies from the bad racist Indians with his white buddy Danny
Day Lewis), and lastly Ward is an Asshole.
The only one of the facts listed above Ward can dispute is that he is an
asshole.The rest has all been documented by the great Ward Churchill or
in the public media. So all you lefties who condemn Farakahn because he
is a sexist and homophobic, or Clarence Thomas because he is right wing,
why are you giving Ward Churchill and Russ Means so much leeway. Why
aren't you seeking out the true leaders and founders of AIM when you
look to support Indians. Is it because you prefer people who support the
Contras, the Republican party, and the Moonies more than you do people
who have done real hard time in the struggle for justice behind bars?
Are these the Indians you can stomach? By the way don't forget Russ
Means running for President with Larry Flynnt (porno kingpin) with the
Libertarian Party (real anti-imperialist that Flynnt).
For the record the founders of the AIM were Dennis Banks and Clyde
Bellecourt. Even Russ's Brother Bill jpoined before he did. The leaders
of the AIM today are still there they have a web site AIMovement.Org
they have demanded repeatedly that the imposter calling himself the
International Confederation of Autonomous AIM chapters cease and desist.
How many of you ever heard of that back in the seventies. the National
American Indian Movement has been in exsistence 31 years and was founded
in Minn. Mn. where it still exsists today ph.612-721-3914. We have been
working to fight the good fight and will continue. We urge anyone who
would like to ask Mr. Churchill these questions the next time he is in
your area to do so. We also urge anyone who feels inclined to call Speak
Out speakers bureau and South End Press (his publisher) to stop
promoting his garbage. If you need a speaker concerning Indian issues
call AIM at 612-721-3914 .By the way Dennis Banks has his own website
and you can find it. We need your help to expose this bastard son of two
white folks who raised him in Champaign Ill.How can we compete with a
movie star who has the ear of the right wing media. Charlene Teeters is
one of our strong female leaders by the way and can be found at the
Native American Institute of Art in Santa fe and is a wonderful speaker
and a powerful activist against racism and sexim. Ward is slick they
created him that way. Please see throught the smoke coming out of his
ass.Megwitch thank you.If you are real anarchists you will not sensor
this message.
OGITCHIDA
OGITCHIDA

Won't do to ignore the questions

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 01:51

AIM deserves more respect than it is getting here. They have issued a disrupter notification on this fellow from years back, and it won't do to just blow it off.

AIM knows Ward Churchill far better than people who have just read his articles in Z Magazine, and AIM is trustworthy. They called him a provocateur only after years of putting up with his nonsense and trying to reach out to him. If they say he's a fake, he's probably a fake.

Though he apparently now denies it, quoted portions of his essay on 9-11 actually do justify the attack on the twin towers. That is an EXTREMELY irresponsible thing for someone to write, UNBELIEVABLY irresponsible coming from a university professor and self-proclaimed movement leader. And that he would deny this now also doesn't speak well of him.

There is no doubt that the feds use long-term infiltrators to disrupt political movements of all stripes. Excellent information about this practice can be gained from a book called "Every Knee Shall Bow," concerning the way that confidential informants framed Randy Weaver for a weapons charge, or the whining screed known as "False Prophets" written by confidential informants hired to infiltrate the Montana Freemen who did not get paid as promised.

Also, while his defense essay mentions his tour in Vietnam, it does not mention what he did there. Apparently he was a "public affairs officer." That is a person whose job it is to subvert the local people, to trick them in to siding with the U.S. forces.

A lot of people got drafted in to Vietnam, and others volunteered out of mistaken idealism. But I would be surprised to learn that many of those wound up as public affairs officers.

Then here is the matter of his fake-Indian-ness. In itself, of course, it isn't important that he isn't an Indian. But he really does seem to have told a long string of lies about being an Indian, which is really deeply dishonest. And the main people he has been telling these lies to are on the left, AIM people and the like. That he holds a job reserved for an Indian despite not actually being an Indian may be a lesser matter, but it sure isn't right.

All of this being the case, I wouldn't get caught up in offering him solidarity and consequently making yourself a target. He's not entitled. Say something like, "Well, Ward's a nutball, and we on the left have known it for a long time, but, you know, even a nutball has a right to free speech."

shoot the messenger?

logic 04.Feb.2005 02:09

Challenging Churchill's heritage, or any other credential, leaves his arguments untouched. How about engaging the material instead of shooting the messenger? Even if he's a total phoney it doesn't change his arguments AT ALL.

Ward Churchill 9/11 Comment

SKJ 04.Feb.2005 02:13

To look at Ward Churchills' comments in a way that will be enraging to liberals, how are his comments on the victims of 9/11 any different than if someone was to claim that the KKK had every right to be prejudiced against blacks and committ acts of violence against them because of crime problems, gang activity, drugs, etc., found in many black neighborhoods? The idea that the actions of the 9/11 terrorists is righteous retribution is no different. Using Churchill's enlightened point of view, the KKK would be excused, or at least understood, for their prejudice due to the actions of members of minorities that are perverted to make the whole group look criminal and create stereotypes. Acts of justice should only be against those that have committed the injustice, not anybody and anything that can be found. This is true if you are a terrorist or if you are a member of the KKK.

I am sure Churchill can create a powerful argument of why Arab people's would have a laundry list of issues with the USA and the West. (No doubt, there is a list equally long - or dare I say loger - that can be made condemning the terrorists) But there can be no justification of civilians as the direct target of terrorists.

Not shoot the messenger, out the cop

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 03:06

Not shoot the messenger, but out the cop, and out the cop line as well. This business about the U.S. deserved 9/11 is a cop line, a provocateur line designed to isolate the left and to stop the left from going into the meatiest political issue around 9/11: U.S. government complicity in an act of mass murder of Americans. To paraphrase Bush, "They massacred their own people."

How did all of these people who were on watch lists manage to reside unmolested in the U.S. for years, to enroll in flight schools, etc. How did the U.S. manage to ignore the threat of airplances being used as bombs years after they had definite, confirmed information that terrorists were planning such an attack? Why were FBI investigations which could possibly have stopped 9/11 stopped on orders from above?

A speaker should know his audience, and an audience should know its speaker.

Some Journalism! Stop giving Churchill a free Pass!!

Me 04.Feb.2005 03:46

Why does Indy Media never really cover the real Churchill story. Did he speak at your college or something? You have never bothered to interview or cover any of the AIM founders dispatches on Churchill or Means. This isn't about free speech it is about an imposter getting away with posing as a radical. Some journalists!

Ward Churchill

Arthur Randolph Erb 04.Feb.2005 04:03

The controversy over Churchills comments does NOT involve free speech issues or academic freedom ones. In his essay, he clearly and explicitly calls the terrorists, combat teams who made valiant sacrifices on 9/11. THAT is condoning terrorism and murderous attacks on civilians which he decries when the US has casualties in conjunction with military ops. The big difference is that the terrorists made civilians the prime target. It also is a fact that he blames the bond traders for their own demise. The largest company who lost most people was Fitzgerald Cantor which had nothing to do with foreign operations of any US company. They specialized in municipal bonds service, and the WTC was owned by the Port Authority of New York, and has little or nothing to do with world affairs other than allowing imports to the US.
I have NO problem with him having his opinion or expressing it. I DO have a problem with his being paid at taxpayer expense to do such things as advocate murder of innocent people. His essay is also a very poor one which would get an F from any academic and is hardly of the caliber one would want from a professor. So for two reasons, he should be fired. He is using his post to advocate murder and adhering to enemies who have murdered thousands of Americans, and he is also deficient in that he does a very poor job at what he was hired to do. It is also disingenuous to assert now as he is trying to do that he didn't advocate such terrorism. His essay says otherwise and I have read it. He also asks if the people who were in the WTC could have been made to pay for their supposed crimes in any other way, and he answers in the negative. THAT is also advocating such murder.
It is time to restore common sense and excellence in education and time to get rid of Churchill. I am also a Kerry supporter and I hate Bush with a passion. To support or defend such a man is both absurd and counter productive.

Great to sa ya injuns a fight'in 'an a bitch'in....

33 Degree Mason. 04.Feb.2005 14:43

...again...

Why sir! I think I feel a hard on coming on right now...you've got uzz so excited!!!

Native American genocide....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 16:08

The fact is that the white settlers have almost destroyed Native American Tribal society...In fact concentration camps were invented by the American government to herd native people into. American's tend to get angry..they/you are in denial about this. You don't like to be compared to the Third Rhiech, even theough this is the reality. I don't even really care in particluar what Warc Churchiull said...the fact is your society is a scapegoat abuse trick AND YES WITH REAL ACTUAL NEGATIVE OCCULT DRIVING FORCE. Thus 'you' and your country are (**&^*&^^%. Is that quite (*(*^*&(*& well clear?

Kerry/Bush whatever no difference...it's all part of the same game from the Native type persective.

I reitereate in reality, forgetting the (mainstream) government skitzo line, 9/11 was a cool action.

OM SHIVA!


Ward churchill's controversial identity

Dr. Elissa Montjoy 04.Feb.2005 17:55

I would urge all those who defend Ward Churchill's extremist views to read again the warning posted anonymously on this site by an American Indian.
I have known Ward Churchill for over twenty years, and when I first met him, he was a "white man." His change of identity over the years, and his mimicking of so-called American Indian "resentment" etc.. as well as his vitriolic speech have raised some serious concerns about his motivations, and who he really is. He is - to say the least about this thorny topic - highly suspect in the eyes of some American Indians. His reputation as an American Indian "activist" is chiefly among white liberal groups who are unaware of the fact that his stance more often hurts the American Indian communities than help them.

I am a professor and an anthropologist, steeped in the humanities. I stand for freedom of speech, but early in my carer, I seriously asked myself if freedom did not entail deep responsibility, and if, without this sense of responsibility to others, freedom was not simply disguised selfishness. I believe that a freedom of speech that causes great harm to others by disrespecting their suffering, or is detrimental to the well-being of one's family, friends, or nation, is something else. In my view, Ward Churchill has an identity problem and is in denial. Under some assumed identity, he allows himself, not just to be critical of his government, but abusive and a transgressor of normal democratic dissent. He should not be kept on the faculty of Colorado University at Boulder, but counseled to seek some kind of therapy.

Ward Churchill Should Be Ashamed

Rocky 04.Feb.2005 19:33

He lied about his heritage and insulted victims of terrorist attacks. What if one of your friends or relatives died in the World Trade Center? Would you still be defending someone who called your friend or relative a "little Eichmann"?

@nti

pissant 04.Feb.2005 20:29

This is a fight for freedom, not Ward Churchill. Everyone has the right to say anything they feel like at any time they feel like. It doesn’t matter who it offends, who it inspires, who it reflects upon. If he is exposed as a phony then nothing he says will have a lot of relevance. I am so sick of these damn right wing idiots whining all of the time. It is time to take this world back from these assholes. The terrorists are the same to me as all of the other heads of state We have been state terrorists for many years. Not just us though. This isn’t a recent issue. The day we dropped a nuclear weapon on a civilian population, we crossed the line into terrorism (There are cases dating back way before that.) We also pushed the line forward into what is acceptable warfare. Pretty much anything goes. Guns? Sure. Bombs? Sure. Huge radioactive fireballs that consume the earth? Sure! All power cares about is power. ALL POWER. We cannot distinguish between this head of state and the other. The problem is not capitalism, it is not communism, it is not socialism, it is not fascism, it is all of them, because they are power. Everyone in power would have you believe that they will lead you into the new and peaceful world where everyone will be happy and content as they murder, destroy, and rape just out of sight. Not my sight though. I see it and I will stop it. We can never progress without discussion on all sides. The only line crossed is when others lives or livelihoods are destroyed. I have never started a war. I am only hoping to participate in a revolution.

P.S. And King whatever, You aren’t making any sense. Are you drunk? You tear down Christianity while hailing Jah, Allah, Shiva. You pick every other religion to prop up while tearing one down. Religion is a form of government. Spirituality is a state of mind.

So what if he is a white geezer?

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 21:58

I have white skin, but a black heart. I live in the UK, I KNOW as do many others the true nature of western society...in particular here, the FREE 'peace convoy' travallers. I've also actually through my life experience found out that this mainstream 'order' actually has a horrifically negative abusive dodge ritual basis...I've already given the link, this makes me an incredble hero by the way. I also was given a REAL Sundance Eagle feather, from the Dine'h tribal protest Sundance at Black Mesa, by Daniel Zapata whilst he was visiting the 'Eithinog' comman land protest in North Wales a few years ago and whether or not a few assimilated americanised government skitzo's think I'm mad, out of line, or what the fuck ever, I'm playing this FOR REAL. And by the way if the bunch of wankers at alt.native (yes there are Native people outside of the USA by the way) were to say what they said to my face......They'd be facing SOME FUCKING SERIOUS VIOLENCE.

You think evidence of state ritual racist child abuse is some sort of fucking joke?

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

These people are pure liquid fidlth...THUS WHO FUCKING GIVES A FLYING TOSS IF SOME BRAVE FUCKERS FLY SOME PLANES INTO THE HEART OF THE BEAST...

In fact...

Merit. Allah Akbar.

Now stop acting...It doesn't matter what people think, or who you think is reading this, you don't have to present a 'normal front' as though talking to a audience of strait democrats in smalltownsville USA. JUST BE YOURSELF AND BE TRUTHFUL. remeber this IS not 'masturbate towards the anchor man' mainstream media. This is ANARCHY!

YOU'RE FUCKED AMERICA (etc)

END OF FUCKING STORY.

Blessed be,

King Amdo

You have to recognise and then work at....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:09

INNER power. This is sacred. Forget the state abuse of 'power'...that's a different sort of power..particularly in the west..as described...it's a total horror power! (christian freemason dodge temple builders).

Again, christianity is unique in it's abuse of 13/mother/female/lunar/goddess aspect..and the ACTUAL SOURCE REASON WHY is described thus in the link given. Total abuse of the occult..thus the reason why people are asleep in the west...pysco/spiritually...and why the western paradigm is raping the Sacred Mother.

Religion? You wanna know about religion?...

Have some respect for tribal people and culture please...just because everyone with any sense has rejected the blag (pretend) religion of christianity doesn't mean that real religions are to be throw in the dustbin of western arrogance!!! For astart various religious practices have great power for magical work...there is a practical benefit!

There is a huge and total differnence between eastern magic and relgion and cultures and western, even though we use the same words for convienience.

Take care!!!

OM SHIVA!

King Amdo

(I'm reincarnated Tibetan Tribal leadership as it goes)

Just to make it perfectly clear....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:13

Why the fuck da'ya think I'm praying like a Mullah?

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

ALLAH AKBAR

"Religion is a form of government"

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:31

That's a very very very narrow way of looking at it. And so what of the hierachy is religious one...they are valid and good. I know this. You are just parroting. Ok well so christian freemasonry really is the government (nice one Romans)...and a nightmare construct for sure, but this is really NOT at all neccessarily so for eastern magic and leadership!

These are incredibly beautiful senarios, please have some respect western fool!

ALSO these eastern religions have given me personnal protection from the extreme negative dodge occultist controlling society here in the west.

Allah Akbar.

Until the near TOTAL AND COMPLETE LACK OF ANY SORT OF SOLIDARITY FROM NEW AGERS OR POLITICAL ACTIVISTS HERE!!!

The natural state of being for human beings, of everybeing is occult/religious awareness. AND IT IS THIS CONSCIOUSNESS (AND AMAZING REALITIES) THAT IS/ARE BLOCKED BY THE MAINSTREAM DODGE OCCULTISTS HERE. THATS A FACT!!!

And it is this areness...consciousness that is incarnate in (traditional) Native American's...and this state of consciousness (essentially we are talking pro goddess consciousness) that is so dissed out out by the christian white supremistis...and communists of course. (colloborators in effect).

If you can PLEASE go and visit and help these people...

www.blackmesais.org

They have an INCREIBLE culture/religious belief system, these elders!

Also read what this man says.....a true hero...

 http://www.leonardpeltier.org/subscribe.html

His last statement was excellent.

EXODUS IN THE HOUSE!





Let me put this as plainly as I can

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 22:37

The issue is not that Ward Churchill is white. The issue is that Ward Churchill is working for the government. He may be a confidential informant for the FBI. He may be working for some other agency. But his job is and has been for a long time to confuse, disrupt, distract and discredit the left, and particularly AIM.

When he talks, if you want to listen, well, go ahead, but be warned that he's the pied piper and he's subjectively, intentionally trying to lead you to your destruction. Some of what he says is true and some of it is false. All of it is calculated to fool, cheat, and deceive you. And these are the calculations of a very clever man, cleverer than most of us.

If you don't understand that, go back to the AIMovement.org site and read further. If you do understand that, and you are not insane, you are going to be profoundly conscious of it every time you read his words or hear him speak.

Hey Churchill Supporters!

Rocky 04.Feb.2005 22:57

Do those jackboots and SS uniforms fit you? And if you're going to call me a fascist, the question of which political party blames Jews for the world's problems is going to come up. The fact is that you Democrats are the fascists! Why?

1. You hate Jews!
2. You blame Jews for your problems!
3. You condone Islamofascist suicide bombers who kill Jews!
4. You defend the actions of Arafat, Hamas, and Hezbollah!
5. You want to wipe Israel off the map and have a pan-Islamic Middle East!

What the?

dB 05.Feb.2005 00:24

Rocky must have saw "Team America" one too many times. Since when do the Democrat's hate Jews? The Jewish-American population votes liberal and democrat by a significant margin in every major election.
A lot of ignorant flame fanning going on here....

As a fellow ethicist

1Planet1People 05.Feb.2005 04:37



The problem with this entire situation is not what this person is saying, but the community’s attempt to censor him. Let me explain, I have a Masters degree in philosophy. I worked under a diverse group of faculty, some in which I agreed with, and others that I did not. The reason that this is important is because we genuinely argued in a democratic fashion, and arrived at an autonomous point of view. I have had professors on both sides of the isle: I had one that wanted to bring slavery back as a form of indentured repayment for crimes, and others, who argued that every sentimental being had a fundamental right to equal consideration. Some philosophers (Harman) believe that morality is relative to the society in which one lives, while others (Kant) thinks it is based on universal moral laws, and yet others (Mill) who argue that what is best of the community is moral. There are those (Zionists) who argue for the mass extermination of the Palestinians, and others (Chomsky) who argue that Palestinians are equal humans who deserve equal rights. Without the diversity in views on the academia level, you wind up with true censorship. Academic freedom is one of the most fundamental principles to a free society. You take that away, regardless of WHO you censor, you take freedom away. Without freedom, you will lose my consent to participate, and my allegiance to the resistance. Give me liberty, or you can give me death. And I can say all this without even telling you if I agree with him; it is simply not a correlated issue.

AIM Communique on Ward Churchill

Ogithida- American Indian Movent 05.Feb.2005 04:54

AIM Communique on Ward Churchill
Ogithida- American Indian Movent 04 Feb 2005 23:41 GMT

This is a summary of our communique on recent Churchill events. He may have a right to say what he is saying but we have a right to say his positions are not in keeping with our position and once again and since 1985 he is not a part of the American Indian Movement.

AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL


MINISTRY FOR INFORMATION
P.O. Box 13521
Minneapolis MN 55414
612/ 721-3914 . fax 612/ 721-7826
Email:  aimggc@worldnet.att.net
Web Address: www.aimovement.org




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ward Churchill was scheduled to speak at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York on February 3, 2005. His appearance was canceled by the college after he caused a public furor over his loathsome remarks about the 9-11 tragedy in New York. AIM's Grand Governing Council has been dealing with Churchill's hateful attitude and rip-off of Indian people for years.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council representing the National and International leadership of the American Indian Movement once again is vehemently and emphatically repudiating and condemning the outrageous statements made by academic literary and Indian fraud, Ward Churchill in relationship to the 9-11 tragedy in New York City that claimed thousands of innocent people’s lives.

Churchill’s statement that these people deserved what happened to them, and calling them little Eichmanns, comparing them to Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, who implemented Adolf Hitler’s plan to exterminate European Jews and others, should be condemned by all.

The sorry part of this is Ward Churchill has fraudulently represented himself as an Indian, and a member of the American Indian Movement, a situation that has lifted him into the position of a lecturer on Indian activism. He has used the American Indian Movement’s chapter in Denver to attack the leadership of the official American Indian Movement with his misinformation and propaganda campaigns.

Ward Churchill has been masquerading as an Indian for years behind his dark glasses and beaded headband. He waves around an honorary membership card that at one time was issued to anyone by the Keetoowah Tribe of Oklahoma. Former President Bill Clinton and many others received these cards, but these cards do not qualify the holder a member of any tribe. He has deceitfully and treacherously fooled innocent and naïve Indian community members in Denver, Colorado, as well as many other people worldwide. Churchill does not represent, nor does he speak on behalf of the American Indian Movement.

New York’s Hamilton College Kirklands Project should be aware that in their search for truth and justice, the idea that they have hired a fraud to speak on Indian activism is in itself a betrayal of their goals.

Dennis J. Banks, Ojibwa Nation
Chairman of the Board
American Indian Movement
Phone: 218-654-5885


Nee Gon Nway Wee Dung, aka, Clyde H. Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
National Executive Director
American Indian Movement
Cell: 612-251-5836
Office: 612-724-3129


Press Contact:
WaBun-Inini, aka, Vernon Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
Executive Committee Member
Director Council on Foreign Relations
American Indian Movement
Office: 612-721-3914
Cell: 612-889-0796


Churchill's membership in tribe honorary only
By Stuart Steers,
Rocky Mountain News

February 4, 2005

The former chairman of the Keetoowah band of Cherokee Indians says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill was given an honorary membership that required no proof of Cherokee heritage.

John Ross led the tribe for several years in the 1990s. He says the Keetoowah established an "associate member" program to recognize friends of the tribe.

"If somebody helped out in a certain way, to honor them they'd give them an associate membership," Ross said Thursday. "There were 300 or 400 associate members."

Former President Clinton also was given an honorary membership in the tribe.

To be a full-fledged member of the Keetoowah, a person has to prove he or she is at least one-fourth Cherokee. Churchill has never had such a membership. Only full members are allowed to vote, hold office and receive tribal privileges.

Churchill has cited his associate membership in the tribe as proof of his Cherokee roots. He told The Denver Post on Wednesday he is three-sixteenths Cherokee. In the past, he has described himself as one-sixteenth Cherokee and also claimed to have Creek Indian blood. Ross said Churchill came to several Keetoowah celebrations in the early 1990s and befriended tribal members, who decided they wanted to give him the associate membership.

"He told the tribal council that if they needed him to lend a hand, he would," Ross said. He recalls Churchill offering to represent the tribe at an academic forum sponsored by the University of Arkansas.

Eventually, Ross came to feel the associate membership program was being abused, and he asked the tribal council to abolish it. The Keetoowah haven't given out any new associate memberships since 1994.

"There were a lot of people coming in and trying to use the associate memberships to elevate themselves," he said. "We decided we shouldn't give them out anymore and did away with it."

Ross said some of the associate members were people who started claiming to be Keetoowah artisans. He says Churchill is also misusing his associate membership status.

"In a sense, he's misleading people," Ross said. "He's like the others - that's what he's done."

Churchill did not return numerous phone calls during the past two days seeking comment.

Many non-Indians are now claiming Cherokee ancestry, said Richard Allen, a policy analyst with the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. The Keetoowah are a small offshoot of the much larger Cherokee Nation.

Allen has worked for the Cherokee Nation for more than 20 years. He said he has followed Churchill's career for much of that time.

"When it comes to Churchill, I've always thought he was a wannabe Indian," Allen said. "His history is a little bit like Forrest Gump."

Allen said Churchill picked up a packet to enroll in the Cherokee Nation in 1991 and never returned it.




November 3, 1999

BACKGROUND: The United States Government War
Against the American Indian Movement

On December 17-18, 1993 a group of suspected government agents, co-conspirators, collaborators, and a few unsuspecting pawns and dupes convened a meeting at Edgewood, New Mexico under the banner of the so-called "confederation of autonomous AIM" chapters and released the Edgewood declaration in which they launched their attack on the legitimate leadership of the American Indian Movement.

This declaration was signed by Russell Means, Glen Morris, Bob Robideaux and David Hill. In addition to these individuals we find at the heart of this conspiracy Ward Churchill, Bobby Castille, George Martin, Donald Grinde Jr., Paulette d’ Autueil, M. Annette Jaimes, Nantinki Rose and Robert (Bob) Roche. We believe that Joe D. Locust, Sr., Dianne Million, Sharon Venne and Regina Brave Dixon are unsuspecting dupes who have allowed themselves to be used by these conspirators (see Susan Shown Harjo letter). Faith Townsend Attaglia of Dark Night Field Notes), Shelly Davis, and Bill Lawrence, owner and publisher of the so-called Native American Press in Minnesota, along with reporters, Gary Blair and Joe G. Geshick are co-conspirators, and are directly connected to this misinformation campaign. (Joe G. Geshick was in attendance at the mock tribunal).

In addition, Bill Lawrence and his newspaper have aligned themselves with the likes of Bud Grant, Howard Hansen and other individuals and organizations like CERA, Citizens Equal Rights Association, PERM, PARR, etc., which by their words and deeds have proven themselves to be anti-Indian, anti-Indian Nation Sovereignty and anti-Treaty Rights, which includes the spiritual, cultural, social, economic, and political rights of our Indian peoples. (See lawsuit, V. Bellecourt v. Lawrence & Geshick)

On March 25-26, 1994 at San Luis Obispo Community College in California this fraudulent group staged an event that was characterized by Northern California respresentative and founding board member of the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council, Carol Standing Elk, as a mock tribunal. These two events were the continuation of a covert program which originated during the Nixon White House in 1972, and continues today on the internet (see Council on Security and Intelligence).

These co-conspirators calling themselves the confederation of autonomous AIM chapters have attempted to infiltrate, misdirect, divide, disrupt and cause confusion by claiming to be American Indian Movement on the one hand, and on the other hand they continue their campaign to vilify and discredit the legitimate leadership, and members of the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council as part of their campaign to destroy the American Indian Movement.

Previous to the March 25-26, 1994 mock tribunal held at San Luis Obispo Community College, a meeting was called in Minneapolis, Minnesota attended by 250 men, women, and children responding to a tobacco invitation. They gathered in spirituality and consultation on Sunday, March 20, 1994 and included elders, spiritual leaders and ten pipe carriers. They spoke of the Movement's history and these attacks against the Movement and leaders, Clyde and Vernon Bellecourt.

Spiritual leaders of the Midewin and Sun Dance ways advised Clyde and Vernon not to respond to the attacks against them, and not to travel to the sham "tribunal" to defend themselves, and to ignore the false charges. In reference to those who are making charges and bringing false "indictments," one elder advised Clyde, "Let them speak, and let them say all they will say, and when they are done, they will have no more to say."

However, on Friday, March 25 and Saturday, March 26, leaders of the national and local American Indian Movement met together in San Francisco to strategize how to deal with Ward Churchill and a self-styled radical faction of his followers. Present at the meeting were AIM National President and co-founder, Clyde Bellecourt; AIM National Board Member and Northern California AIM Director, Carol Standing Elk; Southern California AIM Director, Fern Mathias; California AIM Publicist, Patti Jo King; long-time AIM affiliate, Floyd Red Crow Westerman; International Indian Treaty Council President, William Means; and IITC Information Director, Yvonne Swan. They were accompanied by Anishinabe spiritual leader Ellie Favel who carried with her a sacred medicine bundle, and an urgent message from the gathering of traditional spiritual leaders in Minnesota.

The group gathered to discuss their concerns regarding a defamatory "tribunal" in which distinguished Indian leaders of national and local Indian organizations were "put on trial" and condemned by a radical group of self-styled "Indian activists" falsely claming to be members of the American Indian Movement, and spearheaded by ring leader Ward Churchill.

While it was seen as one last effort to reason with those Indian and non-Indian friends that were being manipulated by these conspirators, we are again reminded of the advice of our elder who said, "Let them speak, let them say all they will say, and when they are done, they will have no more to say."

The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council has allowed them to have their say going back to September 23, 1986 when Ward Churchill and Glen Morris were expelled from the International Indian Treaty Council (IITC). After seven (7) more years of investigations by our Council on Security, and attempts to reason with Russell Means, who continues to be aligned with them and is a central figure in this conspiracy, Ward Churchill and Glen Morris were expelled from the American Indian Movement on November 24, 1993. Six years later in 1999 they continue their misinformation campaign and attacks against the leadership of the American Indian Movement on the Internet.

Their deceitful method of operation becomes clear and are listed as follows:


Their web site is a perfect example. They list issues as their own that the American Indian Movement, International Indian Treaty Council and other organizations have been developing over a thirty-year period of time.

They list as related sites various well known organizations and individuals and projects in order to cloak their misinformation campaigns with legitimacy.

Specifically, in regards to the revisionist writings of Ward Churchill, Glen Morris and Russell Means, they often use people such as Vine Deloria, LaDonna Harris, Gerry Spence, Noam Chomsky and many other Indian and non-Indian intellectuals and academics, some who naively play into their game plan.

Working with willing agents like Santos "Hawks Blood" Suarez, and Lawrence Sampson and others, they are attempting to sell for money chapters of so-called confederation of autonomous AIM and AIM club membership cards.

They continue to perpetuate this misinformation campaign in front-operations like Dark Night Field Notes, using well-known persons like Noam Chomsky, Eddie Hatcher, Winona LaDuke, and others on their advisory board. They are now putting out the same misinformation on the Internet (see letterhead and Dark Night Field Notes by Faith Attaglia, and Chomsky, LaDuke letters), also (See Bob Brown, AAPRP letter).

They use publications like Houghton-Mifflin, Random House Publishers, South End Press, and Speak Out Speakers Bureau who allow Ward Churchill and others to perpetuate their literary, academic, and Indian fraud on the unknown public.

In order to carry out this cruel hoax, they are deceitful and treacherous to the point that they will always surround themselves with innocent and naïve individuals out of the Indian and non-Indian communities, some who are well known who actually have endorsed their revisionist, inaccurate, shoddy, and fraudulent writings. The result of this is that without review of the contents of their publications, Indian and non-Indian educators and educational institutions and libraries are using these books in their curriculum. In doing so, they and our students become victims of this fraud. 8. Using the American Indian Movement to give themselves credibility, cover and access, they have been able to infiltrate other organizations and movements nationally and internationally.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What you can do to help:


The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council urges our friends and supporters worldwide to expose and isolate these conspirators expeditiously.

We request that educators, Indian and non-Indians alike remove from their curriculums and libraries all of their revisionist, inaccurate and shoddy writings, and send them back to their publishers (a clear example of the problem is the Encyclopedia of the North American Indian by Frederick E. Hoxie, published by Houghton Mifflin, a subsidiary of Random House). Mr. Marc Jaffe of Houghton Mifflin first contacted and met with Tim Giago, Oglala Lakota, and award winning publisher of Indian Country Today, and syndicated columnist to do the book, and without notifying Mr. Giago, Mr. Jaffe selected Mr. Hoxie who allowed Indian literary and academic fraud, Churchill to submit the article, "Radicals and Radicalism, 1990 to the Present." Everyone knows that Mr. William A. Means has provided key leadership in the development of the International Indian Treaty Council from its inception in 1974 to the present. IITC is the international political and diplomatic corp of the American Indian Movement, yet, Churchill gives credit to fellow wannabe Jimmy Durham, and Winona LaDuke. No doubt Churchill's motives in his revisionist writings in omitting William A. Means is because of the 1986 letter in which Mr. Means expelled both Churchill and Glen Morris from further association with IITC.

Discontinue utilizing Speak Out Speakers Bureau and publications from South End Press, Zeta Magazine and Common Courage Press until they agree to stop promoting these frauds. Additionally, do now allow Native American Press to be circulated in your place of business or community.

Join with us in demanding that the Senate Judiciary Committee hold Waco and Ruby Ridge-type hearings on the Pine Ridge Oglala Lakota Nation; the site of Wounded Knee 1890-1973, and the botched FBI operation that left FBI agents, Williams and Coler and AIM member, Joe Stuntz dead. An FBI operation that led to the deaths of Anna Mae Aquash, Buddy Lamont, Frank Clearwater, and Pedro Bissonette to name a few of many, and Leonard Peltier remains in prison after twenty-three years.

We request that organizations such as the National Indian Education Association and the American Indian Higher Education Consortium create a watchdog-type agency to review what books are being published by these literary, academic, and Indian frauds so that their revisionist writings are not finding their way into our education curriculum. This problem is of epidemic proportions, and must be stopped.

Join with us in our demands that the 6,000 pages currently under a national security cover be released to Leonard Peltier’s attorneys.

Those persons whose names appear on the Freedom of Information (FOI) declassified documents are all targets of the U.S. government war against the American Indian Movement; you should request your files from the various government agencies.
For information on how to make a Freedom of Information file request, write, fax, or email to the attention of Joslyn Kaye at the Center for Constitutional Rights
666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York NY 10012. Email is  jkaye@ccr-ny.org
Telephone number is 212-614-6464, ext. 470. Fax is 212-614-6499.

AIM's statement on 911

PRESS RELEASE BY THE
American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council
The American Indian Movement Peace Statement
September 15, 2001
The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council vehemently condemns the recent acts of violence and terrorism perpetrated against innocent civilians in the United States. We condemn similar acts of violence and terrorism perpetrated by all governments and organizations against innocent civilians worldwide.

THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL DECLARES:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. central time, Indian people will be standing with thousands of Minnesotans at the State Capitol to join our prayers and spirit in the wake of these horrific and tragic events. We request that all of our Indian peoples and others join us in our offerings and prayers at this time.
Our hearts go out to the victims and their families, and we mourn with them the loss of their loved ones. As a people who have historically suffered similar crimes against humanity perpetrated against peaceful Indian villages in the North America, and continuing today against Indian civilians in several countries of Central and South America, we nonetheless at this time grieve and join our prayers and spirits with the families of the innocent victims of these acts of violence in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C.

However, we caution and remind the U.S. Government leaders that all faiths of the world are taught that violence begets violence. Mahatma Ghandi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. have proven the power of non-violence. Our great chiefs like Blackhawk and Chief Joseph, in the face of great adversity, were men of peace and non-violence. Blackhawk, who correctly observed at that time, when he asked the question, "Why is it that you Americans always insist on taking with a gun what you could have through love?"

With acts of love, we can become the most respected government and people in the world, and we will prevail. If we continue the cycles of violence, we will continue to be the most despised in many parts of the world, and we will fail. We must continue to pray for justice and world peace.


CONTACT:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ne-Gon-We-Way-We-Dun, Anishinabe Ojibwe Nation
Also known as Clyde H. Bellecourt
Phone: 612-724-3129
National Director American Indian Movement






[article.email.prefix]:  AIMGGC@worldnet.att.net <<img src="/img/maillink.gif" border="0"/> AIMGGC@worldnet.att.net [article.homepage.prefix]:  http://www.aimovement.org [article.phone.prefix]: 612-721-3914

WHy has Indy Medi arefused to cover Founders of AIM!!

Love doctor 05.Feb.2005 04:57

Why has Indy media never bothered to ask the founders of AIM who have clear radical credentials (Wounded Knee, Mohawk Uprising, their well known solidarity and relationship with the Zapatistas, and key relationships with many freedom fighters around the world) about their feelings on these issues.

dB, about your comment

Rocky 05.Feb.2005 06:02

I am aware that Jews vote Democrat, but a number of Democrats have been anti-Jewish. Take Virginia Congressman Jim Moran's March 2003 comment about how he blames Jews for the Iraq War, for example. Or comments about Jews made by Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. And I have never seen "Team America." And what about all those Berkeley activists who protest against Jews every chance they get?

I agree with 1Planet1People

marco 05.Feb.2005 08:39

I have to agree with 1Planet1People.

We must defend Ward Churchill's rights.
This is a purge. And I'm afraid it's the
sign of things to come really.

We can discuss whether we agree/disagree with
Churchill some other time. It has nothing to
do with the matter at hand.

Does Nat Hentoff agree with everything YOU'VE
ever said and done in your life? Probably not.
Has he defended your First Ammendment rights
tirelessly for your entire life?

PROBABLY.

He sure has defended mine.

We need to do likewise.

marco

r: "Let me put this as plainly as I can"

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 12:56

(denonciation of Churchill as FBI etc etc etc).

Again, this sort of attack goes on ALL THE TIME in Native activist circles...and is crazy and stupid. Of course he's not %%$£££ FBI!

Russel Means one of the 'Grand Governing Council' people IS NOT FBI also. (another frequently made accusation)...He may be an egosier and 'dodgy geezer'..but he's not FBI. Again these days, there is no 'offical AIM'. Why? Look what happened to the original AIM. So this is why people say that Means must be FBI, maybe, in that he is allowed to get away with this 'organistion/trip'. Not neccessarily so of course. (although if their 'official' stance is pro Zapatista that is a joke because they are communists...and Means is certainly no communist!???!!! (Nor was Zapata by the way!)

Very very few of the people that are accused of being FBI are thus. The point of government interervention is to generate all this scisming out and paranoia and distruption of tribal focus and energy, so that poeple get disallusioned and lunch out back into the mainstream ^^%%&%$!!!


And please note that this intervention occurs PRIMARILY on a 'energy level'...i.e. what the Native American's call 'bad medicence'...I should not have to tell you why again!...

Stay cool.

Om

(sorry but it's my 'program' however I may feel to at least try)

Sorry one more thing.....

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 13:00

..then I'll leave the talking to others....

The central point here is magic as in auspicious tribal energy/liberation RATHER THAN government pervert power/negative mind/reality control.

Blessed be!

DINE'H TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

HOPI TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

From United Native America

Founder Mike L. Graham 05.Feb.2005 13:03

Contact FCC and demand they pull 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorado broadcasting licenses



Message to the American Indian community on the Internet, contact the Federal Communication Commission and demand they pull 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorado broadcasting licenses. Let them know that Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles working for the radio station are using public air ways to generate race hate toward the American Indian community.

Let the FCC know that these three men are calling for "Native American" Professor Ward Churchill of the University of Colorado to be fired for a letter he wrote about 9-11. The manner in which they are doing this on public air ways has brought about death threats to Professor Churchill and vandalism to his car. Reports are that KKK members are joining students on campus in Hate actions against Professor Churchill.

The broader issue here is that Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles repeatedly on their radio show refer to the Native America community and how this issue will affect them in the state of Colorado. They have all but called Professor Ward Churchill the brother of terrorist Ben Laden. Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles repeatedly report that death threats are coming in against Professor Ward Churchill and they do not call for and end of this. They sound like their taking great pride in the fact that their manner of reporting on this issue is angering people against Professor Churchill and the Native American community to the point someone may end up being killed.

Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles are doing a disservice to all people in Colorado and America in the way they are handling the issue of Professor Ward Churchill on their radio show. Professor Churchill has not broken any laws! he is only exercising his first amendment right of freedom of speech. On Petter Boyles web page it states, We know Professor Ward Churchill's real Indian name "Horse Sh*t," This is a total racial put down directed toward the Native American community!!! UNA has called the station about this issue, and the Rocky Mountain Newspaper for their reports on this issue.
End statement:

Use contact information below to send in your letters of complaint to the Federal Communication Commission demanding action be taken toward 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorado to include Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles.

Dan Caplis & Craig Silverman
 http://www.khow.com/hosts/caplis-silverman.html

Petter Boyles
 http://www.khow.com/hosts/peterboyles.html

630 KHOW-AM's offices are located at:
4695 S. Monaco Street
Denver, CO 80237

Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554
1-888-225-5322 Fax: (202) 418-0710

Chairman Michael K. Powell:  Michael.Powell@fcc.gov
Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy:  Kathleen.Abernathy@fcc.gov
Commissioner Michael J. Copps:  Michael.Copps@fcc.gov
Commissioner Kevin J. Martin:  KJMWEB@fcc.gov
Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein:  Jonathan.Adelstein@fcc.gov

Mike L. Graham, member Oklahoma Cherokee Nation
Founder United Native America www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Whoops, apologies...

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 13:13

I meant Vernon Bellacourt and not Russel Means....as in 'official' (sick) AIM.

You're a cheecky cunt Bellacourt..it's not up to you who is or who isn't part of AIM!

Anyone, who is Native American is part of AIM! (please spporters I guess).

jezzz, maybe the guy is FBI?...no just a egoisng dodgy twat.

(hey! hope that everyone's digging the Mason loony bin!!!)

Blessed be,

King Amdo.

CYMRU TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

United Native America

Mike L. Graham 05.Feb.2005 13:40

As to Vernon Bellecourt and Colorado UV Professor Ward Churchill, I have read the Denver news reports out today. I know both these men and I have to say I like Vernon but, he is doing a big "wrong" in speaking out on this issue, I'm also taking to the AIM Grand Council about this issue. Anyone can look at Professor Ward Churchill and see he has Indian heritage, as most Indians in this country they cannot prove their Indian heritage, thanks to the federal government in taking Indian children away from their Mom and Dads for so many years, their family history is lost forever.

I have talked two times on a radio show there in Denver that is coming at Churchill, he has not broken any laws in what he wrote, they are turning his words around and trying to make it look like he is for the terrorist, he has stated he is not, he is just telling people why the terrorist hit the Twin Towers two times, and that is because of the federal government and big business in their back yard.

I'm putting together a letter calling for people to contact the FCC on the two men and the radio station for their actions that have brought about death threats against Ward Churchill and damage to his car from KKK members on campus. On the radio show they keep bringing up the Native American community and how this issue will hurt them, well it is in the way they are reporting on the issue. The Colorado media is generating race hate toward the Indian community, this issue is not just about Ward Churchill!

This is taking place because the Denver court let the people go that were arrested on Columbus Day, this is their way of putting the Native American community down and turning people against Indians and their issue of Columbus being a state holiday.

Rocky Mountain Newspaper is leading the pack attack against Professor Ward Churchill. UNA is contacting everyone we can on the Internet asking them to stay united on this issue against the Colorado media and the governor!
Newspaper poll: Please vote NO to fire Professor Ward Churchill.
 http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_3513399,00.html

Radio station trying to sound bite Professor Ward Churchill to death for real!!
 http://www.khow.com/hosts/caplis-silverman.html

Contact the FCC and demand this radio station be shut down for their actions against the Native America community on this issue!!!
 http://www.fcc.gov/

Mike L. Graham, member Oklahoma Cherokee Nation
Founder United Native America
www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:39

The federal government brought the terrorist to the good old USA!!! It started back in 1974...remember? If you buy oil and gas your supporting terrorist, FACT!

The oil selling countries in the Middles are training their men to come at us. We are buying oil from them, get an education!!!!

How else would these sand people have the money to come to America???? Get it now?

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Ward Churchill just told you the same thing I did here, fire me!!! Sadam and Ben Laden are the most wanted men in the world!!! Your federal government gave them your tax dollars for over 40 years for their support in the Middle East to fight against the USSR, when that war was over they came after the USA. Now it's our turn to pay for Middles East OIL!!! That is what it's about!!! Get over it!!! Ward Churchill just told you what the terrorist are doing to the USA and why!!!

People in the Towers worked for the USA companies in the Middle East. He stated, how would you take them out? Well, they had two chances and they did it, now we all have to live with the fact that our government did not do it's job in taking care of US! But just look at all your tax dollars now going to the Middle East again, what do you thank about that?? You just can't handle the truth, your like most Americans LOL.

I'm a retired services connected disable Vet, I know what I'm saying and talking about her!!!

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Unite Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:42

Our national group members our in support of doing away with Columbus Day in the state of Colorado and America are sending the letter posted on this UNA page to the State Governor, Denver Mayor and other state and city representatives.
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/issues/CO.html

Seventeen state governments have dropped Columbus Day as a state holiday, cities can do this as well. By state law South Dakota and Wyoming have changed Columbus Day to Native American Day. The state of Alabama has brought about Native America Heritage Day/Columbus Day set on the second Monday of October.

We now have a bill before the Oklahoma State Government, HB. 1216, calling for Native American Day set on the second Monday of each October, Oklahoma is one of the seventeen states that have dropped Columbus Day.

Congressman Joe Baca of California will reintroduce a house resolution calling for National Native American Day. Senator Brownback of Kansas is looking into posting the bill on the senate side of the house. Last year we had 26 congressmen signed on in support of Native American Day, we need around 80 congressmen signed on to the bill before it goes before the full house for a vote. This year we will make it happen!!

If the Denver Mayor issues a parade permit this year under the name of Columbus, we are calling for over 1000 people to show up and be willing to go to jail.

We have over one hundred and fifty thousands hand signed holiday petitions calling for and end of Columbus Day in America and to bring about National Native American Day, over 38,300 people have signed our on line holiday petition.

 http://www.petitiononline.com/indian/petition.html


Send holiday petition to White House

 http://users.skynet.be/kola/nhnapet.htm



United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:44

Now, in our day and time of the 2000s Our federal government wants to apologize to the Americans Indians for it's holocaust they committed against them, or do they? The US Senate bill on the web page below was put forth last year, it did not pass!! Now a US Congressman has brought the bill back before this new congress we have, think it will pass this year of 2005? Call your congressman at: 202-225-3121 and see what he thinks about it?

2004 bill page
Republican Representative Sam Brownback of Kansas aided by the National Council of Americans
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/issues/res37.html

The new bill before US Congress
Your support is needed on this issue, contact your federal congressmen. Ask them to sign on in support of H.J. RES. 3
United States House of Representatives, 109th Congress, 1st Session: Member We

To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples... (Introduced in House)
HJ 3 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 3
To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2005
Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States.

Whereas the ancestors of today's Native Peoples inhabited the land of the present-day United States since time immemorial and for thousands of years before the arrival of peoples of European descent;

Whereas the Native Peoples have for millennia honored, protected, and stewarded this land we cherish;

Whereas the Native Peoples are spiritual peoples with a deep and abiding belief in the Creator, and for millennia their peoples have maintained a powerful spiritual connection to this land, as is evidenced by their customs and legends;

Whereas the arrival of Europeans in North America opened a new chapter in the histories of the Native Peoples;

Whereas, while establishment of permanent European settlements in North America did stir conflict with nearby Indian tribes, peaceful and mutually beneficial interactions also took place;

Whereas the foundational English settlements in Jamestown, Virginia, and Plymouth, Massachusetts, owed their survival in large measure to the compassion and aid of the Native Peoples in their vicinities;

Whereas, in the infancy of the United States, the founders of the Republic expressed their desire for a just relationship with the Indian tribes, as evidenced by the Northwest Ordinance enacted by Congress in 1787, which begins with the phrase, `The utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the Indians';

Whereas Indian tribes provided great assistance to the fledgling Republic as it strengthened and grew, including invaluable help to Meriwether Lewis and William Clark on their epic journey from St. Louis, Missouri, to the Pacific Coast;

Whereas Native Peoples and non-Native settlers engaged in numerous armed conflicts;

Whereas the United States Government violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatic agreements with Indian tribes;

Whereas this Nation should address the broken treaties and many of the more ill-conceived Federal policies that followed, such as extermination, termination, forced removal and relocation, the outlawing of traditional religions, and the destruction of sacred places;

Whereas the United States forced Indian tribes and their citizens to move away from their traditional homelands and onto federally established and controlled reservations, in accordance with such Acts as the Indian Removal Act of 1830;

Whereas many Native Peoples suffered and perished--

(1) during the execution of the official United States Government policy of forced removal, including the infamous Trail of Tears and Long Walk;

(2) during bloody armed confrontations and massacres, such as the Sand Creek Massacre in 1864 and the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890; and

(3) on numerous Indian reservations;

Whereas the United States Government condemned the traditions, beliefs, and customs of the Native Peoples and endeavored to assimilate them by such policies as the redistribution of land under the General Allotment Act of 1887 and the forcible removal of Native children from their families to faraway boarding schools where their Native practices and languages were degraded and forbidden;

Whereas officials of the United States Government and private United States citizens harmed Native Peoples by the unlawful acquisition of recognized tribal land, the theft of resources from such territories, and the mismanagement of tribal trust funds;

Whereas the policies of the United States Government toward Indian tribes and the breaking of covenants with Indian tribes have contributed to the severe social ills and economic troubles in many Native communities today;

Whereas, despite continuing maltreatment of Native Peoples by the United States, the Native Peoples have remained committed to the protection of this great land, as evidenced by the fact that, on a per capita basis, more Native people have served in the United States Armed Forces and placed themselves in harm's way in defense of the United States in every major military conflict than any other ethnic group;

Whereas Indian tribes have actively influenced the public life of the United States by continued cooperation with Congress and the Department of the Interior, through the involvement of Native individuals in official United States Government positions, and by leadership of their own sovereign Indian tribes;

Whereas Indian tribes are resilient and determined to preserve, develop, and transmit to future generations their unique cultural identities;

Whereas the National Museum of the American Indian was established within the Smithsonian Institution as a living memorial to the Native Peoples and their traditions; and

Whereas Native Peoples are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that among those are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND APOLOGY
SECTION 1. The United States, acting through Congress--

(1) recognizes the special legal and political relationship the Indian tribes have with the United States and the solemn covenant with the land we share;

(2) commends and honors the Native Peoples for the thousands of years that they have stewarded and protected this land;

(3) acknowledges years of official depredations, ill-conceived policies, and the breaking of covenants by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes;

(4) apologizes on behalf of the people of the United States to all Native Peoples for the many instances of violence, maltreatment, and neglect inflicted on Native Peoples by citizens of the United States;

(5) expresses its regret for the ramifications of former offenses and its commitment to build on the positive relationships of the past and present to move toward a brighter future where all the people of this land live reconciled as brothers and sisters, and harmoniously steward and protect this land together;

(6) urges the President to acknowledge the offenses of the United States against Indian tribes in the history of the United States in order to bring healing to this land by providing a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and Indian tribes; and

(7) commends the State governments that have begun reconciliation efforts with recognized Indian tribes located in their boundaries and encourages all State governments similarly to work toward reconciling relationships with Indian tribes within their boundaries.

DISCLAIMER
SEC. 2. Nothing in this Joint Resolution authorizes any claim against the United States or serves as a settlement of any claim against the United States.


United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:46

In World War ll, six million Jews were said to be killed because of Hitler. World wide in that war over one hundred million people were killed.

From the time Columbus was found all most dead from lack of food and water off the shores of Indians true home land to the 1900s, over one hundred million Indian men, Women and children were killed because they were Indian!! Fact, I do not care if you can't handle the truth, you cannot change true history!! Our federal government states it did this to the Indian people of the Americas.
Bureau of White Affairs
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/bureau/bwa_6.html

Largest mass hanging in United States history
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/hanging.html

American Indian Holocaust - United Native America
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/aiholocaust.html

After you look over these pages you will know how America came about!!
It should never happen again in mans history


United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:47

Colorado media is trying to turn people against the Indian movement on Columbus  Day in their state. This has turned into another right wing attack on ANYONE who speaks out against injustice. We have to stop them dead in their tracks!!! Now the national media is coming in on this issue, you must send your emails in now and make calls!!!

The number to call the Chancellor of UC. is 303-492-8908. Call and let him know how embarrassed you are at CU's stand against Ward Churchill. This at a University that damned Dalton Trumbo years ago and now honors him with a fountain. Let the Chancellor know how disappointed you are.  

We all know Americas true history from the Federal Government, as to how they did the America Indian Indians. It did not stop with them, it went world wide, now you know why America today is under attack!! Is this your government? Or theirs!!


Ward Churchill report:

 http://www.marxmail.org/ward_churchill.htm

This issue is now being reported on National FOX TV News, Bill Oreily show. Send your emails to him and other Fox shows shows, let all your friends on the Internet know about this issue. Colorado is trying to put Indians downs because of Columbus Day event in their state!!! The Colorado government stands with the federal government in having you and me pay for Columbus Day in our country, by coming at Indians in our true home, let's stop it here and now!!!

 oreilly@foxnews.com

Other FOX NEWS shows to contact:

Please copy as is: this is a blind copy to each of them.

( Colmes@foxnews.com,
 cavuto@foxnews.com,
 myword@foxnews.com,
 studiob@foxnews.com
 friends@foxnews.com)


www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com



First Amendment

First Amendment Supporter 05.Feb.2005 14:48

Sure he's got a right to speak w/out losing his job. But what about Jodi Rave's (former student of Churchill's right to free speech? A Native-American journalist who went on to win a journalism fellowship at Harvard, Rave wrote a profile of Churchill. He didn't like it and her grade dropped from an A to a C-. That's something the Regents should be investigating. After gradution, Rave was working for a Nebraska paper. Again, Churchill didn't like something she wrote and he showed up waving a membership card around, demanding a retraction. Her editor backed her. What about freedom of the press? Below are links about Rave's experiences w/Churchill and his idea of freedom of speech:

 http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_3519179,00.html

 http://missoulian.com/articles/2005/02/05/jodirave/rave64.txt

What about his late wife's family's right to free speech when they tried to discuss w/him & his publisher what they regarded as innacuracies in his account of her life? According to the resolution below, they were met w/threats.

 http://www.afn.ca/resolutions/2004/res56.htm

United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:52

Fox News loves the Ward Churchill issue, you can play Custer and kill off an Indian. All Ward Church did was tell us why America is being hit by terrorist, our federal governments actions in their home lands! Like it or not, that's the facts!

The governor of Colorado should step down, our tax dollars pay for Columbus Day, Columbus = Hitler  Fact!! This holiday is a national sick joke!!


9-11 almost 3000 people killed. American Indian Trail Of Tears, over 5000 Indian men, women and children killed, the list goes on and on.
 http://www.petitiononline.com/indian/petition.html

United Native America

Mike Graham 05.Feb.2005 14:55

I support Churchill keeping his job!!!!  

American Indians fighting terrorism from
1492
Now, thanks to our federal government we are all in the same boat!!!

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Where did freedom of speech come from under government rule?

9-11 almost 3000 people killed. American Indian Trail Of Tears, over 5000 Indian men, women and children killed.

105TH CONGRESS - 1ST SESSION - S. RES. 145

Designating the month of November as "National American Indian Heritage Month".

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES


Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Allard, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Collins, Mr. Conrad, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Dashle, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Ford, Mr. First, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Graham, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lott, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reid, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Murkowski and Mr. Stevens) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary November 9, 1997 Committee discharged; considered and agree to

RESOLUTION Designating the month of November 1997 as "National American Indian Heritage Month."

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives were the original inhabitants of the land that now constitutes the United States;

Whereas American Indian tribal governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation of powers that form the foundation of the United States Government;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have traditionally exhibited a respect for the finiteness of natural resources through a reverence for the earth;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have served with valor in all of America's wars beginning with the Revolutionary War through the conflict in the Persian Gulf, and often the percentage of American Indians who served exceeded significantly the percentage of American Indians in the population of the United States as a whole;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have made distinct and important contributions to the United States and the rest of the world in many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives deserve to be recognized for their individual contributions to the United States as local and national leaders, artists, athletes, and scholars;

Whereas this recognition will encourage self-esteem, pride, and self-awareness in American Indians and Alaska Natives of all ages; and

Whereas November is a time when many Americans commemorate a special time in the history of the United States when American Indians and English settlers celebrated the bounty of their harvest and the promise of new kinships: Now, therefore, be it



1 Resolved, That the Senate designates November
2 as "National American Indian Heritage Month" and re-
3 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling on
4 the Federal Government and State and local governments,
5 interested groups and organizations, and the people of the
6 United States to observe the month with programs appropriate ceremonies, and activities.

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com


Churchill nails himself in interviews

AIM 05.Feb.2005 16:42

November 3, 1999

United States Government War
Against the American Indian Movement

Following a lengthy twenty-five (25) year investigation of Ward Churchill, Glen Morris and their Indian and non-Indian co-conspirators, collaborators, dupes and unwitting pawns, the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council’s Council on Security and Intelligence is releasing this lengthy report. We do so because of the continued attacks by this group of deceitful and treacherous frauds against the legitimate leadership of the American Indian Movement and of our international political and diplomatic Corp, the International Indian Treaty Council. They perpetuate these attacks by fraudulently representing themselves as being members of the American Indian Movement, and the so-called confederation of autonomous aim chapters, now using their web site to sow disruption, division and confusion.

The ringleaders of this conspiracy are two wannabees, white men masquerading as Indians, who are very deceitful and treacherous individuals by the name of Ward Churchill and Glen Morris (see Ministry for Information on Glen Morris and Russell Means, the CIA/Contra Connection). We are convinced they are the continuation of a campaign to destroy the American Indian Movement and its leadership that began in the White House office of Richard Nixon in 1972 during the Trail of Broken Treaties march on Washington D.C. in November, 1972 (see Trail of Broken Treaties Manifesto in AIM Archives; also see Council to the President, John Wesley Dean III Correspondence to Acting FBI Director W. Mark Felt under AIM's Council on Security and Intelligence Page).

Four items that should be given special attention are:

Churchill's book, Agents of Repression, page 438, item 49, reads:

"49. Author Churchill experienced one of these sweeps firsthand when, while driving across Pine Ridge on June 27, 1975, the day after the gunfight at the Jumping Bull residence that claimed the lives of AIM member Joe Stuntz and FBI agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams, he stopped to urinate alongside the road, about five miles south of Porcupine. Over the ridge came an APC, accompanied by some 20 FBI and BIA police personnel, moving "on line," carrying M-16s, and dressed in Vietnam-style jungle fatigues, boots and bush hats. Most of the group was also wearing military-issue flack-jackets. Needless to say, the whole scene afforded a sense of deja-vu to the viewer, given that he had spent a year in Southeast Asia in combat."

Churchill further states that he served in Vietnam as an Information Specialist. We say, misinformation specialist.

The second item is an interview conducted with Churchill by Amy Goodman and Bernard White of Radio Pacifica and Station WBAI 99.5 FM, New York City. Again, these are Churchill's own words:

"Well, in 1969, after I came out of the Army, I was a draftee and sent to Vietnam. I came back from that a little bit irritated of the posture of my government. I'm also an American Indian and I was sent to Southeast Asia to uphold a treaty, which did not require that I be there. I considered it a fact before I even left there that while I was over there that, the United States was in the process of standing in complete violation of 371 odd treaties that were on record with my people or related peoples right here in North America. If we’re going to be busy enforcing treaties, it ought to home, not over there.
With that perspective, I became politically active and had a roommate, at least part of the time, in Peoria, Illinois, which is where I’m originally from. His name was Mark Clark. Mark was a downstate defense captain for the Black Panther Party in Illinois, where in December 1969, he was the first person killed in an armed raid on an apartment on Monroe Street in Chicago, which also took the life by assassination of the chairman of the Illinois Panthers, Fred Hampton. That, I guess you can say, caught my attention. And since there were clear indications from the onset of direct FBI involvement in that, and since there was a clear attempt made to cover that up, I became active in the effort to bring out the information of exactly how the murders of Hampton and Clark had occurred.
And one thing followed another from there. I became involved in the Leonard Peltier case. After I joined the American Indian Movement, a couple of years after the point that I'm talking about here."
(See Churchill File, Council on Security and Intelligence).
This is no coincidence. Our investigations show that the FBI raid on the Jumping Bull residence, which sparked the firefight that led to the deaths of FBI agents, Jack Coler and Ron Williams, and AIM member Joe Stuntz, was, in fact, a botched FBI job caused by agents/informants of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and/or other military and intelligence agencies that may well have instigated the shootout or, at least, were in and about the Jumping Bull community. FBI agent informants were no doubt also involved in the death of Anna Mae Aquash. The fact is, Fred Hampton, Mark Clark, agents Jack Coler and Ron Williams, and AIM member, Joe Stuntz, and Anna Mae Aquash are dead, and our brother, Leonard Peltier remains in prison after 23 years.


The third item is the blatant manipulation of Peter Mathieson, Oliver Stone, CBS and 60-Minutes, regarding the "Mr. X" hoax, which was orchestrated by David Hill, Bob Robideaux, and Ward Churchill. (See Dino Butler article published in News from Indian Country, May 1995). In the article Dino states, "There is no Mr. X. There was no white man coming to our camp that day bringing dynamite. Those are all lies created to keep Leonard in jail longer." (See Council on Security and Intelligence, Churchill File).

You may also see Jodi Rave interview of Ward Churchill in November of 1993 at Boulder, Colorado, specifically the last three paragraphs on page two (2) which continues to page three (3).

"Question: That must have changed just recently?
Answer: Yes, about three years ago, the name of the university, it was still a college then. So I agreed to teach some extension courses for them. I thought that once I would do that, and at Loneman School on Pine Ridge I would do some workshops there ... but what they assigned me to do was to teach the police force in Rapid City.
Question: Oh, really?
Answer: Yah, the guys were taking courses on weekends and shit, so they could make their rank. It was a money maker for the school. I needed the money. I was teaching the Rapid City Police Department about the American Indian Movement."

For those of you that have visited our web site, aimovement.org, see the remarkable progress that the legitimate leadership of the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council, the International Indian Treaty Council, the National Coalition on Racism in Sports and Media, and all of our other projects listed on our web site have accomplished; work that continues over a thirty-year period of time.
On the other hand, this group of detractors have done nothing for the Indian people, or for humankind in general. Everything they have done is self-serving to put money in their pockets, be it their revisionist writings, lectures, movies, etc., while they continue their campaign and attempts to divide and destroy the American Indian Movement.


There is so much more information that we can share with you that is in this report. Everything that is represented in this Press Statement and following report entitled, The United States Government’s War Against the American Indian Movement are factual based in part on our careful review of the first of 17,722 pages of declassified documents from various U.S. government agencies under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI).

Additionally, it is based on a twenty-five year investigation by the Council on Security & Intelligence, and the conspirator’s and collaborator’s own words, writings, representations, and as important, their actions. (See Council on Security and Intelligence, the United States Government War Against the American Indian Movement) , the role of the White House and Secret Service, Senate Judiciary Committee, Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), other U.S. military and intelligence agencies.

Finally, as you review the total report, we trust that you will come to the same conclusions that we have.

Vernon Bellecourt
National Representative
AIMGGC

Ward taught cops is a cop!

AIM 05.Feb.2005 17:40

You may also see Jodi Rave interview of Ward Churchill in November of 1993 at Boulder, Colorado, specifically the last three paragraphs on page two (2) which continues to page three (3).

"Question: That must have changed just recently?
Answer: Yes, about three years ago, the name of the university, it was still a college then. So I agreed to teach some extension courses for them. I thought that once I would do that, and at Loneman School on Pine Ridge I would do some workshops there ... but what they assigned me to do was to teach the police force in Rapid City.
Question: Oh, really?
Answer: Yah, the guys were taking courses on weekends and shit, so they could make their rank. It was a money maker for the school. I needed the money. I was teaching the Rapid City Police Department about the American Indian Movement."

Ward's cop status is NOT irrelevant

Nobody 05.Feb.2005 18:22

Ward's cop status is NOT irrelevant. There is a very good possibility that he is trying to trick the left into backing him in a position where they are going to get slammed. That is to say, what he is looking for is for people like Indymedia to say, "Well, the U.S. DID deserve 9/11." That would help to further discredit the left with a lot of people.

That's important because, if you had not noticed, we are a small minority in the U.S. at this point, and to have any real effect on our country's policies, we are going to have to GROW and win over more people. Going around telling people that the only real victims on 9/11 were the poor hijackers is not going to get you there. You may or many not understand this; Ward Churchill does.

That said, if you want to defend him on free speech grounds, it's probably harmless enough. But I would treat him about like I would a Klan person in that case: Damn his position every chance you get, but defend his right to say it.

For my part, I'm not going to get too up in arms about it. Whether he gets fired -- which doesn't seem likely from my reading of his school's academic freedom policy -- or whether he doesn't, he isn't going to end up homeless and on the street. The feds will take care of their boy. He probably has quite a lot in the bank at this point, and if not I'm sure they will arrange for him to make a good living as a speaker and so forth.

Frankly I think the more important task is to tell all the people getting whipped up at this latest story of outrage by the left that Ward Churchill is nothing to do with us. Keep him or let him go, as you like; but don't blame us, blame Nixon. This seems to have been AIM's focus, which is a demonstration of their political experience and savvy. Other organizations would do well to watch and learn.

In the long run I think this will do more good for preserving academic freedom than anything else: Making the point that the worst offender among academics is a plant, and that the "problem" of academics writing nonsense is a manufactured and a fake problem, and perhaps distinguishing between what he has said about 9/11 and what Noam Chomsky, Amiri Baraka and other controversial writers have said. It IS different. Responsible writers, such as Baraka, have taken great pains to make clear their horror at the 9/11 attacks.

Like it or not, people judge us by what we do. People look not only at the arguments the left makes but the way the left acts. And when some jackass, in our name, or the name of AIM, writes something that everyone can see is a jackass thing to write, it DOES hurt us.

Also, I would like to point out that the position attributed to Ward Churchill in these pages, that the U.S. is responsible for the 9/11 attacks because of arming and funding Bin Laden, because of the oil money which was behind the attacks, etc., is NOT Ward Churchill's position. There is a link to the article at the back of this whole debate at the top of THIS article. In it he does not portray the hijackers as U.S. trained mad-dogs slipped off their leashes -- which is an accurate portrayal -- but as heroic, rational, admirable freedom fighters.

"Stop Thief!" Is Not Hate Speech

Transform 05.Feb.2005 18:45

"STOP THIEF!" IS NOT HATE SPEECH

The apartheid media of invader-settlers illegally
occupying Indian Country by force of arms has had
quite a little punitive fit of McCarthyism lately with
their frustrated attacks on Ward Churchill. The
needles of their moral compasses spinning
hysterically, these establishment white males have
gone haywire with their hypocritical, slanderous rants
against CU's professor of Ethnic Studies.

Here's just a random, paraphrased sampling of the
bigotry of these hiss-terics for who Churchill is no
less than a (big, deep breath) celebrator of mass
slaughter, exhultor of terrorists, apologist for mass
murder, suppressor of civil liberties, indoctrinator
of innocent children of taxpayers, an intellectual
goon, a vicious rhetorician, a reckless exaggerator, a
lunatic, nutcase, lightning rod whose intellectually
bankrupt, morally depraved, repugnant, slovenly,
puerile, inept, degenerate rants are indefensible,
reprehensible, outrageous examples of a cheap
self-promoter whose utter disregard for the dead of
911 is, well, "hurtful".

Whoa there, cowboys, put down that thesaurus and take
your meds! Aren't you the same keyboard commandos
whose newspapers regularly publish war-porn pictures
of captured Iraqis in S&M positions so blatant and
degrading they look like they belong in the back of
the Westword's pimp pages? Geneva Convention anyone?

Often handcuffed, under the gun, and at the feet of
our Kevlared little Jeffrey Dahmers whose rape/murder
spree at Abu Ghraib our tax dollars sponsored, and
whose degradation of the people they claim to be
liberating might just be one more reason why most of
the world hates us so much. And is it really any
surprise that men who come from a country where a
woman is raped once every six minutes (often by
someone she knows) would do this sort of thing?

Puritans are certainly not known for their balanced
sense of moral outrage, and their racially-motivated
attacks on an American Indian man who dared to call
them on their greedy exceptionalism shows just how
precisely he hit a nerve. The last time I looked it
was not an act of hate speech to cry "Stop thief!"
especially when the one giving the warning can back
his charge up with the kind of historical/legal
evidence and rigorous scholarship that is the hallmark
of Ward Churchill's works.

On that fateful, prophetic day in September 2001 after
the Twin Towers collapsed, a photograph was snapped of
a man in a business suit covered from head to toe in
ash, capturing forever his utter bewilderment at what
had just happened. Stripped of his arrogant
pretensions, his briefcase full of broken treaties,
broken lives, and broken nations, he stands there
looking like he really forgot to ask some very
essential questions - questions like: Whose world?
What kind of trade? In the center of what?

Fortunately, the rest of us might have a little more
time to examine, with a whole lot of help from
scholar-activists like Ward Churchill, just what
exactly those three words REALLY mean. And not to the
beneficiaries of the U$A's business-as-usual policies,
but to the rest of the nations of the world -
especially Turtle Island's indigenous nations - whose
land, labor, and lives it was the business of many of
the people in those towers to buy and sell as they
pleased.

The sheer, media-numbed ignorance that American
Indians face every day from Ugly AmeriKKKans, whose
genocidal hate and greed puts us all in danger, was
nowhere more evident recently than in one of the
anti-Churchill, racist screeds that shrieked for a
"simple denunciation of lunatic opinions".

Gee, simply denounce lunatic opinions? OK, here's a
couple of lunatic ones for you: Columbus was a great
explorer and this is not stolen land.

Transform you are mossing the point!

AIM 05.Feb.2005 19:15

AIM's position on 911 showed solidarity with victims families and pointed out the hypocrisy of our government:

On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. central time, Indian people will be standing with thousands of Minnesotans at the State Capitol to join our prayers and spirit in the wake of these horrific and tragic events. We request that all of our Indian peoples and others join us in our offerings and prayers at this time.
Our hearts go out to the victims and their families, and we mourn with them the loss of their loved ones. As a people who have historically suffered similar crimes against humanity perpetrated against peaceful Indian villages in the North America, and continuing today against Indian civilians in several countries of Central and South America, we nonetheless at this time grieve and join our prayers and spirits with the families of the innocent victims of these acts of violence in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C.

However, we caution and remind the U.S. Government leaders that all faiths of the world are taught that violence begets violence. Mahatma Ghandi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. have proven the power of non-violence. Our great chiefs like Blackhawk and Chief Joseph, in the face of great adversity, were men of peace and non-violence. Blackhawk, who correctly observed at that time, when he asked the question, "Why is it that you Americans always insist on taking with a gun what you could have through love?"

With acts of love, we can become the most respected government and people in the world, and we will prevail. If we continue the cycles of violence, we will continue to be the most despised in many parts of the world, and we will fail. We must continue to pray for justice and world peace.

AIM has a right to demand this imposter stop using his manufactured identity to nischaracterize their organization.If he wants to stand alone as a wing nut who has no ability or propensity to be sensitive to the janitors,waitresses, and yes even the secretaries working in the trade centers then fine!!AIM has a right to see our principled position shared by the majority of our members be representative. Our position? That we are in solidarity with the victims of 911 but call on the US government to examine it's history of oppression and murder worldwide.

Thank god Ward isn't really Indian. We don't need his mischaracterizations imposed upon us. We called on the U of CO to rid themselves long ago. Not for what he says but for misrepresenting his credentials as a native person, an expert on our affairs, and his false claim as a leader of AIM.

Get it straight!

I See a Vile Smear Campaign

Old Radical 05.Feb.2005 19:58

Many of the comments here are misleading, poorly thought out, and sometimes just ugly and deliberate lies.

If Ward Churchill is a government agent he has done more to expose the criminal actions of the US government than all of his critics on the supposed left put together!

And what about the college professor who cannot spell? Clearly she cannot read either. I have read Churchill's books, talked to him and listened to his speaches. He has said that he deeply cares for the innocent victims of 911 but adds that he also cares for the innocent victims of US attacks in Iraq, and that many of the people in the WT Center were, in fact, not so very innocent. Are you, in fact innocent?? Are any of us who live on the resources and labor robbed from the poor of this earth?? Have they no right to fight back? Apparently not, and anyone who even suggests that they may is marked for a smear campaign. The US may bomb all sorts of civilian targets, killing and maiming innocent children, women, and men at will, but if Ward Churchill points this out you question his credibility on every level. What perfidy! Ward has written volumes of excellent material that many of you have never read. Here is a sample:

"It is not disputed that the Pentagon was a military target, or that a CIA office was situated in the World Trade Center. Following the logic by which U.S. Defense Department spokespersons have consistently sought to justify target selection in places like Baghdad, this placement of an element of the American 'command and control infrastructure' in an ostensibly civilian facility converted the Trade Center itself into a 'legitimate' target. Again following U.S. military doctrine, as announced in briefing after briefing, those who did not work for the CIA but were nonetheless killed in the attack amounted to no more than 'collateral damage.' If the U.S. public is prepared to accept these 'standards' when the are routinely applied to other people, they should be not be surprised when the same standards are applied to them."

I worked long and hard in the early gay liberation movement, when to say you were gay in public generally got you beaten up. The kissgranny establishment gays tried to shut us up in the beginning, fearing a backlash. Cheered us for a bit, a short bit, when we were successful. Took advantage of the inroads we finally made, and then slandered us again when we'd outlived our use to them, in a way not unlike what is happening to Ward Churchill by supposed members of the left. Only what's going on here looks far worse than anything that was done to us. It makes me sick.

BTW: Here is a link to the Colorado AIM (which some of you think doesn't exist)  http://www.coloradoaim.org/councils.htm Clearly all organizations calling themselves AIM and all people daring to call themselves radicals have not yet turned on Ward Churchill.

In deepest love for the oppressed everywhere,
Old Radical

Ward has admitted to working for the police and the Contras

Nobody 05.Feb.2005 20:46

What more could you possibly want?! It is notorious, a matter of public record, no serious person can deny, that the Contras were a creature of the Reagan White House, a front for the CIA. Ward worked with them. Therefore he has worked with the CIA. This is not a matter of conjecture, speculation, or probability. It is a construction based purely on undeniable fact and firm logic. Wiggle and wriggle how he may, he is hooked.

He has also admitted to teaching classes to South Dakota police about AIM. This fact speaks so eloquently by itself that I can think of nothing to add to it.

If you have any lingering doubts, consider the number of deceptions surrounding him.

Remember, too, who is who here. Leonard Peltier fired Ward Churchill from his committee. Are you saying that Leonard is part of the smear campaign? The Zapatistas enjoy excellent relations with AIM. Are you saying the Zapatistas are some kind of government front?

AIM is for real. Ward is not. Anything useful Ward has done is an attempt to fool you.

Yes, there are, unfortunately, still some people who are taken in by him. But, you know, some people were taken in by Mobutu Seise Seko. A fake who has the support of the press, establishment credentials, and access to money can fool a certain number of people, however obvious he is.

I agree that the letter from the professor is funny. I couldn't find any professor by that name, and I'm pretty sure that twenty years ago Ward had already become an Indian. But that doesn't change a thing.

As to what he has said about 9/11, he has said a lot of different things. In the essay in question he didn't express the slightest BIT of sympathy or solidarity for the victims of 9/11. He just didn't. It isn't in there. Nowadays, lately, in an effort to confuse the issue, he is expressing such sympathy. But he hasn't apologized for not doing so before. He's pretending that was his position all along, and it wasn't.

Don't hitch your wagon to that.

Smear campaign indeed!! By Churchill

AIM 05.Feb.2005 21:20

Ward has repeatedly attacked the founders of AIM

Supported the Contras

Claimed to be members of tribes he wasn't

Called Dennis Banks (co-founder of AIM and the engineer of Wounded Knee uprising) "a willing dupe" and implicated him in the murder of Ana Mae Aquash

Ward never done a stretch in jail while all the true leaders of AIM have done no less than a year. ANd no!! we don't include one night stays for CD!!

He created a fake wing of AIM calling it "the International Confederation of the Autonomous Chapters of the AIM". Notice he doesn't call it AIM!!! Dumb asses after his only connection to the movement Russ Means resigned form AIM (9 times!!)

He helped organize a press conference at FBI headquarters to accuse the leaders of AIM of murder and Russ went on to testify to a US grand jury against his own brother!! and the leaders of AIM.

You reference a website to prove the valid existence of COAIM? Get the record straight. Vernon Bellecourt founded the Colorado Chapter of AIM after he had moved away and Russ and subsequently Ward were ousted/resigned Ward hi-jacked the name and refused to stop misrepresenting himself as Indian or AIM after AIM repeatedly informed the public he was not AIM!!!

You cannot choose our leaders Wasichu!!(Those who eat fat/invading barbarians)

White people made Ward what he is today: a celebrated lecturer to white college kids and well paid government agent who has through his dumb ass 911 commentary has accomplished having AIM's name dragged through the mud again. We stand in solidarity with the innocents who died in the attacks of 911. We alos want to inform the US government once again that it has and continues to kill millions on scale that dwarfs the 911 attacks everyday all over the world. A muchmore intelligent and thoughtful way to approach the subject.

He has the right to say whatever the hell he wants. He does not have the right to do it on behalf of Indians or AIM!!!!

I have never seen an "old radical" who would stand next to a Contra supporter. All the old radicals I know supported the revolution!!

Old Radical is more like Ward Groupie?

For Real 05.Feb.2005 21:24

You read a book, you saw a lecture, and decided he was the man? What an idiot.

Tribal documents, photos of Gleen Morris with the Contras, Smear campaign?

Seems Clear 05.Feb.2005 21:27

Seems pretty clear that Ward iis a liar based on the Ketoowah and Creek denials of his tribal membership that go way before this recent event. It seems clear that Ward and Company have supported the Contras. Where is the smear?

Oh for fucks sake shut up...

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 22:05

left/right is irrelevent scitzo's what is important is (tribal) goddess consciousness!

Blessed be!

Ward Churchill, the Contras, Elliott Abrams and Soldier of Fortune Part 1

KL 05.Feb.2005 22:10

I confess to having thought that a political introduction was a courtesy inan unsolicited communication. I bear no responsibility for Louis's post of mye-mail on this list, which he then attacked as though I had posted theinformation myself, and some others also have done. Inadvertently, I got underLouis's skin. He professes to relish that as sport when he can inflict it onothers, but turns nasty and irrational when it happens to him.Louis manages to see the clay feet on everyone else's radical heroes, withwhich I concurred generally, and added a few points to his, in a privatecommunication. But the purpose of my e-mail was to note for his benefit, inthe event he had not been aware of it, that Ward Churchill, the hero of hisown post, also has clay feet.I wrote as someone who had worked with Ward on a number of projects over adecade's time, always cordially, though in later years our disagreementsstrained our ability to unite on the political field of struggle. Ward and Idiscussed and debated our differences at his home, his office, at publicforums, and on the telephone. When I objected to Ward that his book on Marxismwas a caricature, he replied that perhaps it was, but it reported on Marxistsas he knew them.By the mid-1980s, Ward regarded CISPES as his main political enemy in Boulderand Denver. I was heavily involved in solidarity work with the FMLN, andsanctuary support, which included speaking/organizing engagements in Colorado.As far as I could tell, Ward's hostility to the FMLN was derivative, becauseof its political alliance with Sandinista Nicaragua. To my knowledge, noindigenous Salvadorans were oppressed or politically mistreated by the FMLN orby any of its constituent parties.At about that time, Ward condemned the American Indian Movement leadership --specifically Bill Means and Vernon Bellecourt by name -- as stooges of theleft (his words, not mine). Ward and his supporters set up Colorado AIM toadvance their political agenda. So much for Louis's assertion that "There isno other activist/intellectual in the American Indian movement who is moreresolutely opposed to capitalism than Ward Churchill."Of necessity, many of us who personally deplored the split in AIMnevertheless were obliged to work politically with Colorado AIM on solidarityissues of great importance. (Louis's vain boast of being the only Marxistsupporter of indigenous people and their struggles is so much wind.) In this arena, the culture of machismo cast a pall over much of the work, aswomen were assigned menial tasks but excluded from the circle where decisionswere taken. One woman raised a fuss; I concurred with her point; Ward soughtto put out the fire, but without implementing change at the top. I hope thatthings have improved in the decade since.On the national level, Ward and I continued to collaborate on issues ofagreement, particularly political repression in the United States. I haddeveloped a considerable body of information on Jill and Gi Shafer, the FBI(and CIA, according to one reporter who interviewed Gi Schafer long afterward)provocateurs at Wounded Knee, much of it learned from Joe Burton, a self-confessed undercover FBI spy who had targeted my work in a small way, but hadworked throughout the U.S. and Canada with the Shafers to set up phonycommunist collectives under FBI control. (Nearly all had Red in the title --Red Star Cadre, Red Sun, Red Collective, and so forth.) Ward and Ken Tilsenhad information on Doug Durham and others who had caused similar damage.Our disagreements were acknowledged with uneasy humor. Ward would call totease/taunt me -- for example, about his meeting with Brooklyn Rivera andEliott Abrams ("What will our CovertAction friends say about that?" he mocked)and about his barroom encounters with Robert K. Brown. I baited him back ("IfRoxanne was bad to rat on her comrades to a HUAC investigator, how can youjustify your hat-in-hand meeting with the most enthusiastic war criminal inWashington?"). If anyone knows a better way to function under difficultcircumstances, I'm all ears.Louis denies that Ward chose to ally with the CIA, but ended up on the CIA'sside by virtue of his support to the Miskito struggle. The latter point istrue, but -- once more for effect -- Ward eventually penned (with GlennMorris) a political justification for alliance with the CIA, using the Hmongpeople of Laos as his principal example. If Louis hasn't read the CulturalSurvival article, he should read it before he comments further. If he has readit, his postings here are dishonest. Although Louis states that the Miskitoalliance with the CIA was a mistake, Ward and Glenn argued the opposite,following the Laotian example.

part 2 of Ward and the CIA

kl 05.Feb.2005 22:12

Earlier, at the Boulder anti-apartheid teach-in, Ward had proposed that heand I debate our differences. It was after the CS article appeared that Irenewed the proposal to hold a public debate. I asserted the necessity ofanti-capitalism and anti-imperialism as the central political ingredients ofliberation; Ward and Glenn rejected them. Glenn offered to provide a platformfor the debate, which never occurred. After the Sandinista defeat, there wasscant political interest in Denver or Boulder, but I still proposed to writeand publish it. Ward was willing; unfortunately, our editor was not.In the years since, we have drifted apart, and have not remained in touch.Nevertheless, despite our fierce differences, I have always regarded Ward as afriend and as I reconstructed these events, find that I still do.Now back to the beginning:Ward and I met shortly after he had published his insider account of Soldierof Fortune magazine in the political journal on Africa published at DU, whosetitle I have forgotten. Louis asks for the facts; he should look up thatarticle. I do not have access to my Mississippi archive at this time. Besidesthose details, which are politically valuable, I asked Ward how he had takensuch a revolting job in the first place.Ward is a professional graphic artist of outstanding talent, as anyonefamiliar with his work will attest. In an encounter with SoF'sowner/publisher/editor Robert K. Brown, Ward told Brown that his magazine wasugly and amateurish. Brown offered him a job to spruce up and professionalizeSoF, which Ward accepted. According to Ward, their political differences wereknown to both (specifically, Ward's association with SDS in the sixties, andBrown's work as a CIA asset), but they both enjoyed the military-macho banterthat defined the magazine's culture, and continued to relate on that leveleven long after Ward had published his kiss-and-tell exposé.This was in the mid-1970s, when both Ward and I were working, in verydifferent political arenas, to thwart CIA mercenary recruitment, in solidaritywith Angola and with the Zimbabwe liberation movement. Any time I was in thevicinity of Denver or Boulder, he helped set up speaking opportunities.As I recall, the last time he did so was in the fall of 1983, shortly beforemy trip to Nicaragua. Ward and other friends organized several meetings forme, including one at which I was scheduled to debate Brown and Gen. JohnSinglaub. Their agreed participation could only have been arranged by Ward,but in the end Brown and Singlaub backed out. (Singlaub's secretary attendedmy talk at UCD, presumably to gather intelligence for her boss.) The closestwe came to an actual debate occurred when Brown called a radio talk show thathosted my appearance, with this remark about the previous several weeks'events: "His guys got our guys in Beirut, but our guys got his guys inGrenada."

Part three of Ward loves the Contras

kl 05.Feb.2005 22:13

At that time, Ward was warmly encouraging of my visit to Nicaragua as amember of an Oxfam delegation. One person I met at Puerto Cabezas was the theneditor of Navajo Times, Mark Trahant (I hope I'm recalling his namecorrectly), who had toured the entire Atlantic Coast war zone without aSandinista escort, and wrote his report upon his return. Both of us agreedthat the Sandinistas had made dreadful political mistakes, but that they hadrecognized this, apologized, and honestly sought to make amends, the resultsof which were palpable everywhere we went.Another was Roxanne Dunbar, then a Sandinista publicist, whose account didnot differ significantly from Trahant's. Meanwhile, the contra Miskitos weredirecting their war efforts against the radical pro-Sandinista Indians,clinics, agricultural co-operatives, and other manifestations of modernity andreconstruction, and torching whole villages (our group visited Sukat Pin aftersuch an attack, and while another was in progress a mile or so away) whileseeking allies among the older, traditional leaders. Trahant's serializedNavajo Times report bears study by any radical who wishes to discuss thisissue honestly and intelligently.Upon my return, Ward and I had detailed discussions of all this. Ward saidthat he had been asked by Tomás Borge to mediate an accord with the Miskitoinsurgents, based on the program that Louis professes to have been correct.Initially, Ward agreed, but later changed his position. Although embarrassedby Russ Means's declaration that he was going to Nicaragua "to kill aSandinista," and his false charge that Borge had ordered the Sandinista army"to shoot the Indians out of the trees like they shoot monkeys," Ward'sColorado AIM backed and publicized the Means/Morris military adventure, whichhad been funded by the Moonie ultra-right front, CAUSA.That brings me full circle.Having no ability to respond politically to my points, Louis attacked me forreporting my political experiences as an indulgence. Evidently he prefers Web-site Marxism/indigenism derived from the experiences of strangers. My teacherstaught that our duty was to join the struggles of workers and oppressedpeople, and to report on them that they may be propagated. I have done my bestto live up to that.With Rosa Luxemburg, I believe that the mistakes of a truly revolutionaryproletariat (and of the oppressed) are more valuable and more instructive thanthe finest decisions of the most excellent central committee. With AntonioGramsci, I believe that the greatest barrier to socialist revolution is notthe armed might of the state and the ruling class -- though that iscapitalism's ultimate prop, after the initial barrier is breached -- butrather the ruling class culture and world view that has been internalized byworkers and oppressed people.As for the extended narrative I have presented here, no one needs to take myword for anything. Though Ward and I have not spoken in many years, it wouldsurprise me if he would fail to verify my factual account. To be sure, hewould have a robustly different political perspective on these events, andperhaps on his movement's strategy. Others who participated in many of thesestruggles include such Colorado activists as Larry Mosqueda (no longer there,but still engaged in struggle), Priscilla Falcon, Ricardo Romero, KikoMartinez, Lowell May, Elaine Heinrichs, and Jim and Jenny vander Wall.Perhaps even Louis will eventually be able to manage the more complex,contradictory, and ambiguous nuances of real revolutionary struggle, after hisnext political conversion. He seems to have defined his political career bythose phases, which accounts for his knee-jerk retort to my simile ofTrotskyism. Lest he get away with that remark, I close with this: By the timeC.L.R. James came to dwell in Chicago, where I lived and worked in the 1960s,the term Troskyist was as perjorative for him as my usage that caused Louis tosmart -- like a towel snapped on his bum, I guess. The more things change . ..Ken Lawrence

Yep, Churchill's sound I knew it....

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 23:50

The left/right scism is a false trip...(again)...what is important is goddess consciousness....because (again) it is this MAGIC that is blocked by the western christian freemason dodge occultists. This IS the nature of the problem. Extreme leftists abuse the occult with the 'red star' trip. The Zapatista's are doing this. This is what Native American's call 'plastic shammanism'....misuse of real magic that produces a false trip (self defeating in terms of community consciousness/reality change). Please stop misusing traditional Euopean goddess magic. THANK YOU.

Red star at night abused Tibetan in site.

Communists YOU ARE DINASORS. just beacuse the freemasons abuse the goddess pentagram (pentagon...pentagram) doesn't mean that you have to as well.

Have some respect or you will FAIL. (to change collective reality auspiciously).

And by the way bellacourt and his 'grand governing council' is bullshit. he's driving around in a posh motor with 'AIM 1'..plates his lifestyle funded by his memorabliia sales etc. he should be shot. I'm not joking. Fucking ridiculas bullshitting asshole. Typical 'champange' socialist. Control freak. Head merchant.

Blessed be.


Wow... you guys are really ridiculous!

Scott 06.Feb.2005 05:37

The bellecourt's (the one's who say ward isnt an indian) have no evidence. And they are not even really indians themselves.

From here:  http://www.coloradoaim.org/why.html

There's too much evidence against their claims.
"Enrollment in a federally-recognized tribe is the point the Bellecourts, Standing Elk and others most fuss about. Their animus against Churchill outweighs any consideration of whether they should support a criterion consisting of certification from a non-Indian government the United States involving bureaucratic extinction of indigenous peoples, like the Abenaki of Vermont. Instead, NAIMI [National American Indian Movement Inc. A CORPORATION run by the bellecourt's!] insists that maintaining "tribal rolls" based upon criteria set by a non-Indian government is an important aspect of native self-determination. To be a "real" Indian, you must be enrolled. The procedure essentially deeds to the US government the privilege of determining who is or is not an Indian. There is a certain perverse logic to this argument in the baleful light of the assimilationist nature of US Indian policy since as early as 1880.52 But the Bellecourts' application of the rule is anything but consistent. For instance, they never suggest that imprisoned Chippewa/Sioux activist Leonard Peltier is not an Indian because he remains unenrolled, or denounce former AIM national spokesperson John Trudell, an unenrolled Santee, as an "impostor." Their behavior exempts IITC's Antonio Gonzales, a self-identified Seri, and Andrea Carmen, who claims to be a Yaqui.53 Hogwash washes both sides of the hog.

Yet in Churchill's case, federal certification isn't enough. Instead, the Bellecourts first trotted out David Cornsilk, a supposed "genealogist for the Cherokee Nation" to question Churchill's ancestry before the council of the Tahlequah, Oklahoma-based United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees (in which his roll number is R7627). The Keetoowah Band's refusal to impugn Churchill's status laid them open to bitter sniping.54 Cherokee Nation officials emphatically deny ever having employed Cornsilk as a genealogist.55 "David never had access to the material he'd need to form a legitimate opinion on Churchill's genealogy," says Cherokee artist Murv Jacobs. "He's just a guy who doesn't like Ward Churchill. As to the Bellecourt brothers, I wasn't aware that Chippewas had standing to decide who is and isn't Cherokee. Cherokee rolls are Cherokee business and nobody else's."56

The Keetoowah Band have their own genealogists. According to Band Chief John Ross, "When Ward applied for enrollment, and it should be pointed out that we invited him to do so, he had to provide documentation just like anybody else. We checked it out. He's who he says he is. End of story."57 The punchline is that the Keetoowahs formally verified that Churchill is "at least 3/16 Cherokee Indian by blood." This quantum accrues strictly from his lineage through his mother. "I was asked if I wanted to try to document my father's [Creek] side of things," Churchill recalls, "because he was at least as much Indian as Mom. But he's dead now. I never knew him, and I don't know my relatives on that side. So I just let it go. I make the reference in my self-identification out of respect, but I've never claimed the quantum because I don't believe in [quantum]. To me, it's no different whether I'm 3/16 or 3/8. You don't measure identity by either pounds or percentage points unless you're some kind of Nazi."58"

The Bellecourts support blood quantum when it comes to Churchill, but not apparently when it comes to themselves. According to Joe Geshick writing for the Ojibwe News (published in the heart of Bellecourt "territory"), tribal records reveal that the brothers themselves are "essentially Frenchmen, possessing only 1/32 degree of Indian blood," information that never finds its way into News From Indian Country.59 Despite Chief Ross and others' repeated corrections of his intentional error, Paul DeMain continues to refer to Churchill as an "honorary Keetoowah, like Bill Clinton," editorially overriding the band's own determination as to his status.60 The blood quantum criterion, as historically tainted as tribal enrollment, is the pseudoscientific negative of the kind of racist thinking that created the one drop rule whereby one drop of negro blood makes you a negro. Blood quantum erases indigenous people by making Indians technically not Indian. Bellecourt-style identity policing, ignoring logic, history, and his movement's supposed ends, does anything but reinforce native sovereignty.61


52. The "issue" is itself an irrelevancy in the Colorado AIM community, as chapter spokespersons Robert Chanate (enrolled Kiowa) and Josh Dillabaugh (enrolled Cheyenne River Sioux) put it in a letter published in the Colorado Daily on Dec. 16, 1993. With reference to a profile of Churchill by Jodi Rave, published in the Daily on Nov. 23, they state: Its "biased journalism gives a distorted view of the sentiments of native people. The article states that Ward Churchill '...by Indian standards, is not an Indian' because he is not an enrolled member of a federally recognized tribe. The article goes on to state that '...an attitude prevails in Indian Country: If you're not enrolled, you're not shit.' Actually, enrollment is not an 'Indian standard'; it is a standard imposed on indigenous people by the U.S. government."

53. Carmen identifies herself as being part of the "Yaqui Nation" of "California" despite the fact that California was never part of Yaqui territory, and that she herself lives in Alaska. Gonzales identifies himself as a "Seri/Chicano"; International Indian Treaty Council Speakers Bureau brochure (IITC's offices are located in San Francisco; contact information visavis the Speaker's Bureau is, however, listed as being Minneapolis, where NAIMI is situated).

54. Cornsilk is quoted in the above mentioned article by Jodi Rave-"Few who know Churchill are indifferent: Some critics question CU prof's 'Indianness'"-and falsely identified as "a genealogist for the Cherokee Nation." He also appeared at a meeting of the Keetoowah Cherokee Band Council in an unsuccessful effort to block Churchill's enrollment by the group, on the grounds that, among other things, Clyde and Vernon Bellecourt objected (video tape on file). Cornsilk also published a guest column titled "A threat to sovereignty: illegal Indian aliens" in the Dec. 12, 1993, issue of Indian Country Today in which he sides with Vernon Bellecourt, Suzan Harjo, Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell and "the rest" in denying that Churchill is of Cherokee descent, but offers nothing by which to substantiate (or even support) the statement.

55. Statement of the Enrollment Office, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Nov. 25, 1993.

56. Statement of Murv Jacobs, July 9, 1994.

57. Statement of Chief John Ross, July 11, 1994.

58. Statement of Ward Churchill, July 10, 1994; also see David Kamp, "Churchill honored with membership at Keetoowah council," Ojibwe News, July 22, 1994. Many others, incidentally, agree with Churchill on this. As Robert Scott Ladd put it ("The different faces of AIM"), "Racism divides Indian people. Some AIM factions have begun demanding to see people's tribal membership cards; I've seen confrontation within AIM in Colorado, and I've heard of tense incidents in California. It seems odd that an organization so concerned with racism should partake of the incredibly racist 'white' system of identifying Native Americans by blood quanta."

59. Joe Geshick, "Integrity of Bellecourt Brothers called into question again," Ojibwe News, Feb. 18, 1994; "Clyde pressures his employees." According to Sara Lawrence, an Ojibwe News editor, the Bellecourts' blood quantum cannot in fact be accurately computed at all since their mother is shown on the White Earth rolls as possessing no degree of Indian blood at all (this is correct; a complete copy of the pertinent records is on file).

60. Clinton was made an "Honorary Keetowah" in 1994. The accolade bears no suggestion of either Cherokee descent or genuine membership status within the Band. Churchill, on the other hand, is an Associate Member: one whose descent is verified at less than onequarter blood quantum, and who is under Keetoowah rules as much a member as anyone else other than that he does not vote or hold office. There is thus a substantial difference between Clinton's standing and Churchill's which DeMain has deliberately chosen to blur.

61. Put quite eloquently: "The 'identity police' [claim to be involved in] some sort of viable move toward ending the oppression of indigenous peoples. On the contrary, to oppose those who struggle for justice and selfdetermination is to align oneself with the oppressor. The movement for justice is being derailed by the identity police, who are nothing more than tools of the state in [its] efforts to divide and conquer. Once again, envy and personal vendettas will have served the oppressor's purpose"' (Chanate and Dillabaugh, Letter).


Why he has added Metis and Creek to his "indianness"

"In point of fact, there are five criteria by which native people are normally identified in the US-self-identification, genealogy, tribal enrollment, blood quantum and community recognition.41 Churchill qualifies by all five standards. Let's start with self-identification and genealogy. Contrary to Tim Giago's claim that Churchill has identified himself as being of different peoples at different times, the record is absolutely clear that he has always identified as Cherokee (his mother's lineage). The first conclusive evidence of this dates from a 1970 article on the Alcatraz occupation.42 By 1975, having met his father for the first and only time in the interim, he added Creek, as in the identification he gave for an art show he mounted at the Sioux Indian Museum that year.43 Thereafter, he added Métis -meaning one of mixed ancestry and culture - to accomplish what he called "truth in advertising."44 From 1979 onward, his self-descriptor was always "Creek/Cherokee Métis," nothing else. Churchill has publicly challenged Giago to produce evidence of any other self-identification.45 Giago has not responded."


41. See, e.g., Frank Anthony Ryan, Blood Quantum and Indian Education: A Working Paper (Cambridge, MA: National Advisory Commission on Indian Education, July 18, 1979).

42. Ward Churchill, "Warpath '70," Spiro: The Peoria Free Press, January 1970.

43. Ward Churchill: Paintings and Drawings (Rapid City, SD: Sioux Indian Museum and Craft Center, May 1975).

44. "Before that, I'd explicitly identified myself as being unenrolled," Churchill says. "That's reflected in the vitas I submitted to Black Hills State College in 1975, the Boulder Valley School District in 1976, and the University of Colorado in 1978, all of them presumably on file with the relevant personnel offices. But that left open the possibility, especially with respect to Cherokee, that I might be an unenrolled fullblood or something. So I adopted the term métis as being a more accurate self descriptor. Nobody except Tim Giago raised any fuss about it from 1979 until 1990 or 91, and that includes people like Vernon Bellecourt and Suzan Harjo."

45. One such challenge was issued after a talk at Concordia College, Moorhead, MN-which Giago had sought to preventÑin February 1992; "Churchill Lectures at Moorhead," The Circle, March 1992.

You MIGHT be a chump if...

Nobody 06.Feb.2005 08:15

Your favorite Indian radical is neither Indian nor a radical.

Ketoowah deny Churchills Membership- say his card is honorary like Clinton's

AIM 06.Feb.2005 09:22

Churchill's membership in tribe honorary only
By Stuart Steers,
Rocky Mountain News

February 4, 2005

The former chairman of the Keetoowah band of Cherokee Indians says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill was given an honorary membership that required no proof of Cherokee heritage.

John Ross led the tribe for several years in the 1990s. He says the Keetoowah established an "associate member" program to recognize friends of the tribe.

"If somebody helped out in a certain way, to honor them they'd give them an associate membership," Ross said Thursday. "There were 300 or 400 associate members."

Former President Clinton also was given an honorary membership in the tribe.

To be a full-fledged member of the Keetoowah, a person has to prove he or she is at least one-fourth Cherokee. Churchill has never had such a membership. Only full members are allowed to vote, hold office and receive tribal privileges.

Churchill has cited his associate membership in the tribe as proof of his Cherokee roots. He told The Denver Post on Wednesday he is three-sixteenths Cherokee. In the past, he has described himself as one-sixteenth Cherokee and also claimed to have Creek Indian blood. Ross said Churchill came to several Keetoowah celebrations in the early 1990s and befriended tribal members, who decided they wanted to give him the associate membership.

"He told the tribal council that if they needed him to lend a hand, he would," Ross said. He recalls Churchill offering to represent the tribe at an academic forum sponsored by the University of Arkansas.

Eventually, Ross came to feel the associate membership program was being abused, and he asked the tribal council to abolish it. The Keetoowah haven't given out any new associate memberships since 1994.

"There were a lot of people coming in and trying to use the associate memberships to elevate themselves," he said. "We decided we shouldn't give them out anymore and did away with it."

Ross said some of the associate members were people who started claiming to be Keetoowah artisans. He says Churchill is also misusing his associate membership status.

"In a sense, he's misleading people," Ross said. "He's like the others - that's what he's done."

Churchill did not return numerous phone calls during the past two days seeking comment.

Many non-Indians are now claiming Cherokee ancestry, said Richard Allen, a policy analyst with the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. The Keetoowah are a small offshoot of the much larger Cherokee Nation.

Allen has worked for the Cherokee Nation for more than 20 years. He said he has followed Churchill's career for much of that time.

"When it comes to Churchill, I've always thought he was a wannabe Indian," Allen said. "His history is a little bit like Forrest Gump."

Allen said Churchill picked up a packet to enroll in the Cherokee Nation in 1991 and never returned it.

Why am I not surprised...

Lamhrir 06.Feb.2005 09:50

LOL...this is just great. Disagree with what one man says (that though crudely phrased echoes the truth) and suddenly he is no longer 'respectable'. There are a number of closet Nazi/fascist sympathizers spewing venom and pulling strings all over the place and we find that Mr. Churchill whose statements are not Anti-Semitic (and are quite mild in comparison) is suddenly at the center of controversy. A gaggle of pea-brained hypocrites IS what most Americans ARE apparently and I hate to say it but 9/11 WAS the CLEAREST show that the proverbial chickens HAVE come home to roost. I truly pity anyone that doesn't see this fiasco for what it is: another attempt by the Powers That Be (tm) to silence and discredit yet another one of their most outspoken opponents. It boggles the mind just how stupid and gullible so many people are. Think about what the PTB have planned for ALL of US and all will be made clear...can you say: Police State? Good ;).

Interesting none of you Churchill defender will address the CIA/COnmtra issue!

Talk about Horse SHit 06.Feb.2005 10:13

You blow back crap from Ward's COAIM webiste and refer to listen to official statements from the Ketoowah Nation?

Left/right, scitz/scizm, 0/1

King Amdo 06.Feb.2005 14:44

...If he's not a Sandinista he must be a Contra....

I should think he's neither....but in fact outside of this mainstream modus. I don't know that much about the geezer, but it seems to me that he's under attack from the christians (in effect 'the beast'), and deserves solidarity and respect!

Again it is the Sacred Mother Witch that they hate so much and rape and destroy...they do this beacuse they (freemson christian 'order') are a function of pure evil ritual. Totally anathma to Native ritual. (OBVIOUSLY!) Nice graphics up there by the way!!! Sorry about the huge file I put up here, I don't know how to convert scanned stuff to text.

This (the dodge ritualk foundation) explains why american's etc are brain dead zombies...and communists, and that includes the Zapatista, are part of the problem...because they are also anti religious/occult.

Again, it has to be said, the solution starts within.

Blessed be.

Burning the Reichstag

Nobody 06.Feb.2005 21:26

One trick which has been commonly used for centuries against opposition movements is to commit some offensive act and blame it on them. In Nazi Germany, it was burning the Reichstag, which was done by a mentally unbalanced leftist manipulated by the German secret police.

In the case of the September 11 attacks we are dealing with rogue elements of the security forces themselves who have been not so much manipulated as simply allowed to carry out a much more sanguinary terror attack on a much greater scale. Thus the responsibility for the September 11 attacks is shared between Islamic feudalists of an outlook quite similar to the Taleban or the Iranian clergy and the U.S. security forces who armed and trained them and then stood passively by while they did their work.

The burning of the Reichstag was a great deal easier to defend than September 11. It had the same element of assault on the symbol of a fascist empire, only with the Reichstag fire, no one died. German leftists could certainly be forgiven if they felt a fleeting sense of glee at this destruction of a symbol, since there is no reason to feel special empathy for a falling BUILDING.

Still, defending the burning of the Reichstag was not the right thing to do, and would have played in to the hands of the Nazis, both at home and abroad. The German left at the time was a lot more sophisticated and resistant to manipulation than the U.S. left today, and because of this they did not fall for the trap. Instead, they worked to expose the responsibility of the Nazi government for the Reichstag fire.

Although this had relatively little effect domestically, it did a great deal to stoke the fires of anti-Nazi sentiment abroad. There can be little doubt that it was more successful than the alternative would have been.

A section of the U.S. left today IS falling for the trap, despite that the trap should be a great deal easier to see and avoid. Despite the enormous advances made by the U.S. empire on the strength of the September 11 attacks, and despite the enormous loss of entirely innocent life (children, Salvadoran and Puerto Rican workers in the lowest wage jobs, etc.) a section of the U.S. left continues to defend the September 11 attacks. This is SHEER STUPIDITY. That they are doing so at the behest of notorious and obvious agents of the U.S. security forces is a mark of precisely how NAIVE and CHILDISH they are.

People on this site who continue to defend Ward Churchill need to grow up and learn to tell a friend from an enemy.

This is not a game or a classroom debate. Pretty words and counter-charges don't change the notorious facts. People who have spent a year in jail, found themselves facing felony charges from left field, or had friends murdered by the police understand this. The rest of you need to meditate on it.

Churuchill starts to crack says it doesn't matter if he isn't Indian!

RMnews 07.Feb.2005 00:13

Prof's genealogy is sketchy; he offers little clarification
By Kevin Flynn, Rocky Mountain News
February 5, 2005
Ward Churchill traces part of his American Indian lineage to Joshua Tyner, a Revolutionary War veteran from Georgia.
But Tyner listed himself on the 1820 census as "white," and historical documents report that his mother was killed and scalped by Creek Indians.
Meanwhile, genealogy records researched by the Rocky Mountain News show that even if Joshua Tyner had been a full-blooded Indian, he would have provided Churchill with only one-sixty-fourth Indian blood.
Nevertheless, the fiery Churchill - who maintains that he is at least one-sixteenth Cherokee - has fashioned a controversial career of activism and education over injustices to America's indigenous people.
And, amid the controversy over his essay saying that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were in retribution for deadly American imperialism throughout the decades, he says he resents his background being traced like a pedigree for a dog.
"I am not accountable for making the particulars of my genealogy public knowledge or to respond to interrogation from a Cheyenne or a Chippewa or the Bureau of Indian Affairs, as far as I'm concerned," Churchill said.
He will not provide documentation of his heritage.
"I have never been confirmed as having one-quarter blood, and never said I was," Churchill said. "And even if (the critics) are absolutely right (about his lack of Indian ancestry), what does that have to do with this issue? I have never claimed to be goddamned Sitting Bull."
Officially, he maintains an associate membership, obtained in May 1994, from the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Tahlequah, Okla., two months before the band stopped issuing such memberships amid controversy over whether they were merited.
Unofficially, he says his wide acceptance for 25 years by the indigenous community as an Indian activist and advocate also demonstrates his heritage.
Churchill has claimed since high school days in Elmwood, Ill., near Peoria, that he has Indian blood, mostly from his mother's side. He claimed Tyner as an Indian and said that his grandmother, Minnie Billington, had some Creek Indian blood.
The News found no independent verification for the Billington claim. A Pope County, Ill., listing from the 1860s of able-bodied males eligible for Civil War service enlistees contains the name of Lawson Billington, the same name as Churchill's great- great-grandfather, but there was no claim that he had Indian blood.
Churchill has also claimed his father had some Indian ancestry as well, although in an interview 11 years ago, he said he didn't know much about his father's side of the family.
Churchill doesn't help out much when asked to document his lineage.
Instead, he waves it off by saying a Keetoowah researcher had documented the connection. But he hasn't provided any details.
Churchill and his allies have feuded with other Indian leaders, including Vernon Bellecourt, of the National American Indian Movement. Bellecourt, his allies and some other researchers call Churchill a white man masquerading as an Indian.
Churchill's unclear claim to Indian ancestry is a controversy that would exist with or without the feud with the Bellecourt faction, because of the lack of documentation.
To have one-sixteenth Cherokee blood, Churchill would have to have one great-great grandparent who was full-blooded, or two great-great-great grandparents, or so on, back through his lineage.
But the only ancestor Churchill has mentioned in interviews as having Indian blood - and who can be linked to him directly through his genealogy - is Joshua Tyner. Tyner was a young Revolutionary War veteran from Wilkes County, Ga.
Even if Tyner were a full-blooded Cherokee, an ancestor tree researched by Churchill's critics shows Tyner as Churchill's great-great-great-great-grandfather, seven generations removed. That would leave Churchill with only a one-sixty-fourth portion of Cherokee blood.
But there's no evidence Tyner had any Indian blood at all.
"Joshua Tyner was a white man," said Thomas Brown, a professor on the sociology faculty at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, who researched Churchill's background as part of his attacks on Churchill's academic record.
Likewise, research by the News into Tyner family genealogy found no evidence that Joshua Tyner was an Indian. Historical accounts from Georgia, in fact, claim the Tyner family was attacked in 1788 or 1789 by Creek Indians while the father, Richard, was away in revenge for some official action a family member had taken against the Creeks. Joshua's mother, Abigail, was killed and scalped, along with several of her eight children.
Richard Tyner later remarried, to a Cherokee woman, Sookie Dougherty, the family histories relate, and had seven more children, who would all be half Indian.
But Joshua Tyner, born in 1767, was Abigail's child. From this history, Churchill could only lay claim to having a great-great-great-great-great-stepgrandmother who was Indian, and not a blood relative.
In 1806, Joshua Tyner moved to southern Tennessee, then to southern Illinois in 1816 or 1817. He died there in 1838. One genealogy says he was buried "Indian style" in the Big Muddy River.
In the 1820 census for Franklin County, Ill., Tyner told the census taker he was white. And in an affidavit in 1832 while applying for a veteran's pension for his service in the Revolutionary War, Joshua Tyner said that during the war, he had engaged in a battle in Georgia with Indians in which men on both sides were killed.
In other interviews, Churchill has hinted that he is also related to Reubin Tyner, a Cherokee whose name appears on the 1817 Cherokee emigration list. Reubin Tyner later moved to Arkansas. But Churchill has offered no verification of this.

Churchill says "who cares if I'm not Indian"? AIM does!!!

AIM 07.Feb.2005 02:26

Prof's genealogy is sketchy; he offers little clarification
By Kevin Flynn, Rocky Mountain News
February 5, 2005
Ward Churchill traces part of his American Indian lineage to Joshua Tyner, a Revolutionary War veteran from Georgia.
But Tyner listed himself on the 1820 census as "white," and historical documents report that his mother was killed and scalped by Creek Indians.
Meanwhile, genealogy records researched by the Rocky Mountain News show that even if Joshua Tyner had been a full-blooded Indian, he would have provided Churchill with only one-sixty-fourth Indian blood.
Nevertheless, the fiery Churchill - who maintains that he is at least one-sixteenth Cherokee - has fashioned a controversial career of activism and education over injustices to America's indigenous people.
And, amid the controversy over his essay saying that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were in retribution for deadly American imperialism throughout the decades, he says he resents his background being traced like a pedigree for a dog.
"I am not accountable for making the particulars of my genealogy public knowledge or to respond to interrogation from a Cheyenne or a Chippewa or the Bureau of Indian Affairs, as far as I'm concerned," Churchill said.
He will not provide documentation of his heritage.
"I have never been confirmed as having one-quarter blood, and never said I was," Churchill said. "And even if (the critics) are absolutely right (about his lack of Indian ancestry), what does that have to do with this issue? I have never claimed to be goddamned Sitting Bull."
Officially, he maintains an associate membership, obtained in May 1994, from the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Tahlequah, Okla., two months before the band stopped issuing such memberships amid controversy over whether they were merited.
Unofficially, he says his wide acceptance for 25 years by the indigenous community as an Indian activist and advocate also demonstrates his heritage.
Churchill has claimed since high school days in Elmwood, Ill., near Peoria, that he has Indian blood, mostly from his mother's side. He claimed Tyner as an Indian and said that his grandmother, Minnie Billington, had some Creek Indian blood.
The News found no independent verification for the Billington claim. A Pope County, Ill., listing from the 1860s of able-bodied males eligible for Civil War service enlistees contains the name of Lawson Billington, the same name as Churchill's great-great-grandfather, but there was no claim that he had Indian blood.
Churchill has also claimed his father had some Indian ancestry as well, although in an interview 11 years ago, he said he didn't know much about his father's side of the family.
Churchill doesn't help out much when asked to document his lineage.
Instead, he waves it off by saying a Keetoowah researcher had documented the connection. But he hasn't provided any details.
Churchill and his allies have feuded with other Indian leaders, including Vernon Bellecourt, of the National American Indian Movement. Bellecourt, his allies and some other researchers call Churchill a white man masquerading as an Indian.
Joe Geshick, a full-blooded Ojibwe from Minneapolis who knows Bellecourt, sides with Churchill in the dispute. He said Bellecourt and his entourage don't like that they can't control Churchill or some of the other Colorado American Indian Movement leaders.
"Bellecourt just doesn't want to lose his power base," Geshick said.
But Churchill's unclear claim to Indian ancestry is a controversy that would exist with or without the feud with the Bellecourt faction, because of the lack of documentation.
To have one-sixteenth Cherokee blood, Churchill would have to have one great-great grandparent who was full-blooded, or two great-great-great grandparents, or so on, back through his lineage.
But the only ancestor Churchill has mentioned in interviews as having Indian blood - and who can be linked to him directly through his genealogy - is Joshua Tyner. Tyner was a young Revolutionary War veteran from Wilkes County, Ga.
Even if Tyner were a full-blooded Cherokee, an ancestor tree researched by Churchill's critics shows Tyner as Churchill's great-great-great-great-grandfather, seven generations removed. That would leave Churchill with only a one-sixty-fourth portion of Cherokee blood.
But there's no evidence Tyner had any Indian blood at all.
"Joshua Tyner was a white man," said Thomas Brown, a professor on the sociology faculty at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, who researched Churchill's background as part of his attacks on Churchill's academic record.
Likewise, research by the News into Tyner family genealogy found no evidence that Joshua Tyner was an Indian. Historical accounts from Georgia, in fact, claim the Tyner family was attacked in 1788 or 1789 by Creek Indians while the father, Richard, was away in revenge for some official action a family member had taken against the Creeks. Joshua's mother, Abigail, was killed and scalped, along with several of her eight children.
Richard Tyner later remarried, to a Cherokee woman, Sookie Dougherty, the family histories relate, and had seven more children, who would all be half Indian.
But Joshua Tyner, born in 1767, was Abigail's child. From this history, Churchill could only lay claim to having a great-great-great-great-great-stepgrandmother who was Indian, and not a blood relative.
In 1806, Joshua Tyner moved to southern Tennessee, then to southern Illinois in 1816 or 1817. He died there in 1838. One genealogy says he was buried "Indian style" in the Big Muddy River.
In the 1820 census for Franklin County, Ill., Tyner told the census taker he was white. And in an affidavit in 1832 while applying for a veteran's pension for his service in the Revolutionary War, Joshua Tyner said that during the war, he had engaged in a battle in Georgia with Indians in which men on both sides were killed.
In other interviews, Churchill has hinted that he is also related to Reubin Tyner, a Cherokee whose name appears on the 1817 Cherokee emigration list. Reubin Tyner later moved to Arkansas. But Churchill has offered no verification of this.

CU Regent Defends Churchill

vonda 07.Feb.2005 02:57

CU Regent defends Ward Churchill. Statement on-line at  http://www.thecherrycreeknews.com

I don't like indymedia

anonymous 07.Feb.2005 03:39

1) Why not tell people what he said?

2) Does anyone believe that comparing WTC victims to Eichmann would be less controversial if Churchill was white?

Ward Churchill's backgroun DOES matter

Paul Wolf 07.Feb.2005 05:00

I have to side with the Bellecourts, much as I dislike to involve myself in other people's fights. Ward Churchill has worked with the CIA and appears to be a provocateur. About five years ago I scanned his book, The COINTELPRO Papers and posted the entire book on my website, www.cointel.org, with his permission of course. Then I was contacted by various people and made aware of his background. The facts are that:

- Ward Churchill worked as a Public Information Officer in Vietnam, not as a truck driver. The Rocky Mtn News has requested his records - however, note that if he was working as an agent, there will be a duplicate, false military record as a cover.

 http://www.aimovement.org/csi/Churchill/churchill_resume_80.jpg

- He also worked for Soldier of Fortune magazine, which has always been a CIA front. Later he said he "infiltrated SOF". Good luck infiltrating a CIA front organization, they do check bona fides.

- The fact is that he split AIM by creating a splinter group. AIM had been subject to FBI disruption by provocateurs for years before he did that. Churchill went so far as to accuse the legitimate AIM leadership of murder and other crimes. It goes way beyond normal political infighting.

- He recruited mercenaries for the CIA- supported contras and admits this, as was shown above.

- He allegedly sabotaged negotiations between AIM and Saddam Hussein in Libya. This story was related to me in person by someone attending the Libya meeting.
A related document is the BBrown_Rmeans memo at  http://www.aimovement.org/csi/index.html

However you feel about his writing, or the abstract issues of freedom of speech, it does matter if Ward Churchill is an agent provocateur. I don't know whether he is or not, but his background is extremely disturbing.


Paul Wolf

Federal Government holocaust against Indians

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com 07.Feb.2005 06:05

Now, in our day and time of the 2000s Our federal government wants to apologize to the Americans Indians for it's holocaust they committed against them, or do they? The US Senate bill on the web page below was put forth last year, it did not pass!! Now a US Congressman has brought the bill back before this new congress we have, think it will pass this year of 2005? Call your congressman at: 202-225-3121 and see what he thinks about it?

2004 bill page
Republican Representative Sam Brownback of Kansas aided by the National Council of Americans
 http://www.unitednativeamerica.com/issues/res37.html

The new bill before US Congress
Your support is needed on this issue, contact your federal congressmen. Ask them to sign on in support of H.J. RES. 3
United States House of Representatives, 109th Congress, 1st Session: Member We

To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples... (Introduced in House)
HJ 3 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 3
To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2005
Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To acknowledge a long history of official depredations and ill-conceived policies by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes and offer an apology to all Native Peoples on behalf of the United States.

Whereas the ancestors of today's Native Peoples inhabited the land of the present-day United States since time immemorial and for thousands of years before the arrival of peoples of European descent;

Whereas the Native Peoples have for millennia honored, protected, and stewarded this land we cherish;

Whereas the Native Peoples are spiritual peoples with a deep and abiding belief in the Creator, and for millennia their peoples have maintained a powerful spiritual connection to this land, as is evidenced by their customs and legends;

Whereas the arrival of Europeans in North America opened a new chapter in the histories of the Native Peoples;

Whereas, while establishment of permanent European settlements in North America did stir conflict with nearby Indian tribes, peaceful and mutually beneficial interactions also took place;

Whereas the foundational English settlements in Jamestown, Virginia, and Plymouth, Massachusetts, owed their survival in large measure to the compassion and aid of the Native Peoples in their vicinities;

Whereas, in the infancy of the United States, the founders of the Republic expressed their desire for a just relationship with the Indian tribes, as evidenced by the Northwest Ordinance enacted by Congress in 1787, which begins with the phrase, `The utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the Indians';

Whereas Indian tribes provided great assistance to the fledgling Republic as it strengthened and grew, including invaluable help to Meriwether Lewis and William Clark on their epic journey from St. Louis, Missouri, to the Pacific Coast;

Whereas Native Peoples and non-Native settlers engaged in numerous armed conflicts;

Whereas the United States Government violated many of the treaties ratified by Congress and other diplomatic agreements with Indian tribes;

Whereas this Nation should address the broken treaties and many of the more ill-conceived Federal policies that followed, such as extermination, termination, forced removal and relocation, the outlawing of traditional religions, and the destruction of sacred places;

Whereas the United States forced Indian tribes and their citizens to move away from their traditional homelands and onto federally established and controlled reservations, in accordance with such Acts as the Indian Removal Act of 1830;

Whereas many Native Peoples suffered and perished--

(1) during the execution of the official United States Government policy of forced removal, including the infamous Trail of Tears and Long Walk;

(2) during bloody armed confrontations and massacres, such as the Sand Creek Massacre in 1864 and the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890; and

(3) on numerous Indian reservations;

Whereas the United States Government condemned the traditions, beliefs, and customs of the Native Peoples and endeavored to assimilate them by such policies as the redistribution of land under the General Allotment Act of 1887 and the forcible removal of Native children from their families to faraway boarding schools where their Native practices and languages were degraded and forbidden;

Whereas officials of the United States Government and private United States citizens harmed Native Peoples by the unlawful acquisition of recognized tribal land, the theft of resources from such territories, and the mismanagement of tribal trust funds;

Whereas the policies of the United States Government toward Indian tribes and the breaking of covenants with Indian tribes have contributed to the severe social ills and economic troubles in many Native communities today;

Whereas, despite continuing maltreatment of Native Peoples by the United States, the Native Peoples have remained committed to the protection of this great land, as evidenced by the fact that, on a per capita basis, more Native people have served in the United States Armed Forces and placed themselves in harm's way in defense of the United States in every major military conflict than any other ethnic group;

Whereas Indian tribes have actively influenced the public life of the United States by continued cooperation with Congress and the Department of the Interior, through the involvement of Native individuals in official United States Government positions, and by leadership of their own sovereign Indian tribes;

Whereas Indian tribes are resilient and determined to preserve, develop, and transmit to future generations their unique cultural identities;

Whereas the National Museum of the American Indian was established within the Smithsonian Institution as a living memorial to the Native Peoples and their traditions; and

Whereas Native Peoples are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that among those are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND APOLOGY
SECTION 1. The United States, acting through Congress--

(1) recognizes the special legal and political relationship the Indian tribes have with the United States and the solemn covenant with the land we share;

(2) commends and honors the Native Peoples for the thousands of years that they have stewarded and protected this land;

(3) acknowledges years of official depredations, ill-conceived policies, and the breaking of covenants by the United States Government regarding Indian tribes;

(4) apologizes on behalf of the people of the United States to all Native Peoples for the many instances of violence, maltreatment, and neglect inflicted on Native Peoples by citizens of the United States;

(5) expresses its regret for the ramifications of former offenses and its commitment to build on the positive relationships of the past and present to move toward a brighter future where all the people of this land live reconciled as brothers and sisters, and harmoniously steward and protect this land together;

(6) urges the President to acknowledge the offenses of the United States against Indian tribes in the history of the United States in order to bring healing to this land by providing a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and Indian tribes; and

(7) commends the State governments that have begun reconciliation efforts with recognized Indian tribes located in their boundaries and encourages all State governments similarly to work toward reconciling relationships with Indian tribes within their boundaries.

DISCLAIMER
SEC. 2. Nothing in this Joint Resolution authorizes any claim against the United States or serves as a settlement of any claim against the United States.

If you buy oil and gas you support terrorist

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com 07.Feb.2005 06:15

The federal government tells us if you buy drugs you support terrorist, if you have an education........Well, the federal government buys oil from the Middle East everyday and you buy it, so you and the federal government are supporting their cause!!! The terrorist!!!! GIVE ME A FREAKEN BREAK!! Can you read writeing and fulley understand it when you read it??? 9-11 belongs to the FEDERAL GOVERMENT!!! NOT WARD CHURCHILL!!!! HE JUST TOLD YOU WHY IT CAME ABOUT!

GET OVER IT!!!

"He's not Indian!"

repost 07.Feb.2005 10:39

The substantial effort to discredit Churchill' Native American identity buys into several of the dominant culture's racist assumptions and policies, ironically on the part of those who least stand to be served well by them. As in the attempts to link him to mainstream, right-wing or governmental agencies or organizations, the effort to destroy his credibility by playing the red race card is not only in itself racist but based on lies. The leader of the pack in this connection has always been Tim Giago, a notoriously anti-AIM South Dakota publisher who made his mark as chief propagandist and apologist for the lethally repressive COINTELPRO-supported Dickie Wilson régime on the Pine Ridge Reservation in the 70s.39 As early as 1988, trying to counter Churchill's exposés of what transpired on Pine Ridge during the 70s, Giago used his Republican-backed newspaper Lakota Times (now Indian Country Today), to announce that Churchill was an "ethnic fraud" and "impostor" who "changes his tribal identity like some people change socks."40

In point of fact, there are five criteria by which native people are normally identified in the US-self-identification, genealogy, tribal enrollment, blood quantum and community recognition.41 Churchill qualifies by all five standards. Let's start with self-identification and genealogy. Contrary to Tim Giago's claim that Churchill has identified himself as being of different peoples at different times, the record is absolutely clear that he has always identified as Cherokee (his mother's lineage). The first conclusive evidence of this dates from a 1970 article on the Alcatraz occupation.42 By 1975, having met his father for the first and only time in the interim, he added Creek, as in the identification he gave for an art show he mounted at the Sioux Indian Museum that year.43 Thereafter, he added Métis -meaning one of mixed ancestry and culture - to accomplish what he called "truth in advertising."44 From 1979 onward, his self-descriptor was always "Creek/Cherokee Métis," nothing else. Churchill has publicly challenged Giago to produce evidence of any other self-identification.45 Giago has not responded.

Meanwhile, Paul DeMain has repeatedly printed that his "investigations" (what these are is never made clear) into Churchill's genealogy reveal that because Churchill is not of American Indian descent, he "hides" his family history. Churchill responds that his family is as entitled to privacy as anyone else's: "I don't accept that these guys have any prerogative to hassle my 90-year-old grandmother, or my mother for that matter, and I don't recognize their right to inspect these personal records any more than I would if they demanded my credit history or medical file." Moreover, he has already published the relevant general information.46 According to AIM leader Russell Means, a long-term friend with whom Churchill once shared his family documents, "Not only does Ward have Indian ancestry, he has more proof of it than I do."47

As to community recognition, Churchill has been active in several. In Boulder, where he has lived the last twenty years, Churchill's record speaks for itself. He was hired as an Indian by the 'committee of the Boulder Valley School District's Title-IV Indian Education Project in 1977. He was hired as an Indian by the all-native staff of the American Indian Educational Opportunity Program at the University of Colorado Boulder campus in 1978.48 "He has always been accepted as an Indian by the Indians in this town," says Norbert S. Hill, Jr., an Oneida and former director of the Educational Opportunity Program, now head of the Boulder-based American Indian Science and Engineering Society. Hill cites that Churchill has been repeatedly honored by the Oyate Indian Student Organization at University of Colorado over the years. "I don't agree with him on a lot of things," Hill concludes, "but I've never known anybody who worked harder for Indian rights."49

In the Denver area, the story is the same. Bellecourtian accusations in the local press in 1993 provoked an outpouring of letters to the editor from Indians and others supporting Churchill, including one signed by the entirety of the Elders and leadership Councils of Colorado AIM.50 Both Churchill and Glenn Morris, another Bellecourt target, offered to resign their positions as codirectors of the chapter if the membership felt the publicity blitz was detrimental to Indian interests or were in any way uncomfortable about either of their identities. They unanimously reaffirmed both men's leadership.51

Enrollment in a federally-recognized tribe is the point the Bellecourts, Standing Elk and others most fuss about. Their animus against Churchill outweighs any consideration of whether they should support a criterion consisting of certification from a non-Indian government æ the United States æ involving bureaucratic extinction of indigenous peoples, like the Abenaki of Vermont. Instead, NAIMI insists that maintaining "tribal rolls" based upon criteria set by a non-Indian government is an important aspect of native self-determination. To be a "real" Indian, you must be enrolled. The procedure essentially deeds to the US government the privilege of determining who is or is not an Indian. There is a certain perverse logic to this argument in the baleful light of the assimilationist nature of US Indian policy since as early as 1880.52 But the Bellecourts' application of the rule is anything but consistent. For instance, they never suggest that imprisoned Chippewa/Sioux activist Leonard Peltier is not an Indian because he remains unenrolled, or denounce former AIM national spokesperson John Trudell, an unenrolled Santee, as an "impostor." Their behavior exempts IITC's Antonio Gonzales, a self-identified Seri, and Andrea Carmen, who claims to be a Yaqui.53 Hogwash washes both sides of the hog.

Yet in Churchill's case, federal certification isn't enough. Instead, the Bellecourts first trotted out David Cornsilk, a supposed "genealogist for the Cherokee Nation" to question Churchill's ancestry before the council of the Tahlequah, Oklahoma-based United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees (in which his roll number is R7627). The Keetoowah Band's refusal to impugn Churchill's status laid them open to bitter sniping.54 Cherokee Nation officials emphatically deny ever having employed Cornsilk as a genealogist.55 "David never had access to the material he'd need to form a legitimate opinion on Churchill's genealogy," says Cherokee artist Murv Jacobs. "He's just a guy who doesn't like Ward Churchill. As to the Bellecourt brothers, I wasn't aware that Chippewas had standing to decide who is and isn't Cherokee. Cherokee rolls are Cherokee business and nobody else's."56

The Keetoowah Band have their own genealogists. According to Band Chief John Ross, "When Ward applied for enrollment, and it should be pointed out that we invited him to do so, he had to provide documentation just like anybody else. We checked it out. He's who he says he is. End of story."57 The punchline is that the Keetoowahs formally verified that Churchill is "at least 3/16 Cherokee Indian by blood." This quantum accrues strictly from his lineage through his mother. "I was asked if I wanted to try to document my father's [Creek] side of things," Churchill recalls, "because he was at least as much Indian as Mom. But he's dead now. I never knew him, and I don't know my relatives on that side. So I just let it go. I make the reference in my self-identification out of respect, but I've never claimed the quantum because I don't believe in [quantum]. To me, it's no different whether I'm 3/16 or 3/8. You don't measure identity by either pounds or percentage points unless you're some kind of Nazi."58

The Bellecourts support blood quantum when it comes to Churchill, but not apparently when it comes to themselves. According to Joe Geshick writing for the Ojibwe News (published in the heart of Bellecourt "territory"), tribal records reveal that the brothers themselves are "essentially Frenchmen, possessing only 1/32 degree of Indian blood," information that never finds its way into News From Indian Country.59 Despite Chief Ross and others' repeated corrections of his intentional error, Paul DeMain continues to refer to Churchill as an "honorary Keetoowah, like Bill Clinton," editorially overriding the band's own determination as to his status.60 The blood quantum criterion, as historically tainted as tribal enrollment, is the pseudoscientific negative of the kind of racist thinking that created the one drop rule whereby one drop of negro blood makes you a negro. Blood quantum erases indigenous people by making Indians technically not Indian. Bellecourt-style identity policing, ignoring logic, history, and his movement's supposed ends, does anything but reinforce native sovereignty.61

It was such historical and political considerations that led Churchill to oppose the Act for the Protection of Indian Arts and Crafts in 1990. This act made it a federal crime for an artist to identify as an Indian without the official sanction of the government, that is, tribal enrollment.62 At this point, Federal lobbyist Suzan Shown Harjo, who actively promoted the bill by arguing that it should cover not just visual artists but writers, scholars, educators and many others, joined the anti-Churchill bandwagon.63 Another voice in the chorus was that of David Bradley, an artist from Santa Fe and leader of the law's cheering section. Churchill had openly accused him of selling out the unenrolled, by trying to boost his own sales at the expense of other native painters with a "blatantly racist restraint of trade measure" involving a "direct usurpation of indigenous rights by federal authorities."64 Eventually, Paul DeMain, who claims to have conducted a "two-year investigation" into Churchill's family tree without being able "to confirm a single Indian relative, let alone one real relative who can vouch for his tribal descent," added his voice to the babble.65

The Bellecourts frequently cite an "investigation" of Churchill by the University of Colorado. Operating on the racist assumption that Churchill's "Indianness" specially qualified him to teach subjects related to Indians and that such an assumption influenced his university's hiring him, Vernon Bellecourt made an appointment with University President Judith Albino in October 1993 to accuse Ward of ethnic fraud and misuse of public resources."66 President Albino then received an information packet from Carole Standing Elk and a letter from Suzan Shown Harjo expressing concern for the "safety of students" in Churchill's classes.67

The fraud charge was dismissed on its face, as Bellecourt was informed in writing a month later.68 As required by state law, the University responded to the allegation of misappropriation with an audit. Ward was fully exonerated: "It became painfully obvious that Mr. Bellecourt's accusations were completely gratuitous and intended as harassment," says Dr. Evelyn Hu-DeHart, director of the Department of Ethnic Studies where Churchill is a professor.69 Harjo's claims that Churchill's students were victims of "physical intimidation" could be dismissed even more readily. Anonymous student evaluations of Churchill's classroom performance rate him at the A level not only for the semester of Harjo's complaint, but for every semester, his cumulative teaching evaluations ranking in the top five percent of all Boulder faculty. Ironically, while under attack from these quarters, Churchill received the 1994 Teaching Excellence Award from the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences, one in a long string of teaching recognitions.70 "We concluded that Ward Churchill is one of our more productive and distinguished faculty members," says Dean of Arts and Sciences Charles Middleton.71 Standing Elk, Harjo and Bellecourt were all duly informed of this outcome more than two years ago, yet NAIMI continues to present this "investigation" as ongoing, never mentioning that it occurred solely through their own instigation.

NOTES:
39. See, e.g., Giago's eulogy to Wilson in Lakota Times on Feb. 13, 1990. In a subsequent editorial, Giago asserted that contrary to the contentions of researchers like Churchill, who places the confirmed bodycount at 69, his own investigators had found evidence supporting "only 10" AIM members having been murdered by Wilson's GOONs on Pine Ridge between March 1973 and March 1976; Tim Giago, "Facts and figures tell true story of Wounded Knee, '73," Indian Country Today, Nov. 10, 1993.

40. It is noteworthy that NAIMI picked up this entirely spurious allegation-"You, Mr. Churchill, after a period of time [in] which you declared yourself a member of various Indian groups..."-at page 6 of its November 24, 1993, letter of expulsion addressed to Churchill and Glen (sic) Morris. Also interesting is the analysis of Giago offered by one of his own relatives in a letter to Churchill on Sept. 21, 1992 (copy on file): "He has a deeprooted insecurity about his own Indianness, and because of this, he often attacks others about their Indianness... Tim Giago is an unscrupulous user of Indian people."

41. See, e.g., Frank Anthony Ryan, Blood Quantum and Indian Education: A Working Paper (Cambridge, MA: National Advisory Commission on Indian Education, July 18, 1979).

42. Ward Churchill, "Warpath '70," Spiro: The Peoria Free Press, January 1970.

43. Ward Churchill: Paintings and Drawings (Rapid City, SD: Sioux Indian Museum and Craft Center, May 1975).

44. "Before that, I'd explicitly identified myself as being unenrolled," Churchill says. "That's reflected in the vitas I submitted to Black Hills State College in 1975, the Boulder Valley School District in 1976, and the University of Colorado in 1978, all of them presumably on file with the relevant personnel offices. But that left open the possibility, especially with respect to Cherokee, that I might be an unenrolled fullblood or something. So I adopted the term métis as being a more accurate selfdescriptor. Nobody except Tim Giago raised any fuss about it from 1979 until 1990 or 91, and that includes people like Vernon Bellecourt and Suzan Harjo."

45. One such challenge was issued after a talk at Concordia College, Moorhead, MN-which Giago had sought to preventÑin February 1992; "Churchill Lectures at Moorhead," The Circle, March 1992.

46. "Start with Ruben Tyner, on the 1817 Cherokee Emigration Roll, and work your way forward. Perhaps you'll end up, if you connect the dots correctly, not only with the Tyners, but with the Allens and Julia Churchill as well, on the 18981914 Dawes/Quion Miller Rolls"; Churchill, "On my identity."

47. Williamson, Letter.

48. The nature of the hiring process is a matter of record with the school district, and is confirmed by Roseanna Sneed (enrolled Eastern Cherokee) and Sarah Carufel Williams (enrolled Lac du Flambeau Chippewa) who were members of the parents' hiring committee.

49. Statement of Norbert S. Hill, Jr., May 13, 1994. Oyate awards were bestowed on Churchill in 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1989 and 1993 (copies of certificates on file).

50. The letter, signed by Joe D. Locust, Sr., Vivian Nelson Locust, Lillian Fobb, Loma Star Yellow Wood Williams, Sylvia Crippen, Don Kaulity and George 'Tink' Tinker (Elders Council), and Melissa Stone Road, Douglas Remington, Ted Roy, Josh Dillabaugh, Vicci Anderson, Jo Wilkerson, Michelle Wolf, Tony Beltham, Jennifer Williams and Carol Berry (Leadership Council), and was published under the heading "Churchill a longstanding member of AIM leadership," Colorado Daily, February 25, 1994. Another letter, signedoff by more than a hundred chapter members, was not published.

51. Russell Means, "Churchill is a committed Indian leader," Colorado Daily, Jan. 18, 1994. Also see Russell Means, "Those who disparage AIM leaders are wrong," Colorado Daily, Dec. 1, 1993.

52. The "issue" is itself an irrelevancy in the Colorado AIM community, as chapter spokespersons Robert Chanate (enrolled Kiowa) and Josh Dillabaugh (enrolled Cheyenne River Sioux) put it in a letter published in the Colorado Daily on Dec. 16, 1993. With reference to a profile of Churchill by Jodi Rave, published in the Daily on Nov. 23, they state: Its "biased journalism gives a distorted view of the sentiments of native people. The article states that Ward Churchill '...by Indian standards, is not an Indian' because he is not an enrolled member of a federallyrecognized tribe. The article goes on to state that '...an attitude prevails in Indian Country: If you're not enrolled, you're not shit.' Actually, enrollment is not an 'Indian standard'; it is a standard imposed on indigenous people by the U.S. government."

53. Carmen identifies herself as being part of the "Yaqui Nation" of "California" despite the fact that California was never part of Yaqui territory, and that she herself lives in Alaska. Gonzales identifies himself as a "Seri/Chicano"; International Indian Treaty Council Speakers Bureau brochure (IITC's offices are located in San Francisco; contact information visavis the Speaker's Bureau is, however, listed as being Minneapolis, where NAIMI is situated).

54. Cornsilk is quoted in the abovementioned article by Jodi Rave-"Few who know Churchill are indifferent: Some critics question CU prof's 'Indianness'"-and falsely identified as "a genealogist for the Cherokee Nation." He also appeared at a meeting of the Keetoowah Cherokee Band Council in an unsuccessful effort to block Churchill's enrollment by the group, on the grounds that, among other things, Clyde and Vernon Bellecourt objected (video tape on file). Cornsilk also published a guest column titled "A threat to sovereignty: illegal Indian aliens" in the Dec. 12, 1993, issue of Indian Country Today in which he sides with Vernon Bellecourt, Suzan Harjo, Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell and "the rest" in denying that Churchill is of Cherokee descent, but offers nothing by which to substantiate (or even support) the statement.

55. Statement of the Enrollment Office, Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Nov. 25, 1993.

56. Statement of Murv Jacobs, July 9, 1994.

57. Statement of Chief John Ross, July 11, 1994.

58. Statement of Ward Churchill, July 10, 1994; also see David Kamp, "Churchill honored with membership at Keetoowah council," Ojibwe News, July 22, 1994. Many others, incidentally, agree with Churchill on this. As Robert Scott Ladd put it ("The different faces of AIM"), "Racism divides Indian people. Some AIM factions have begun demanding to see people's tribal membership cards; I've seen confrontation within AIM in Colorado, and I've heard of tense incidents in California. It seems odd that an organization so concerned with racism should partake of the incredibly racist 'white' system of identifying Native Americans by blood quanta."

59. Joe Geshick, "Integrity of Bellecourt Brothers called into question again," Ojibwe News, Feb. 18, 1994; "Clyde pressures his employees." According to Sara Lawrence, an Ojibwe News editor, the Bellecourts' blood quantum cannot in fact be accurately computed at all since their mother is shown on the White Earth rolls as possessing no degree of Indian blood at all (this is correct; a complete copy of the pertinent records is on file).

60. Clinton was made an "Honorary Keetowah" in 1994. The accolade bears no suggestion of either Cherokee descent or genuine membership status within the Band. Churchill, on the other hand, is an Associate Member: one whose descent is verified at less than onequarter blood quantum, and who is under Keetoowah rules as much a member as anyone else other than that he does not vote or hold office. There is thus a substantial difference between Clinton's standing and Churchill's which DeMain has deliberately chosen to blur.

61. Put quite eloquently: "The 'identity police' [claim to be involved in] some sort of viable move toward ending the oppression of indigenous peoples. On the contrary, to oppose those who struggle for justice and selfdetermination is to align oneself with the oppressor. The movement for justice is being derailed by the identity police, who are nothing more than tools of the state in [its] efforts to divide and conquer. Once again, envy and personal vendettas will have served the oppressor's purpose"' (Chanate and Dillabaugh, Letter).

62. The Act, Public Law 101644 (104 Stat. 4662) was signed by George Bush on November 29, 1990. It makes it a crime punishable by fines of up to $1 million and as much as fifteen years federal imprisonment for anyone not officially recognized as such to identify themselves as an American Indian when selling arts or crafts. Churchill's major response was published under the title "Nobody' Pet Poodle: Jimmie Durham, an Artist for Native North America" in Crazy Horse Spirit (Summer 1992) and is included in his Indians Are Us?. His remarks on Bradley were made in response to a question at the conclusion of a public lecture at the University of New Mexico on April 15, 1992.

63. Suzan Shown Harjo, "Harjo responds to writers' series," Indian Country Today, Sept. 29, 1993; "Suzan Harjo: Churchill has come out of his closet," Indian Country Today, Dec. 8, 1993. The first reference is to a threepart series by Indian Country Today staff writer Jerry Reynolds, "Indian writers: the good, the bad and the could be," run in the paper during September and October 1993.

64. See, e.g., David Bradley, "Colorado newspapers side with Ward," Indian Country Today, Dec. 22, 1993; "Churchill's 'unnaturally hateful' tactics," Indian Country Today, MidAugust 1994; "The tribes decide," San Francisco Weekly, Nov. 10, 1993; "Jodi Rave is a student hero," Colorado Daily, Jan. 13, 1994; and undated, xeroxed circular, "The Columbus Syndrome and Ward Churchill, Chief of the Wannabees, a Tribe of the Master Race" (copy on file), excerpts from which were first published in the NovemberDecember 1992 issue of Crazy Horse Spirit and reprinted in News From Indian Country in late June 1994. Bradley also contacted one of Churchill's publishers, Common Courage Press, with a threat to file suit if Indians Are Us? was not immediately withdrawn from distribution; he was told by Common Courage attorney Edward Copeland to take a hike in correspondence dated March 29, 1994 (copy on file). It has always been assumed that Bradley has been fronting for Suzan Harjo. While this is probably true, a handwritten notation he made in the margin of a fax he sent to NAIMI in 1993 (copy on file) makes it clear he's been receiving instruction from Vernon Bellecourt as well.

65. DeMain, "Sovereignty."

66. Memo from Marilyn Decalo, Assistant to President Judith Albino, to L. Louise Romero, University Legal Counsel, Dec. 13, 1993 (copy on file).

67. Dr. Evelyn Hu-DeHart reported to Dean Charles Middleton that "In a letter addressed to Marilyn Decala [sic] of CU, dated December 27, 1993, [Standing Elk] enclosed 18 items-which she annotated and offered as supporting material for her charges against Prof. Churchill. Many of the items were written by Ms. Standing Elk herself or issued by organizations she is closely associated with, i.e., National AIM." Hu-DeHart further reported that Harjo made her claims in a letter dated March 9, 1994 (copy on file). Harjo also claimed that Churchill had physically menaced her during a conference at the University of Colorado, and that she was thereafter afraid to set foot on the campus. Dr. Vine Deloria, Jr., who had organized the conference, and Dr. Deward E. Walker, who was in attendance, stated categorically that the "incident" recounted by Harjo had never occurred; HuDeHart, Report, October 10, 1994 (copy on file).

68. "Even if Mr. Churchill is not an American Indian, as he claims, Title VII protects Caucasians as well as persons of color. Further, it has always been University policy that a person's race or ethnicity is selfproving. This University policy regarding selfidentification is consistent with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has taken the position that observation and selfidentification are the most reliable indicators of one's racial grouping"; letter from Chancellor James Corbridge to Vernon Bellecourt, April 19, 1994 (copy on file).

69. HuDeHart, Report. HuDeHart's assessment corresponds very well with the tactics described by Ojibwe News editor Sara Lawrence in a letter written to CU President Albino in support of Churchill on April 6, 1994 (copy on file): "Unfortunately, many others have had to endure the Bellecourts' brand of smear tactics that are currently being inflicted on Mr. Churchill. They always operate in the same manner, starting out with a series of vicious rumors, followed by the famous words 'He/She's not a real Indian!' if the person is lightskinned, and utilizing, 'He/She's an FBI informant!' if the individual passes the scrutiny of the 'purity police.' Then they proceed to harassment of the individual's employer, funder, sponsor, etc., and speaking in loud, authoritative voices they try to preach their way to intimidation, all the while threatening legal action. Sadly, we in Minnesota know their ways well."

70. This was added to the already-received honorariums of the President's University Service Award (1987), Robert L. Stearns Alumni Service Award (1989), Thomas Jefferson Award (1990), College of Arts & Sciences Writing Award (1992), and honorary doctorate from Alfred University (1992); HuDeHart, Report (evaluations and certificate on file). As concerns the "misuse of institutional resources" allegation, HuDeHart concluded that, "I find no evidence to support this charge. Since joining the [Ethnic Studies] faculty, Ward Churchill uses only plain white paper, his home address, and his name without his university title or affiliation in any nonuniversity related business. He has not traveled at university expense. He has the lowest xerox charge of any faculty member [in the unit], the lowest phone charge, and practically never uses the university's long distance line. He uses his office...only to conduct university business, such as meet with students."

71. Statement by Dean Charles Middleton, Nov. 29, 1994; the same date, Dean Middleton formally approved a request by Churchill's home department to "clear him of these scurrilous charges."

Repost from:

 http://www.coloradoaim.org/why.html

Ward backs off his claim to Indian Heritage!!

RMN 07.Feb.2005 14:30

Churchill Says "What if I'm not Indian as it becomes more clear He isn't Indian
aim 07 Feb 2005 02:25 GMT

Rocky Mountain News in depth probe of Churchill's Indian heritage shows the people he calims to be related to who are Indian in fact are not!
Prof's genealogy is sketchy; he offers little clarification
By Kevin Flynn, Rocky Mountain News
February 5, 2005
Ward Churchill traces part of his American Indian lineage to Joshua Tyner, a Revolutionary War veteran from Georgia.
But Tyner listed himself on the 1820 census as "white," and historical documents report that his mother was killed and scalped by Creek Indians.
Meanwhile, genealogy records researched by the Rocky Mountain News show that even if Joshua Tyner had been a full-blooded Indian, he would have provided Churchill with only one-sixty-fourth Indian blood.
Nevertheless, the fiery Churchill - who maintains that he is at least one-sixteenth Cherokee - has fashioned a controversial career of activism and education over injustices to America's indigenous people.
And, amid the controversy over his essay saying that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were in retribution for deadly American imperialism throughout the decades, he says he resents his background being traced like a pedigree for a dog.
"I am not accountable for making the particulars of my genealogy public knowledge or to respond to interrogation from a Cheyenne or a Chippewa or the Bureau of Indian Affairs, as far as I'm concerned," Churchill said.
He will not provide documentation of his heritage.
"I have never been confirmed as having one-quarter blood, and never said I was," Churchill said. "And even if (the critics) are absolutely right (about his lack of Indian ancestry), what does that have to do with this issue? I have never claimed to be goddamned Sitting Bull."
Officially, he maintains an associate membership, obtained in May 1994, from the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Tahlequah, Okla., two months before the band stopped issuing such memberships amid controversy over whether they were merited.
Unofficially, he says his wide acceptance for 25 years by the indigenous community as an Indian activist and advocate also demonstrates his heritage.
Churchill has claimed since high school days in Elmwood, Ill., near Peoria, that he has Indian blood, mostly from his mother's side. He claimed Tyner as an Indian and said that his grandmother, Minnie Billington, had some Creek Indian blood.
The News found no independent verification for the Billington claim. A Pope County, Ill., listing from the 1860s of able-bodied males eligible for Civil War service enlistees contains the name of Lawson Billington, the same name as Churchill's great-great-grandfather, but there was no claim that he had Indian blood.
Churchill has also claimed his father had some Indian ancestry as well, although in an interview 11 years ago, he said he didn't know much about his father's side of the family.
Churchill doesn't help out much when asked to document his lineage.
Instead, he waves it off by saying a Keetoowah researcher had documented the connection. But he hasn't provided any details.
Churchill and his allies have feuded with other Indian leaders, including Vernon Bellecourt, of the National American Indian Movement. Bellecourt, his allies and some other researchers call Churchill a white man masquerading as an Indian.
Joe Geshick, a full-blooded Ojibwe from Minneapolis who knows Bellecourt, sides with Churchill in the dispute. He said Bellecourt and his entourage don't like that they can't control Churchill or some of the other Colorado American Indian Movement leaders.
"Bellecourt just doesn't want to lose his power base," Geshick said.
But Churchill's unclear claim to Indian ancestry is a controversy that would exist with or without the feud with the Bellecourt faction, because of the lack of documentation.
To have one-sixteenth Cherokee blood, Churchill would have to have one great-great grandparent who was full-blooded, or two great-great-great grandparents, or so on, back through his lineage.
But the only ancestor Churchill has mentioned in interviews as having Indian blood - and who can be linked to him directly through his genealogy - is Joshua Tyner. Tyner was a young Revolutionary War veteran from Wilkes County, Ga.
Even if Tyner were a full-blooded Cherokee, an ancestor tree researched by Churchill's critics shows Tyner as Churchill's great-great-great-great-grandfather, seven generations removed. That would leave Churchill with only a one-sixty-fourth portion of Cherokee blood.
But there's no evidence Tyner had any Indian blood at all.
"Joshua Tyner was a white man," said Thomas Brown, a professor on the sociology faculty at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, who researched Churchill's background as part of his attacks on Churchill's academic record.
Likewise, research by the News into Tyner family genealogy found no evidence that Joshua Tyner was an Indian. Historical accounts from Georgia, in fact, claim the Tyner family was attacked in 1788 or 1789 by Creek Indians while the father, Richard, was away in revenge for some official action a family member had taken against the Creeks. Joshua's mother, Abigail, was killed and scalped, along with several of her eight children.


Again the Left eats its own

Shadow Merchant 07.Feb.2005 17:17

Hah, I love to see stupid fucking leftist assholes turning on each other.

How does it feel to be a useless, marginalized piece of dung stuck under the heel of the mighty Right, shrieking impotently from the margins of society? Get used to it, it's only going to get worse.

This is just the beginning, you commie scum. We're going to shovel a lot more shit out of our universities before this is over.

Whites decide who is Ketoowah and not the tribe?

What assholes! 07.Feb.2005 17:20

Prof's Indian roots disputed
By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
February 3, 2005

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is not a member of their tribe.

"He's not in the database at all and is not a member of the Keetoowah," said Georgia Mauldin, the tribal clerk in Tahlequah, Okla.

Prof's Indian roots disputed
By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
February 3, 2005

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is not a member of their tribe.

"He's not in the database at all and is not a member of the Keetoowah," said Georgia Mauldin, the tribal clerk in Tahlequah, Okla.



Ward's roots disputed by Ketoowah Band he claims to belong to

AIM 07.Feb.2005 17:29

Prof's Indian roots disputed
By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
February 3, 2005
The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is not a member of their tribe.
"He's not in the database at all and is not a member of the Keetoowah," said Georgia Mauldin, the tribal clerk in Tahlequah, Okla.
In his books and articles, Churchill has described himself as a member of the Keetoowah Cherokee tribe in Oklahoma. In past interviews, he's claimed to be one-sixteenth Cherokee.
But the Keetoowah say that's not true.
Attempts to contact Churchill for comment Wednesday on his background were unsuccessful. But Churchill's claim to American Indian roots has been challenged repeatedly by people in that community.
One Montana woman has an especially personal tale of confronting Churchill on his claim to American Indian heritage. She was taking one of Churchill's classes at CU in 1994 when she wrote an article for the Colorado Daily newspaper, saying there was no evidence he had any American Indian background.
"For so long it was whispered on campus that he really isn't an Indian," said Jodi Rave, who studied journalism at CU. "Here you had the director of the Indian studies program and he's not an Indian."
Rave is a Mandan-Hidatsa Indian originally from North Dakota. Today, she is a reporter and columnist with the Missoulian newspaper in Missoula, Mont. She was recently a fellow in the prestigious Nieman program for journalists at Harvard University.
In one of her journalism classes at CU, Rave was assigned to write a profile, and she decided to profile Churchill.
"To have somebody of that stature masquerading as an Indian was intriguing to me," Rave said. "On two separate days I asked him questions. I was up-front in asking him questions (about his background)."
Rave says she discovered that Churchill had enrolled in the Keetoowah tribe under a program initiated by a former tribal chairman that let almost anyone sign up. She says the Keetoowah later discontinued that program and disenrolled the people who had joined under it.
When her article came out, Rave says Churchill was furious and insisted that he did have American Indian lineage.
"He called me and said, 'Jodi Rave, this is your professor and I need to talk to you right away.' He was surprised I had a story published that called into question his identity."
He also defended his American Indian background and said her story was unfair.
Rave said she was enrolled in one of Churchill's classes when the article came out, and her grade went from an A to a C-minus.
She says Churchill can write what he wants, but his claim of American Indian heritage is bogus.
"There's no denying what he writes resonates with a lot of people, but when he says this is something he's experienced as a Native American man, that's fraudulent," Rave said.
The question of who is and who is not an American Indian is a sensitive one in that community. Many Indians resent the idea that only those who grew up on a reservation or have two American Indian parents are real Indians.
"Tracking blood lines is the business of Nazi Germany and South Africa (under apartheid)," said professor George Tinker, who teaches American Indian culture and religious tradition at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver. "That's not an Indian issue at all."
Tinker said that it should be up to the tribes themselves to decide who is an Indian.
The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee
• The word A-ni-kee-too-wah-gee ("Keetoowah people") was used by Cherokee speakers to refer to themselves. Kituhwa was the mother town of the Cherokees; its location, probably in present- day North Carolina, is now lost in the past.
• The Keetoowah Society was formed in 1859 by Cherokees transplanted to Okla- homa on the "Trail of Tears" as a way of preserving cultural traditions.
• The United Keetoowah Band is a part of the Tahlequah, Okla.-based Cherokee Nation. It was formed from various Cherokeee subgroups after passage of the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act in 1936, and it was recognized by Congress in 1949.Source: Www.Cherokeeobserver.Org

Churchill is NOT American Indian

Stuart Steers 07.Feb.2005 17:57

In his books and articles, Churchill has described himself as a member of the Keetoowah Cherokee tribe in Oklahoma. In past interviews, he's claimed to be one-sixteenth Cherokee.

But the Keetoowah say that's not true.

Attempts to contact Churchill for comment Wednesday on his background were unsuccessful. But Churchill's claim to American Indian roots has been challenged repeatedly by people in that community.

One Montana woman has an especially personal tale of confronting Churchill on his claim to American Indian heritage. She was taking one of Churchill's classes at CU in 1994 when she wrote an article for the Colorado Daily newspaper, saying there was no evidence he had any American Indian background.

"For so long it was whispered on campus that he really isn't an Indian," said Jodi Rave, who studied journalism at CU. "Here you had the director of the Indian studies program and he's not an Indian."

Rave is a Mandan-Hidatsa Indian originally from North Dakota. Today, she is a reporter and columnist with the Missoulian newspaper in Missoula, Mont. She was recently a fellow in the prestigious Nieman program for journalists at Harvard University.

In one of her journalism classes at CU, Rave was assigned to write a profile, and she decided to profile Churchill.

"To have somebody of that stature masquerading as an Indian was intriguing to me," Rave said. "On two separate days I asked him questions. I was up-front in asking him questions (about his background)."

Rave says she discovered that Churchill had enrolled in the Keetoowah tribe under a program initiated by a former tribal chairman that let almost anyone sign up. She says the Keetoowah later discontinued that program and disenrolled the people who had joined under it.

When her article came out, Rave says Churchill was furious and insisted that he did have American Indian lineage.

"He called me and said, 'Jodi Rave, this is your professor and I need to talk to you right away.' He was surprised I had a story published that called into question his identity."

He also defended his American Indian background and said her story was unfair.

Rave said she was enrolled in one of Churchill's classes when the article came out, and her grade went from an A to a C-minus.

She says Churchill can write what he wants, but his claim of American Indian heritage is bogus.

"There's no denying what he writes resonates with a lot of people, but when he says this is something he's experienced as a Native American man, that's fraudulent," Rave said.

The question of who is and who is not an American Indian is a sensitive one in that community. Many Indians resent the idea that only those who grew up on a reservation or have two American Indian parents are real Indians.

"Tracking blood lines is the business of Nazi Germany and South Africa (under apartheid)," said professor George Tinker, who teaches American Indian culture and religious tradition at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver. "That's not an Indian issue at all."

Tinker said that it should be up to the tribes themselves to decide who is an Indian.

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee

• The word A-ni-kee-too-wah-gee ("Keetoowah people") was used by Cherokee speakers to refer to themselves. Kituhwa was the mother town of the Cherokees; its location, probably in present- day North Carolina, is now lost in the past.

• The Keetoowah Society was formed in 1859 by Cherokees transplanted to Okla- homa on the "Trail of Tears" as a way of preserving cultural traditions.

• The United Keetoowah Band is a part of the Tahlequah, Okla.-based Cherokee Nation. It was formed from various Cherokeee subgroups after passage of the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act in 1936, and it was recognized by Congress in 1949.Source: Www.Cherokeeobserver.Org




 steerss@RockyMountainNews.com or 303-892-2282

Another questin I would like answered

Nobody 07.Feb.2005 18:39

In the interview posted as comments to this article, Ward reveals that he doesn't actually have a doctorate. He just has an honorary doctorate from a little-known school in upstate New York.

Could someone please explain to me how someone who doesn't even have a proper doctorate came to be department head a major university? Usually they wouldn't let a person like that even teach a class anywhere above community college.

I can't see any way other than friends in high places.

Federal Government Holocaust Against Indians

Mike 07.Feb.2005 20:22

The federal government brought the terrorist to the good old USA!!! It started back in 1974...remember? If you buy oil and gas your supporting terrorist, FACT!

The oil selling countries in the Middles are training their men to come at us. We are buying oil from them, get an education!!!!

How else would these sand people have the money to come to America???? Get it now?

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Ward Churchill just told you the same thing I did here, fire me!!! Sadam and Ben Laden are the most wanted men in the world!!! Your federal government gave them your tax dollars for over 40 years for their support in the Middle East to fight against the USSR, when that war was over they came after the USA. Now it's our turn to pay for Middles East OIL!!! That is what it's about!!! Get over it!!! Ward Churchill just told you what the terrorist are doing to the USA and why!!!

People in the Towers worked for the USA companies in the Middle East. He stated, how would you take them out? Well, they had two chances and they did it, now we all have to live with the fact that our government did not do it's job in taking care of US! But just look at all your tax dollars now going to the Middle East again, what do you thank about that?? You just can't handle the truth, your like most Americans LOL.

I'm a retired services connected disable Vet, I know what I'm saying and talking about here!!!

www.UnitedNativeAmerica.com

Inverse snobbery

King Amdo 07.Feb.2005 20:52

It's a weird thing that you have there in the USA of this syndrome...white people that reject mainstream america seem to turn to Native American culture instead. The classic case of this is the 'rainbow tribe'. The real Rainbow Tribe being the real Native American's. There is actually a total and quantitative difference in the magic also.

This is complicated by various 'reality possibilities' that (mainly white)people have clung onto such as the famous (elders) Hopi tribal prophecy (the one that the 'rainbow tribe' are obsessed with) of the reincarnating Rainbow Warriors who will help to heal the Mother of the western disease (etc). I know about reincarnation, and this might explain some white people who may 'know' that they are Native American's... (however some of the energy in this scene IS REAL (be warned!)) the dominace of teepee type scene at rainbow tribe type gatherings belies a lack of respect for many participants true incarnation (certainly not jesus fucking christ)...and crucially, ancestry...which is an amazing thing. Europeans need to look to their European ancestry....come over here and explore it! The sacred sites of the old pagan culture are very powerful and revealing, you really do not need to pretend to be Native American!

The fact is that Native Americans, Blacks, Whites, whatever,... 'we' have been drawn into the christian masonic anti full-brain occult consciousness... plot.... which means that we have 'forgetton' who we really are and are contained in superficial materialism and unmagic.

How many people do you know who 'dreamtimewalk' for real? (instant space time travel).

Not many...but in real tribal realities this would be as normal as catching a bus. It defends what senario that one is connected to. This is possible as part of Hindu magic for example.

It's a state of mind...but one's state of mind is a function of societies programming.

Churcill or anyone doesn't need to say that they are Native American to show support for Islamic Jihad against western influence (yes I know that he probably didn't actually say or mean this). By the way, Having read this excellent book....'Taliban, the story of the Afghan warlords' by Ahmed Rashid (recommended), it seems that indeed the american government (not just bush) supported the Taliban because they were anti communist and 'conservative' and a 'unifing force' in this region. However this is a real religious movement, be it facsistically squewed (inherent anti jewish and anti other tribal groups/religions...you must be fundimentalist whabbi Sunni Islam end of story type thing)..and so the energy turned against it's previous benifactors...to their horror no doublt. These people, this movement, being eastern, is heavily mystical (forget the gibberish about fuedalism)....and this is what directs the trip...so it's important to 'keep it on balance'. Ain't that so Bellacourt???!!!(did you REALLY have to download all that stuff here rather than just given us the links. again, his organistation, www.aimmovement.org is not neccessarily AIM.)

Back to the Taliban/Al qa'ida:

But at least they are pro traditional and anti materialistic culture. Traditional eastern culture is amazing...again though, just a shame that there trip is (or was now)... so facsistic. I mean Whabbism puritansism is not indigenous to the Pashtun tribal areas...The famous 'skunk' type of Cannabis contains much genetics from nearby the Kyber pass. Allah Akbar. there used to be big Sufi gatherings/events near Peshawar...now the 'islamic police' prevent any of this energy from happening. (they are 'anti idolitry') Just as the Pashtun tribal zone was split into two by the british...to try and weaken this powerful tribe....so the 'great game' has generated a multitde of false trips all over the place...I call it 'masonloonybin'. The solution lyes in 'shapeshifting' reality back on centre. Blessed be....what the (eastern) Indian's call 'inter-communal peacefulconsciousness'. This auspicious state of collective consciousness leads to a good reality by literal magical change also! Blessed be. Allah Akbar. (nad this reality is INHERENTLY anathma to the western reality/consciousness and by definition that os the westren secret services because there trip is a function of ritual racist child abuse. This is the true and full horror of the west. So, the other side of the coin should well be truely amazing!!!

There is a real impectus and need for directaction against this system, this 'order'....I myself have probably 'pixied'(sabartarged) more Earth raping machines on construction sites and quarry's and so on that anyone else on this planet. I'm not joking, I was on full time 'pixyjihad' for a few years.

So anyway, I would suggest infrastruture targets to disable the ecomony rather than 'people terror'. (of course 9/11 was anti western economic sabatarge)
...rather thab allowing yourself to be overwelmed by hate and 'we must kill them' type thing.

Take out the expressway road network..that would be great fun...Raods are the viens of the 'system'...and this sort of action would be very pro environment, and genuinely pro real tribal values...goddess protected. Blessed be. !!!

Blessed be the Great Mother Witch!

Inverse snobbery...

King Amdo 07.Feb.2005 20:54

Here it is again with the spelling corrected.....

It's a weird thing that you have there in the USA this syndrome...white people that reject mainstream America seem to turn to Native American culture instead. The classic case of this is the 'rainbow tribe'. The real Rainbow Tribe being the real Native American's. There is actually a total and quantitative difference in the magic also.

This is complicated by various 'reality possibilities' that (mainly white) people have clung onto such as the famous (elders) Hopi tribal prophecy (the one that the 'rainbow tribe' are obsessed with) of the reincarnating Rainbow Warriors who will help to heal the Mother of the western disease (etc). I know about reincarnation, and this might explain some white people who may 'know' that they are Native American's... (However some of the energy in this scene IS REAL (be warned!)) the dominance of tepee type scene at rainbow tribe type gatherings belies a lack of respect for many participants true incarnation (certainly not jesus fucking Christ)...and crucially, ancestry...which is an amazing thing. Europeans need to look to their European ancestry....come over here and explore it! The sacred sites of the old pagan culture are very powerful and revealing, you really do not need to pretend to be Native American!

The fact is that Native Americans, Blacks, Whites, whatever,... 'we' have been drawn into the christian Masonic anti full-brain occult consciousness... plot.... which means that we have 'forgotten' who we really are and are contained in superficial materialism and unmagic.

How many people do you know who 'dreamtimewalk' for real? (instant space time travel).

Not many...but in real tribal realities this would be as normal as catching a bus. It defends what scenario that one is connected to. This is possible as part of Hindu magic for example.

It's a state of mind...but one's state of mind is a function of societies programming.

Churchill or anyone doesn't need to say that they are Native American to show support for Islamic Jihad against western influence (yes I know that he probably didn't actually say or mean this). By the way, having read this excellent book....'Taliban, the story of the Afghan warlords' by Ahmed Rashid (recommended), it seems that indeed the American government (not just bush) supported the Taliban because they were anti communist and 'conservative' and a 'unifying force' in this region. However this is a real religious movement, be it fascistically squewed (inherent anti Jewish and anti other tribal groups/religions...you must be fundamentalist whabbhi Sunni Islam end of story type thing)..and so the energy turned against it's previous benefactors...to their horror no doubt. These people, this movement, being eastern, is heavily mystical (forget the gibberish about feudalism)....and this is what directs the trip...so it's important to 'keep it on balance'. Ain't that so Bellacourt???!!!(did you REALLY have to download all that stuff here rather than just given us the links. again, his organisation, www.aimmovement.org is not necessarily AIM...even though of course they cklaim to be the one and only aim, and are probably a 'squewed' aim)

Back to the Taliban/Al Qa'ida:

But at least they are pro traditional and anti materialistic culture. Traditional eastern culture is amazing...again though, just a shame that there trip is (or was now)... so fascistic. I mean Whabbhism Puritanism is not indigenous to the Pashtun tribal areas...The famous 'skunk' type of Cannabis contains much genetics from nearby the Kyber pass. Allah Akbar. there used to be big Sufi gatherings/events near Peshawar...now the 'Islamic police' prevent any of this energy from happening. (they are 'anti idolatry') Just as the Pashtun tribal zone was split into two by the British...to try and weaken this powerful tribe....so the 'great game' has generated a multitude of false trips all over the place...I call it 'masonloonybin'. The solution lye’s in 'shapeshifting' reality back on centre. Blessed be....what the (eastern) Indian's call 'inter-communal peacefull consciousness'. This auspicious state of collective consciousness leads to a good reality by literal magical change also! Blessed be. Allah Akbar. (and this reality is INHERENTLY anathema to the western reality/consciousness and by definition that IS the western secret services because their trip is a function of ritual racist child abuse! This is the true and full horror of the west. So, the other side of the coin should well be truly amazing!!!

There is a real impetus and need for direct action against this system, this 'order'....I myself have probably 'pixie' (sabartarged) more Mother Earth raping machines on construction sites and quarry's and so on that anyone else on this planet. I'm not joking, I was on full time 'Pixy Jihad' for a few years.

So anyway, I would suggest infrastructure targets to disable the economy rather than 'people terror'. (of course 9/11 was anti western economic sabotage)
...rather than allowing yourself to be overwhelmed by hate and 'we must kill them' type thing.

Take out the expressway road network...that would be great fun...Roads are the veins of the 'system'...and this sort of action would be very pro environment, and genuinely pro real tribal values...goddess protected. Blessed be. !!!

Blessed be the Great Mother Witch!

comments hidden

marco 07.Feb.2005 21:04

Comments entitled "Revealing Jodi Rave Interview- Shocking"
have been hidden because they take up too much bandwidth.

You can read them by clicking them individually at:

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112891.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112892.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112893.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112894.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112895.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112896.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112897.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112898.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112899.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112900.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112901.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112902.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112903.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112904.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112905.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112906.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112907.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112908.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112909.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112910.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112911.jpg

Also:

Leonard Peltieer condemns Dark Night Field Notes attack on AIM leaders

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112912.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112913.jpg


Please be considerate of people logging in on dialup.
This would take about a half hour to load in at 28.8



I also notice there are half a dozen ward churchill stories
on the open newswire.

Here are some links to a bunch:

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818778.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818778.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818753.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818736.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818754.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818745.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818747.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818737.shtml



I see two others here we should hide. I'll put links to them
here when we do...


______________________


Ward says he is Creek Creek say he isn't!!

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112920.jpg

Churchill has a point....

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112883.jpg

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112884.jpg

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112885.jpg



Denial of Churchill tribal membership from Creek Nation

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112881.jpg

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112882.jpg

Russ Means and Wrd confidant Glenn Morris with the Contras!!

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112878.jpg

Shocking COvert Action writer tells of Ward Contra connect!

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112876.jpg

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112877.jpg



Ward has a right to speak! But not on our behalf!

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112875.jpg

Wake up Whie people!!.....christian genocide of Native Americans....

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112874.jpg



wow..I'm starting to get a hard on again.....

King Amdo 07.Feb.2005 21:09

...this is all very very exciting ya'll hear!!!

..'scuse me while I check some pics of white bitch's. (slobber slurp dribble)

KKK 'grand wizard'/FBI Master Controller.

(As you can probably tell by now my involvemnt in Native American campaigning has been rather taxing on my sanity...but then I'm just some English white cunt to used and abused by egoising wankers)



Founder of AIM Dennis Banks on Ward Churchill

DJ AIM 08.Feb.2005 05:47

Ward Churchill 'Academic, Literary & Indian Fraud'
by DENNIS BANKS

(Editor's Note: Ward Churchill, the Wannabe Indian, certainly has had his own chickens come home to roost. Isn't the "professor" hip to the return of karma?)

Ward Churchill was scheduled to speak at Hamilton College in Clinton,
New York on February 3, 2005. His appearance was canceled by the college after he caused a public furor over his loathsome remarks about the 9-11 tragedy in New York. AIM's Grand Governing Council has been dealing with Churchill's hateful attitude and rip-off of Indian people for years.

The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council representing the
National and International leadership of the American Indian Movement
once again is vehemently and emphatically repudiating and condemning the outrageous statements made by academic literary and Indian fraud, Ward Churchill in relationship to the 9-11 tragedy in New York City that claimed thousands of innocent people’s lives.

Churchill’s statement that these people deserved what happened to them, and calling them little Eichmanns, comparing them to Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, who implemented Adolf Hitler’s plan to exterminate European Jews and others, should be condemned by all.
The sorry part of this is Ward Churchill has fraudulently represented
himself as an Indian, and a member of the American Indian Movement, a
situation that has lifted him into the position of a lecturer on Indian activism. He has used the American Indian Movement’s chapter in Denver to attack the leadership of the official American Indian Movement with his misinformation and propaganda campaigns.

Ward Churchill has been masquerading as an Indian for years behind his
dark glasses and beaded headband. He waves around an honorary membership card that at one time was issued to anyone by the Keetoowah Tribe of Oklahoma.

Former President Bill Clinton and many others received these
cards, but these cards do not qualify the holder a member of any tribe. He has deceitfully and treacherously fooled innocent and naïve Indian community members in Denver, Colorado, as well as many other people worldwide.

Churchill does not represent, nor does he speak on behalf of
the American Indian Movement.

New York’s Hamilton College Kirklands Project should be aware that in
their search for truth and justice, the idea that they have hired a
fraud to speak on Indian activism is in itself a betrayal of their goals.

Dennis J. Banks, Ojibwa Nation
Chairman of the Board
American Indian Movement
Phone: 218-654-5885

Nee Gon Nway Wee Dung, aka, Clyde H. Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
National Executive Director
American Indian Movement
Cell: 612-251-5836
Office: 612-724-3129

Press Contact:
WaBun-Inini, aka, Vernon Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
Executive Committee Member
Director Council on Foreign Relations
American Indian Movement
Office: 612-721-3914
Cell: 612-889-0796

 http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/churchill05.html

AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL

MINISTRY FOR INFORMATION
P.O. Box 13521
Minneapolis MN 55414
612/ 721-3914 . fax 612/ 721-7826
Email:  aimggc@worldnet.att.net
Web Address: www.aimovement.org


See the following:

Us vs AIM
 http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/USgovt-vs-AIMnov99.html

Us vs AIM Backgound
 http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/USvAIMbackground.html

The Public's Response
 http://www.hamilton.edu/news/wardchurchill/

For more information regarding Churchill’s fraudulent enrollment:

United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma
Enrollment officer: 918-431-0385 or 918-456-8698

 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~2689334,00.html

CU prof affirms Indian heritage
Tribe says he's not full member

By Howard Pankratz, Denver Post, Feb 3, 2005

The Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians said Wednesday that University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is an associate member of the tribe but not a full member, which requires a person to have at least
one-fourth Cherokee blood.

"He was trying to get recognized as an Indian. He could not prove he was an Indian (Cherokee) at all," said Ernestine Berry, who was on the
tribe's enrollment committee and served on the tribal council for four
years.

Churchill, who resigned as chairman of CU's ethnic studies department on Monday, has been condemned for comparing victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks to Nazis.

He has described himself as an Indian and has said that shaped many of
his opinions. But over the last week, as Churchill's comments made news, his critics have claimed he is a fraud.

On Wednesday, Churchill steadfastly maintained that he is an Indian,
claiming he is three-sixteenths Cherokee. But he acknowledged that he is an associate member, not a full member, of the Keetoowah.

"I don't vote, I don't hold office, I don't collect benefits," Churchill said. He said he was enrolled as an associate member of the Keetoowah after a genealogical investigation showed his Cherokee lineage.

Click here to see Ward Churchill's essay, "Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," as posted on a third-party website. Todd
Gleeson, dean of the University of Colorado's College of Arts and
Sciences, which oversees Churchill's department, has indicated to The
Denver Post that this posting is an authentic copy of Churchill's essay.
He said he could have become a full member of the larger, 240,000-member
Cherokee Nation because it has no "blood quantum threshold." But he
chose the Keetoowah because they are a more "hard- line" group.

Berry, of the Keetoowah Band, said Churchill was given an associate
membership in the 10,000-member tribe, based in Tahlequah, Okla., in the early 1990s.

"Mr. Churchill started coming around in 1992 or 1993, said he wrote some books and was a big-time author, and convinced us he could help our people," Berry said.

On that basis, he was given an associate membership, said Berry, who was on the tribe's enrollment committee and has served on the tribal council.

Berry said Churchill never fulfilled his promise to help the tribe,
which she said is an extremely poor offshoot of the Cherokee Nation.

"After he received his associate card, we never heard from him again,"
Berry said.

The tribe no longer offers associate memberships, although it didn't
revoke any existing memberships, Berry said.

In addition to questioning Churchill's Indian heritage, some people have raised questions about his duties in Vietnam, where he said he fought in that country's highlands and then moved to coastal regions, where he was assigned to "gun trucks" similar to today's Humvees.

One of the skeptics is Vernon Bellecourt, director of the Council on
Foreign Relations for the American Indian Movement.

Bellecourt says he believes Churchill worked counter-intelligence in
Vietnam while also claiming to be an "information specialist" there.

"According to research by one of our people, he has had two military
records. There is something very strange which we have not been able to get into," Bellecourt said.

In 1995, News From Indian Country, an Indian-owned, reservation-based
Wisconsin newspaper for Native Americans, said it had "observed many
interesting things about (Churchill) including contrary military
records. ... "

Churchill's service record was not available from the Pentagon. But one private group that tracks Vietnam veterans has obtained some data.




Urinating on Amendment One

Collin Baber 08.Feb.2005 08:39



By attempting to silence Ward Churchill, government is urinating on Amendment One.

attempt to cast doubt on "The COINTELPRO Papers"

Butros Butros Mohamid Ali Sandwiches 08.Feb.2005 15:29

What Churchill's disputed ethnic background may or may not be, seems to be a character assination issue. He claims to be 3/16th native, while the "blood" issue is minimum 1/4 - in the US. I read somewhere that in Canada, tribal membership is not based on blood whatsoever, and that the blood issue was something imposed by the US government. ?

That many people may not want to be associated with what someone else says,
that can be understood.

That these radio DJs seem to be bitter about the blocking of the Colombus(let's celebrate genocide like REAL nazis) Day (p.s. I'm 'white' with no college degree).
seems to be their reason for initiating this whole fiasco and calling on super hero Bill O'Reilly was to get him to help stir the pot of racial hatred to obscure and further distort what Churchill said

AND/OR try to get the very good work he (& Jim Vanderwall) have done in The COINTELPRO Papers
to be seen as less credible.

From what I understand, Churchill did not say a Janitor or secretary that gets coffee was like a "little Eichman". Such claims are a distortion of his statements - or so I hear. Looks like I'll just have to find the book and read for myself. Funny, something I was planning on doing just a week or so before this blew up.


Whether Churchill is not a Real Indian, something I have heard years ago,
or even if he is an fed provacateaur since the it is almost always, almost always ONLY the feds who are the ones pushing for violence,
the work he & Vanderwall have done in The COINTELPRO Papers cannot be dismissed so easily.
Yes revoke the sick-o "Patriot" Act & all similar legislation.
It is deseigned, like the fascist COINTELPROs before it, to keep
tabs on political dissent. Or so what has come before has led me to believe this.


On matters of US government's foreign policy.
Yes, of course it was disgusting, dispicable, and unjustifiable even before Bush(w) ran for office. This adminstration only Nthed its terribleness.

attempt to discredit "The COINTELPRO Papers"?

alla peanut butter sandwiches 08.Feb.2005 18:25

I tried to post something here, but after an hour, still nothing.


Sure I called a Colombus day the same thing as Nazis celebrating genocide.
But THAT is exactly what it is. Deny and ice your conscience all you want.

Maybe the page cannot accept any more posts and is full or something?



Whatever is going on around Churchill,
nothing yet has discredited the superb work he (&Jim Vanderwall)
have done on "The COINTELPRO Papers". - which is argument in itself
to withdraw the "patriot" act and all such related legislation.


gawd.
the page must be full.
Why else would even after an hour my post not show up?

But you're 13/16ths European Ward!!!

King Amdo 08.Feb.2005 19:00

Be pround of that ancestery moron!....the real roots of European culture (not the christian stuff) are ok and sound.

I'll apologize for him if he brought you unneccessary heat on this matter.

Blessed be.

One more go...

Nobody 08.Feb.2005 20:25

I haven't read the COINTELPRO papers and so can't say much about it. It may be that, as people on this thread have said, it's a good book. I would be a little wary of the danger that it would tend to paint the heroes as the villains and the villains as the heroes, but that may not be the case.

Much good writing exists concerning COINTELPRO, and someone posted links to a great deal of it on the newswire. Here is the link to the list of links, if you will:

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818778.shtml

Certainly nothing I have written on this thread has been intended to question the government's use of infiltrators to disrupt the left. To the contrary, I have called Churchill such an infiltrator. Many of the other anti-Churchill posters, including Paul Wolf and everyone in the AIM camp, seems to be coming from much the same place.

I reiterate that the question of Churchill's Indian identity is distinctly secondary to the question of whether he is or is not a cop. It is important mostly in that it is an obvious and egregious example of fakery surrounding him.

I do not think that it is the position of AIM that a person needs to be one-quarter Indian by blood to be considered Indian. (Although, by the way, Churchill is NOT 3/16th Indian. That's not correct. Read some of the earlier posts and you will see that he's pretty clearly not over 1/64th Indian, if he has ANY Indian blood at all.) But Ward has made various claims of Indian ancestry and tribal membership which are plainly false, and that IS important.

As to whether he should or should not be considered an Indian: the only non-discredited basis which he has ever put forth for his claimed Indian identity is his political work among Indians. When we consider that it looks clear that this work has all been on behalf of governmental agencies in an attempt to infiltrate Indian activists and keep them down, Churchill's claim to Indian identity may be said to boil down to this:

"What do you mean I'm not an Indian?! I've been inflitrating Indians for the CIA for 25 years! I guess that makes me an Indian by now!"

reader

Letter to Joshua Frank of Counterpunch 08.Feb.2005 22:04

Letter to Joshua Frank of Counterpunch (writing on the left attack of Churchill)

"I am sure you've heard of Ward Churchill's latest tribulations -- so I'll save you the repetition. However, I bet what you didn't know was that liberals were running hand in hand with conservatives in hopes of clotheslining the radical professor."
 http://www.counterpunch.org/frank02052005.html

I'm glad you wrote the piece.

But just imagine if Churchill had gone one step too far and actually suggested the WTC towers were taken down by demolition. Or even Building 7, never hit by a plane, which fell in on itself into a neat pile many hours after the morning events.

These were the first buildings in the history of steel framed structures to ever collapse from fire. But just imagine if the radical Churchill had stepped over *that* line!

He wouldn't dare.

But had he, then Counterpunch and CommonDreams would be competing to see who could clothesline the 'loony conspiracy' professor first.

Sincerely,

------

ps -

See WTC background at :

 http://911research.wtc7.net/
 http://wtc7.net/

Don't worry Ward White America has decided you are their Indian!

Hilarious 09.Feb.2005 04:00

This is hilarious no one is even noticing. Not one reputable Native person has come forward to claim this bastard. AIM, the Ketoowah Cherokee, The Muskogee Creek Tribe, News From Indian Country Today, every tribal newspaper, Dennis Banks the Founder of AIM, and yet a bunch of White college kids have decided! "Ward is the leader of Indians and we don't care what anybody else says" anyway he looks soooo cool in his glamour shots with the AK and the beret.His position sucked and Indians don't want to be associated with it. Is that sooo hard for you to understand? Native people don't want to be associated with his forged idntity or his fucked up ideas. He may have a right to say them but not for us and not for AIM they aren't our positions. If he wants to accept AIM and Indian people want nothing to do with his little " push back" and stands as an individual representing no one then fine!!

Ugh

Izzy Straddlin' 09.Feb.2005 05:09

Just curious about a few things. Nearly all of the posts in this thread repeat the same criticism over and over again - that Ward Churchill not a "real Indian". And while that's fine and dandy, who the fuck cares? He isn't being targeted by the Right because of disputes over his ancestry. He's being targeted by the Right because the essay he wrote. Notice - no debate about the actual content of that essay on this thread? Why is that? I see an awful lot of people whining, saying that Churchill and his essay are harmful to the American Indian Movement and to Native people as a whole, but no actual discussion about the content of that essay. Why?

From what I've read of the essay, it was pretty accurate. Is this a case of people hiding their true feelings about certain events in recent years or another example of more center-orientated groups happily hanging radicals out to dry when it becomes politically convenient to do so?

You racists!!

it matters 09.Feb.2005 06:07

Of course it matters whether or not he is Indian. In Indymedia's banner he is referred to as Indian. In every media story they mention that he claims to be Indian and that he claims to be from AIM. Indian people although wishing to hope Americans see that our government causes injuries much worse than 911 all over the world for tow centuries must stand with the innocent victims of any violent assault or we have no right to complain about such things ourselves. Maybe that is your eye for an eye culture but it isn't ours. What a bunch of Nazis you are.

Using Reason, Wake Up everyone

JSF, Ph.D - Sociology, Philosophy 09.Feb.2005 07:42

Professor Ward Churchill is trying to wake us up. Saying more 9/11's is a declaration that we are still sleeping, that we are still forcing our religion and our ideals on others. Dubya forcing his religious ideas on everyone, and being an intolerable person is part of what fueled the attacks of 9/11, our attack of Iraq, and by the very fact that we are trying to force our ideal of life on others is creating more hatred in the world. This is fueling more hatred towards us, and this is what Professor Churchill is warning us about. We still don't get it, we still don't understand that not only each individual person is different, and has their right to be so, but as we travel throughout the world their are cultures that are so far different from ours that we cannot try to nationalize our ideals. This is what fuels the fire, this Professor needs to be listened to and understood not chastised.

JSF is racist as well

AIM 09.Feb.2005 09:48

We don't need you or any other professor to tell u s to wake up! We've had all the help we can stand from you the people who put Indians where they are today. Much less need any help from Ward Churchill to know America needs to wake up. You need to realize that we need you assholes to stop deciding what we need. What we need is for you jackasses to stop deciding what is best for us. Churchill is a cop and a white guy posing as an Indian leader and what we need from him I won't state in written word.

reply to Izzy Straddlin'

marco 09.Feb.2005 11:49

Izzy, you ask some really good questions.

I would suggest that this appears to be right out of the
Karl Rove playbook. Which might explain why Bill O'Reilly,
Charlie Daniels and David Whore-O-Wits jumped on it the
quickest, eh?

Although I can't call Karl Rove original. He probably hasn't
articulated an original thought in his life. Not only does this
smack of Karl Rove, you'll notice it's almost note for note
something Lee Atwater would've done too.

Again, why else would a fascist musician jump on it so quickly
it seems he had insider information to prepare HIS soapbox
statement.

 http://www.charliedaniels.com/soapbox/soapbox.asp?id=12

Keep fighting back. We'll win this one.

 http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/02/3588.php

BTW: you know Churchill's not the only one maintaining
these claims out loud right? Late night Air America radio
(I think his name is Mark Malloy) is just chock full of
sentiment. Call ins AND his own rants.

What's next, proof that Ward dates 15 year olds?
Finding planted kiddie porn in his harddrive?
Publishing proof that one of his college degrees
is from an unaccredited university?

The noise is designed to keep us from discussing
what's NOT being disputed here. Keep us busy arguing
whether Ward Churchill is 7/8s or 1/16th something
or other.

I'll repeat one last time, probably for my own health.
I don't trust Ward OR the Bellecourts. But I *will*
fight for Churchill's first ammendment rights. "Cointelpro
Papers" is a must read to understand this very problem,
and Ward wrote it. Let's go all the way to the feds'
logical conclusions here. Suppose Churchill IS CIA, or
maybe he is FBI. Since when did hearing this stuff scare
us coming from John Stockwell? Or Jack Ryan who stopped
following around Brian Willson and instead fasted against
Columbus with him in 1992!!! If Churchill is a cop, and
he's written a book like "Cointelpro Papers," then hear
the fucker speak for crying out loud. We use Mike Ruppert
as a unique source pretty often don't we? Dammit, read
the book. Ignore the attempts to jam you and get you
spreading interference noise.

I'll close with this, that should give them enough to
chew on til their watercooled super computers implode!

Essentially that George W. Bush blew up building 7
by hand with his own homemade blasting caps, and
that he used to have sexual intercourse with Ronald
Reagan when he was a minor.

Bunch of you morons still don't get it

Nobody 09.Feb.2005 14:46

What Ward said was that everyone that got it on 9/11 deserved it. I know, I know. He's not saying that now. So read the original essay. If you haven't, you really can't talk about it very much.

There's a serious problem with that position: It's bullshit, that's the problem. As has been pointed out numerous times in this thread, while it may be true that some of the people working in the WTC were big time capitalists with a major role in corporate decision making, others worked in liquor stores, were janitors, security guards, secretaries, or people working in companies that sold municipal bonds. Others just happened to be on the wrong airplane.

These people are no more responsible for U.S. policy than Ward himself. Actually, they are probably less so, in that Ward has benefitted much more from U.S. policy. Department head and all that; this guy is not a minimum wage earner. The figure is probably up over 100k/year.

And did anyone happen to read the rest of the essay, where he got into his predictions of wave after wave of escalating attacks? Not only did this turn out to be absolute and utter nonsense -- there hasn't been a successful foreign terror attack on U.S. soil since 9/11/01 -- but it's fearmongering that in the most obvious way plays into the hands of the administration, which has been making its case for the Patriot Act, etc., on a ridiculously inflated view of Al Qaeda, and it's case for the war in Iraq on non-existent Iraqi weapons.

Don't trust the Bellecourts? Any reason why not? No? OK. Protest, radicalism, all this started with you, I guess. You have no interest in building alliances with an organization that has been the most militant representative of Native Americans for over thirty years. You hear a couple of stupid, nonsense rumors about them and you blow them off.

There are people who say that where there is smoke there is fire. Really, my experience is that where there is smoke there is action. And if people aren't accusing you of murdering some poor lady, or whatever, you're not doing anything. If every time you hear a nasty rumor about someone you decide you really can't trust them anymore, you're goign to find that you don't trust anyone who's doing anything important, because if struggle is the territory, slander comes with the territory.

Which means you have to make some sort of attempt to actually sort out who is who and what's what, which charges are real and which are bullshit. That may strain your brain, and it may be easier to just not care, but you can't blow off a group like AIM just because it's easier to do so.

And Ward is not a case of some CIA agent ratting out the agency. It's a little different than that. He's actively working for them still, and was when he wrote his book.

And HOW can anyone say that Ward's lies about being an Indian are unimportant? Do you have NO expectation of honesty from people who are on your side?! Is it alright if they lie, cheat and steal to their little heart's content, so long as they cloak their lying in a mantel of leftism? Besides which, he has been LYING TO YOU! Does that not make you wonder what else he has told you that doesn't quite stand up?!

Personally, I would be much less harsh on this kind of nonsense coming from someone on the right, just because then it would damage THEIR reputation and not ours.

Let me apologize for the title of my last comment

Nobody 09.Feb.2005 16:14

That was over the top.

No it wasn't over the top!

King Amdo 09.Feb.2005 20:16

You are a bunch of morons and you deserve in fact much much worse than 9/11 and this is the karmic siituation that you are heading into... a personnal real time karmic nightmare...Al Qa'ida or otherwise.

Why is this so?

....because the way that your 'great country', and your individual american consciousness is 'foculised' is by this means....

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

So you think I'm mad or a CIA agent trying to freek you out?

Bad luck this is the truth. (as many know intuitively).

YOU AND YOUR 'GREAT COUNTRY' IS/ARE FUCKED, AMERICANISED NATIVE, WHITE, BLACK OR WHATEVER. (This applies to all these 'nation states' also) (so much for 'rapture').

Allah Akbar.

(Advice to politcio native american's: all these people that you think are FBI agents are, of course, not in fact. You are merely suffering from mildish mental disorders induced by pyscoligical and pyscik confusion originating from malaign intervention and influence from this source. (above link). One thing I learnt when with the (FREE) 'new age traveller's' (here in blighty) ... who experienece the sort of harrasment that makes it imperitive NOT to hold grudges! This is something that seems to be a dibilitating poison in the Native American scene. PLEASE REMEMBER THE NATURE OF THE ENEMY. PURE UNADULTARATED EVIL.


Douglass Durham

Paul Wolf 09.Feb.2005 21:14


I wonder if someone from AIM could comment on this book which claims that Douglass Durham, the notorious informant written about at length by Ward Churchill, had some relationship with Robert K. Brown. I have never read the book and don't know what to make of it. Of course Ward Churchill also admits to have worked for Brown at SOF magazine.

It seems strange to me that the CIA or army would be involved in disrupting a domestic group - that's the FBI's job.

- Paul


 http://www.dickshovel.com/dur.html

From Wasi'chu - The Continuing Indian Wars

by Bruce Johansen and Roberto Maestres

... Durham's "secret" or covert Army commander was then-Col, now Lt. General Robert K. Brown, publisher of Soldier of Fortune Magazine, and of a group of "covert" entities, which includes Omega Ltd (a funds laundry), all located in Boulder, CO. Brown is not a retired old right-wing officer with an odd hobby (recruiting bikers and psychos for "deniable" paramilitary operations in Africa and S. America), he is an active leader in covert U.S. "intelligence" operations, which includes assassinations, quiet murders, and organizing "native" troops for battles against their fellows ...

wrong AIM

JSF, Ph.D 09.Feb.2005 21:42

AIM your wrong, I don't believe I had one racist comment to say, I support Professor Churchill, or maybe you didn't understand what I wrote, I was trying to simplify his message so that others would understand what he was saying and justify the message that he said, because if you analyze his message the meanings of it are correct, but our country has a difficult time looking beyond the surface of any issue. Perhaps you do too, if you are going to call me a racist. Perhaps you will re-read a supportive post next time that address the issue not the race part. It may do a better job of educating yourself instead of creating for friction.

the other AIM

joey homicides 09.Feb.2005 21:56

check out the other aim in colorado- coloradoaim.org

Tell me what this means, You CANT say its racist.

JSF, Ph.D 09.Feb.2005 22:48

YOU CAN'T SAY THIS IS RACIST, THIS IS AN INTERPRETATION OF THE MEANING AND A RE ENFORCEMENT OF THE MEANING OF CHURCHILLS WORK!

Professor Ward Churchill is trying to wake us up. Saying more 9/11's is a declaration that we are still sleeping, that we are still forcing our religion and our ideals on others. Dubya forcing his religious ideas on everyone, and being an intolerable person is part of what fueled the attacks of 9/11, our attack of Iraq, and by the very fact that we are trying to force our ideal of life on others is creating more hatred in the world. This is fueling more hatred towards us, and this is what Professor Churchill is warning us about. We still don't get it, we still don't understand that not only each individual person is different, and has their right to be so, but as we travel throughout the world their are cultures that are so far different from ours that we cannot try to nationalize our ideals. This is what fuels the fire, this Professor needs to be listened to and understood not chastised.

My reply to JSF and his ilk

Nobody 09.Feb.2005 23:36

If that's what Ward Churchill was saying I'd be all for it. But you don't get to put words in his mouth. Read his essay. That's not in there, my friend.

And just to clarify...

Nobody 09.Feb.2005 23:37

It still wouldn't make him an Indian, or make him not a cop. It would just mean what he was saying on this occasion was true.

leanard leanord peltair defense committee appeal supports churchill

joey homicides 10.Feb.2005 00:02

THE ANTI-AIM TIDE IS RISING-- by lpsc

All of us who surround those who were involved in AIM since the early
70's have known it was coming, or rather "they" would come for them
again. There is no shock in the recent campaign to discredit Ward
Churchill. Most of all, we are sure Mr. Churchill himself knew it was
coming sooner or later. We are sure Ward is at home asking himself
questions such as: why now, what will be gained by disabling me at this
time and how will this negatively affect the movement? Most of all,
like any good warrior, we hope he finds himself asking how he can make
this work for the movement's benefit. Mr. Churchill has co-authored
books which guaranteed he would be attacked by his favorite
organization, the FBI.

His contributions academically to the Indian movement, whether it be AIM
or a generation of like minded thinkers, has been vast. Without books
such as Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against the Black
Panther Party and the American Indian Movement and The COINTELPRO
Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret War Against Dissent in the
United States our generation and those younger would not have a map by
which we can predict the government's response and how they will work to
stop Indians being outspoken. Simply put, we firmly believe that many of
AIM's figureheads are modern day Indian heroes. We cannot sit by and
watch our government continue to destroy Native Americans.

Mr. Churchill's writings are motivational in a way the government does
not appreciate. His writings are critical of the government. We
believe any educated Indian would have to agree with his works and
themes though not necessarily embrace every point. We believe we need
people such as Mr. Churchill who are not afraid to exercise their First
Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech. American Indians need to feel
free to speak.

Please note the newspaper reporters seem to forget how long ago Mr.
Churchill wrote the 9/11 piece. It is also important to note how the
mainstream press has totally misinterpreted
and misreported Mr. Churchill's statements and intent. We challenge
those who have not read Mr. Churchill to read what he has written and
draw their own conclusions and not be swayed by the propaganda being
spread by the mainstream media.

Our question is why all of a sudden is the press attacking Mr. Churchill
for issues which happened more than a year ago? This is not news, these
are old issues. We should all be asking ourselves why now. Our belief
is, that as we await the results of the John Graham extradition hearing,
the United States wishes to raise anti-AIM sentiments hoping to use the
John Graham extradition as a vehicle to attack people such as Ward
Churchill and Leonard Peltier.

We would like to remind the older generation of AIM of allegiance and
honor. Don't forget, years of knowing each other, and years of trying
to have Leonard Peltier freed means there is a spider web of
relationships which the government is clearly trying to unentangle and
frame Leonard as a patsy.

We are not saying Anna Mae does not deserve justice. We believe she was
a loyal AIM woman and she should be treated as such. We believe that
those involved in what happened to her owe her family answers, very
soon. We hope her family still believes as she did, in the cause and
rights of Indians. Please beware the government will use Anna Mae's
murder, 9/11 and anything else they find inflammatory right now to turn
the tide against AIM and against Leonard Peltier. Our phones are
tapped, of this we are sure, so the FBI clearly knows lately those at
the LPDC have made some great contacts internationally. We assure you
they want to turn the tide against Leonard and AIM right now, they must
undo all our work, they must keep us down. Remember these guys earn a
paycheck to suppress us, we have nothing but pocket lint because it is
our lives. But if we do not let the rising anti-AIM tide drown our
spirits we can still win. We say good luck Mr. Churchill. We
personally like the way you exercise your first amendment rights..

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, send a blank message to  lpdc-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to  lpdc-off@mail-list.com
To change your email address, send a message to  lpdc-change@mail-list.com
with your old address in the Subject: line

That was a post on a blog not from Leonard

AIM 10.Feb.2005 01:28

That was a post from a blog form someone within the LPDC not from Leonard. If anyone has done anything to threaten Leonard lately it has been Ward and his goddamn 911 bit forcing Leonard to be loosely associated with his stupid ass remarks that will do nothing to get Leonard out of jail and everything to keep him in!!

The most important thing in the post!!

They never refer to him as indian
They refer to any contributions hew may have made to AIM as purely academic!!
THey never refer tro him as an AIM leader

I will be glad to post Leonard Peltier's letter removing Ward from LPDC later tonight.

Dumb asses

Racist Using Reason, Watch Out everyone

Just Speaking Farts ,PHD-Sociology Yawn 10.Feb.2005 06:00

Racist Using Reason, Watch Out everyone
JSF, Ph.D - Sociology, Philosophy 09.Feb.2005 07:42
“Professor Ward Churchill is trying to wake us up. “
Really that is why he falsified his Indian identity and claims to be from organizations that disavow him? Who in the hell are you to tell us Indians who the fuck is to wake us up? What a racist!
“Saying more 9/11's is a declaration that we are still sleeping”
So 911 helped us? Helped radicals? Because folks from the Zapatisitas I know as well as many other rebel organizations feel that 911 has done more to unchain the beast of US imperialism more than ever before. It has re-elected cross eyed George and sacked the governments of two nations. This all carried out by a cia trained and funded Bin Laden? Bully Bully you dumb ass.
“, that we are still forcing our religion and our ideals on others.” :
Oh and Bin Laden and his Wahabistas are for religious freedom? Womens rights? They didn’t try to kill Qadafy and Saddam? Like you are sooooommme professor of horseshit. I mean could you get a little more obtuse?
“Dubya forcing his religious ideas on everyone, and being an intolerable person is part of what fueled the attacks of 9/11, our attack of Iraq, and by the very fact that we are trying to force our ideal of life on others is creating more hatred in the world.”:
See above plus- ok so there isn’t any other way to say this than Churchill said it? He had to equate the people in the building with war criminals? Because I can tell you now Indian people can point out the innocents killed and wage struggle without taking out innocent people or negating their lives. Churchill doesn’t represent us on these issues, he claims to and he needs to stop!!
“and this is what Professor Churchill is warning us about.”:
Oh the genius I want to have his semen. You lame flaccid bag of nonsense. All he talked about from our point of view is a bunch of shit that gives more Redknecks in Indian Country to hate the brothers. Thanks Ward. You viagra guzzling buzzard eatin, Wasichu (Barbarian)
“We still don't get it, we still don't understand that not only each individual person is different, and has their right to be so, but as we travel throughout the world their are cultures that are so far different from ours that we cannot try to nationalize our ideals.” :
Really you can speak for us on that. Can oh great fathers. FUUUUUUUK U We don’t need our genocidal serial killers telling us when we get it. Ok? Is that all right with you? We have supported the Palestinian, Irish, South African, Arab, Central and South American rebel groups, trained the Zapatistas, and had stand offs with the military. Now you oh great father are here to tell us what we don’t understand?
“This is what fuels the fire, this Professor needs to be listened to and understood not chastised. “
So you know great white father what fuels the fire and who we need to listen to? I don’t think you do. We don’t want to listen to any white boy pretending to be an Indian, pretending to be a militant AIM member misrepresenting us! And we don’t need any help from you either! Thanks but we’ve had all the help we can stand from you people.

Ward Churchill is correct

Paul Revere 10.Feb.2005 11:13

Ward Churchill is correct. I was not so much saddened as much as angry when the 9/11 attack occurred. I was mad at our government for putting us in the position to suffer the attacks, which were a response to our foreign policy. The attacks were due to happen. Piss off enough people and they will retaliate.

During the 30 years or more, the U.S. Government has conducted covert operations around the world that have resulted in corrupt dictators taking power and killing innocent citizens. After 9/11, Osama Bin Laden told the world why he attacked the USA. Did anyone listen? No! Idiots like Bill O'Liely and the brownshirts at FOX "Nazi" News have ignored all the crap foisted on this country and the world by the Reaganites and the NeoScum, and, instead, beat the drums for the USA to police the world for so-called terrorists and people who supposedly "hate our freedoms." What a bunch of crap!

You stupid people! Wake up! It's time to give Bush and the NeoScum the boot. That's if you really love God, your fellow human beings, and this country.

aaa

aaaa 10.Feb.2005 17:57

fuck ward churchill

They've also supplied Tibetan tribal resistance

King Amdo 10.Feb.2005 20:08

And the Afghan resistance...Bin Laden and the Taliban themselves in fact...as they are an anti communist cause, luck of the draw I suppose. I think the intersting thing is that these erstwhile partners quarrelled so badly. There is that communist influence in the South American scene..I think due to the christian infux (spanish and portugese) which 'turns it ot shit' anyway. Look at the Zapatistas with their world wide efforts at...what exactly..red star plastic shammanism?...forget it...this will never work.

I mean what's goanna happen when the Dalai lama find out about this....

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

Was this suppost to be kept quite or something?

...I mean primarily on the magical level...it would seem like a appalling travesty of justice to allow these westerners to escape from this origins of their 'trip' (and transcending collectivtly along with everyone else into a new age of love and light etc etc)...without paying the neccessary karmic price (for ritual riacist child abuse)..which I would assume to be very severe indeed.

Individually, of course, one may escape, but collectivly, as a whole...the west? certainly not without those at the top of this dodge occult abusive pyramid going into what amounts to 'Exodus'...a real time personnal pysco/spiritual reality nightmare increasing at an incresing rate form their perspective. (don't ask how I know this).

JAH LIBERATION!!!

(well I keep trying, but I'm just some lone scitzphrenic being vampired by this power, in reality)

Sorry but I've got to try and forget about you, and community karma yoga , and all this stuff and seek my own escape.

Good luck,

Blessed be,

Om





But that was years ago 'grand governing council aim'

King Amdo 10.Feb.2005 20:25

...perhaps the situation has changed now?

if people remain permanently locked in disputes then, well nothing can be achieved,its pyscologically destructive, and gives joy and pleasure to some very very sick and evil people.

Why must you rule 'grand governing council aim?' why try and constuct this monumental ediface? and then make endless and obvious false accusations. Not just about Ward. All this does you no credit or honour. its like those cases at alt.native Indians getting off on seeing amazing survivors and heros and sheros real warriors for the Mother Earth and the traditional elders and Native American culture... going mad or being sent down...that is just insane. Is that what you are on? the 'aim' there seemed to be to send people as mad as them. To break the real vision, and real power, in a very cynical and nasty way.

NO!

Blessed be.







Leonard Peltier Defense Committee Responds

Scott 10.Feb.2005 22:51

The Anti-AIM Tide Is Rising
All of us who surround those who were involved in AIM since the early 70's have known it was coming, or rather “they” would come for them again. There is no shock in the recent campaign to discredit Ward Churchill. Most of all, we are sure Mr. Churchill himself knew it was coming sooner or later. We are sure Ward is at home asking himself questions such as: why now, what will be gained by disabling me at this time and how will this negatively affect the movement? Most of all, like any good warrior, we hope he finds himself asking how he can make this work for the movement’s benefit. Mr. Churchill has co-authored books which guaranteed he would be attacked by his favorite organization, the FBI.

His contributions academically to the Indian movement, whether it be AIM or a generation of like minded thinkers, has been vast. Without books such as Agents of Repression: The FBI’s Secret Wars Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement and The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI’s Secret War Against Dissent in the United States our generate on and those younger would not have a map by which we can predict the government’s response and how they will work to stop Indians being outspoken. Simply put, we firmly believe that many of AIM’s figureheads are modern day Indian heroes. We cannot sit by and watch our government continue to destroy Native Americans.

Mr. Churchill’s writings are motivational in a way the government does not appreciate. His writings are critical of the government. We believe any educated Indian would have to agree with his works and themes though not necessarily embrace every point. We believe we need people such as Mr. Churchill who are not afraid to exercise their First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech. American Indians need to feel free to speak.

Please note the newspaper reporters seem to forget how long ago Mr. Churchill wrote the 9/11 piece. It is also important to note how the mainstream press has totally misinterpreted and misreported Mr. Churchill’s statements and intent. We challenge those who have not read Mr. Churchill to read what he has written and draw their own conclusions and not be swayed by the propaganda being spread by the mainstream media.

Our question is why all of a sudden is the press attacking Mr. Churchill for issues which happened more than a year ago? This is not news, these are old issues. We should all be asking ourselves why now. Our belief is, that as we await the results of the John Graham extradition hearing, the United States wishes to raise anti-AIM sentiments hoping to use the John Graham extradition as a vehicle to attack people such as Ward Churchill and Leonard Peltier.

We would like to remind the older generation of AIM of allegiance and honor. Don’t forget, years of knowing each other, and years of trying to have Leonard Peltier freed means there is a spider web of relationships which the government is clearly trying to unentangle and frame Leonard as a patsy.

We are not saying Anna Mae does not deserve justice. We believe she was a loyal AIM woman and she should be treated as such. We believe that those involved in what happened to her owe her family answers, very soon. We hope her family still believes as she did, in the cause and rights of Indians. Please beware the government will use Anna Mae’s murder, 9/11 and anything else they find inflammatory right now to turn the tide against AIM and against Leonard Peltier. Our phones are tapped, of this we are sure, so the FBI clearly knows lately those at the LPDC have made some great contacts internationally. We assure you they want to turn the tide against Leonard and AIM right now, they must undo all our work, they must keep us down. Remember these guys earn a paycheck to suppress us, we have nothing but pocket lint because it is our lives. But if we do not let the rising anti-AIM tide drown our spirits we can still win. We say good luck Mr. Churchill. We personally like the way you exercise your first amendment rights.

posted by Leonard Peltier Defense Committee at 9:08 AM


alright NAIMI... so why did the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee support Churcill???

Smear Campaign

Seattle -Duwash traditional lands 11.Feb.2005 01:39

Hail to the Chief of the Wannabees,

anti-colonial thinker, decolonialize yourself.
Walk a mile in my mocasins.
But no he won't. He'll keep his job and propagate his notion of indian to the world.

Now he wants to use this very oppressive system to preserve his job as a tenured professor.

Boo Boooooo.

Now who is the one being colonialized?

Ward step down and fight your battle where it really counts...

i
n

the

r
e
a
l

world.

Our world is full of poverty, and despair and of course struggle.
We cannot afford the luxury of $3500 speaking engagements, or to complain of Starbucks/Seattle's Best Coffee volcano eruptions onto your plain white t-shirt before an indy media event here in Seattle a few years ago.
He'll its hard to buy food, let alone coffee.

So Chief Wannabee step down and fight your fight from the trenches and not from a colonial system set up to reward the systematized.

You want constructive arguments?
I have just given you one.
By your very actions, claiming your right to free speech,
You choose to support the very thing that you profess to dismantle.

I guess you are like the constitution.
In some hands it is golden, but to those in authority, it makes for some good toilet paper.


NDN in Seattle

Native Phony

Carl Bivens 11.Feb.2005 01:48

Your Primary article is incorrect. Ward Churchill is not of native blood. He was given an honorary membership into the Cherokee the same type of honorary membership card given to Bill Clinton. Ward Churchill is a Phony. He has taken the honor of native peoples and abuses it by spreading then hate within him for his own people. Ward Churchill is just another whiteman trying to hide the guilt of his peoples past by rejecting his own birth and fradulantly taking a mantle of an honorable people.
This man is hate in one of it's purist and most desceptive forms.
TN

I don't see Leonards letterhead on your post scott I see a blob from LPDC site

AIM 11.Feb.2005 03:24

Leonard didn't write it. Nowhere in it does it say Ward is AIM. Only thanks "academic contributions". Nowhere does it say he is Indian. Oh by the way Ward screw your DNA test no one is allowed to see, tell us what Indian community you ever lived in or have relatives in?

Ward's Scholarship doubted Page 1

AIM 11.Feb.2005 03:44

University of Colorado officials reviewing Ward Churchill's writings and qualifications will find questions about his scholarship and accuracy dating back at least eight years.
"If he is going to get fired, it is going to be for making up data, and that's one thing you can't get away with in the academic community," said Thomas F. Brown, who holds a doctorate from Johns Hopkins and is an assistant professor of sociology at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas.
Brown is one of two professors at different universities who have published or have sought to publish detailed critiques of Churchill's work. Others have questioned his work in interviews.
University of New Mexico law professor John LaVelle in 1996 published a seven-page essay in the journal American Indian Quarterly questioning the basis of Churchill's theories and the underlying scholarship behind them."In view of America's entrenched ignorance of the legal and political concerns of Indian tribes, the publication of a grossly misleading and misinforming book like (Churchill's) 'Indians Are Us?' constitutes a regrettable setback in Indian people's struggle for social justice," LaVelle wrote.
That work apparently was never requested or considered by CU officials as they transferred Churchill's tenure from the communications school to ethnic studies in 1997, appointing him chairman of that department.
But today, Churchill's intellectual rigor is the third area to face scrutiny in the academic and political world since his views about the Sept. 11 attacks - he called some of the victims "little Eichmanns" - became widely known.
His claims of Indian heritage, which remain unconfirmed by anyone other than Churchill, as well as the shifting tales of his military service, remain the source of public debate as Churchill battles calls for his resignation or dismissal.
Churchill, who has asserted at different times that he was of one-sixteenth Creek or three-sixteenths Cherokee ancestry, now refuses to discuss anything about his past or questions about his academic qualifications.
"None of those questions are relevant to anything," Churchill said Tuesday. "This is not an issue about me. This is an issue about what I said. I'm not going to turn it into the ... National Enquirer."
But while Churchill has been unable or unwilling to produce anyone who can testify to his claims of Indian ancestry, or his accounts of facing combat in Vietnam, he has many defenders of his academic record.
"I've read a fair amount of his work, and a lot of it is excellent, penetrating and of high scholarly quality," said Noam Chomsky, linguistics professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an anti-war activist.
"His work is viewed highly. I use it in my classes," said James Riding In, longtime professor in the Department of American Indian Studies at Arizona State University. "...I've used some of his work in my classes before. He's a good scholar but very controversial."
Several of Churchill's theories have generated both questions and controversy in both the Indian community and the academic world at large.
But two of his opinions, often repeated in his works, have drawn much of the attention: His assertion that the U.S. government established criteria that would force Indians out of existence, and his claim that the government intentionally introduced smallpox to the Plains Indians.

Ward's sholarship doubted Page 2

AIM 11.Feb.2005 03:48

out. LaVelle, an enrolled member of the Santee Sioux Tribe, is particularly offended by Churchill's view that the various tribes have, through the establishment of membership policies, contributed to Indian problems.
In the essay, LaVelle deconstructs Churchill's collection of commentaries, "Indians Are Us? Culture and Genocide in Native North America."
Contained Even in the occasionally bare-knuckled world of academic criticism, LaVelle's 1996 essay on Churchill stands in that collection is a statement by Churchill that the U.S. government, through a piece of legislation called the General Allotment Act, sought to require proof that an Indian was of one-half or more Indian blood before providing a land grant to that person.
Such a requirement would have forced Indians to procreate only among themselves, or eventually their recognized existence would end. Trouble is, LaVelle's 1996 essay says, the U.S. government never made such a requirement in that law.
"Churchill's asserted General Allotment Act 'standard' does not exist anywhere in the text of the Act," wrote LaVelle. "Rather, that Act - like nearly all federal legislation in both history and modern times - defers to membership in an Indian tribe as the core criterion for triggering the law's applicability to individuals."
Churchill declined to respond to LaVelle's charge for this story but provided a response to the American Indian Quarterly at the time.
Then-editor Morris W. Foster of the University of Oklahoma said he declined to publish the response because he considered it potentially libelous.
Brown, of Lamar University, complains in print about Churchill's claim that smallpox-tainted blankets were intentionally distributed by U.S. officials to Indians.
In a brief filed with the Denver court in an effort to have charges of disrupting the 1992 Columbus Day parade dismissed, and in a later essay, Churchill cites UCLA anthropologist Russell Thornton as the source of his assertion that "the U.S. Army distributed smallpox-laden blankets as gifts among the Mandan (Indians)."
But Thornton actually wrote that smallpox was likely accidentally spread by deckhands with the disease as they unloaded merchandise among the Mandan.
"Churchill's tale of genocide by means of biological warfare is shocking," Brown writes in a paper he is preparing for publication. "It is also entirely fraudulent."
Churchill's defenders point to his meticulous use of footnotes that can stretch for pages after an essay.
"He's impeccable on his sources and known for his empirical and archival-based methodologies," said Arturo Aldama, a professor with Churchill in the CU ethnic-studies department. "Whether you agree with it or not, it's always been praised for academic rigor. He has 400 footnotes per chapter."
But the footnotes themselves are not always praised.
"By researching those copious endnotes, however, the discerning reader will discover that, notwithstanding all the provocative sound and fury rumbling through his essays, Churchill's analysis overall is sorely lacking in historical/factual veracity and scholarly integrity," LaVelle wrote.

Ward the Martyr? You mean Dilettante?

AIM- Some Indians Smack Back!! 11.Feb.2005 04:35

Some Indians Smack Back!
Some white’s start to call Ward Churchill martyr? Now I know you arm chair revolutionaries are on crack!! It’s certain.
Let me get this right:

Dennis Banks founder of AIM who was a fugitive form the American government for 15 years and spent yearsd in prison isn’t on you’re a list of people to talk to.

How about John Trudell whose entire family was burned alive by the FBI on Pine Ridge. No he doesn’t have a Federal Government approved doctorate and he isn’t on your list of desired lecturers.

How about Charlene Teters who endured the wrath of the entire student body at the University of Illinois opposing that racist mascot who was beaten up by Uni of Minn, police at a basketball game and is preparing to defend herself at the US supreme court demanding that Cleveland Police drop charges for arresting her for refusing to move to a “free speech zone”? She is a college prof at the Native American Institute of Art at Santa Fe. Oh I forgot that is one of those schools for Indian people. You wouldn’t be interested.

How about Vernon Bellecourt who did 18 months for refusing to testify to a federal grand jury about activists good will trips to Libya? Doesn’t meet the bar? Oh that’s right he doesn’t like Churchill for pretending to be Indian. You won’t talk or respect anyone who doesn’t agree with your “martyr”.

How about Ingrid Washinawatook who was murdered by Farc renegades bribed by the Oil companies to do so because she wouldn’t stop helping the U’wa people. Oh that’s right she was friends with AIM founders and they don’t like your boy toy Ward!

No obviously the most important martyr of all is an asshole who is gonna loose his life? A lifetime in jail? A year in jail? A beat down? No!! He will loose his 96 grand a year snow bunny salary to live life in the “TONY” in prestigious Boulder Co.

You mean he won’t live in poverty stricken Pine Ridge? No there ain’t no Starbucks there! Four Corners? With those dirt poor Indians? You goota be kidding. No he is gonna stay with the snow bunnies. Iwish you were a martyr Ward I really wish you could know how that pain feels!

A message to Ward!

AIM- Ogitchida 11.Feb.2005 04:43

there are alot of ways to get the point across Ward! Your way sucks!
there are alot of ways to get the point across Ward! Your way sucks!

Hello

THE LPDC STATEMENT CAME FROM THEIR EMAIL LIST

"b"oB mcglynn (Agent A!) 11.Feb.2005 05:03

the lpdc statement saying hands off churchill is just that - an lpdc statement, and leonard has to agree to it. ask the lpsc. i did.

the fbi is laughing at all this mud-slinging (and i bet involved). people are reacting before thinking. if u want another side to the media/the indymedia thread and the stuff from minn. AIM see coloradoaim.org/why.html and then maybe you'll hav all sides to make an opinion. that site answers all the stuff bout cia/soldier of fortune/churchill indian or not etc.

cointelpro is alive and well if not in fact then its inside of us . . .

David Braadley Article condemneing Churchill is from LPDC paper as well

Site Stomp 11.Feb.2005 06:24

No where in that letter does it say Ward is Indian or that he is AIM.

As if Leonard is stupid enough to attach his name to this guy right now!

Spat 11.Feb.2005 06:25

If he does he will never get out of jail ever. That will suck.

Ward the Poser!

AIM 11.Feb.2005 06:28

Ward the Martyr? You mean Dilettante?
AIM- Some Indians Smack Back!! 11.Feb.2005 04:35

Some Indians Smack Back!
Some white’s start to call Ward Churchill martyr? Now I know you arm chair revolutionaries are on crack!! It’s certain.
Let me get this right:

Dennis Banks founder of AIM who was a fugitive from the American government for 15 years and spent years in prison and he isn’t on you’re "A list of people to talk to.

How about John Trudell whose entire family was burned alive by the FBI on Pine Ridge. No he doesn’t have a Federal Government approved doctorate and he isn’t on your list of desired lecturers.

How about Charlene Teters who endured the wrath of the entire student body at the University of Illinois opposing that racist mascot who was beaten up by Uni of Minn, police at a basketball game and is preparing to defend herself at the US supreme court demanding that Cleveland Police drop charges for arresting her for refusing to move to a “free speech zone”? She is a college prof at the Native American Institute of Art at Santa Fe. Oh I forgot that is one of those schools for Indian people. You wouldn’t be interested.

How about Vernon Bellecourt who did 18 months for refusing to testify to a federal grand jury about activists good will trips to Libya? Doesn’t meet the bar? Oh that’s right he doesn’t like Churchill for pretending to be Indian. You won’t talk or respect anyone who doesn’t agree with your “martyr”.

How about Ingrid Washinawatook who was murdered by Farc renegades bribed by the Oil companies to do so because she wouldn’t stop helping the U’wa people. Oh that’s right she was friends with AIM founders and they don’t like your boy toy Ward!

No obviously the most important martyr of all is an asshole who is gonna lose his life? A lifetime in jail? A year in jail? A beat down? No!! He will lose his 96 grand a year snow bunny salary to live life in the “TONY” in prestigious Boulder Co.

You mean he won’t live in poverty stricken Pine Ridge? No there ain’t no Starbucks there! Four Corners? With those dirt poor Indians? You gotta be kidding. No he is gonna stay with the snow bunnies. I wish you were a martyr Ward I really wish you could know how that pain feels!

Who pays Wrd's salary? The Little Eichmanns! Of course

AIM 11.Feb.2005 18:22

Ward Churchill gets paid plenty by the rich parents of kids from the country's major metropolitan areas who can afford CU's hefty nonresident bills.

He owes his professional existence to the very "technicians of empire" he likened to "little Eichmanns."

So when Churchill contends - as he did Tuesday night - that he does not work for Bill Owens or the CU regents, he's telling the truth.

Just not the whole truth.

The system he so despises has not kept him down. It has propped him up"

In fact most of the technocratic offspring that visit this website are propped up by the largesse of their mummies and papa's and are enrolled in many of the finest institutions the imperialists have to offer.

Meanwhile back on the Rez: Children die at early ages and AIM leaders who were jailed and actually abused by the imperialists in real and tangible way are still organizers of their people. Ward is like a Martian landed on earth in Indian Country no one knows who he is with the exception of knowing this Wasichu (white barbarian)is making America hate Indians again by pretending to be one of us (ala Iron Eyes Cody the Italian with Velcro pigtails who played Indian chiefs in the movies for years) and spouting stupid uneducated positions about how 3000 white folks deserved what they got on 911.
Fact is Ward you are not only like many of the people you criticize you are worse.
You work for the intelligence wing of the US government using your loose connection to AIM (Russ Means Bounced from AIM for supporting CIA in 85) and your bully pulpit to make stupid ass statements that the government can loosely associate with AIM thus putting us back on the DTO list (Ward you know what I am talking about). Sloppy work, agent Churchill. Now we can prove once and for all to those that matter within AIM that Ward is out to get all of us. Russ and Ward have proven that through testifying to the Federal Grand Jury ,supporting the Contra's, and now the conclusive forcing all of AIM to loosely associated with his little Eichmanns 911 debacle. Even those who feel obligated to support Ward because of their long contact in Denver must be feeling quite stressed about being forced to stand in public with him. His identity unraveling (he isn’t Indian), having basically said anybody in front of a computer terminal in the Trade Center deserved what they got, Indian people expect our leaders to raise the issue of US atrocity world wide without embracing atrocity carried out by a former CIA thug Bin Laden.
Is it ok with you white folks if we choose the leader and who we want our message to be delivered by?
And can we choose the message ?
Our leaders had a message for 911 it was in solidarity with the innocent people killed in the attack and at the same time it reminded US leaders once again that they have carried out many such devastating attacks on millions of innocent victims and that this was a great opportunity to reflect and take the plank out of our own eye.
Is that ok? Do we have to say senseless insensitive crap to families that have just lost their families to get the point out? No we do not. If Churchill wants to be the authorized leader of Al Qaeda, that is up to him. We don’t need him to speak for Indians and draw down the wrath of Bush on our people. Use your own people for such dangerous folly.


IS the FBI laughing at this fight?

Nobody 11.Feb.2005 19:49

Somebody said they are. So prove it. Saying it doesn't make it so. I'd say what they're laughing at is so many leftists jumping to the defense of one of their long-time employees. I think that's what people have put up real evidence of, that Ward works for them.

And I think that the AIM people have made a very good point when they say the struggle for Indian rights can't mainly be waged on college campuses. Really revolutionary activity by students is activity that takes them off of the campus, and gets them connecting with the oppressed, in ghettos and Indian reservations and so on.

Think what you like about Ward, the primary issues for Indians today are still bread and butter issues. The best way to understand those issues and the best way to fight those struggles is to connect with the Indians who are fighting those struggles and living those problems.

Finally, a constructive suggestion, directed particularly at Marco:

Marco earlier said he did not trust the Bellecourts. Presumably this is because of the various negative rumours swirling around concerning the Bellecourts. I have already made my opinion of those rumors clear, but if they continue to trouble you, why not interview Vernon Bellecourt about them? He has offered to be interviewed particularly about the Anne Mae Acquash rumours by pretty much anyone. Call him and set it up. Do a telephone interview if you have to.

Only, do me a favor and don't ask ONLY about the negative rumors. Also give him a chance to speak about what AIM is doing now, and whatever else he would like to talk about.

Then publish the interview on Indymedia, on the front page of the features section, where it belongs.

LPDC Continuing Support of WC

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 02:06


The LPDC is coming out strongly in favor of Churchill, and accusing "factions" - presumably of AIM - of maliciously framing Leonard Peltier for the Aquash murder. They don't say who they are referring to presumably because it would be libelous and Peltier is suing Paul DeMain for libel already. The LPDC is also denying it has ever supported Arlo Looking Cloud or John Graham. From reading Peltier lawyer Barry Bachrach's impression of the trial I'd had the impression LP's attorney (who's role in this is to represent LP's views not his own) was taking a much firmer position in support of Looking Cloud - I will have to reread it.

Also note that the media have gotten a hold of Ward Churchill's military records. Churchill was an expert marksman with a machine gun, and also trained in movie projector operation. (?) Maybe that was his Public Information Specialist job. Hard to tell if its in the realm of USO or psyops.  http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2005/0205/021105-ward-churchill.htm



From:  info@leonardpeltier.org

Dear Supporters,

It has become clear that certain factions are maliciously and wrongfully
framing Leonard Peltier as a patsy to be falsely blamed for the death of
Anna Mae Aquash. First and foremost, let us be clear that Leonard had no
involvement in the murder.

Leonard Peltier has never voiced an opinion as to the innocence or guilt
of those charged with Anna Mae's murder. That is fact. Leonard's
statements in the past year have not given support to Arlo Looking Cloud
or John Graham specifically (or anyone else alleged to have taken part
in Anna Mae's murder), but have been solely in support of fairness and
due process.

Leading up to the Looking Cloud trial and then in reporting the trial,
the media has embraced the false statements made by Kamook (Banks)
Ecoffey and others. It should be noted that Mr. Ecoffey was a key
investigator in the Looking Cloud case and carried on a relationship
with a key witness prior to trial, a witness who made falsely damning
statements about Leonard at trial. By sensationalizing testimony given
in that trial, the media has made outrageous accusations about Leonard
Peltier that have no foundation in the truth.

Indeed, the reporting is becoming more outrageous as a host of a
Canadian television program recently stated:
"At his [Cloud's] trial the question was raised that Leonard Peltier
ordered the execution fearing that she was an FBI informer." This
statement was an intentional misrepresentation of the facts and is not
at all supported by the Looking Cloud trial transcript. This is part of
a larger conspiracy to smear Leonard in the press and make him the patsy
for the wrongs committed by the FBI and others, some of whom have
purported to have been long time supporters of Leonard. We cannot stand
and let shadows gutlessly utilize the media to skewer Leonard Peltier to
protect themselves, in some instances, and, in other instances, simply
to make sure that Leonard remains in prison.

This has not been the only media attack. In a recent settlement in a
civil suit Leonard filed against Paul DeMain (editor of News From Indian
Country) - who had also aligned himself with the FBI against Leonard
Peltier in implying his involvement in the Aquash murder - DeMain was
forced to admit what is common knowledge in The Movement, i.e., that
Leonard "had no authority to order the murder," and that he has no
evidence that Leonard had any involvement in any way in the murder of
Anna Mae. That is fact.

The recent attacks on Ward Churchill - who has contributed vastly to our
knowledge on the FBI's COINTELPRO activities (specifically on how the
FBI worked to destroy the American Indian Movement) and who has also
served as a spokesperson for Leonard Peltier for many years - is another
example of gross media manipulation. Remember that speakers, teachers,
writers, and publications themselves were targets of the FBI's
counterintelligence program during the 60s and 70s in an attempt to
interrupt or prevent the exchange of free ideas and to adversely affect
public opinion on activists and dissident groups. These attacks on Mr.
Churchill are designed, in part, to discredit Leonard Peltier and the
work that has generated vast interest in his case, as well as efforts to
win his freedom. People, such as Ward Churchill, have exposed the FBI's
disruption of AIM, the Black Panthers, and virtually any person who
dares commit the heinous crime of domestic dissent.

The FBI maneuvered in a very calculated fashion to disrupt AIM and other
organizations, and it continues to do so today, as we witness the
Kafkesque trial of Leonard Peltier for the death of Anna Mae Aquash in
the media. The motives underlying Anna Mae's death were planted by the
FBI as part of its co-intelpro activity. It started by the infiltration
of AIM by Douglas Durham who infiltrated AIM at its highest levels. He
earned the trust of Dennis Banks, Vernon Bellecourt and others whom he
used to get information for the government. Because Anna Mae saw through
Durham, she became a threat to Durham because, she, like many others did
not trust him. Leonard did not trust him and voiced his opinion to
Dennis Banks who disregarded it during the first International Treaty
Council Convention on the Standing Rock Reservation in 1974.

The FBI then began targeting and setting up Anna Mae because she had
become a threat to Durham's cover and they began a campaign to "bad
jacket" her. We know that both the FBI and people within AIM targeted
Anna Mae Aquash because of the connection which the FBI created between
her and Durham. Shortly after Durham was exposed as an agent of the FBI,
Anna Mae became a target because AIM leaders believed she was working
with Durham. At this time, AIM leaders resolved to rid AIM of so-called
"rats." The fact is that Anna Mae never was a "rat," but the FBI played
people and maneuvered to create fear among AIM leaders that she was.
This caused great concern to certain members of AIM because she was
deeply involved with AIM Leaders. The fear and suspicion became so
overwhelming, certain factions decided something had to be done with
Anna Mae. Leonard was not involved in any way with the decision making
and the death of Anna Mae. In fact, Leonard at this time was a fugitive
on the run into Canada, incommunicado with the group that he worked.

Now we have the John Graham Defense Committee inappropriately using
Leonard's statements to bolster support for Graham and also manipulate
the media. Indeed, John Graham has falsely associated himself in a
relationship with Leonard that does not and never did exist. In an
interview with David Melmer on March 02, 2004, Graham falsely stated
that shortly after the Oglala firefight, he and Anna Mae ". . .connected
with Leonard and them, and they were in the hills there..." However, Mr.
Graham did not, at any time, meet or join with Leonard's group. In fact,
Leonard Peltier has never met and doesn't know John Graham personally.
We now know that Graham's lies are part of a conspiracy and attempt to
implicate Leonard in the killing of Anna Mae.

Four requests were sent to the John Graham Defense Committee asking that
all links to Leonard Pettier Defense Committee Web sites and all Peltier
statements be removed from the John Graham Defense Committee's Web site.
When the private attempts to have these materials removed was ignored,
we publicly demanded the removal of all links to the Leonard Peltier
Defense Committee Web sites and all Peltier statements. Still, contrary
to Leonard's express demands, the John Graham Defense Committee has
failed to honor Leonard's wishes.

Let us be clear. Leonard Pettier had no involvement in the murder of
Anna Mae and it has become clear to Leonard that he must distance
himself from anyone alleged to have played a role in her death. Leonard
must protect himself from unfounded accusations. It is important that we
not stand still while Leonard is made the fall guy for yet another crime
he did not commit. Leonard has suffered 29 years and we will not stand
by and allow him to suffer any further injustice. We have already seen
the United States Government present patently false evidence both in
Leonard's case and in the Looking Cloud case. Baseless accusations are
being made against Leonard and associations being alleged that never
existed. It is important that we stand behind Leonard and not let him be
framed for yet another incident in which he had no part. It has become
clear to Leonard and those close to him that he must remove himself from
anything or anyone who has been allegedly connected to Anna Mae's
murder. Most importantly is that certain factions be stopped from lying
and implicating Leonard. We will not rest until that is done.

Robert Robideau
LPDC
International/National Spokesperson
And Legal Assistant to Leonard Peltier and Barry Bachrach
Phone: 01134938150425
Email:  americanindianm@telefonica.net

LPDC supporting Churchill, dumping Graham / Looking Cloud

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 02:31

The LPDC is coming out strongly in favor of Churchill, and accusing "factions" - presumably of AIM - of maliciously framing Leonard Peltier for the Aquash murder. They don't say who they are referring to presumably because it would be libelous and Peltier is suing Paul DeMain for libel already. The LPDC is also denying it has ever supported Arlo Looking Cloud or John Graham. From reading Peltier lawyer Barry Bachrach's impression of the trial I'd had the impression LP's attorney (who's role in this is to represent LP's views not his own) was taking a much firmer position in support of Looking Cloud - I will have to reread it. I can't paste the whole statement apparently because of indymedia's text limit.

Also note that the media have gotten a hold of Ward Churchill's military records. Churchill was an expert marksman with a machine gun, and also trained in movie projector operation. (?) Maybe that was his Public Information Specialist job. Hard to tell if its in the realm of USO or psyops.  http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2005/0205/021105-ward-churchill.htm



From:  info@leonardpeltier.org

Dear Supporters,

It has become clear that certain factions are maliciously and wrongfully
framing Leonard Peltier as a patsy to be falsely blamed for the death of
Anna Mae Aquash. First and foremost, let us be clear that Leonard had no
involvement in the murder.

Leonard Peltier has never voiced an opinion as to the innocence or guilt
of those charged with Anna Mae's murder. That is fact. Leonard's
statements in the past year have not given support to Arlo Looking Cloud
or John Graham specifically (or anyone else alleged to have taken part
in Anna Mae's murder), but have been solely in support of fairness and
due process.


Indeed, the reporting is becoming more outrageous ... This is part of
a larger conspiracy to smear Leonard in the press and make him the patsy
for the wrongs committed by the FBI and others, some of whom have
purported to have been long time supporters of Leonard. We cannot stand
and let shadows gutlessly utilize the media to skewer Leonard Peltier to
protect themselves, in some instances, and, in other instances, simply
to make sure that Leonard remains in prison.

This has not been the only media attack. In a recent settlement in a
civil suit Leonard filed against Paul DeMain ...


The recent attacks on Ward Churchill - who has contributed vastly to our
knowledge on the FBI's COINTELPRO activities (specifically on how the
FBI worked to destroy the American Indian Movement) and who has also
served as a spokesperson for Leonard Peltier for many years - is another
example of gross media manipulation. Remember that speakers, teachers,
writers, and publications themselves were targets of the FBI's
counterintelligence program during the 60s and 70s in an attempt to
interrupt or prevent the exchange of free ideas and to adversely affect
public opinion on activists and dissident groups. These attacks on Mr.
Churchill are designed, in part, to discredit Leonard Peltier ...

The motives underlying Anna Mae's death were planted by the
FBI as part of its co-intelpro activity. It started by the infiltration
of AIM by Douglas Durham who infiltrated AIM at its highest levels. He
earned the trust of Dennis Banks, Vernon Bellecourt and others whom he
used to get information for the government. ...

The fear and suspicion became so
overwhelming, certain factions decided something had to be done with
Anna Mae. Leonard was not involved in any way with the decision making
and the death of Anna Mae. ...

Robert Robideau

Either you're with us, or you're part of the cointelpro

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 02:49

I also find it ludicrous to claim that the attacks on Ward Churchill are meant as an attack on Leonard Peltier. Bill O'Reilly and dozens of other journalists obviously could care less about Leonard Peltier. Churchill is the man of the hour. The Bellecourts and Dennis Banks are obviously trying to associate themselves with LP, so who is the one attacking WC with the real motive to frame LP? Paul DeMain? As far as I know he has been silent on the WC media nonsense.

That's it folks, either you're with us or you're part of the FBI cointelpro. It's all a conspiracy to frame Leonard Peltier. I've read Leonard Peltier's FBI file and I believe he was framed. He was shooting at the agents but no one knows who fired the fatal shots, and the story about them being killed at close range is total BS. However that doesn't give the LPDC carte blanche to suggest that others work with the FBI. They have no evidence and no credibility in making the accusation.

I've kept my comments about WC narrowly defined to expressing concern about his background. The questions have not been answered satisfactorily up to this point but I expect that will be changing since so many people are now investigating him.

no need

marco 12.Feb.2005 03:33

There is no need for me to say another word about
the Bellecourts. I already pointed out that I don't
trust them any more OR less than Ward Churchill.
That, and many other things discussed in this thread
have nothing to do with the matter at hand.

My suspicion is that people are fixated on the other
topics as deliberate distractions. It does little to
no good to try and point out to them that these
things have nothing to do with whether Churchill
deserves freedom of speech under the first ammendment.
I'm beginning to think people have fully trained on
ignoring such facts.

 http://mke.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/202746.shtml



ps: David Horowitz and Anne Coulter are wingnuts.

CHURCHILL IS A CULTURAL IDENTITY THIEF

CHURCHILL IS A CULTURAL IDENTITY THIEF. 12.Feb.2005 03:53

He should be teaching WANNABEE STUDIES.
He should be teaching WANNABEE STUDIES.

This was on Indian Country Today
This was on Indian Country Today

Both of the largest Native Anerican newpapers, Indian Country Today and News from Indian Country, have denounced Ward Churchill as a fake and fraud.

He was hired under Affirmative Action to give more positions to Native American professors. 11 American Indian professors went for Native American studies professorship at UC. Out of those REAL American Indians they hired a WHITE MAN who lied on his resume to get that job. A $96,000 a year job that should have gone to an Indian.

His ancestors were slave owners AND ALSO INDIAN KILLERS, NOT INDIANS.

He lied to steal a job away from a Native American. He is white and not Indian, but a fraud.

He is just like all the rest of those white men he goes on about. He stole from us Indians by claiming "Indianess" to get a job.

He also said he writes from the point of view he is Native American, yet even that is false...SINCE HE IS NOT INDIAN.

HE IS A CULTURAL IDENTITY THIEF FOR HIS OWN EGO AND PROFIT.

JOB RESUME SHOWS HE IS A LIAR

He stole an American Indian's job. NO HONOR!!! 12.Feb.2005 04:13

This from the local newspaper.

"Churchill's original 1978 application to the school for a position as a lecturer in Native American studies included a completed federal affirmative action form, on which he claimed "American Indian" ethnicity, according to records obtained Thursday by KHOW radio talk show host Dan Caplis through open records law requests to CU.

A second document obtained by Caplis, a 1990 application by Churchill for the position of associate professor of American Indian Studies, prior to his receiving tenure, also shows that Churchill claimed "American Indian" status.

An affirmative action data collection form shows that 11 American Indians applied, but only two, including Churchill, were interviewed.

Many questions have been raised, since the Churchill controversy erupted last month, about whether he can properly claim American Indian status.

Churchill, who could not be reached for comment Thursday, was granted associate member status in the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in May 1994 - two months before such memberships ceased being issued.

"If he is not Native American, if he lied about his ethnicity to get a job in the Equal Opportunity program, I think they would fire him on those ground alone," Caplis said.

So if someone falsely supplies a resume which is based on mistruths. Then he can be fired. It is like if you went for a firemens or policemens job, but lied about your training."

HE STOLE A JOB BY CLAIMING ON AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DOCUMENT HE WAS INDIAN WHEN HE WAS WASN'T.


The url address shows how his ancestor was really a White guy who KILLED INDIANS.





Cointelpro Papers

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 04:18

Marco I note in your links that you've found every website about cointelpro except mine. www.cointel.org Take a look. I've read the 50,000 pages released by the Church Committee. Formatting two volumes of the Church Committee reports was about two months of solid work, equivalent to reading them three times. I have more FBI cointelpro documents on my website than all those others put together, plus the congressional reports - you should be interested in it.

About 5 years ago I scanned and formatted The COINTELPRO Papers and posted it to my website, in an agreement with Ward Churchill. I am thoroughly familiar with the book. I still think its a good book, except that WC couldn't play it straight. He eliminated the White Hate Groups cointelpro (KKK and Am. Nazi Party) as if the cointelpro's were all directed at the left. He also included AIM which was not an FBI cointelpro program, although it resembled one. He left out others too, Cuba, Mexico, Yugoslavs, Special Ops. Also many of the documents in his book previously appeared in Nelson Blackstock's book called "COINTELORO" with a forward by Noam Chomsky, which I used my my report for the CBC.

My website has a neutral tone because I think the programs speak for themselves and my goal was to avoid charges of being a conspiracy theorist. Still, I have dozens of UFO and mind control sites linking to mine. If you think I'm somehow against Leonard Peltier, you can consider the work I've done on his FBI file - which is still fairly disorganized but I will get to it someday.
 http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/peltier.htm
- Paul

Walked across America for Leonard and I say screw Ward!!

ALL THE PEOPLE 12.Feb.2005 10:01

The fact is that Ward Churchill, Russ Means, and others made a grave mistake in recent years in regards to Leonard. If Bobby (angeldust) Robideau wants to defend Ward and disown these two poor indians Graham and Looking Cloud who have been charged 30 years after the fact with no evidence for a murder that AIM has always contended was committed by the FBI then he is a sad desperate hull of a man. Then again Robideau was found innocent and let go forever for the same killing Leonard is sitting in jail for. Interesting situation. Does anyone really believe
a) It did Leonard's cause good to accuse the leadership of AIM of murder?
b) That it helps Leonard for Churchill to say the crap he did about 911?

We don't think so. We think Leonard is in such a crap position there is nothing else he can do. Desperate choices are made in desperate times. Chooosing Bobby for a spokesperson is surely a temporary ordeal.

Marco who cares whatr you said? Who the hell are you?

AIM 12.Feb.2005 10:04

Interesting enough, none of you punks have ever bothered to interview the original AIM. Shame

MARCO AIM ASKED FOR HIS FIRING YEARS AGO.

The real AIM asked for his firing from UC years ago for STEALING. 12.Feb.2005 11:21

Marco. You don't sound like an Indian. So stick your non-Indian nose out of American Indian business.

Churchill is NOT INDIAN and took a job away from a qualified Indian person.

If he lied about being Indian. Lied about his military service. Lied about his AIM service.

FACE IT. HE IS JUST A PLAIN LYING WHITE GUY STEALING OUR INDIAN HERITAGE FOR HIS OWN EGOMANIC AGENDA.

He should resign,OR BE FIRED, and the job given to a REAL INDIAN. Not a lying wannabee.

heavy .jpgs hidden

marco 12.Feb.2005 12:02

Comments which are nothing more than a huge .jpg
have each been hidden.

You can read them by clicking them individually at:


Please be considerate of people logging in on dialup.
This would take about a half hour to load in at 28.8




Leonard Peltier says Ward no longer represents me!!

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112935.jpg

Form The Leonard Peltier Newsletter

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112936.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112937.jpg

Peltier Condemns Dark Knight Field Notes

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112938.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112939.jpg


Leonard dumps Ward from public representation

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112940.jpg

How many people post crap on LPDC internet? Lots

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112952.jpg

CHURCHILL A FAKE

 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112963.jpg
 http://www.indymedia.org/images/2005/02/112964.jpg




I also notice there are half a dozen ward churchill stories
flooding other stories off the open newswire.

Here are some links to a bunch:

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/819100.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/819029.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/819016.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818945.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818942.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818870.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818858.shtml



 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818778.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818778.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818753.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818736.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818754.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818745.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818747.shtml

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818737.shtml





ps: if you feel you MUST put up a .jpg with picture and text
rather than html, please change the size and texture of the
picture so it's the smallest while still being readable.
Half a meg and a quarter meg is not acceptable.

SONGS ABOUT THE FAKE FRAUD INDIAN.

funny that phony liar. Here are some songs about him. 12.Feb.2005 12:28

 http://www.mediawhore.com/boyles/

He is fake wannabee.

Assasinating Legitimate Dissent Dept.

in struggle 12.Feb.2005 18:05

Indian Country Today is well known to traditionals and their supporters to be in cohootz with the BIA and government attack mandate. If you peruse through the well-funded newspaper, you'll see which ideas and which institutions are systematically promoted, and which are systematically suppressed or attacked in all manner of modern ways of attack.

See the principle editor of Indian Country Today, Tim Giago, going out of his way to defend the government
 http://www.dickshovel.com/giaggo.crazy.html

It is always interesting to see that when tyranny feels threatened, it goes to such lengths to character assasinate and discredit leading members of challenge. Those not familiar with techniques like these would do well to inform themselves on such once illegal (now legal) government programs like COINTELPRO.

Two important sites:
"The Sabotage of Legitimate Dissent":
 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/COINTELPRO/cointelpro.html

and

www.cointelpro.org

Qualified Support For Churchill

Vicky Davis 12.Feb.2005 19:12

I listened to Churchill speak at the university regarding both his statements and his positions. I was with him right up to the point where he claimed that this land belongs to the indigenous people implying that the White Man doesn't belong here. That's where I draw the line and withdraw my support.

We don't need to have another round of Indians and minority wars. People like Churchill are dangerous because he is actually promoting it.

I really believe that he is a right wing insurgent. He is an obscure professor involved in obscure subject matter with a small audience. How is it that he was propelled to national prominence? Think about it.

Reply to Marco

Nobody 12.Feb.2005 19:50

Are you ABSOLUTELY SURE that before this discussion ever started you knew everything there was to know about any of these issues? Because that sure seems to be your stance, based on your most recent post. You took a position, and nothing, out of the thousands of words posted on this site, could possibly convince you that you might have to RETHINK the position. That's astounding stubborness, really it is.

It's no use arguing with you on the subject because you've made it just perfectly plain that nothing ANYONE could say would persuade you that you might be wrong. That's DEEPLY disappointing to me in what it says about you personally and about the staff of Indymedia.

Secret Plan Against Leonard (2)

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 20:04


Now we have Robert Robideau back on the LPDC and calling for the prosecution of the guy who was supposedly covering for Leonard:

 http://www.indigenouswomenforjustice.org/

"An act committed by one, a founder of AIM, nevertheless with the heart of a coward ordered Anna Mae's execution. He and those that followed his dictates must pay their dues and I feel in the enemies court is a proper and fitting place for these individuals who would not in the last 30 years show some remorse to their people who had given them their trust and with this act betrayed. John Boy, I hope, will follow in the footsteps of Arlo because it is the only way to the top and as John said, 'They did what they were told.'"


LP is certainly getting some strange advice these days.

Secret Plan Against Leonard (1)

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 20:27


These are in reverse order due to posting problems.

This thing about the attacks on Ward Churchill being part of a secret plan against Leonard Peltier seem to come from the Paul DeMain affair. DeMain's theory is that AIM leaders ordered Aquash killed because of her alleged knowledge that Peltier killed agents Coler and Williams. AIM was covering for Leonard Peltier. That's DeMain's theory of what happened.


 http://www.naja.com/nativevoice2003/peltier_lawsuit.html

"Peltier’s suit claims DeMain irresponsibly told his readers that the “primary motive for the murder” of activist Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash by other members of the American Indian Movement 'was her knowledge that Leonard Peltier had shot the two agents as he was convicted.'”

“I got a lawyer now that’s an expert in (libel law) … and we’ve already talked about it. Let him come … (We’ll) review the whole article and I’ll own that paper,” the interview transcript says.

"Under libel law, a plaintiff — in this case Peltier — must demonstrate that the published statement was materially false and harmed his or her reputation. For people classified as public figures, the burden of proof is higher: They must also show that the text was published with “actual malice,” which means knowing a statement is false and publishing it anyway. The standards of current libel law were established with the landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Sullivan v. New York Times case."


It doesn't look like Peltier has a chance in hell to win this lawsuit. He's just going to look like a bully when he loses. He may even have to pay the other side's attorney's fees and additional damages if its determined to be a frivolous lawsuit meant to harrass a journalist. How is Peltier going to prove that DeMain knew his statement was false?

I don't want to give the impression I believe DeMain's theory. I have no idea. But accepting Robideau back onto the LPDC when he's known to be hostile to the AIM leadership, and now he's writing the press releases, may be a way to counteract DeMain's allegations.

Secret Plan Against Leonard (1)

Paul Wolf 12.Feb.2005 20:34

These are in reverse order due to posting problems.

This thing about the attacks on Ward Churchill being part of a secret plan against Leonard Peltier seem to come from the Paul DeMain affair. DeMain's theory is that AIM leaders ordered Aquash killed because of her alleged knowledge that Peltier killed agents Coler and Williams. AIM was covering for Leonard Peltier. That's DeMain's theory of what happened.

 http://www.naja.com/nativevoice2003/peltier_lawsuit.html

"Peltier’s suit claims DeMain irresponsibly told his readers that the “primary motive for the murder” of activist Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash by other members of the American Indian Movement 'was her knowledge that Leonard Peltier had shot the two agents as he was convicted.'” ... “I got a lawyer now that’s an expert in (libel law) … and we’ve already talked about it. Let him come … (We’ll) review the whole article and I’ll own that paper,” the interview transcript says. ... "Under libel law, a plaintiff — in this case Peltier — must demonstrate that the published statement was materially false and harmed his or her reputation. For people classified as public figures, the burden of proof is higher: They must also show that the text was published with “actual malice,” which means knowing a statement is false and publishing it anyway. The standards of current libel law were established with the landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Sullivan v. New York Times case."

It doesn't look like Peltier has a chance in hell to win this lawsuit. He's just going to look like a bully when he loses. He may even have to pay the other side's attorney's fees and additional damages if its determined to be a frivolous lawsuit meant to harrass a journalist. How is Peltier going to prove that DeMain knew his statement was false? I don't want to give the impression I believe DeMain's theory. I have no idea. But accepting Robideau back onto the LPDC when he's known to be hostile to the AIM leadership, and now he's writing the press releases, may be a way to counteract DeMain's allegations.

info on Bellecourts aim from colorado aim site

The 'Its COINTELPRO Goin On Here Foolz' Dr. 13.Feb.2005 01:31

this aim site will rebut ward = cia,fbi,conta, soldier of fortune, he aint aim, he aint indian , he's the loch nes monster shit : coloradoaim.org/why.html

read it all then make up yer own mind.
hysteria is afoot over him.
just what the pigs want.
its sick that people-especialy white leftoids- are arguing about the blood quantum
level of "indianness". plenty of people hav cherokee background - and u can act on that cultural inheritance or not. if u read the col. aim site you'll see he found other indian nations in his family. is he lying? as a white guy whose met the man a few times i never thought that shit was any of my biz- cept upon seeing/talkin to him it was obvious he was part indian as so many american indians are.

and those posts from those claiming to be aim trashing ward- maybe, or maybe your a cointelpro plant? or a pro soviet leftoid who can't forgive ward for breaking with the pro-soviet/pro sandinista bellecourts? please if u say your from aim then explain how- otherwise you stink of bein a cop or a fool for the bellecourts . . .

grow up everyone- the fbi is laughing at u

Indy Media-Enemy fo AIM or not make up yopur mind?

AIM 13.Feb.2005 01:43

So “Marco” as we take it is part of the Indymedia board? So am I to assume that Indymedia has decided that they “don’t trust the Bellecourrts”? If that is the case then let me give you some information you won’t have to guess or beat around the bush about. Marco or whoever you think you are, I guess you think you want to be a part of our people’s struggle. Unless you state otherwise you and Indymedia are then taking a side? Marco I can guarantee you we will know you and everything we need to know about our adversaries in Indymedia momentarily. It seems that Indy Media has been overrun by the government. You support the government funded Indian not those who actually struggle.
Even though there is no side to take. AIM, the AIM that carried our Alcatrez occupation, Wounded Knee and countless other actions is and always ahs been a unified group. You cannot dispute that because even according to Ward Churchill they created a separate and absolutely unrelated organization called the International Confederation of the Autonomous Chapters of The American Indian Movement (The ICACAIM as it were). The only history we see from this group? Supported the CIA/Contras, Protested Columbus, attacked the leadership of AIM for 15 years. He has spent more time attacking Indians than the White government.
Now IndyMedia or some psuedo expert named Marco is Ward’s front line of defence? You need to either take another look or redevelop a more unbiased position towards our people and our organization.
This is truly a shame you have declared yourselves enemies.


Academic misconduct

Colorado white boy 13.Feb.2005 02:44

Outside of the free speech and "Is Ward an FBI stooge?" questions is that of his academic integrity. Both Thomas Brown (Lamar U.) and John LaVelle (U. of New Mexico and an Indian) have raised questions about Churchill's integrity. See  http://lawschool.unm.edu/faculty/lavelle/allotment-act.pdf for an example. LaVelle claims this is all part of an effort by Churchill to delegitimize tribal governments. I won't speculate on anybody's motives, but dishonesty is not a good way to speak truth to power, if you ask me.

Something To Ponder

marco 13.Feb.2005 03:15

Sounds like some people need to read the feature
story here again before they do any more comments.

The title is:

Ward Churchill Under Attack.

That should give you a clue or two as to the main topic as well.

You might want to focus your replies on that.
Is he under attack? Is he not under attack?


You'll notice the title isn't:

1) Ward Churchill a bonafide NDN -
2) Ward Churchill should lose his tenure;
3) Ward Churchill chain smokes,
or
4) Ward Churchill = Leonard Peltier/C or V Bellecourt/Paul Demain.
5) PlaceYourAdHominemHere


If you have a burning desire to discuss something
else besides "Ward Churchill Under Attack," you
really should find somewhere else to do it, you know.
Perhaps a brand new thread somewhere?

 http://www.indymedia.us perhaps!

If you keep trying to stuff all that other polemical
bullshit into here, and someone calls you a

1) distraction
2) fed
3) c0int3lpro operative
4) tinfoilist

then that's just what you get.

Marco? What's this?

AIM 13.Feb.2005 08:53

Didn't you post above several days ago that "you really don't trust the Bellecourts"?

Who says we can't argue about the topic?

Nobody 13.Feb.2005 20:15

You've decided what the topic is, and anyone who thinks that maybe that's the wrong topic is a tinfoilist, FBI agent, whatever.

The reality is that, as you yourself admit in your post, a lot has to do with what the question is. Your charge is that anyone who disagrees with your choice of topic is a nut or a cop.

That's every bit as much nonsense as the people who say "everyone who says Mumia is guilty is a cop," or whatever. There can be honest disagreement about what the proper topic is every bit as much as their can be honest disagreements about questions of fact.

A lot of us don't want to get into a discussion of "does Ward Churchill have the right to spew nonsense or doesn't he" because we think there's no good answer to it. And that's been our point.

It's like the old bit about "when did you stop beating your wife?" What do you say? "A long time ago?" "I NEVER stopped beating my wife?" Sometimes it's just a bad question.

And the suggestion that someone who thinks Ward is an FBI agent is a tinfoilist or a cop is pretty outlandish when you break it down. On the one hand you are saying that some of the posters here might be cops. On the other hand, you are saying that people who accuse other people of being cops are mentally ill.

I sure wish you would take a deep breath and THINK before you right, friend.

Colorado AIM position on Ward Churchill

Colorado AIM 13.Feb.2005 22:26

Colorado AIM Press Release

1 FEBRUARY 2005
Denver, CO 
THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT (AIM) OF COLORADO CONFIRMS ITS SUPPORT OF WARD CHURCHILL AS A MEMBER OF OUR LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
COLORADO AIM CONDEMNS RACIST ATTACKS AGAINST CHURCHILL
CONTACT:  denveraim@coloradoaim.org
www.coloradoaim.org

The Elder’s Council and the Leadership Council of the American Indian Movement (AIM) of Colorado confirm our support for Ward Churchill as a member of our chapter, and as a member of the Leadership Council of Colorado AIM. Colorado AIM further condemns the transparent, racist attacks against Churchill by those who seek to silence alternative voices. While Churchill’s particular statements about events of September 11, 2001 were his personal views, his broader critical analysis of U.S. domestic and foreign policy is consistent with Colorado AIM’s perspective.
Colorado AIM is one of the largest and most active AIM chapters in the United States. Our strength, power and authority springs from our spirituality, from the example of our ancestors, and from the members of our community who embrace our principles.
We neither recognize, nor do we accept, the dictates of any person or persons who pretend to speak for us. Any person or entity that purports to speak on behalf of Colorado AIM other than our Elder’s Council or the Leadership Council, is being dishonest. Each AIM chapter is independent and autonomous, and our authority emerges from the voice of the people in our community, and we support Ward Churchill.
Ward Churchill has been an important member and leader of the American Indian Movement (AIM) of Colorado since at least 1984. His analysis of U.S. law and policy has been an essential tool in educating both indigenous and non-indigenous people on the history and the current circumstances of native peoples in the Americas. Ward has been tireless in his defense of indigenous peoples’ aspirations for freedom and justice around the world, and we applaud him for his numerous contributions.
Colorado AIM is painfully familiar with racist attacks against our movement, and against individuals in our movement, of which this is simply the most recent. We do not have to agree with every statement, or with every position that members of our chapter take in order to rally to their support when they are subject to an unprincipled, anti-Indian lynch mobs.
Churchill is not under attack because of a couple of statements that he made about the events of September 11, 2001. He is under attack because he has exposed the pain and the suffering caused by U.S. domestic and foreign policy. He does so without apology, and from the perspective of an indigenous scholar. He is under attack by racists who would prefer to silence indigenous voices altogether, and who would erase the history of indigenous peoples from the memory of the Western Hemisphere.
Our view of Ward Churchill is not through the lens of a few sentences taken out of context for calculated purposes. Our view is of an indigenous man who has devoted decades of his life to the defense of indigenous peoples’ self-determination and freedom.
The fact is not lost on us that the attacks on Churchill began immediately after the acquittal of him and others in the Columbus Day trials in Denver. Colorado AIM is proud of the actions of Churchill and the other Columbus Day resisters. We will continue our efforts to remove the slave-trading, Indian killer Columbus as a national hero, and we will continue with our numerous other initiatives to promote indigenous peoples’ freedom.
We are especially mindful of Governor Bill Owens’ hypocritical statements condemning Churchill. By making such statements, Owens takes his place along side other racist governors such as John Evans, one of the main instigators of the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864. Just this past fall, Owens had the audacity to refer to the Cheyenne and Arapaho people as “blackmailers” and “extortionists” for their economic development plan in Colorado. Now, he is attacking one of the few tenured American Indian professors in the state, using such McCarthyist claims that Churchill is “un-American” and a “terrorist defender.” Owens should immediately apologize to Churchill, and should keep his uniformed and ignorant statements to himself.
We also call on the Board of Regents for the University of Colorado to respect their own rules on academic freedom, and to affirm Ward Churchill’s right to speak openly and freely as a scholar and a freethinker, and to continue his duties as one of the few indigenous academics in the University of Colorado system. 

Denver Post Background Investigation

Paul Wolf 13.Feb.2005 23:02

Until last week Ward Churchill was an obscure professor, best know for his controversial involvement in AIM. Of course, Leonard Peltier is the best known person associated with AIM. The Graham/Looking Cloud trials are the latest news. I don't see how this is off topic. The moderator may not be comfortable with the views presented but that is another story.

The Denver Post writes this story on WC's background:
 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~2709008,00.html

They say that WC worked as a designer for SOF magazine for a short time. However in his articles in Africa Today and Covert Action Info Bulletin WC says he "infiltrated the inner circle" of SOF in 1976 and 77. Infiltrated on whose behalf? How do you infiltrate an organization like that? Here's more on SOF:

 http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:teHNN5JyN2MJ:www.mail-archive.com/ctrl%40listserv.aol.com/msg28512.html+%22ward+churchill%22+%22robert+k+brown%22&hl=en


Activities: Although the group's main activity is the publishing of Soldier of Fortune magazine, it is the group's mercenary activities which bring it criticism. Calling themselves "action journalists," many of SOF's reporters have come under fire for participating in the training of counterrevolutionary groups in El Salvador and Nicaragua. SOF claims to have sent over a dozen training teams to El Salvador in the early 1980's to train government troops in sniping, anti-guerrilla urban warfare, explosives and weapons maintenance. ...

An SOF employee in El Salvador said "We don't hide the fact that we support one side and follow them into combat. What we don't draw attention to is that we kill people."(3)...

SOF journalists have also reported about and traveled with the Guatemalan Special Forces. According to SOF, the special forces have been working in Guatemala "to win the confidence of rural indians..." In Guatemala, the army is working along with Civil Affairs in a multi-faceted military and psychological operation to subdue the Highland Indians who had previously been supporters of the Guatemalan guerrilla movement.

Ward Churchill's Military Records Challenge

Paul Wolf 13.Feb.2005 23:44

Churchill Challenge
Churchill Challenge
997K

From Covert Action Info Bulletin, No 22 (Fall 1984)

MArco Thanks for making sure we know where you stand!

AIM 14.Feb.2005 04:21

SO there we have it. You aren't journalists or even dedicated volunteers. You are crazy enough to not bother covering a story from both sides that has been available to you from the beginning. AIM has repeatedly tried to engage with your board for years and you are taking Ward Churchill's side against the entire American Indian Movement (Colorado AIM is the Ward Chuchill Movement). Too bad we always wanted to think you might actually be interested in the truth.
If the U of Co wants to employ Ward for his 911 opinions or in spite of them we don't care. If he continues to call himself AIM or and Indian then it is our business! If you people don't care that Ward supporter the CIA backed Contras then let us make one thing clear. You aren't progressives, leftists, or even well intending white people. Your just spoiled rich white kids with nothing better to do. At least we tried.

Marco! Wake up

The titile? 14.Feb.2005 04:23

So are you saying that Native people nor AIM want to be associated with Ward's little tirade is not part of this story? It is!

The sadness of your ignorance

AIM 14.Feb.2005 04:38

All we see and hear from these folks is "Ward is Great and everybody that disagrees is a wingnut or a cop". To think that great leaders of the Indian left that led so many monumental struggles are of no interest is sad. It points to an arrogance that is hard to stomach. These are leaders that actually fought , bled, and went to jail. It would be like glorifying someone who wrote about CHe' and than was mistaken for Che' himself? To add insult to injury Ward has used his books to miseducate the public into thinking that Dennis Banks, Lyde Bellecourt, and others are the bad guys even though without them there would never have been an American Indian Movement. HE brags about showing people how to make bombs but was never arreted for any heavy political direct action. Meanwhile, the leaders off AIM are headed to the Supreme Court again and getting arrested in their 70's to late 70's. Exactly how the fuck do you people chose your role models. It's as if Ward played Denis bbanks in the docudrama so you idolized him instead of the people who actually did the heavy lifting. Notice the above posting is from Colorado AIM renewing it's support for Ward. COAIM is Ward. It doesn't say American Indian Movement he knows he is not part of that esteemed organization.

Churchill Under Attack

marco 14.Feb.2005 06:00

I will defend Ward Churchill's right to publish and lecture
under the First Ammendment. I have not, and never will defend
any other thing about Churchill.

How can I make that any clearer?

And how can I point out that everything else is meaningless
to me without offending you? I won't even try. But I will
not respond to anything else. That's just too bad.

Live with it.

Marco...

Nobody 14.Feb.2005 07:11

I don't agree with the charge that Indymedia is a COINTELPRO tool or any of that. I suppose it could be, but any of us could be, and unlike many posters, including a considerable number of my detractors, I will not make or repeat such a charge without substantial evidence that it is true. I think that's really a pretty important rule. Of course I've made the charge about Churchill, but there is a lot of evidence in that case, more than just that I disagree with him.

That Indymedia is a dupe of the feds I don't doubt; if not on this issue, than on some other. Everyone is a dupe sometimes, after all.

What bothers me, and I think fundamentally what bothers most of these other posters is that there is this enormous history to this issue which many committed people have spent years of their life, sweat, jail time, and yes even blood involved with, and you just block it off as irrelevant.

And as to your decision that you will support Ward Churchill's right to speak publicly... I think what bothers people about that is that you say it and repeat it without so much as expanding on it (how present the defense? What he is saying is true? Or what he is saying is nonsense, but it is still his right to say it?) let alone responding to the arguments against it.

Of course in a certain sense that is your right. But at the same time the purpose of most of the writing on this website is as much polemical as it is anything else. And furthermore you have contributed several polemics to this very debate. So to take on the work of writing polemics for the purpose of influencing other people's opinions and actions, and then to ignore polemics written by other people comes off as a little arrogant.

Some of these arguments come from posters like me, who may be anybody or nobody, but then there is Paul Wolf, and the arguments which plainly, whoever is posting them to this site, have their origin with AIM. These are serious, weighty people.

Let me make another constructive suggestion. Could we, perhaps in some other forum, take up the possibility of posting an interview with Vernon Bellecourt on the front page here? I'm sure it could be arranged by other people than those working at Indymedia, as I know that you all have quite a lot on your plates. What I would like to discuss is particularly whether we could arrange to give it pride of place, so to speak. I think that would mollify most of the posters, including certainly me.

I appreciate your responding and I sure would like to see everyone leave this satisfied.

Indy Media makes all kind s of false assertions about Ward.

AIM 14.Feb.2005 09:51

WE AGREE THE ASSHOLE HAS A RIGHT TO SAY WHAT HE WANTS!! WE DO NOT AGREE THAT HE HAS A RIGHT TO ASSOCIATE HIMSELF WITH THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT OR INDIAN PEOPLE AS HE DOES IT!! WE HAVE CALLED FOR HIM TO BE FIRED BY U OF CO YEARS AGO BECAUSE HE FALSIFIED HIS CREDENTIALS AND RESUME!! GOT IT!!! STOP TRYING TO PIGEON HOLE US AS "GOING ALONG WITH OREILY"!!
Nice try but it isn't so. If you want to talk about contraversial? What about when Vernon Bellecourt got thrown in jail for 18 months with heart problems after refusing to testify to a grand jury about the movements of friends he travelled to Libya with in the 80's./ Interesting enough Ward went to Libya at that time and didin't gert thrown in jail! Maybe he testified who knows.

Look at the lead in to the story. You say far more than you defend his right to speak:

1) You asert that he is Native American and may be a target because "of his race". Notice that Ward himself has completely backed off trying to show his native heritage when questioned to false claims made in the past.
2) You assert "he is generally considered a friend to the radical left and and to indigenous communites". That is the biggest load of crap I have ever seen. He has been on the rocks with left for so many reasons. He is a friend to white college kids. Let once again briefly categorize the resons:
1) He got in bed with Russ Means and openly supported the right wing death squad mercenaries the Contras. They murdered hundreds of thousands of people most of whom were real Indians unlike Ward.
2) Covert Action writer Ken Lawrence exposed every bit of this long ago and then recently on Indy Media. Did you pay attention.
3) He has stuck with Russ Means through his playing the voice of Pochahantas's father in that racist cartoon, supported the Contras, supported John Thune (Bush's boy) who just unseated Daschle in South Dakota.
4)Russ did a lecture tour paid for byhe moonies and the John Birch society.
5) Ward has repeatedly attacked the founders of AIM for 15 years as sidekick to Russ Means who was bitter about being thrown out of the movement (his own brother Bill wrote the expulsion letter).
6) Ward has accused AIM leaders along with Russ (who testified in Fed Grand Jury) of kiling Anna Mae Aquash.
7) Ward has lied about everything from his Indian heritage to his viet Nam service. This is embarasing to Indian people.
8) Ward made comments about 911 and further 911 type events that are not in keeping with any Indian org or Indian people that we have a right to demand the press cover as we don't want to be rolled into his bullshit!!
8) Every progressive Indian newspaper in the country has researched his heritage and come to the conclusion he is a fake Wannabe bullshit artist.

For all these reasons and many more we want the true story to be covered. If you want to say his freedm of speech is under attack and that shouldn't be the case then FINE!! But don't call him Indian, a friend of Indians, or AIM when with the exception of Russ Means and a few friends in CO, the rest of Indian country wants him to represent himself as Ward the white guy!

Marco One more thing

AIM 14.Feb.2005 09:58

You try living with it. You said you didn't "trust the Bellecourts". Indymedia is still calling Ward Indian and a friend of our community. Bottom line until you folks cover the whole story and spit out that shit without ever having even bothered to talk to our elders and family then you are on shaky ground, walking on thin ice, and taking a tiger by the tail. Good luck in this arena of struggle. You are taking on the like of Banks, Bellecourt, and Ogitchidag and Ogitchidaquay who love their fearless leaders who have died, gone to jail, and bled for our people. We will defend them to the end against any detractors. And by the way. Bob Robideau go to hell!

Churchill revelas he is Asian Woman

Ima Mamasan 14.Feb.2005 10:18

The Real Ward
The Real Ward
997K

BOULDER, Colo. - Stung by recent revelations that left his decades-old American Indian persona in tatters, controversial University of Colorado professor, Ward Churchill announced today that he is no longer claiming to be a Native American man. Appearing in a flowery satin kimono and faux kabuki hairstyle, Churchill revealed to the world that he has always been a petite Asian girl.

“For too long, I ran from my heritage, ashamed and outcast,” Professor Churchill told a gathering of his rapt, semi-literate, trustafarian followers, “The persecution I suffered, as an Asian woman, is a legacy of Eurocentric colonialism from which those of us who have endured it may never recover.”

Asked if the sudden change in Churchill’s ethnic background and sex bothered him, one of his loyal students, David Rhone answered simply, “Dude!” while his chronically-unemployed friend, Jo-Jo, tunelessly plucked a Japanese koto in inappropriate accompaniment.

“Shut up! You shut the f#ck up! He has a right to his free speech!” added a supporter known only as Firefly, before she jumped off the second story balcony to protest allegedly environmentally-destructive US agricultural practices.

“Why can’t you just leave him alone, hater! He’s suffered enough!” she moaned from the hood of the car she landed on. “I think my spine is broken and I don’t have healthcare, you fascists!”

“I just pray to Buddah that somebody will blow up a busload of school children so that those who are denied unending welfare payments can at last have the measure of retribution they so richly deserve,” muttered the professor as he desperately searched for a television camera.


Read Brian Glick's book "war at home."

marco 14.Feb.2005 11:53

Read Brian Glick's book "War At Home."

Even you, "nobody." Even you, "AIM."



In Defense of Ward Churchill

Matthew Rothschild [reprint from Progressive Magazine] 14.Feb.2005 12:10

Ward Churchill is under attack.

But it’s not about him.

It’s about free speech and academic freedom.

And it’s about the ability to criticize U.S. foreign policy in the context of 9/11.

As you’ve probably heard, Ward Churchill is a professor at the University of Colorado who wrote some regrettable words in an essay after 9/11, comparing what he called “the technicians” in the World Trade Center to “Little Eichmanns.” That unfortunate comparison was outrageous and insensitive, and I wish he hadn’t made it.

But that doesn’t mean he didn’t have the right to make it.

He has the right that all Americans have: the right of free speech.

And he has the right that all tenured faculty have: the right to express themselves and their ideas freely so that in the free exchange of ideas, truth will eventually win out.

Now, more than three years after his essay, the snarlers and growlers of the right have come after Churchill, led by Bill O’Reilly and the editors of The Wall Street Journal.

Churchill has received many death threats, his car has been vandalized with swastikas, a Denver talk show host said he should be executed for treason, and now Churchill’s job is on the line.

The Board of Regents is undertaking a 30-day review of all of Churchill’s writings and statements.

The governor of Colorado has called for his dismissal. “No one wants to infringe on Mr. Churchill’s right to express himself,” Governor Bill Owens wrote on February 1 in an Orwellian throat-clearing. But then he got the muzzle out. “We are not compelled to accept his pro-terrorist views at state taxpayer subsidy nor under the banner of the University of Colorado. Ward Churchill besmirches the university. . . . Mr. Churchill’s views are not simply anti-American. They are at odds with simple decency, and antagonistic to the beliefs and conduct of civilized people around the world.”

The Colorado House of Representatives on February 2 said his essay “strikes an evil and inflammatory blow against America’s healing process.”

I have read Churchill’s offending essay, “ ‘Some People Push Back’: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens.” (To read it and Ward Churchill’s response to the controversy, go to www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/ churchill.html.)

And there is much in there that offends me: his indelicate and imprudent and historically inaccurate comparisons to Nazi Germany, his callousness to those who lost their lives on 9/11, his romanticized treatment of the terrorists and their motives on 9/11, his lack of appreciation for the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism, and his disdain for pacifists.

But my strong disagreements with Churchill are beside the point. As are Bill O’Reilly’s or the editors’ of the Wall Street Journal or the regents’ of the University of Colorado or Governor Owens’s.

Ward Churchill has the right to express himself freely.

And his method of writing and speaking and teaching is to shake people up, to provoke a reaction, so that people will reexamine their beliefs. This provocative style may have the opposite effect, sparking emotional reactions and stiffening psychological defenses, but he’s entitled to his speaking and teaching style.

“I go for the gut,” he explained to the Boulder Weekly on February 10. “That’s my speaking strategy. I go for the gut to provoke a response.”

He’s succeeded this time.

And now he’s in trouble for it.

He rightly identifies the attack on him “explicitly as political repression,” adding: “This is a book-burning exercise. It’s a stifling of political discourse.” And he believes he is but the first of many. “I’m the kick-off. . . . It’s the opening round of a general purge of the academy of people who say things they find to be politically unacceptable.”

We’ve been down this ugly road before.

We need to defend Ward Churchill.

We need to defend free speech.

We need to defend academic freedom.

And we need to defend the right to criticize the U.S. empire.

For the attack on Churchill is an attack also on anyone who dares to question the myth of American imperial innocence.

That was at the very heart of Churchill’s essay. And he is right about the American people’s unblissful, immoral ignorance of, or complicity with, the crimes that our government has committed since its very founding, crimes that have killed innocent people in the tens of millions. Churchill, a Native American professor, knows a thing or two about those crimes.

Churchill delineates those crimes and puts 9/11 on the scale with those crimes. And there is nothing wrong with that, though the Governor of Colorado assailed him as “anti-American” for doing so.

And Churchill warned in his essay that if the United States doesn’t change its policies, it can expect more attacks. The age of impunity is over, he said. And Americans don’t want to hear that.

“The bottom line of my argument is that the best and perhaps only way to prevent 9/11-style attacks on the U.S. is for American citizens to compel their government to comply with the rule of law,” Churchill wrote on January 31.

Everyone who values free speech, everyone who respects academic freedom, everyone who wants U.S. foreign policy to finally obey international law must come to the defense of Ward Churchill.

 http://www.progressive.org/mcwatch04/mc021205.php
 http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0213-08.htm

Quote from 'Colardo AIM':

King Amdo 14.Feb.2005 13:43

"cointelpro is alive and well *******if not in fact then its inside of us*****" . . .

Indeed well realised matey's...

And this is how they take over ya brain.....

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

BUT DON'T LISTEN TO ME WILL YOU, THIS IS ONLY THE GREAT MOTHER GODDESS SPEAKING. (and you haven't paid $9.99 for this awareness which would make it seem like 'real' teaching).

PEACE!

ENGLISH TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

(here's a Dine'h/Lakota/Hopi tribal sundance Eagle sundance Feather for you...whats left of it anyway)



bellecourts 'banished from aim by aim tribunal

don't believe the hype "b"oB 14.Feb.2005 15:34

THIS IS FROM COLORADO AIM SITE, BY FAITH ATTAGUILE. for ALL the gossip on ward bein fraud bla bla; coloradoaim.org/why.html

The AIM Tribunal

Contrary to what the Bellecourts would like people to believe, it was
they who were "banished for life from AIM," not Churchill and Morris.119
This came
about when a group of noted senior native activists, desperate to put an
end to the swirling charges and countercharges which they saw impairing
the struggle for indigenous rights, opted to establish a “movement
tribunal" to assess the merits of what was being said.

"It was a really difficult situation," says former Bellecourt colleague
Joe Locust, who chaired the panel. "I felt that Clyde and Vernon were
way out of line, but I frankly didn't believe some of the things the
people on the other side were saying about them. As an elder in the
movement who's known and worked with most all of the parties involved, I
decided it was my responsibility to try and clear the air." Locust's
council, convened in March 1994 at San Raphael, California, consisted of
a Wounded Knee veteran, Regina Brave; a former IITC delegate and
attorney for the Treaty 6 Chiefs in Canada, Sharon Venne; a former
Leonard Peltier Defense Committee staffer and Northwest AIM elder, Dian
Million; and noted native scholar, Donald A. Grinde, Jr.

"I told people it was time to put up or shut up," Locust recalls. "If
they had a case, then make it before the tribunal, not in the media. If
there was a basis to their charges, we'd uphold them and take
appropriate action. If, on the other hand, they couldn't prove what they
were saying, they were to stop saying it. That was the deal." Locust
found the autonomous AIM chapters "very receptive" to the idea. "They
were cooperative," he says. "Russ Means agreed to present their case,
and they made a group pledge to stand down on any point they couldn't
prove."120

The Bellecourts were another story, however. "Vernon flatly refused to
participate under any circumstances," Locust says, "and Clyde showed up
only long enough to provoke a big confrontation by insisting that we use
his pipe in the opening ceremony. The fact that what he was doing was a
desecration of the pipe we'd already loaded for that purpose didn't
phase him in the least. It was obvious he'd come just to disrupt, not to
engage in anything constructive. It was a real eye-opener for me."121
So
was the testimony and other evidence submitted over the next two days,
material so extensive and compelling that the panel unanimously entered
an "interim finding" banishing the Bellecourts' and scheduling a second
set of hearings in Minneapolis the following October (the hearings were
ultimately moved to Rapid City, South Dakota).122

Although all this happened over three years ago, the results seemed to
have evaporated because of the tribunal's decision at the proceedings'
outset to bar non-Indian press.123 "Our idea, based on a lot of experience, was
that Indian against Indian disputes invariably get distorted to the
advantage of nonIndians by the media," says Joe Locust. "So we decided
that reportage should come through Indian papers only."124 This seemed a viable approach when /News From Indian
Country /assigned reporter Shelly Davis, a Cherokee, to cover the
tribunal firsthand, from start to finish. (Joe Geshick, an /Ojibwe News/
reporter, also attended throughout, but since he was also a witness, his
reportage was discounted.)

Davis undertook to write a series of articles on what she learned, but
was shortly made aware that her editor, Paul DeMain, considered them
"biased." She recalls,

It was really weird. I'd quote Vernon Bellecourt, and that was
okay. But every time I'd quote somebody from the other side, or
cite some of the evidence presented, I'd start getting questions
about my "personal relationships." Finally, I said, "Paul, I don't
know what's going on here, but I'm going to cover both sides of
this thing or I'm not going to cover it at all." He said, "Fine.
I'll cover it myself," and he hadn't even been there. About a week
later, he fired me for lacking "objectivity and professionalism."
What a joke.125

Shortly after her termination, Davis received a Native American Press
Association award for the quality of the very articles DeMain found so
objectionable.

Apart from letters to the editor, neatly flanked by DeMain commentary,
from then on only the NAIMI version of reality appeared in /News From
Indian Country/. The content and conclusions of the tribunal were frozen
out, while an unending stream of editorials and "news reports" pilloried
Churchill and others, none of whom were ever so much as contacted for a
comment.126 "It was a
rather astonishing turn of events," says Don Grinde. "We didn't expect a
rubber stamp of our findings, but we did expect a thorough and fair
reporting of them. In the end, we'd have done better to have turned
things over to the mainstream media."127

Exactly what prompted DeMain to pursue this course is unclear since he
has no known history of connection with the Bellecourts. Churchill
suspects a payoff. "I don't know Paul DeMain at all," he says, but I do
know he's been running pretty much on a shoestring operation. At the
same time, there's a lot of loose cash kicking around in Vernon's
coffers. He'd pay a nice price to turn a publication which was in the
process of exposing him into what amounts to a personal propaganda
vehicle. You put two and two together and what you end up with is some
money changing hands. Likely, it was just chump change, but enough to
account for DeMain's sleazy behavior since mid '94. It's too bad,
really. /News From Indian Country/ used to be a pretty good paper. Now,
I'd have to rate its editorial integrity as being lower than that of
/Spotlight /or the /National Inquirer/."128

*The Bellecourts.* So, what was it that so stunned Joe Locust and his
colleagues during the tribunal, and put Paul DeMain in such a frenzy of
denial? The tribunal turned up many things sufficiently repellent to
create such a strong response, but the sheer cumulative weight of the
autonomous AIM chapters' evidence sketching the careers of both
Bellecourts over the past quarter-century was itself condemning. Some
forty witnesses, hundreds of pages of documentation and videotaped
depositions from as far afield as Nicaragua were entered into the
record. Although Means withdrew several charges for insufficient
evidence and the panel dismissed two for lack of support, what follows
is a summary of what was proven to the tribunal's collective satisfaction.

While it is true that Clyde Bellecourt was a member of the founding AIM
group in Minneapolis in 1968, the same cannot be said of his older
brother, Vernon. A Denver wig stylist moonlighting as an insurance
salesman, Vernon sat out the opening years of the movement. It was only
after AIM had taken root that he traded in his leisure suits for ribbon
shirts and started growing braids. "Vernon saw a parade," as one witness
aptly put it," and decided to jump in front."129 The sharp divisiveness preventing the movement from
ever consolidating its impressive early gains can be reasonably dated
from the moment of his entry into its ranks.

In 1972, little more than a year after the Denver chapter was formed,
Vernon presented himself for election as an AIM officer. After losing
the election to Russell Means at the annual membership meeting, Vernon
swiftly organized a "protest bloc." He then persuaded intermediaries to
propose to Means that he abdicate in favor of Vernon in the interests of
unity. Means refused and tension increased until Clyde and AIM-founder
Dennis Banks engineered the creation of a new appointed position for
Vernon to fill. He was duly appointed to this job, the only national
title he would ever hold. Vernon then walked away from the Denver
chapter, stationing himself at the movement's national office in
Minneapolis.130

This pattern enlarged itself in 1974 when Vernon decided it was time for
him to become AIM's national chairperson. Once again, the membership had
other ideas, electing Carter Camp, a Ponca from Oklahoma, to the top
job. Vernon started a whispering campaign to the effect that Camp was,
among other things, "a government infiltrator," a charge familiar to us
only from hindsight. He incidentally added to an antagonism so
incendiary it resulted in bloodshed.131

At its 1975 meeting, partly to stem the rising factionalism, the
membership voted to abolish all titles of national office (except
"national spokesperson," a title held by John Trudell until it, too, was
discarded in 1979.) The decision not to have a national office or
officers was reaffirmed at an "AIM Summit" conducted in San Francisco in
September 1982.132

Unfortunately, this did not end Vernon's badjacketing of rivals. During
the same 1975 meeting at which the national office was dissolved, he
seized the opportunity to start a rumor that Micmac activist Anna Mae
Aquash, one of his severest critics, was an FBI informer. He instructed
an AIM security team consisting of Leonard Peltier, Dino Butler and Bob
Robideau to take her out to interrogate her. According to Robideau, the
order was to "bury her where she stands" if they were unsatisfied with
her responses.133 While Robideau does not contend that Vernon himself pulled the
trigger on the gun that killed Aquash a few months later, he points out
that the resulting suspicion and isolation within the movement Vernon's
snitch rumor created made Aquash especially vulnerable to her fate.
Perhaps to prevent others from coming to the same conclusion, Vernon
volunteered to head up AIM's internal investigation of the murder.
Interestingly, the "investigation was terminated" soon after.134

What had increasingly upset Aquash and many others was Vernon's growing
and pronounced disruption, profiteering and misrepresentation. For
instance, although holding no elected office even at chapter level,
Vernon consistently portrayed himself as a "foremost AIM leader,"
insinuating that he was a "veteran" of the spectacular federal siege of
AIM members at Wounded Knee in 1973, a misrepresentation he still
cultivates.135 Vernon was not at Wounded Knee. During much of that
confrontation he was touring Italy "raising funds." On his return, he
claimed to have been arrested by federal agents at Chicago's O'Hare
International Airport and forced to post the $17,000 in proceeds as
bond.136 It is on
record that Jesse Jackson's Operation PUSH posted the bond at Vernon's
request, and that the funds were returned to them when Vernon wasn't
prosecuted. The Italian donations, however, were never turned over to
the movement.137

Similar monetary wrongdoing rears its ugly head before and after Wounded
Knee. For instance, at the end the November 1972 AIM occupation of the
Bureau of Indian Affairs headquarters in Washington, DC, the Nixon
administration provided $66,650 in cash to underwrite the dissidents'
travel home. The money was supposed to be divided up in proportion to
the actual transport costs involved.138 However, according to Robert Free, the AIM
member assigned to oversee disbursements, Vernon demanded $30,000 and
actually received more than $7,000 "for the National Office."139 Consequently, many grassroots
participants received nothing at all. Similarly, during the so-called
"Wounded Knee Leadership Trials" of 1974-1975, more than $100,000 in
defense funds disappeared from accounts to which only Vernon and his
cohort, Mike Haney, had access.140

curchill re 'soldier of fortune' nonsense

"b"oB mcglynn, THE KING OF ALL BIKE MESSENGERS! 14.Feb.2005 15:58

wat a fuckin lynch mob people hav become. my god if someone like churchill worked for soldier of fortune shouldnt the 1st response be 'why?' instead of 'hes a cop!'??

heres the why according to faith attaguille from colorado aim site: coloradoaim.org/why.html

AND WILL THE PERSON POSTING AS 'AIM' SAY WHO U R?
IF ITS CLYDE/VERNON BELLECOURT THAN HAV THE GUTS TO SAY SO...


Churchill's role at /Soldier of Fortune/ was hardly that of a true
believer. Says Churchill, "I was there for a couple of months in late
'76 Ê early-77, just long enough to get a handle on who was who, and
what they were up to. I've never made any secret of it because it was
part of the research for articles I wanted to write about the facts and
fictions of U.S. mercenaries. In fact, I've included the information
that I managed to get inside /Soldier of Fortune/ in every piece I've
written on the matter."35 The articles
in question include a seminal exposÈ of the activities of American
mercenaries in South Africa. Published in Africa Today in 1980,
antimercenary organizer Rob Shware called it "the best work available on
the subject."36 Others
include pieces in the /Colorado Daily/ and /Daily World/, and a profile
of the magazine's publisher, self-styled "king of the mercenaries"
Robert K. Brown, published in the decidedly anti-CIA /Covert
Action/Information Bulletin/ in 1986, and in the /Best of CAIB/
collection released in 1989.37 As
columnist Alexander Cockburn put it in 1992, "It seems to me that
Churchill should be commended for this sort of investigative journalism,
not condemned for it.38

Make you a deal Marco

Nobody 14.Feb.2005 16:23

I will read the book you recommend if you will agree to the following:

If I can get an original interview with Vernon Bellecourt by a professional journalist, you'll post it on the front page of Indymedia and leave it as the top article for 72 hours.

You should like both your part of the deal and mine. After all, it would be good for Indymedia, right?

Just tell me where to e-mail you. I don't really have an e-mail addy set up that I use with these postings, and I'm not going to post my real e-mail on the front page. Call me a coward, if you like.

And... Those of you who are suggesting that the AIM posts are from the Bellecourts are falling into a little trap, specifically imagining that AIM, which is a very large organization, is actually only made up of two people. AIM is not like a pseudonym for Vernon Bellecourt or something.

The Article above Drak Night Field Notes was condemned by Peltier and AIM!!

Ogitchida 14.Feb.2005 16:27

Letter condemning Dark Night Field Notes and Faith the author by Peltier Defence
Letter condemning Dark Night Field Notes and Faith the author by Peltier Defence
997K

In fact the author was kicked out of LPDC for it.

Don't belive the hype is right

Ogitchida 14.Feb.2005 16:39

Number one: Ward and Russ cannot hold a tribunal ousting anyone from AIM because.
a) Russ resigned from AIM 1985
b) Ward Churchill has never been AIM
c) AIM including Leonard Peltier denounced the whole affair.
d) Churchill isn't Indian.
E) The affiar you posted about was yet another attempt by Ward and Russ to attack the founders of the American Indian Movement. Neither of them would ever have the authority to do any such tribunal.

We are glad you posted the above bullshit transcript because You are documenting for us that Ward attacked the leaders and founders of AIM way long before this aleged "smear campaign began". Thanks for putting it out there.
AIM headquarter's and founding home is Minneapolis Minnesota. Clyde and Dennis Banks were the orfiginal founders of AIM. Ward nor Russ dispute this fact. They have always been on the board. That board has never convened a tribunal against anyone!




Forget this bullshit.......

King Amdo 14.Feb.2005 18:57

......and listen to this.......

 http://www.aramusic.com/htmls/sid096.htm

Allah Akbar.

Will the real AIM please stand up?

Paul Wolf 14.Feb.2005 21:21

What I don't understand is why, after all these years of complaining about Ward Churchill and Colorado Autonomyous AIM, the original AIM has never sued them for trademark infringement? It seems like a straightforward way to resolve the problem.

You don't need to federally register a mark to receive trademark law protection. Use of the mark is enough. It is not restricted to for-profit enterprises. The names do not have to be exactly the same, just similar enough to create a likelihood that a substantial number of people will be confused that the two users of the mark are the same.

Colorado AIM goes way beyond most trademark infringements. Not only are they getting away with using the same name, but they claim to be the real one, and further that all AIM chapters are autonomous with no affiliation to the original and incorporated AIM.

It seems to me to be a straightforward matter to ask the court for an injunction to prevent Colorado AIM from using this name, plus damages to the reputation and goodwill of AIM. Malicious intent could even be proven, from Colorado AIM's published statements which show intent to destroy or at least take over AIM. This maliciousness might allow AIM to pierce through the normal protection afforded corporate officers and go after Colorado AIM officers personally. Those like Churchill publicly claiming affilation with AIM after having been kicked out could clearly be sued individually.

Although a lot of people are turned off by lawsuits, it might resolve the matter once and for all rather than having this permanent state of confusion. As it is now a person interested in joining AIM would have no idea which one is the real one. But that can be determined easily by looking into the history. In fact, Congress investigated AIM back in the 70s, I think. I saw a report which had AIM flyers with the Bellecourts, Banks and Means, Trudell, and some others. I understand that Russell Means was removed from AIM according to procedures in the bylaws of AIM. That would not give him any right to claim the organization as his own. I don't know why AIM hasn't pursued this.

AIM release on Auto AIM

AIM 14.Feb.2005 21:48

OFFICIAL DECLARATION OF THE
American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council
Mid-Winter Meeting at the Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Nation
March 5th and 6th, 1999
The Grand Council of the American Indian Movement hereby declares:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to be the Governing Authority of all Business, all Chapters, all Support Groups, all actions, all events of the American Indian Movement.
By this Declaration: All so-called "Confederation of Autonomous AIM" chapters are hereby declared: NULL and VOID.
These rogue groups led by agents and informants, instant Indians, wannabees, rip-offs, and others who are using the American Indian Movement to cause disruption and chaos in their communities shall no longer be allowed to foster ill-feelings, misrepresent policy, and they shall no longer be allowed to produce and sell AIM merchandise, or use the AIM name, or any of our copyrighted and trademarked logos.

The Grand Governing Council of the American Indian Movement recognizes that many sincere Indians and Non-Indian People have been inadvertently and innocently caught up in this conspiracy.

Those Individuals, Chapters, and Support Groups that express their desires to be a part of, and affiliated with the only American Indian Movement under the leadership of its Grand Governing Council can do so by contacting our office at:

American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council
Ministry for Information
P.O. Box 13521
Minneapolis MN 55414
612-721-3914 FAX: 612-721-7826
Email:  aimggc@worldnet.att.net
Web Address: www.aimovement.org

Our Name? Ogitchida! Don't understand that do ya?

AIM 14.Feb.2005 22:26

To the jack ass above:
This is the contact info to repond to us. The names of the persons responsible for AIM posts are the Grand Governing Couincil and Warriors. OK?

Dennis Banks, Vernon Bellecourt, Clyde Bellecxourt, and the rest of the council can be contacted here:
AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL
MINISTRY FOR INFORMATION
P.O. Box 13521
Minneapolis MN 55414
612/ 721-3914 . fax 612/ 721-7826
Email:  aimggc@worldnet.att.net
Web Address: www.aimovement.org




So it should be clear that they don't get away with calling themselves AIM. We are still trying to get them to cease using the name AIM within their "International Confederation of Autnomous Chapters of The American Indian Movement.

Let us be clear:
1) COAIM Colorado AIM which is really Ward,Glenn, and Russ uses COAIM not AIM because years ago Russell went out to Colorado after Vernon Bellecourt founded the Colorado AIM chapter. After Russ and Ward had a falling out over the Contras, Russ resigned (9times although the first one was accepted and never reversed). Then they woke up one morning and decided he would use Ward as a proxy and keep the organization on the books as a revenge type thing. Public record shows Vernon Bellecourt organized the first CO chapter.

A few things:
1) AIM was founded in Minneapolis Mn in 1968. The first meeting was organized by Dennis Banks and Clyde Bellecourt arouind a box of doughnuts and some coffee. It was organized to address issues of Police Brutality in the Twin Cities. Subsequently AIM PAtrol was founded and was the first and longest ongoing "CopWatch" in the Nation.
2) AIM in 1970 founded the Little Earth housing project for Native Americans in poverty in the Twin Cities.
3) Next door to Little Earth is the AIM Peacemaker Center which is home to many AIM events and the AIM Patrol to this day:

Elaine M. Stately Peacemaker Center
2300 Cedar Avenue S
Minneapolis MN 55404
 AIMggc@worldnet.att.net
612/ 724.3129 voice
612/ 724.8090 fax

You have our names. Ward you've been attacking us for years.
4) They do not call themselves AIM outright when it comes to official interaction with the goverment or funders they are forced to call themselves the "International Confederation of Autnomous Chapters of The American Indian Movement". When they walk around in public they call themselves AIM.
5) So you got our names we got yours and addresses as well although we post ours publicly. That's cowardice for ya.
6)Most of the warriors of AIM are regular folks steel workers,Limo Drivers, black jack dealers, tribal chairmen and chairwomen, and who the Hell are you?
White college kids following that bag of wind wherever he goes.

Interesting point to note Paul Wolf. If you go to the Colorado AIM website you will find they don't use our logo they developed their own.We are trying to shut down the use of the name and all logos. They change shit ever so slightly to keep our suit off their backs. It is a bunch of bull shit.</