US: Repression

Ward Churchill Under Attack

 
Ward Churchill, generally considered a friend of radical and indigenous communities, is under attack for his views and perhaps his race. He is a Native American, contributor to many publications including Z Magazine, and Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado at Boulder where his job is at risk. Under pressure triggered by local press in Denver, and FOX's Bill O'Reilly (excellent article!), he has has already resigned his department chair position. His recent speaking engagement at Hamilton College was cancelled due to security concerns and death threats in response to an essay he wrote several years ago about 9-1-1.

Denver's Rocky Mountain News is currently running a live poll about whether he should resign his professorship as well. Churchill opponents' on-line poll comments are instructive in their anger and ignorance: "He should resign his citizenship" (he's an Indigenous American), and various comments that free speech is ok until it criticizes the US. If the poll comes out against Churchill, it can be used to exert additional political pressure on his employer. The attack against Churchill was fomented by two AM talk radio DJs in Denver and FOX's Bill O'Reilly.

Other articles and resources: [Info on the O'Reilly attack and contact info for taking action | Panel Including Ward Churchill Cancelled in New York (indybay) | Another good one from indybay | Interview with Derrick Jensen | Older Churchill audio Q&A | More audio (2004)]

Ward Churchill, generally considered a friend of radical and indigenous communities, is under attack for his views and perhaps his race. He is a Native American, contributor to many publications including Z Magazine, and Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado at Boulder where his job is at risk. Under pressure triggered by local press in Denver, and FOX's Bill O'Reilly (excellent article!), he has has already resigned his department chair position. His recent speaking engagement at Hamilton College was cancelled due to security concerns and death threats in response to an essay he wrote several years ago about 9-1-1.

Denver's Rocky Mountain News is currently running a live poll about whether he should resign his professorship as well. Churchill opponents' on-line poll comments are instructive in their anger and ignorance: "He should resign his citizenship" (he's an Indigenous American), and various comments that free speech is ok until it criticizes the US. If the poll comes out against Churchill, it can be used to exert additional political pressure on his employer.

The attack against Churchill was fomented by two AM talk radio DJs in Denver and FOX's Bill O'Reilly.

These same DJs were recently critical of Denver's court finding Churchill and other organizers of the anti Columbus Day parade protest innocent. They denigrated jurors and "interviewed" Churchill on their talk radio show and were obviously upset that protestors were found innocent, employing typical aggressive host tactics to silence and misrepresent people who disagree. Shortly after their Columbus Day coverage, they went on the attack against Ward Churchill inflaming listeners with passages from an essay he wrote years ago about September 11 which later turned into the book On the Justice of Roosting Chickens : Reflections on the Consequences of U.S. Imperial Arrogance and Criminality. This timing and common connection through Churchill makes it appear they're attacking those who oppose the Columbus Day parade.

As Churchill explains in a recent press release these DJs and other press are taking him out of context, suggesting he advocates violence against Americans and hates this country (which even if true isn't a crime, and it's worth noting he's a veteran). While his essay's conclusions are stated in ways inflamatory to middle-class white folks, which is nothing new, they are solidly argued, also nothing new. His biggest "crimes" seem to be suggesting US foreign policy is sometimes criminal and that he humanizes people around the world who view that policy from the receiving end.

Professor Churchill's many books on topics from genocide to COINTELPRO to indigenous struggles are invaluable contributions to a radical understanding of our world. He is perhaps best known in the radical community for a pamphlet entitled Pacifism as Pathology Churchill is a long-standing member of the Colorado American Indian Movement and steadfast supporter and organizer of the yearly struggle to stop the state-supported celebration of Columbus.

The talk radio DJs and O'Reilly are still calling for him to be fired. At the Rocky Mountain News in Denver, the live on-line poll is currently running 3:1 against him.

Other articles and resources:

add a comment on this article

Dissent is essential to a democracy

Dr. Patricia Denis Martin 02.Feb.2005 15:25

Dissent is essential to a democracy. If ideas, even those which are unpopular, are not exchanged in the public forum, we no longer have a free society. We cannot stop the public dialogue unless we wish to cease living life in an arena where ideas are most important in the development of our national consciousness. Freedom of speech is guaranteed under our constitution. If you don't like someone's ideas, you always have the option of not listening.

christian system....

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 15:30

...is a vampire beast.

Blessed be.

Chickens and roosting

Pat Kincaid 02.Feb.2005 16:06

He certainly has every right to spew his vitriol. Threats against him should be unreservedly condemned.

In fact, I would welcome it as it is instructive as to the degeneracy of a substantial portion of the 'left' nowadays.

That being said, free speech is hardly a value championed on Indy.

How many times have I read about rallies to prevent KKK-types, or even David Horowitz from speaking?

The chickens have come home to roost. For Churchill and Indy.

Is ADD - A Democratic Decree ?

Zippo 02.Feb.2005 18:04

I guess the poll takers do not want well thought out opinions.

What I offered as a comment :

Ward Churchill is a Professor of Ethnic Studies. He is hired to be a Professor of Ethnic Studies. There is and there will be clashes of ethnicity in this 21st century world that we share. A virtual guarantee of accelerating a problem is to hide and ignore the problem. If the university has a problem with the job that Ward Churchill was hired to do let them fire him; he should not resign.

What appears as filed :

"Ward Churchill is a Professor of Ethnic Studies. He is hired to be a Professor of Ethnic Studies. There is and there will be clashes of ethnicity in this 21st century world that we share. A virtual guarantee of accelerating a problem is to"

One alternative to well thought out opinion is reactionary targeting, in which case Ward Churchill becomes a scapegoat and a victim.

Pat huh?

bonehead 02.Feb.2005 18:29



That being said, free speech is hardly a value championed on Indy.

How many times have I read about rallies to prevent KKK-types, or even David Horowitz from speaking?
The people posting to indy aren't the same as indy. It is true that
most indy supporters probably disagree with KKK and Horowitz, but that
does not suffice to prove your point. Would a pro-Horowitz rally announcement
be removed? (KKK is a trickier case, since the legal concept of hate speech
may be involved).

In fact, I would welcome [Churchill's spew] as it is instructive as to the degeneracy of a substantial portion of the 'left' nowadays.

Churchill critics rarely engage the material further than elementary
name calling and that leaves people uninstructed as to this claimed degeneracy.
What passes for further engagement is usually some variant of "America:
love it or leave it" with still no substantive discussion of issues.
The on-line poll comments are instructive in this regard. What a wonderful
opportunity Churchill/"liberal" critics are wasting to go beyond the juvenile rhetoric.

the framing of this controversy

anonymous 02.Feb.2005 18:33

I am an American Indian, and there are things that Ward Churchill writes and talks about that agree with and would not dispute. However, this mans claims to American Indian ancestry are highly doubtable. Please see this page from the AIM website at www.aimovement.org speaking to this matter:

 http://www.aimovement.org/csi/Churchill/DisrupternotifyChurchill_01.jpg

some people also allege that Ward is a provocatuer and a spy of the Federal Government. That he brings negative attention on real Native peoples and issues. This is in fact the case with this specific controversy. Ward does not speak for native people, only for himself. Bill O'Reilly stated on the O'Reilly Factor yesterday:

"O'REILLY: Yes. You know what this is all about? This is about political correctness once again. That's what this is about. This guy is a native American. He feels that genocide was perpetuated on his race. And therefore, he can hate his country and say anything he wants.

The people bought into this in Boulder. And yes, he's a native American, we're not going to talk about it." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,146031,00.html

This is shedding negative light upon Native peoples and making light of the real history of this country. DO NOT regard this as a good thing. This negative image of American Indian people is being broadcast to millions of intolerant white Americans. This falls in line with the allegations of Ward being a FBI provocatuer. please take a good look at this issue in these terms....and lets hope that Bush administration Indian Policy doesn't take a turn for the worst because of this man.

Pat is correct

Bob 02.Feb.2005 18:33

Pat raises some good points. For example, during the Republican National Convention, indymedia did not want republicans to speak because they did not like the message. They went so far as to harrass delegates and would have shut down the convention if they were allowed. Some on the left are so nutty as to interrupt the Columbus Day parades because they do not want us to see it.

Now they complain about this nut losing his job?! I don't care what he says, but as a Colorado taxpayer, I don't want to pay him to write this rubbish. I will be pressuring my reps to have him removed from the university. He can go into private life and babble all he wants.

govt funding

freeper 02.Feb.2005 18:46

Let's fire everyone paid with taxpayer dollars who offends any taxpayer! That would probably be the whole government including Bush.

Just some sources

Josh 02.Feb.2005 20:24

This is the official AIM position on the professor.
 http://www.aimovement.org/moipr/churchill05.html

There is nothing I could find on the Colorado AIM site.

To my knowledge there is no seperate branch of AIM. Please correct me if I am wrong.

If this gentleman is a phony, we have a duty as revolutionaries to call him on it no matter how much we agree with his policies. If the AIM site is incorrect please let me know how as my resources are limited.

Cautionary point concerning AIM....

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 20:42

There is no offical 'AIM'...this crew have just set themselves up as such!

..it's rumoured also that the main man..shit forget the &^(*^ name is pocketing loadsamoney...from memorabilia sales etc...and not channeling to the eldersinneed or anything.

Anyway, don't reee-ly wanna get into Native American gossip right now.

Reality is not fixed.

Blessed be.

AIM

King Amdo 02.Feb.2005 20:47

Native american's unlike the death-occultists of america (etc), believe in and experience, the reality of the living Sacred Mother Witch. They are not atheists (please note!). This applies to 'traditional' (unassimilated) Native America's anyway...well to tribal people everywhere as it goes. Thus they (can) hold some clues to liberation...MOTHER.

christian system IS AN ABERATION!

Jah Live!

(I think you'll find my Aim is good!!)

sometimes people DO push back

al buggari 02.Feb.2005 20:57

heh

Nobody is taking away his right to freedom of speech. He is welcome to strap on a sandwich board sign, stand on a soapbox, and hand out pamphlets on the street corner.

irrelevent

anonymous 02.Feb.2005 21:04

Whether or not this AIM group or that one is the "real" one is irrelevent. What is relevent however is that Ward is representing (whether he wants to or not) Native Americans to the American Right. If someone is gonna be in this position of representing Indian people, it should at least be someone who is actually NATIVE and maybe someone who could represent the diverse spectrum of opinion within Native America...Also, notice that Bill O'Reilly is saying that Ward is a sympathizer of Al Quada. What is happening, is the right wing media is drawing a link between terrorism and Native Activism (even as represented by this white man ward). If anyone is aware of recent battles dealing with grave sites such as that in Port Angeles, WA and the Native victories as of lately, they can see where this "Indians are terrorists" link is potentially extremely detrimental.

Scott

where? 03.Feb.2005 04:40

I really wonder if the only source of information you have on Ward's ancestry is that flyer. And... does Ward have to agree with everything AIM says?

show me more evidence, cause I don't believe you.

NOW HEAR THIS!

King Amdo 03.Feb.2005 10:28

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/newswire/2005/02/818365.shtml

Comment on "sometimes people DO push back"

King Amdo 03.Feb.2005 10:47

This phrase summarizes 'rightious (sick) right wing america's' state of ignorance and stupidity. Of course indigenous and tribal people DO push back facsist programmed christian freemason skitzo...this is what makes 'Al Qa'ida/Taliban' such incredible heros (concerning this direct action attack anyway, forgetting for a moment their fascistic 'dreamquest' as a religious movemnet/vison, being anti other tribal ethnic groups).

It is OK and healing to take direct action against these colonialist perverts.

The bottom line is anyway, regardless of anything alse, that the world is overheating as a result of 'westworlds' manic gobbleing up of 'resources'...Overheating at a incresing atan increasing rate.

There's no blagging around this.

Either a breaking of this 'old age' fear abuse power (with actual unbelievably abusive and racist dodge occult foundation....the christina freemason paradigm)....or if the current karma path continues, then purification of this disease by the dieties, in a physical sense....A more detailed explanation of it all....

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

Of course these fascist perverts try and project all this onto 'eco's' trying to panik people or whatever...

You'll learn the hard way I guess. Your karma's fucked america/american's (etc). As the CIA themselves said in a report leaked to at leats the UK obsever, they know that in 5 years time we'll be much much hotter...the amount of energy going into the Earth's life support systems is increasing hugely which will lead to much more chaotic and manic weather and climate.

Don't worry, it will be exciting!

Blessed be.

Allah Akbar.

mp3s of a recent lecture

marco 03.Feb.2005 15:20

last october ward, spoke alongside Derrick Jensen.
Rather than give speeches, these two dynamic
orators agreed to just go right to Q&A after
they were announced.

Wow.

here's parts 1 and 2.

 http://milwaukee.indymedia.org/media/2005/02/202701.mp3

 http://milwaukee.indymedia.org/media/2005/02/202703.mp3

timing

friendandneighbor 03.Feb.2005 15:24

i'm curious whether anyone knows why this has become such an issue just now. Ward wrote about 911 very shortly after it happened and has been saying the same things about it ever since. None of the things he's coming under fire for are new statements... so why is this an issue now, at the beginning of 2005?

why now?

speculation 03.Feb.2005 15:46

Why now is a good question. The main article suggests the recent exoneration of AIM and other protestors who blocked the Denver Columbus Day parade is part of the answer. The two AM talk DJs in Denver who were so upset with the exoneration are also the DJs who are pushing for Churchill, one of the exonerated, to resign or be fired, and virtually right after the trial.

Another path could be the Denver's no-doubt upset Columbus-supporting groups contacting Italian relatives in NY whereupon by accident or design the connection of Churchill in Denver and Churchill at Hamilton College was made and then dissent started. Apparently there are some Italian names in the Hamilton opposition bunch, but that's hardly evidence they're also Columbus supporters or connected with Denver somehow.

If anyone heard the beginning of the O'Reilly attacks, I wonder if he mentioned how he got put onto this story? Being in NY I imagine it was connected with the Hamilton College speaking engagement.

Why Now?

speculation 03.Feb.2005 18:52

The article suggests this attack is in part retribution for the exoneration
of Churchill and ultimately over 200 arrestees who blocked the Columbus Day
parade in Denver this year.

After the verdict, which was quite recent (transformcolumbusday.org), the DJs were enraged and very shortly after that, they became fixated on Ward's old essay.

Additionally, it stands to reason that Denver's Columbus supporters discuss things with Columbus-supporting relatives in NY where Churchill was to speak and put 2 and 2 together. This could have been the cause of the Hamilton College problems and perhaps the path to NY-based O'Reilly too. It would be nice to know.

what Churchill did was NOT dissent

Silent B 03.Feb.2005 19:38

Ward Churchill went way beyond the boundries of sound, constructive, rational dissent. To compare the innocent victims of one of the worst tragedies this country has ever seen to Nazis is outrageously offensive, insensitive and blatantly idiotic. This is worse than when Chomsky accused America of plotting to commit "silent genocide" in Afghanistan. This is worse than when Nicholas de Genova called for "a million Mogadishus." This is proof that the radical left is glad Sept 11, the destruction of the symbols of American capitalism and power, happened, regardless of innocent people killed. I bet he thinks all those 3000 people where white, Protestant, zionist fascists and what not. What about the Latin American immigrant workers who worked in the WTC, trying to make money for their families in Honduras and El Salvador and so on? Where they "little Eichmanns"? And even though %50 of the population hates Bush, you're foolish if you think eben 2% of the population would sympathize with the extremist politics of Ward Churchill and his radical terrorist AIM/Black Panther/Weathermen commrades. If American taxpayers found out their money was being used to fund the extremist politics of the Noam Chomskys, Howard Zinna, Nicholas De Genovas and Ward Churchills that have dominated American public academia. Churchill has no right to accuse the 9/11 victims of being "too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly." Churchill and other hypocritical leftist pricks think that anyone who doesn't agree with them are either ignorant or "little Eichmanns." Well, let these fools butcher history in the private sector, because this "little Eichmann" isn't paying for it.

Yours trully
Silent B

PS When will these clowns realize that America's sanctions didn't kill 500,000 Iraqis? When will they realize that it was Hussein's refusal to accept the terms of the UN Oil For Food Program? When will they realize that their deaths resulted from embezzlement of those funds? When will they realize that had there been no sanctions, those 500,000 probably would have still starved to death since Saddam probably would have used all the oil profits to rebuild his state?

Silence is freedom?

Joshua A. Eaton 03.Feb.2005 19:49

As much as I disagree with the ideas that Ward Churchil expresses in Pacifism as Pathology- and I do disagree with them, vehemently- this sort of censorship and lack of academic freedom in the United States is intolerable. I don't support Ward's views on political violence, at all, but I support his right to hold them, express them, and explore them, as well as any of his other views. And that is what is under attack, not his specific positions.

legitemacy of Wards Identiy

radical dissenter 03.Feb.2005 20:18

Here is a link addressing Wards claims to his identity.

 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0%2C1413%2C36%7E53%7E2689334%2C00.html

He CANNOT prove that he is a Native person, even in terms of lineal decent. Just run a google search on Ward Churchill and include the term 'wannabe' and you will find some Native views on this man. The MNPLS AIM is the original AIM and the CO AIM is a seperate AIM that was started much later that isnt affiliated with the original. I dont know much about the history of how this came about, but Im sure you could google that as well.

I agree with much of what this man says, even the statement that caused this controversy. Most people however aren't aware/smart enough to understand just exactly what he is saying though. However, I do not feel that he represents Native people or has a Native american voice.

Why

Anonymaus 03.Feb.2005 20:43

The Fascists are attempting a takeover. They will use every opportunity to take us as far to the right as possible.

They have gone after high school teachers such as the case of Ian Harvey in Naples, FL. They have made every effort possible to keep us from being seen by this nation and world. They will not stop until we stop them. This has smells of the Reich. We saw this before in the 30's. An act of "terrorism", Personal liberties stripped, preemptive strikes, Shock and Awe (Blitzkrieg). Today's righties don’t have a problem with the tactics of the 30's, just who they were doing it to. Hitler's takeover was not an armed revolution; it came from careful strategy and taking advantage of every opportunity put in front of them.

I need to also point out that I put Democrat politicians in this category of the right, they are probably more dangerous because of their complacency.

This is the right everywhere in the world. Every Religion, Every ethnic group, everywhere.

I can smell the winds of revolution. It is time. We must work and work and work. Write, publish, sing, dance, pray. Do whatever it is that you can do. We need to network more. Make ourselves more visible. Join an affinity group. Just do something. The people of the world are the only ones that can stop this machine. We must support the people of the world that are moving forward and away from this.

some more info

curious party 03.Feb.2005 22:09

Here is some information coming from NDN country regarding Ward Churchill. I urge anyone interested in his background and legitimacy of his voice to read this.....

 http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?feature=yes&id=1096410295

native opinions regarding churchill

anonymous 03.Feb.2005 23:01

people, please see this article....also there is another one on the main page of this site: www.indiancountry.com

These will give you a better idea of Churchills "Indian" point of view

 http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096410293

Indian Country Today: Ward Churchill Isn't An Indian

anon 03.Feb.2005 23:54


Churchill's identity revealed in wake of Nazi comment
Posted: February 03, 2005
by: Editors Report / Indian Country Today
...
Being in the crucible of hostility is not new to the chip-on-the-shoulder
professor, who has become a celebrity for jumping into the polemic melee
over issues big and small, internal and external to the Native world. Even
in the question of personal identity, the professor's position is
controversial. Churchill's Indian status is not verifiable in the usual
ways of checking into tribal membership. We are expansive here from a
national position on recognized and non-recognized tribes, southern nations
and global indigenous people, but the question of relations and proper
belonging in the tribal circles in the United States and Canada is
generally verifiable for Indian observers and such appears to be completely
lacking in Churchill's case. He has claimed membership in the United
Keetoowah Band of Cherokee, but reliable representatives from the tribe
deny Churchill is or ever was, or has blood relatives on their rolls. He
was granted an ''associate certificate'' by a former leader of the tribe
(later impeached) for services supposedly rendered, not due to blood
relations - but even the tribe declines to exactly identify what that means.

Discerning indigenous identity is not an exact science, but it has its
rules. It would not be a primary issue relative to research and writing of
producers from any quarter, except Churchill represents himself as a major
spokesman for Indian people through his participation in a branch of AIM
and his claim to Cherokee origins. So far, nothing whatsoever has surfaced
that gives evidence to Churchill's claims to having Cherokee Indian
origins. Given the intense antagonism and attention focused on Churchill,
his biography in this context is likely to be further scrutinized by the
University of Colorado, the media, and others who were led to understand he
was an American Indian professional at the time of his hiring.

...
We will defend a good Indian argument in these pages any time. But, again,
there is no evidence that Churchill is Indian. Further, Churchill's
statements are obviously devoid of even the most basic humanity that
American Indian peoples hold dear. In no way does his insult reflect the
views of Indian country. To know the response of Indian country to the 9/11
tragedies is to reflect on the humanitarianism shown by Eastern Native
communities: from the Mohawk to the Oneida, the Pequot, Mohegan and many
others who immediately put their people - ironworkers, ferry-boat crews and
medical personnel - into the rescue and recovery operations, to the
California Indian nations that expressed their solidarity with America and
donated generously to the rescue efforts, to the Lakota families who
brought their Sacred Pipe to pray at the site, leaving their quiet
offerings early one dawn. This is always the preferred way of human beings
- to understand the kind of empathy required to belong to the human race is
essential in all political and economic discourse. To call the people who
were murdered on Sept. 11 ''little Eichmanns'' is a hideous expression that
when combined to Churchill's mistaken Native identity can only poison the
public discourse concerning American Indians.

...
Ward Churchill would do himself some good to express a profound apology to
people he has offended and misled. He should also come clean about his
appropriated American Indian identity. This is not advice he will likely
take. Churchill has jumped on the cougar of controversy ever since he came
onto the Indian scene as Russell Means' main speechwriter in the early
1980s. Churchill thrives on riding that controversial cougar, but this time
he poked it in the eye.

Your not listening he has always been a fake and an agent of the FBI

The piercing night 04.Feb.2005 01:10

Prof's Indian roots disputed
By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
February 3, 2005

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill is not a member of their tribe.

"He's not in the database at all and is not a member of the Keetoowah," said Georgia Mauldin, the tribal clerk in Tahlequah, Okla.


Advertisement



In his books and articles, Churchill has described himself as a member of the Keetoowah Cherokee tribe in Oklahoma. In past interviews, he's claimed to be one-sixteenth Cherokee.

But the Keetoowah say that's not true.

Attempts to contact Churchill for comment Wednesday on his background were unsuccessful. But Churchill's claim to American Indian roots has been challenged repeatedly by people in that community.

One Montana woman has an especially personal tale of confronting Churchill on his claim to American Indian heritage. She was taking one of Churchill's classes at CU in 1994 when she wrote an article for the Colorado Daily newspaper, saying there was no evidence he had any American Indian background.

"For so long it was whispered on campus that he really isn't an Indian," said Jodi Rave, who studied journalism at CU. "Here you had the director of the Indian studies program and he's not an Indian."

Rave is a Mandan-Hidatsa Indian originally from North Dakota. Today, she is a reporter and columnist with the Missoulian newspaper in Missoula, Mont. She was recently a fellow in the prestigious Nieman program for journalists at Harvard University.

In one of her journalism classes at CU, Rave was assigned to write a profile, and she decided to profile Churchill.

"To have somebody of that stature masquerading as an Indian was intriguing to me," Rave said. "On two separate days I asked him questions. I was up-front in asking him questions (about his background)."

Rave says she discovered that Churchill had enrolled in the Keetoowah tribe under a program initiated by a former tribal chairman that let almost anyone sign up. She says the Keetoowah later discontinued that program and disenrolled the people who had joined under it.

When her article came out, Rave says Churchill was furious and insisted that he did have American Indian lineage.

"He called me and said, 'Jodi Rave, this is your professor and I need to talk to you right away.' He was surprised I had a story published that called into question his identity."

He also defended his American Indian background and said her story was unfair.

Rave said she was enrolled in one of Churchill's classes when the article came out, and her grade went from an A to a C-minus.

She says Churchill can write what he wants, but his claim of American Indian heritage is bogus.

"There's no denying what he writes resonates with a lot of people, but when he says this is something he's experienced as a Native American man, that's fraudulent," Rave said.

The question of who is and who is not an American Indian is a sensitive one in that community. Many Indians resent the idea that only those who grew up on a reservation or have two American Indian parents are real Indians.

"Tracking blood lines is the business of Nazi Germany and South Africa (under apartheid)," said professor George Tinker, who teaches American Indian culture and religious tradition at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver. "That's not an Indian issue at all."

Tinker said that it should be up to the tribes themselves to decide who is an Indian.

The United Keetoowah Band Cherokee

• The word A-ni-kee-too-wah-gee ("Keetoowah people") was used by Cherokee speakers to refer to themselves. Kituhwa was the mother town of the Cherokees; its location, probably in present- day North Carolina, is now lost in the past.

• The Keetoowah Society was formed in 1859 by Cherokees transplanted to Okla- homa on the "Trail of Tears" as a way of preserving cultural traditions.

• The United Keetoowah Band is a part of the Tahlequah, Okla.-based Cherokee Nation. It was formed from various Cherokeee subgroups after passage of the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act in 1936, and it was recognized by Congress in 1949.Source: Www.Cherokeeobserver.Org

Ward the COP Bad Jacketting AIM with FBI concocted Eichmann comments

OGITCHIDA AIM 04.Feb.2005 01:14

It is amazing to see that Ward Churchill has once again found his way
into the ANALS of predominantly white controlled media. The man who has
by his own account and resume: been kicked off the Leanord Peltier
Defense Committee by Leanord Peltier himself for participating in a
smear campaign against Dennis Banks and Clyde Bellecourt (co-founders of
AIM), was a writer for the right wing "SOLDIER of FORTUNE" magazine,
taught an orientation class on the American Indian Movement for the
South Dakota State Police during the early 70's,has been condemned by
Bob Brown of the All African Peoples Revolutionary Party,roundly
condemned by "news from Indian country"one of the oldest and most widely
respected Indigenous newspapers in the US, supports the now right wing
Russell Means
(who has recntly endorsed the republican party and annouced he is
opening a liquor store outside Pine Ridge (see associated press Oct
5,1999)to raise money for an Indian alchohol rehabilitation center and
has resigned from the AIM 9 times and has done speaking engagements for
the John Birch society as well as the Reverend Moon(CIA operative since
1952) and who recently refused to be tried in Navaho tribal court for
beating his father in law half to death (said Navaho had no right to try
a Lakota)and Russell is now being called the Eldridge Cleaver or Ron
Caringa (former Panthers who turned into right wing evagelicals) of the
Indian world,Ward and Russ both actively and openly supported the
Contras and do not deny it to this day even though Russ's own brother
Bill was in Managua negtotiating a settlement between the Sandanistas
and the Indian people of the North West coast of Nicaragua and the AIM
and the International Indian Treaty Council both stated clearly that
Russ was acting unilaterally and undemocratically when he did press
conferences with Adolpho Calero (Contra leader) in Honduras, Ward has
never been involved in any major action conducted by AIM, he has made as
an excuse for the Contra support that he thought the Sandanistas were
unfair to the Native population of Nicaragua (so he supports the Contras
who have been documented as killing over 100,000 people who had native
heritage), they continued to support the Contras after the Miskito
people had made a satisfactory settlement to their concerns, Ward is on
an answering machine tape threatening the life of respected AIM leader
and Wounded Knee defendant Vernon Bellecourt, he has never lived in
predominantly native community, he attacked Carol Standing Elk and her
mother at a public event, has condemned John Trudell repeatedly (former
national director of AIM whose family was burned alive during the unrest
of the 70's), no one questions the fact that he received tenure at
University of Colorado faster than any man alive and was made director
of Native studies even faster, has repeatedly condemned the founders of
AIM in his books (which white progressives read as the AIM bible),
followed the Walk for Justice (for Leanord Peltier) across the country
saying Leanord didn't support it (Leonard kicked him off the defense
committee for it), and although he claims to have a nose bleed of Indian
blood he by no means is representitive of any person who has spent any
large part of his life living in any Indian community (yet white people
continue to bring him to their colleges to miseducate them about the
AIM), he has never denied any of these allegations but makes excuses for
them,the left abandoned the true AIM who were fugitives from the
imperialist US government and embraced the drunken movie star andthe
college proffesor (Russ who was the voice in that racist Disney cartoon
Pochahants, the lead Native role in that racist movie Last of the
Mohicans a film about the last man of his tribe risking it all to save
two white ladies from the bad racist Indians with his white buddy Danny
Day Lewis), and lastly Ward is an Asshole.
The only one of the facts listed above Ward can dispute is that he is an
asshole.The rest has all been documented by the great Ward Churchill or
in the public media. So all you lefties who condemn Farakahn because he
is a sexist and homophobic, or Clarence Thomas because he is right wing,
why are you giving Ward Churchill and Russ Means so much leeway. Why
aren't you seeking out the true leaders and founders of AIM when you
look to support Indians. Is it because you prefer people who support the
Contras, the Republican party, and the Moonies more than you do people
who have done real hard time in the struggle for justice behind bars?
Are these the Indians you can stomach? By the way don't forget Russ
Means running for President with Larry Flynnt (porno kingpin) with the
Libertarian Party (real anti-imperialist that Flynnt).
For the record the founders of the AIM were Dennis Banks and Clyde
Bellecourt. Even Russ's Brother Bill jpoined before he did. The leaders
of the AIM today are still there they have a web site AIMovement.Org
they have demanded repeatedly that the imposter calling himself the
International Confederation of Autonomous AIM chapters cease and desist.
How many of you ever heard of that back in the seventies. the National
American Indian Movement has been in exsistence 31 years and was founded
in Minn. Mn. where it still exsists today ph.612-721-3914. We have been
working to fight the good fight and will continue. We urge anyone who
would like to ask Mr. Churchill these questions the next time he is in
your area to do so. We also urge anyone who feels inclined to call Speak
Out speakers bureau and South End Press (his publisher) to stop
promoting his garbage. If you need a speaker concerning Indian issues
call AIM at 612-721-3914 .By the way Dennis Banks has his own website
and you can find it. We need your help to expose this bastard son of two
white folks who raised him in Champaign Ill.How can we compete with a
movie star who has the ear of the right wing media. Charlene Teeters is
one of our strong female leaders by the way and can be found at the
Native American Institute of Art in Santa fe and is a wonderful speaker
and a powerful activist against racism and sexim. Ward is slick they
created him that way. Please see throught the smoke coming out of his
ass.Megwitch thank you.If you are real anarchists you will not sensor
this message.
OGITCHIDA
OGITCHIDA

Won't do to ignore the questions

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 01:51

AIM deserves more respect than it is getting here. They have issued a disrupter notification on this fellow from years back, and it won't do to just blow it off.

AIM knows Ward Churchill far better than people who have just read his articles in Z Magazine, and AIM is trustworthy. They called him a provocateur only after years of putting up with his nonsense and trying to reach out to him. If they say he's a fake, he's probably a fake.

Though he apparently now denies it, quoted portions of his essay on 9-11 actually do justify the attack on the twin towers. That is an EXTREMELY irresponsible thing for someone to write, UNBELIEVABLY irresponsible coming from a university professor and self-proclaimed movement leader. And that he would deny this now also doesn't speak well of him.

There is no doubt that the feds use long-term infiltrators to disrupt political movements of all stripes. Excellent information about this practice can be gained from a book called "Every Knee Shall Bow," concerning the way that confidential informants framed Randy Weaver for a weapons charge, or the whining screed known as "False Prophets" written by confidential informants hired to infiltrate the Montana Freemen who did not get paid as promised.

Also, while his defense essay mentions his tour in Vietnam, it does not mention what he did there. Apparently he was a "public affairs officer." That is a person whose job it is to subvert the local people, to trick them in to siding with the U.S. forces.

A lot of people got drafted in to Vietnam, and others volunteered out of mistaken idealism. But I would be surprised to learn that many of those wound up as public affairs officers.

Then here is the matter of his fake-Indian-ness. In itself, of course, it isn't important that he isn't an Indian. But he really does seem to have told a long string of lies about being an Indian, which is really deeply dishonest. And the main people he has been telling these lies to are on the left, AIM people and the like. That he holds a job reserved for an Indian despite not actually being an Indian may be a lesser matter, but it sure isn't right.

All of this being the case, I wouldn't get caught up in offering him solidarity and consequently making yourself a target. He's not entitled. Say something like, "Well, Ward's a nutball, and we on the left have known it for a long time, but, you know, even a nutball has a right to free speech."

shoot the messenger?

logic 04.Feb.2005 02:09

Challenging Churchill's heritage, or any other credential, leaves his arguments untouched. How about engaging the material instead of shooting the messenger? Even if he's a total phoney it doesn't change his arguments AT ALL.

Ward Churchill 9/11 Comment

SKJ 04.Feb.2005 02:13

To look at Ward Churchills' comments in a way that will be enraging to liberals, how are his comments on the victims of 9/11 any different than if someone was to claim that the KKK had every right to be prejudiced against blacks and committ acts of violence against them because of crime problems, gang activity, drugs, etc., found in many black neighborhoods? The idea that the actions of the 9/11 terrorists is righteous retribution is no different. Using Churchill's enlightened point of view, the KKK would be excused, or at least understood, for their prejudice due to the actions of members of minorities that are perverted to make the whole group look criminal and create stereotypes. Acts of justice should only be against those that have committed the injustice, not anybody and anything that can be found. This is true if you are a terrorist or if you are a member of the KKK.

I am sure Churchill can create a powerful argument of why Arab people's would have a laundry list of issues with the USA and the West. (No doubt, there is a list equally long - or dare I say loger - that can be made condemning the terrorists) But there can be no justification of civilians as the direct target of terrorists.

Not shoot the messenger, out the cop

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 03:06

Not shoot the messenger, but out the cop, and out the cop line as well. This business about the U.S. deserved 9/11 is a cop line, a provocateur line designed to isolate the left and to stop the left from going into the meatiest political issue around 9/11: U.S. government complicity in an act of mass murder of Americans. To paraphrase Bush, "They massacred their own people."

How did all of these people who were on watch lists manage to reside unmolested in the U.S. for years, to enroll in flight schools, etc. How did the U.S. manage to ignore the threat of airplances being used as bombs years after they had definite, confirmed information that terrorists were planning such an attack? Why were FBI investigations which could possibly have stopped 9/11 stopped on orders from above?

A speaker should know his audience, and an audience should know its speaker.

Some Journalism! Stop giving Churchill a free Pass!!

Me 04.Feb.2005 03:46

Why does Indy Media never really cover the real Churchill story. Did he speak at your college or something? You have never bothered to interview or cover any of the AIM founders dispatches on Churchill or Means. This isn't about free speech it is about an imposter getting away with posing as a radical. Some journalists!

Ward Churchill

Arthur Randolph Erb 04.Feb.2005 04:03

The controversy over Churchills comments does NOT involve free speech issues or academic freedom ones. In his essay, he clearly and explicitly calls the terrorists, combat teams who made valiant sacrifices on 9/11. THAT is condoning terrorism and murderous attacks on civilians which he decries when the US has casualties in conjunction with military ops. The big difference is that the terrorists made civilians the prime target. It also is a fact that he blames the bond traders for their own demise. The largest company who lost most people was Fitzgerald Cantor which had nothing to do with foreign operations of any US company. They specialized in municipal bonds service, and the WTC was owned by the Port Authority of New York, and has little or nothing to do with world affairs other than allowing imports to the US.
I have NO problem with him having his opinion or expressing it. I DO have a problem with his being paid at taxpayer expense to do such things as advocate murder of innocent people. His essay is also a very poor one which would get an F from any academic and is hardly of the caliber one would want from a professor. So for two reasons, he should be fired. He is using his post to advocate murder and adhering to enemies who have murdered thousands of Americans, and he is also deficient in that he does a very poor job at what he was hired to do. It is also disingenuous to assert now as he is trying to do that he didn't advocate such terrorism. His essay says otherwise and I have read it. He also asks if the people who were in the WTC could have been made to pay for their supposed crimes in any other way, and he answers in the negative. THAT is also advocating such murder.
It is time to restore common sense and excellence in education and time to get rid of Churchill. I am also a Kerry supporter and I hate Bush with a passion. To support or defend such a man is both absurd and counter productive.

Great to sa ya injuns a fight'in 'an a bitch'in....

33 Degree Mason. 04.Feb.2005 14:43

...again...

Why sir! I think I feel a hard on coming on right now...you've got uzz so excited!!!

Native American genocide....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 16:08

The fact is that the white settlers have almost destroyed Native American Tribal society...In fact concentration camps were invented by the American government to herd native people into. American's tend to get angry..they/you are in denial about this. You don't like to be compared to the Third Rhiech, even theough this is the reality. I don't even really care in particluar what Warc Churchiull said...the fact is your society is a scapegoat abuse trick AND YES WITH REAL ACTUAL NEGATIVE OCCULT DRIVING FORCE. Thus 'you' and your country are (**&^*&^^%. Is that quite (*(*^*&(*& well clear?

Kerry/Bush whatever no difference...it's all part of the same game from the Native type persective.

I reitereate in reality, forgetting the (mainstream) government skitzo line, 9/11 was a cool action.

OM SHIVA!


Ward churchill's controversial identity

Dr. Elissa Montjoy 04.Feb.2005 17:55

I would urge all those who defend Ward Churchill's extremist views to read again the warning posted anonymously on this site by an American Indian.
I have known Ward Churchill for over twenty years, and when I first met him, he was a "white man." His change of identity over the years, and his mimicking of so-called American Indian "resentment" etc.. as well as his vitriolic speech have raised some serious concerns about his motivations, and who he really is. He is - to say the least about this thorny topic - highly suspect in the eyes of some American Indians. His reputation as an American Indian "activist" is chiefly among white liberal groups who are unaware of the fact that his stance more often hurts the American Indian communities than help them.

I am a professor and an anthropologist, steeped in the humanities. I stand for freedom of speech, but early in my carer, I seriously asked myself if freedom did not entail deep responsibility, and if, without this sense of responsibility to others, freedom was not simply disguised selfishness. I believe that a freedom of speech that causes great harm to others by disrespecting their suffering, or is detrimental to the well-being of one's family, friends, or nation, is something else. In my view, Ward Churchill has an identity problem and is in denial. Under some assumed identity, he allows himself, not just to be critical of his government, but abusive and a transgressor of normal democratic dissent. He should not be kept on the faculty of Colorado University at Boulder, but counseled to seek some kind of therapy.

Ward Churchill Should Be Ashamed

Rocky 04.Feb.2005 19:33

He lied about his heritage and insulted victims of terrorist attacks. What if one of your friends or relatives died in the World Trade Center? Would you still be defending someone who called your friend or relative a "little Eichmann"?

@nti

pissant 04.Feb.2005 20:29

This is a fight for freedom, not Ward Churchill. Everyone has the right to say anything they feel like at any time they feel like. It doesn’t matter who it offends, who it inspires, who it reflects upon. If he is exposed as a phony then nothing he says will have a lot of relevance. I am so sick of these damn right wing idiots whining all of the time. It is time to take this world back from these assholes. The terrorists are the same to me as all of the other heads of state We have been state terrorists for many years. Not just us though. This isn’t a recent issue. The day we dropped a nuclear weapon on a civilian population, we crossed the line into terrorism (There are cases dating back way before that.) We also pushed the line forward into what is acceptable warfare. Pretty much anything goes. Guns? Sure. Bombs? Sure. Huge radioactive fireballs that consume the earth? Sure! All power cares about is power. ALL POWER. We cannot distinguish between this head of state and the other. The problem is not capitalism, it is not communism, it is not socialism, it is not fascism, it is all of them, because they are power. Everyone in power would have you believe that they will lead you into the new and peaceful world where everyone will be happy and content as they murder, destroy, and rape just out of sight. Not my sight though. I see it and I will stop it. We can never progress without discussion on all sides. The only line crossed is when others lives or livelihoods are destroyed. I have never started a war. I am only hoping to participate in a revolution.

P.S. And King whatever, You aren’t making any sense. Are you drunk? You tear down Christianity while hailing Jah, Allah, Shiva. You pick every other religion to prop up while tearing one down. Religion is a form of government. Spirituality is a state of mind.

So what if he is a white geezer?

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 21:58

I have white skin, but a black heart. I live in the UK, I KNOW as do many others the true nature of western society...in particular here, the FREE 'peace convoy' travallers. I've also actually through my life experience found out that this mainstream 'order' actually has a horrifically negative abusive dodge ritual basis...I've already given the link, this makes me an incredble hero by the way. I also was given a REAL Sundance Eagle feather, from the Dine'h tribal protest Sundance at Black Mesa, by Daniel Zapata whilst he was visiting the 'Eithinog' comman land protest in North Wales a few years ago and whether or not a few assimilated americanised government skitzo's think I'm mad, out of line, or what the fuck ever, I'm playing this FOR REAL. And by the way if the bunch of wankers at alt.native (yes there are Native people outside of the USA by the way) were to say what they said to my face......They'd be facing SOME FUCKING SERIOUS VIOLENCE.

You think evidence of state ritual racist child abuse is some sort of fucking joke?

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

These people are pure liquid fidlth...THUS WHO FUCKING GIVES A FLYING TOSS IF SOME BRAVE FUCKERS FLY SOME PLANES INTO THE HEART OF THE BEAST...

In fact...

Merit. Allah Akbar.

Now stop acting...It doesn't matter what people think, or who you think is reading this, you don't have to present a 'normal front' as though talking to a audience of strait democrats in smalltownsville USA. JUST BE YOURSELF AND BE TRUTHFUL. remeber this IS not 'masturbate towards the anchor man' mainstream media. This is ANARCHY!

YOU'RE FUCKED AMERICA (etc)

END OF FUCKING STORY.

Blessed be,

King Amdo

You have to recognise and then work at....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:09

INNER power. This is sacred. Forget the state abuse of 'power'...that's a different sort of power..particularly in the west..as described...it's a total horror power! (christian freemason dodge temple builders).

Again, christianity is unique in it's abuse of 13/mother/female/lunar/goddess aspect..and the ACTUAL SOURCE REASON WHY is described thus in the link given. Total abuse of the occult..thus the reason why people are asleep in the west...pysco/spiritually...and why the western paradigm is raping the Sacred Mother.

Religion? You wanna know about religion?...

Have some respect for tribal people and culture please...just because everyone with any sense has rejected the blag (pretend) religion of christianity doesn't mean that real religions are to be throw in the dustbin of western arrogance!!! For astart various religious practices have great power for magical work...there is a practical benefit!

There is a huge and total differnence between eastern magic and relgion and cultures and western, even though we use the same words for convienience.

Take care!!!

OM SHIVA!

King Amdo

(I'm reincarnated Tibetan Tribal leadership as it goes)

Just to make it perfectly clear....

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:13

Why the fuck da'ya think I'm praying like a Mullah?

 http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/ritual_abuse/111339/latest/1

ALLAH AKBAR

"Religion is a form of government"

King Amdo 04.Feb.2005 22:31

That's a very very very narrow way of looking at it. And so what of the hierachy is religious one...they are valid and good. I know this. You are just parroting. Ok well so christian freemasonry really is the government (nice one Romans)...and a nightmare construct for sure, but this is really NOT at all neccessarily so for eastern magic and leadership!

These are incredibly beautiful senarios, please have some respect western fool!

ALSO these eastern religions have given me personnal protection from the extreme negative dodge occultist controlling society here in the west.

Allah Akbar.

Until the near TOTAL AND COMPLETE LACK OF ANY SORT OF SOLIDARITY FROM NEW AGERS OR POLITICAL ACTIVISTS HERE!!!

The natural state of being for human beings, of everybeing is occult/religious awareness. AND IT IS THIS CONSCIOUSNESS (AND AMAZING REALITIES) THAT IS/ARE BLOCKED BY THE MAINSTREAM DODGE OCCULTISTS HERE. THATS A FACT!!!

And it is this areness...consciousness that is incarnate in (traditional) Native American's...and this state of consciousness (essentially we are talking pro goddess consciousness) that is so dissed out out by the christian white supremistis...and communists of course. (colloborators in effect).

If you can PLEASE go and visit and help these people...

www.blackmesais.org

They have an INCREIBLE culture/religious belief system, these elders!

Also read what this man says.....a true hero...

 http://www.leonardpeltier.org/subscribe.html

His last statement was excellent.

EXODUS IN THE HOUSE!





Let me put this as plainly as I can

Nobody 04.Feb.2005 22:37

The issue is not that Ward Churchill is white. The issue is that Ward Churchill is working for the government. He may be a confidential informant for the FBI. He may be working for some other agency. But his job is and has been for a long time to confuse, disrupt, distract and discredit the left, and particularly AIM.

When he talks, if you want to listen, well, go ahead, but be warned that he's the pied piper and he's subjectively, intentionally trying to lead you to your destruction. Some of what he says is true and some of it is false. All of it is calculated to fool, cheat, and deceive you. And these are the calculations of a very clever man, cleverer than most of us.

If you don't understand that, go back to the AIMovement.org site and read further. If you do understand that, and you are not insane, you are going to be profoundly conscious of it every time you read his words or hear him speak.

Hey Churchill Supporters!

Rocky 04.Feb.2005 22:57

Do those jackboots and SS uniforms fit you? And if you're going to call me a fascist, the question of which political party blames Jews for the world's problems is going to come up. The fact is that you Democrats are the fascists! Why?

1. You hate Jews!
2. You blame Jews for your problems!
3. You condone Islamofascist suicide bombers who kill Jews!
4. You defend the actions of Arafat, Hamas, and Hezbollah!
5. You want to wipe Israel off the map and have a pan-Islamic Middle East!

What the?

dB 05.Feb.2005 00:24

Rocky must have saw "Team America" one too many times. Since when do the Democrat's hate Jews? The Jewish-American population votes liberal and democrat by a significant margin in every major election.
A lot of ignorant flame fanning going on here....

As a fellow ethicist

1Planet1People 05.Feb.2005 04:37



The problem with this entire situation is not what this person is saying, but the community’s attempt to censor him. Let me explain, I have a Masters degree in philosophy. I worked under a diverse group of faculty, some in which I agreed with, and others that I did not. The reason that this is important is because we genuinely argued in a democratic fashion, and arrived at an autonomous point of view. I have had professors on both sides of the isle: I had one that wanted to bring slavery back as a form of indentured repayment for crimes, and others, who argued that every sentimental being had a fundamental right to equal consideration. Some philosophers (Harman) believe that morality is relative to the society in which one lives, while others (Kant) thinks it is based on universal moral laws, and yet others (Mill) who argue that what is best of the community is moral. There are those (Zionists) who argue for the mass extermination of the Palestinians, and others (Chomsky) who argue that Palestinians are equal humans who deserve equal rights. Without the diversity in views on the academia level, you wind up with true censorship. Academic freedom is one of the most fundamental principles to a free society. You take that away, regardless of WHO you censor, you take freedom away. Without freedom, you will lose my consent to participate, and my allegiance to the resistance. Give me liberty, or you can give me death. And I can say all this without even telling you if I agree with him; it is simply not a correlated issue.

AIM Communique on Ward Churchill

Ogithida- American Indian Movent 05.Feb.2005 04:54

AIM Communique on Ward Churchill
Ogithida- American Indian Movent 04 Feb 2005 23:41 GMT

This is a summary of our communique on recent Churchill events. He may have a right to say what he is saying but we have a right to say his positions are not in keeping with our position and once again and since 1985 he is not a part of the American Indian Movement.

AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL


MINISTRY FOR INFORMATION
P.O. Box 13521
Minneapolis MN 55414
612/ 721-3914 . fax 612/ 721-7826
Email:  aimggc@worldnet.att.net
Web Address: www.aimovement.org




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ward Churchill was scheduled to speak at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York on February 3, 2005. His appearance was canceled by the college after he caused a public furor over his loathsome remarks about the 9-11 tragedy in New York. AIM's Grand Governing Council has been dealing with Churchill's hateful attitude and rip-off of Indian people for years.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council representing the National and International leadership of the American Indian Movement once again is vehemently and emphatically repudiating and condemning the outrageous statements made by academic literary and Indian fraud, Ward Churchill in relationship to the 9-11 tragedy in New York City that claimed thousands of innocent people’s lives.

Churchill’s statement that these people deserved what happened to them, and calling them little Eichmanns, comparing them to Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, who implemented Adolf Hitler’s plan to exterminate European Jews and others, should be condemned by all.

The sorry part of this is Ward Churchill has fraudulently represented himself as an Indian, and a member of the American Indian Movement, a situation that has lifted him into the position of a lecturer on Indian activism. He has used the American Indian Movement’s chapter in Denver to attack the leadership of the official American Indian Movement with his misinformation and propaganda campaigns.

Ward Churchill has been masquerading as an Indian for years behind his dark glasses and beaded headband. He waves around an honorary membership card that at one time was issued to anyone by the Keetoowah Tribe of Oklahoma. Former President Bill Clinton and many others received these cards, but these cards do not qualify the holder a member of any tribe. He has deceitfully and treacherously fooled innocent and naïve Indian community members in Denver, Colorado, as well as many other people worldwide. Churchill does not represent, nor does he speak on behalf of the American Indian Movement.

New York’s Hamilton College Kirklands Project should be aware that in their search for truth and justice, the idea that they have hired a fraud to speak on Indian activism is in itself a betrayal of their goals.

Dennis J. Banks, Ojibwa Nation
Chairman of the Board
American Indian Movement
Phone: 218-654-5885


Nee Gon Nway Wee Dung, aka, Clyde H. Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
National Executive Director
American Indian Movement
Cell: 612-251-5836
Office: 612-724-3129


Press Contact:
WaBun-Inini, aka, Vernon Bellecourt, Ojibwa Nation
Executive Committee Member
Director Council on Foreign Relations
American Indian Movement
Office: 612-721-3914
Cell: 612-889-0796


Churchill's membership in tribe honorary only
By Stuart Steers,
Rocky Mountain News

February 4, 2005

The former chairman of the Keetoowah band of Cherokee Indians says University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill was given an honorary membership that required no proof of Cherokee heritage.

John Ross led the tribe for several years in the 1990s. He says the Keetoowah established an "associate member" program to recognize friends of the tribe.

"If somebody helped out in a certain way, to honor them they'd give them an associate membership," Ross said Thursday. "There were 300 or 400 associate members."

Former President Clinton also was given an honorary membership in the tribe.

To be a full-fledged member of the Keetoowah, a person has to prove he or she is at least one-fourth Cherokee. Churchill has never had such a membership. Only full members are allowed to vote, hold office and receive tribal privileges.

Churchill has cited his associate membership in the tribe as proof of his Cherokee roots. He told The Denver Post on Wednesday he is three-sixteenths Cherokee. In the past, he has described himself as one-sixteenth Cherokee and also claimed to have Creek Indian blood. Ross said Churchill came to several Keetoowah celebrations in the early 1990s and befriended tribal members, who decided they wanted to give him the associate membership.

"He told the tribal council that if they needed him to lend a hand, he would," Ross said. He recalls Churchill offering to represent the tribe at an academic forum sponsored by the University of Arkansas.

Eventually, Ross came to feel the associate membership program was being abused, and he asked the tribal council to abolish it. The Keetoowah haven't given out any new associate memberships since 1994.

"There were a lot of people coming in and trying to use the associate memberships to elevate themselves," he said. "We decided we shouldn't give them out anymore and did away with it."

Ross said some of the associate members were people who started claiming to be Keetoowah artisans. He says Churchill is also misusing his associate membership status.

"In a sense, he's misleading people," Ross said. "He's like the others - that's what he's done."

Churchill did not return numerous phone calls during the past two days seeking comment.

Many non-Indians are now claiming Cherokee ancestry, said Richard Allen, a policy analyst with the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. The Keetoowah are a small offshoot of the much larger Cherokee Nation.

Allen has worked for the Cherokee Nation for more than 20 years. He said he has followed Churchill's career for much of that time.

"When it comes to Churchill, I've always thought he was a wannabe Indian," Allen said. "His history is a little bit like Forrest Gump."

Allen said Churchill picked up a packet to enroll in the Cherokee Nation in 1991 and never returned it.




November 3, 1999

BACKGROUND: The United States Government War
Against the American Indian Movement

On December 17-18, 1993 a group of suspected government agents, co-conspirators, collaborators, and a few unsuspecting pawns and dupes convened a meeting at Edgewood, New Mexico under the banner of the so-called "confederation of autonomous AIM" chapters and released the Edgewood declaration in which they launched their attack on the legitimate leadership of the American Indian Movement.

This declaration was signed by Russell Means, Glen Morris, Bob Robideaux and David Hill. In addition to these individuals we find at the heart of this conspiracy Ward Churchill, Bobby Castille, George Martin, Donald Grinde Jr., Paulette d’ Autueil, M. Annette Jaimes, Nantinki Rose and Robert (Bob) Roche. We believe that Joe D. Locust, Sr., Dianne Million, Sharon Venne and Regina Brave Dixon are unsuspecting dupes who have allowed themselves to be used by these conspirators (see Susan Shown Harjo letter). Faith Townsend Attaglia of Dark Night Field Notes), Shelly Davis, and Bill Lawrence, owner and publisher of the so-called Native American Press in Minnesota, along with reporters, Gary Blair and Joe G. Geshick are co-conspirators, and are directly connected to this misinformation campaign. (Joe G. Geshick was in attendance at the mock tribunal).

In addition, Bill Lawrence and his newspaper have aligned themselves with the likes of Bud Grant, Howard Hansen and other individuals and organizations like CERA, Citizens Equal Rights Association, PERM, PARR, etc., which by their words and deeds have proven themselves to be anti-Indian, anti-Indian Nation Sovereignty and anti-Treaty Rights, which includes the spiritual, cultural, social, economic, and political rights of our Indian peoples. (See lawsuit, V. Bellecourt v. Lawrence & Geshick)

On March 25-26, 1994 at San Luis Obispo Community College in California this fraudulent group staged an event that was characterized by Northern California respresentative and founding board member of the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council, Carol Standing Elk, as a mock tribunal. These two events were the continuation of a covert program which originated during the Nixon White House in 1972, and continues today on the internet (see Council on Security and Intelligence).

These co-conspirators calling themselves the confederation of autonomous AIM chapters have attempted to infiltrate, misdirect, divide, disrupt and cause confusion by claiming to be American Indian Movement on the one hand, and on the other hand they continue their campaign to vilify and discredit the legitimate leadership, and members of the American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council as part of their campaign to destroy the American Indian Movement.

Previous to the March 25-26, 1994 mock tribunal held at San Luis Obispo Community College, a meeting was called in Minneapolis, Minnesota attended by 250 men, women, and children responding to a tobacco invitation. They gathered in spirituality and consultation on Sunday, March 20, 1994 and included elders, spiritual leaders and ten pipe carriers. They spoke of the Movement's history and these attacks against the Movement and leaders, Clyde and Vernon Bellecourt.

Spiritual leaders of the Midewin and Sun Dance ways advised Clyde and Vernon not to respond to the attacks against them, and not to travel to the sham "tribunal" to defend themselves, and to ignore the false charges. In reference to those who are making charges and bringing false "indictments," one elder advised Clyde, "Let them speak, and let them say all they will say, and when they are done, they will have no more to say."

However, on Friday, March 25 and Saturday, March 26, leaders of the national and local American Indian Movement met together in San Francisco to strategize how to deal with Ward Churchill and a self-styled radical faction of his followers. Present at the meeting were AIM National President and co-founder, Clyde Bellecourt; AIM National Board Member and Northern California AIM Director, Carol Standing Elk; Southern California AIM Director, Fern Mathias; California AIM Publicist, Patti Jo King; long-time AIM affiliate, Floyd Red Crow Westerman; International Indian Treaty Council President, William Means; and IITC Information Director, Yvonne Swan. They were accompanied by Anishinabe spiritual leader Ellie Favel who carried with her a sacred medicine bundle, and an urgent message from the gathering of traditional spiritual leaders in Minnesota.

The group gathered to discuss their concerns regarding a defamatory "tribunal" in which distinguished Indian leaders of national and local Indian organizations were "put on trial" and condemned by a radical group of self-styled "Indian activists" falsely claming to be members of the American Indian Movement, and spearheaded by ring leader Ward Churchill.

While it was seen as one last effort to reason with those Indian and non-Indian friends that were being manipulated by these conspirators, we are again reminded of the advice of our elder who said, "Let them speak, let them say all they will say, and when they are done, they will have no more to say."

The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council has allowed them to have their say going back to September 23, 1986 when Ward Churchill and Glen Morris were expelled from the International Indian Treaty Council (IITC). After seven (7) more years of investigations by our Council on Security, and attempts to reason with Russell Means, who continues to be aligned with them and is a central figure in this conspiracy, Ward Churchill and Glen Morris were expelled from the American Indian Movement on November 24, 1993. Six years later in 1999 they continue their misinformation campaign and attacks against the leadership of the American Indian Movement on the Internet.

Their deceitful method of operation becomes clear and are listed as follows:


Their web site is a perfect example. They list issues as their own that the American Indian Movement, International Indian Treaty Council and other organizations have been developing over a thirty-year period of time.

They list as related sites various well known organizations and individuals and projects in order to cloak their misinformation campaigns with legitimacy.

Specifically, in regards to the revisionist writings of Ward Churchill, Glen Morris and Russell Means, they often use people such as Vine Deloria, LaDonna Harris, Gerry Spence, Noam Chomsky and many other Indian and non-Indian intellectuals and academics, some who naively play into their game plan.

Working with willing agents like Santos "Hawks Blood" Suarez, and Lawrence Sampson and others, they are attempting to sell for money chapters of so-called confederation of autonomous AIM and AIM club membership cards.

They continue to perpetuate this misinformation campaign in front-operations like Dark Night Field Notes, using well-known persons like Noam Chomsky, Eddie Hatcher, Winona LaDuke, and others on their advisory board. They are now putting out the same misinformation on the Internet (see letterhead and Dark Night Field Notes by Faith Attaglia, and Chomsky, LaDuke letters), also (See Bob Brown, AAPRP letter).

They use publications like Houghton-Mifflin, Random House Publishers, South End Press, and Speak Out Speakers Bureau who allow Ward Churchill and others to perpetuate their literary, academic, and Indian fraud on the unknown public.

In order to carry out this cruel hoax, they are deceitful and treacherous to the point that they will always surround themselves with innocent and naïve individuals out of the Indian and non-Indian communities, some who are well known who actually have endorsed their revisionist, inaccurate, shoddy, and fraudulent writings. The result of this is that without review of the contents of their publications, Indian and non-Indian educators and educational institutions and libraries are using these books in their curriculum. In doing so, they and our students become victims of this fraud. 8. Using the American Indian Movement to give themselves credibility, cover and access, they have been able to infiltrate other organizations and movements nationally and internationally.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What you can do to help:


The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council urges our friends and supporters worldwide to expose and isolate these conspirators expeditiously.

We request that educators, Indian and non-Indians alike remove from their curriculums and libraries all of their revisionist, inaccurate and shoddy writings, and send them back to their publishers (a clear example of the problem is the Encyclopedia of the North American Indian by Frederick E. Hoxie, published by Houghton Mifflin, a subsidiary of Random House). Mr. Marc Jaffe of Houghton Mifflin first contacted and met with Tim Giago, Oglala Lakota, and award winning publisher of Indian Country Today, and syndicated columnist to do the book, and without notifying Mr. Giago, Mr. Jaffe selected Mr. Hoxie who allowed Indian literary and academic fraud, Churchill to submit the article, "Radicals and Radicalism, 1990 to the Present." Everyone knows that Mr. William A. Means has provided key leadership in the development of the International Indian Treaty Council from its inception in 1974 to the present. IITC is the international political and diplomatic corp of the American Indian Movement, yet, Churchill gives credit to fellow wannabe Jimmy Durham, and Winona LaDuke. No doubt Churchill's motives in his revisionist writings in omitting William A. Means is because of the 1986 letter in which Mr. Means expelled both Churchill and Glen Morris from further association with IITC.

Discontinue utilizing Speak Out Speakers Bureau and publications from South End Press, Zeta Magazine and Common Courage Press until they agree to stop promoting these frauds. Additionally, do now allow Native American Press to be circulated in your place of business or community.

Join with us in demanding that the Senate Judiciary Committee hold Waco and Ruby Ridge-type hearings on the Pine Ridge Oglala Lakota Nation; the site of Wounded Knee 1890-1973, and the botched FBI operation that left FBI agents, Williams and Coler and AIM member, Joe Stuntz dead. An FBI operation that led to the deaths of Anna Mae Aquash, Buddy Lamont, Frank Clearwater, and Pedro Bissonette to name a few of many, and Leonard Peltier remains in prison after twenty-three years.

We request that organizations such as the National Indian Education Association and the American Indian Higher Education Consortium create a watchdog-type agency to review what books are being published by these literary, academic, and Indian frauds so that their revisionist writings are not finding their way into our education curriculum. This problem is of epidemic proportions, and must be stopped.

Join with us in our demands that the 6,000 pages currently under a national security cover be released to Leonard Peltier’s attorneys.

Those persons whose names appear on the Freedom of Information (FOI) declassified documents are all targets of the U.S. government war against the American Indian Movement; you should request your files from the various government agencies.
For information on how to make a Freedom of Information file request, write, fax, or email to the attention of Joslyn Kaye at the Center for Constitutional Rights
666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York NY 10012. Email is  jkaye@ccr-ny.org
Telephone number is 212-614-6464, ext. 470. Fax is 212-614-6499.

AIM's statement on 911

PRESS RELEASE BY THE
American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council
The American Indian Movement Peace Statement
September 15, 2001
The American Indian Movement Grand Governing Council vehemently condemns the recent acts of violence and terrorism perpetrated against innocent civilians in the United States. We condemn similar acts of violence and terrorism perpetrated by all governments and organizations against innocent civilians worldwide.

THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT GRAND GOVERNING COUNCIL DECLARES:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. central time, Indian people will be standing with thousands of Minnesotans at the State Capitol to join our prayers and spirit in the wake of these horrific and tragic events. We request that all of our Indian peoples and others join us in our offerings and prayers at this time.
Our hearts go out to the victims and their families, and we mourn with them the loss of their loved ones. As a people who have historically suffered similar crimes against humanity perpetrated against peaceful Indian villages in the North America, and continuing today against Indian civilians in several countries of Central and South America, we nonetheless at this time grieve and join our prayers and spirits with the families of the innocent victims of these acts of violence in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Washington D.C.

However, we caution and remind the U.S. Government leaders that all faiths of the world are taught that violence begets violence. Mahatma Ghandi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. have proven the power of non-violence. Our great chiefs like Blackhawk and Chief Joseph, in the face of great adversity, were men of peace and non-violence. Blackhawk, who correctly observed at that time, when he asked the question, "Why is it that you Americans always insist on taking with a gun what you could have through love?"

With acts of love, we can become the most respected government and people in the world, and we will prevail. If we continue the cycles of violence, we will continue to be the most despised in many parts of the world, and we will fail. We must continue to pray for justice and world peace.


CONTACT:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ne-Gon-We-Way-We-Dun, Anishinabe Ojibwe Nation
Also known as Clyde H. Bellecourt
Phone: 612-724-3129
National Director American Indian Movement






[article.email.prefix]:  AIMGGC@worldnet.att.net <<img src="/img/maillink.gif" border="0"/> AIMGGC@worldnet.att.net [article.homepage.prefix]:  http://www.aimovement.org [article.phone.prefix]: 612-721-3914

WHy has Indy Medi arefused to cover Founders of AIM!!

Love doctor 05.Feb.2005 04:57

Why has Indy media never bothered to ask the founders of AIM who have clear radical credentials (Wounded Knee, Mohawk Uprising, their well known solidarity and relationship with the Zapatistas, and key relationships with many freedom fighters around the world) about their feelings on these issues.

dB, about your comment

Rocky 05.Feb.2005 06:02

I am aware that Jews vote Democrat, but a number of Democrats have been anti-Jewish. Take Virginia Congressman Jim Moran's March 2003 comment about how he blames Jews for the Iraq War, for example. Or comments about Jews made by Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. And I have never seen "Team America." And what about all those Berkeley activists who protest against Jews every chance they get?

I agree with 1Planet1People

marco 05.Feb.2005 08:39

I have to agree with 1Planet1People.

We must defend Ward Churchill's rights.
This is a purge. And I'm afraid it's the
sign of things to come really.

We can discuss whether we agree/disagree with
Churchill some other time. It has nothing to
do with the matter at hand.

Does Nat Hentoff agree with everything YOU'VE
ever said and done in your life? Probably not.
Has he defended your First Ammendment rights
tirelessly for your entire life?

PROBABLY.

He sure has defended mine.

We need to do likewise.

marco

r: "Let me put this as plainly as I can"

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 12:56

(denonciation of Churchill as FBI etc etc etc).

Again, this sort of attack goes on ALL THE TIME in Native activist circles...and is crazy and stupid. Of course he's not %%$£££ FBI!

Russel Means one of the 'Grand Governing Council' people IS NOT FBI also. (another frequently made accusation)...He may be an egosier and 'dodgy geezer'..but he's not FBI. Again these days, there is no 'offical AIM'. Why? Look what happened to the original AIM. So this is why people say that Means must be FBI, maybe, in that he is allowed to get away with this 'organistion/trip'. Not neccessarily so of course. (although if their 'official' stance is pro Zapatista that is a joke because they are communists...and Means is certainly no communist!???!!! (Nor was Zapata by the way!)

Very very few of the people that are accused of being FBI are thus. The point of government interervention is to generate all this scisming out and paranoia and distruption of tribal focus and energy, so that poeple get disallusioned and lunch out back into the mainstream ^^%%&%$!!!


And please note that this intervention occurs PRIMARILY on a 'energy level'...i.e. what the Native American's call 'bad medicence'...I should not have to tell you why again!...

Stay cool.

Om

(sorry but it's my 'program' however I may feel to at least try)

Sorry one more thing.....

King Amdo 05.Feb.2005 13:00

..then I'll leave the talking to others....

The central point here is magic as in auspicious tribal energy/liberation RATHER THAN government pervert power/negative mind/reality control.

Blessed be!

DINE'H TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

HOPI TRIBAL SOVERIGNTY!

From United Native America

Founder Mike L. Graham 05.Feb.2005 13:03

Contact FCC and demand they pull 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorado broadcasting licenses



Message to the American Indian community on the Internet, contact the Federal Communication Commission and demand they pull 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorado broadcasting licenses. Let them know that Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles working for the radio station are using public air ways to generate race hate toward the American Indian community.

Let the FCC know that these three men are calling for "Native American" Professor Ward Churchill of the University of Colorado to be fired for a letter he wrote about 9-11. The manner in which they are doing this on public air ways has brought about death threats to Professor Churchill and vandalism to his car. Reports are that KKK members are joining students on campus in Hate actions against Professor Churchill.

The broader issue here is that Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles repeatedly on their radio show refer to the Native America community and how this issue will affect them in the state of Colorado. They have all but called Professor Ward Churchill the brother of terrorist Ben Laden. Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles repeatedly report that death threats are coming in against Professor Ward Churchill and they do not call for and end of this. They sound like their taking great pride in the fact that their manner of reporting on this issue is angering people against Professor Churchill and the Native American community to the point someone may end up being killed.

Dan Caplis, Craig Silverman and Petter Boyles are doing a disservice to all people in Colorado and America in the way they are handling the issue of Professor Ward Churchill on their radio show. Professor Churchill has not broken any laws! he is only exercising his first amendment right of freedom of speech. On Petter Boyles web page it states, We know Professor Ward Churchill's real Indian name "Horse Sh*t," This is a total racial put down directed toward the Native American community!!! UNA has called the station about this issue, and the Rocky Mountain Newspaper for their reports on this issue.
End statement:

Use contact information below to send in your letters of complaint to the Federal Communication Commission demanding action be taken toward 630 KOW-AM Radio Station Denver Colorad