|
la lotta dell'FBI all'impegno politico
Indagini segrete del gran giurì USA conducono all'imputazione di 12 personereginazabo 24 Jan 2006 19:48 GMT (traduit par reginazabo)Il 20 gennaio 2006 l'FBI ha emesso un'imputazione con 65 capi d'accusa in cui si sosteneva che tra il 1996 e il 2001 12 persone avevano partecipato negli Stati Uniti ad attività dell'Earth Liberation Front (ELF) e dell'Animal Liberation Front (ALF). In seguito alle indagini svolte dal gran giurì di Eugene, nell'Oregon, gli imputati sono stati accusati di 17 casi di incendio e sabotaggio compiuti in cinque diversi stati contro strutture federali e private. Quegli episodi non hanno mai provocato danni a esseri umani. Al momento anche i gran giurì di San Diego e San Francisco stanno prendendo di mira militanti dei movimenti ambientalisti e animalisti. L'ondata di arresti che sta interessando tutti gli Stati Uniti, nominata Operation Backfire ("Operazione Ritorno di fiamma"), è considerata dall'FBI un importante attacco agli attivisti dei mocimenti ambientalisti e animalisti che compiono devastazioni di edifici per proteggere la natura e la vita degli animali. Tuttavia, molti sospettano che gli arresti rientrino nelle decennali operazioni segrete di intelligence compiute dall'FBI per ostacolare e screditare i movimenti politici. Di fatto, nell'ambito del COINTELPRO e di altri programmi di intelligence, l'FBI si dedica alla sorveglianza dei privati cittadini ed emette imputazioni false contro militanti politici fin dagli anni l'60. Nel suo libro War at Home, Brian Glick scrive: "È evidente che negli USA gli attivisti politici vengono bersagliati con attacchi continui, che violano i nostri diritti democratici fondamentali e creano un clima di terrore e sfiducia che mina i nostri tentativi di mettere in discussione la politica ufficiale. Questo genere di attacchi ai movimenti per la giustizia sociale ha visto la luce negli anni '60, e solo molti anni dopo abbiamo capito che quella era solo la punta di un iceberg. All'epoca, infatti, pochissimi sapevano dell'ampio programma elaborato dal governo per neutralizzare l'opposizione politica interna attraverso "azioni clandestine" (una repressione politica perpetrata in segreto o mascherata da legittima applicazione delle legge)". Nel 2002 una giuria federale ha dichiarato l'FBI e la polizia di Oakland colpevoli di aver violato i diritti di Judi Bari e Daryl Cherney sanciti dal primo emendamento, in quanto li avevano classificati come terroristi in seguito a un attentato rivolto contro Bari e Cherney per screditare Earth First! L'Operazione Ritorno di fiamma è stata annunciata nell'ambito dell'attuale piano elaborato dall'amministrazione Bush per proteggere i propri programmi di spionaggio interno, denunciato di incostituzionalità da molti tanto a destra quanto a sinistra. Il pubblico ministero Alberto R. Gonzales, il direttore dell'FBI Robert Mueller e il direttore del Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Carl Truscott sostengono che l'"ecoterrorismo" è la prima minaccia terroristica interna degli Stati Uniti. Nel corso di una recente conferenza stampa, Gonzales ha dichiarato che: "indagare e prevenire l'estremismo animalista e ambientalista è una delle priorità della politica interna dell'FBI". Stando a quanto afferma Carl Truscott, l'FBI dichiara che al momento sono almeno 188 le indagini aperte su atti rivendicati dall'ELF e dall'ALF. L'unica prova dichiarata nell'atto di accusa di 83 pagine contro i 12 imputati deriva però soltanto dalla testimonianza di cinque "fonti confidenziali". Due persone sono state pubblicamente dichiarate informatori dell'FBI, per la precisione Jacob Ferguson e Stanislas "Jack" Meyerhoff, imputato anch'egli. La stragrande maggioranza dei media mainstream statunitensi ha assimilato fino in fondo il linguaggio governativo e riferisce notizie unilaterali trascurando completamente di denunciare i crimini commessi contro l'ambiente dal governo e dalle grandi aziende e di illustrare le motivazioni e la passione dei difensori dell'ambiente e dei diritti degli animali. Gli arrestati, comunque, si sono quasi tutti dichiarati innocenti, e alcuni hanno affermato di essere del tutto estranei all'ELF o a organizzazioni analoghe. |
Inaccuracy in lead story
ATF Office of Public Affairs 24.Jan.2006 16:15
Dear Sir/Madam:
andrew.lluberes@atf.gov
We want to point out an inaccuracy in the lead story posted on your website. In the 5th paragraph, the story inaccurately attributes to the FBI a statement made by our director and incorrectly paraphrases what our director said. The paragraph should read:
Gonzales said at a recent news conference, “Investigating and preventing animal rights and environmental extremism is one of the FBI’s highest domestic priorities.” According to Carl Truscott, director of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, there are 188 open investigations of crimes claimed by the ELF and ALF, dating to 1987. Twenty-five to 30 of those cases, Truscott added, are being actively being pursued -- about half of them in the Pacific Northwest, California and Utah. The only evidence declared in the 83 page indictment comes from the testimony of five "confidential sources." Two individuals have been publicly identified as FBI informants, Jacob Ferguson and Stanislas “Jack” Meyerhoff, the latter who has been indicted. FBI's indictments are taking some of the heat off the Bureau after a recent 60-Minute episode exposed the FBI’s failure to apprehend anyone in ELF and ALF actions.
Please correct and repost the story. Thank you.
Andrew L. Lluberes
Office of Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Justice
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF)
Washington, D.C. 20226
202-927-8500
202-927-8112 (fax)
Watching Rove bait the press with eco- activists' lives
kirk james murphy, m.d. 24.Jan.2006 18:14
Watching Rove bait the press with eco- activists' lives
January 20, 2006
This morning Congressional Democrats had scheduled
"unofficial" hearings into the Preznit's illegal and impeachable
warrantless wiretap program as well as the Preznit's delusions of
unfettered executive power.
The hearings were broadcast live on CSPAN and on my
local Pacifica affiliate, for which I am grateful.
The hearings may as well have been held on a raft off Vanuatu.
The Preznit's personal lawyer Alberto "tortureman" Gonzales put
on his Attorney General's costume to grab the spotlight with the
"eco-terror" investigation press conference. The Rovians in the DOJ
artfully scheduled the Torturer General's press conference for just
before the start of the wiretap hearings.
The White House's dog and pony show worked. It totally bounced
even a mention of the unofficial hearings off the noon hourly news summaries at NPR and
at least one of the commercial broadcast networks (and possibly two, but
I was losing track of the streams). Neither the NYT nor LA Times
front web pages even mention the hearings for the evening news feed
tonight.
And why should the out-of-towners care when the locals can't be
bothered? Heck, at noon PDT the Washington Post's website didn't
even mention the hearings even as Pacifica broadcast them. What the hell, it's only a
story about a collision of constitutional powers - maybe a bit of
yawner in a hometown where the local industry is er....fighting about
power.
Until recently, my home town was Santa Monica...half way between Malibu
and Beverly Hills. In those communities, the media are the local industry. That's why
the White House's little show this morning would bring a
smile to the southern California PR men and car dealers who carried
Nixon and Reagan to the White House and stayed on to wreak havoc.
Those guys - cause that's what they were, affluent males - they knew
how to spin.
And they would be smiling to hear that Rove's feint is the third story on the BBC
news at 9 PM PDT, but today's wiretap hearings didn't rate a mention. They would be
laughing to see that Rove - after dropping out of the public eye because of that pesky
Fitzgerald and those annoying rumors of felony indicments - used Gonzales, Mueller, and
the other suits as the backdrop for the rollout of Karl Rove, Crimefighter.
While the Torturer General and the FBI Director were reading their scripts, Rove was
settling down for a luncheon address with the Republican National Committee. Rove "vowed
to make the war on terrorism a central campaign issue". (Don't take my word for it - the
Post covered Rove the day he spoke, in a piece entitled "Rove: GOP to Use Terror As
Campaign Issue".)
So if this were all just a trifle in Variety, the political pros
could stand back and admire Rove's slight of hand. The morning would bring a cute
industry header "Prez' Fire pics bump House Dems' shticks - ratings up". The corporate
news greyhound could keep pounding down the track after that killer leak -
keep running after the source, don't bite the feeding hands (not the
manicured ones). Elsewhere the public could watch the dog and pony
show "Look honey - new arrests: elections must be coming"; and the
threat levels could begin their biannual migration to scarlet.
But this isn't a sidebar (well, 'ceptin whatever 'freshments the Preznit has
stashed away about the ranch or the White House).
This is the world in which the emotionally labile cognitively impaired
Oedipally* enmeshed resident of the Oval Office asserts that anyone
anywhere can be abducted, kidnapped, tortured, imprisoned and killed
at his whim. This decade, the justification for limitless power is terrorism.
[Prior boogeymen have included: Communists in Eurasia;
Gangs (without power suits, articles of incorporation, and lobbyists); Drugs (well some drugs);
Communists Near Our Southern Borders (hordes of revolutionaries plot
to bore southern Texans to death with readings of Das Kapital)].
This is the world in which the delusional ideology of infinite economic growth
has obscured the finite realities of physics and biology - well, almost obscured.
Even the most anthropocentric have started to notice the profound
increases in the incidence of malignancies, reproductive disorders,
and developmental and neurological disorders ... all proving that
nature bats last, and that poisoned earth sky and water leads to
poisoned food, sperm, eggs, and babies. Poisons, acids, and the waste
heat of human industry have altered the composition of the skies and
oceans, imperiling all life. Species and whole eco-systems are
perishing.
And this is the living world which eco-activists all over the planet
protect when they put their bodies, health and lives at risk in the
forests and seas and so many other places. The eco-activists - and
the values and perspectives they understand - threaten the delusion of
infinite growth. The eco-activists and their view - my view - of a
finite living world is a great threat to a fantasy held dear by
economic ideologues.
The eco-activists are not a threat to any living thing.
The delusion of infinite economic growth and the ecological destruction
inherent in that fallacy really do threaten every living being on this
planet.
Today I heard the unctuous Torturer General proclaim that illegal
deeds must be punished, regardless of the motives behind them.
The Torturer General did not announce he will be seeking an independent
counsel to investigate his boss for ordering illegal wiretaps and
torture, much less for the homicides resulting from that torture. He
didn't mention indicting those his boss appointed to conspire with
industry to allow more poisons to be spilled upon the public.
Today I did hear the Torturer General announce a whole mess of charges
of property destruction bundled up under the rubric "eco-terrorism".
Well, another triumph for the PR guys - here "eco-terrorism" started
out life as a slogan from a flack for timber and mining interests, and
now it's all dressed up and hobnobbing with a member of the Cabinet
and the directors of FBI and the BATF.
I never knew a timber flack's slogan could be stretched to obscure a
whole White House full of impeachable offences. Karl Rove obviously
knew better, hence the shut out on the airwaves this morning.
But I do know some of this nation's long sordid history of tarring
non-violent activists whose clear vision saw through to the lies of
power and whose strong voices compelled attention to the crimes they
saw. I do know that those who oppose economic power by advocating the
protection of human health or living beings have been met with false
charges of violence and conspiracy for the past centuries. In the last two decades,
forest activists have been falsely charged with bombings and other crimes - and some of
those responsible for the false charges were themselves found responsible in civil court.
So I think of my innocent friend sitting in jail on false charges
and I think of all the other innocent eco-defenders the Administration used this morning
to divert us from impeachable offences and international human rights crimes.
And I look forward to the day when the breaking story is about
the indictments of Bush Cheney Ashcroft Gonzales Woo et al - in the
Hague.
Most of all, I look forward to the day that the accused
eco-activists are acquitted.
But between now and the impeachment/war crimes trials, I expect
to see more show arrests, more sudden "terrorist" announcements during awkward
hearings, and more ecocide.
I hope to see more and more support for the direct action
environmental community. I hope that support will come from the
direct action community's "natural allies" among those who love the
living world and the creatures dwelling in it.
I also hope to see support for accused eco-activists from the larger
progressive communities...and perhaps even from those who may have
different views on economic or social issues, but who share concern
about profound abuse of police powers to suppress legitimate activity.
Because today, after decades of saying that one imperiled creature or
another is the "canary in the coal mine", the non-violent direct
action environmental community has become the new canary.
(OK - a brave wild and free canary briefly joining the earth pillagers in hope
of lifting up their eyes from the path of ecocide.)
Put it this way: today the non-violent direct action community
sits astride the canary's perch in the Constitution mine.
The Northwest eco-activist community has been credited as one factor
in the success of the efforts of civil society to oppose corporate
rule during the 1999 WTO protests. For this reason and others, I
believe the same repressive legal tools turned against eco-activists
today will be used against civil society activists in the months to
come. As killing in Iraq continues and more Bush crimes are revealed,
the need for excuses for the wiretapping and distractions from the war
will only grow.
I hope those concerned about abuse of executive and police
power under Bush will join those concerned for the living world and
support the eco-activists accused today and earlier, as well as
those already convicted and/or imprisoned and those who will be
subpoenaed, harassed, arrested and indicted in the months to come.
And I hope the PR guys are watching from their own cells when Karl,
Shrub, and the rest of the torturers are doing the perp walk in the
Hague. As for the rest of us - especially the accused eco-activists -
I hope we'll be outside and free, enjoying the air and sky on the earth
so many love, cherish, and seek to protect.
[* Nope, not a Freudian here.....but even a broken clock is right twice a
day]
More information...
Anonymous 24.Jan.2006 22:17
Regarding this paragraph in the article:
"In a separate investigation in Sacramento, California, three individuals were arrested on January 16, 2006, on charges of conspiring to damage or destroy certain property by explosive or fire. The government reported that a paid confidential source ALSO HAD A ROLE IN THE ARRESTS." (emphasis mine)
The government has now reported that the confidential source, an approximately 20-year-old woman, received around $75,000 over 2 years while infiltrating the small group. The government has also revealed that the FBI rented a house in California where the activists allegedly plotted the illegal activity, and provided money for the purchase of bomb-making materials.
The Real Terrorists Here
anonymous 25.Jan.2006 00:01
Operation Backfire. I expect it to.
It appears it's the FBI who should be on trial here.
hey ATF
anon 25.Jan.2006 19:10
to the ATF,
Your disgusting political views are not welcome on Indymedia. Dont post on here. Your attempt to blackmail the Left will not work. All you people want to do is wreck activists lives. It's very obvious you want to control the U.S. population with an iron fist. I hope someday it is you people who are the ones in handcuffs being put on trial for crimes against humanity and the Earth. Theres plenty of people trying to make that happen so watch out. Your PR office and the rest of your organization can go to hell.
let me guess
yactivist 25.Jan.2006 21:05
I'm 100% sure the jury will be full of cops when these unfortunate eco-defenders are put on trial.
Thanks For Being The Media
marco 25.Jan.2006 22:14
My Dearest Andrew L. Lluberes,
Can I call you Andy?
Thanks for helping.
You've just made a page 1 correction by being the very
first to reply like that. Essentially you've joined our
consensus circle for a moment and worked with us. Looks
good.
And to think, all you'd get from the NYTimes is a yawn
of a page 3 correction. (If that!!!)
Don't hate, the media, be the media. yippie!!!
Where are the perps?
AlsoRising 27.Jan.2006 13:40
I don't get it: why is the Gov't arresting only innocent people? And what is the moral duty of the perpetrators if the innocent are facing harsh punishment?