Governor Ulises Ruiz; 6 months of harvesting terror in Oaxaca25 Jul 2005 17:11 GMTSince being sworn into office on the first of January, 2005 Oaxaca, México’s governor, Ulises Ruiz Ortiz, of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), has been making good on his promise to “do away with the social problems” (i.e. popular resistance) in the state. Returning to the old, brute tactics of his party, the governor has been utilizing his power to stifle any group or community which opposes his rule. Attacking the Freedom of Expression On 17 June, 2005 an armed mob calling themselves an industrial union (CROC) employed by the paper gathered outside the offices of Noticias de Oaxaca . Using the pretext of a “strike,” they tried to shutdown the paper’s daily operations . The Revolutionary Confederation of Workers and Peasants (CROC) is state-run (PRI) and comprised of paramilitary forces ; only a small handful of the numerous CROC “strikers” actually worked for the paper. For over a month 31 Noticias employees were held up inside their building while CROC thugs occupied, with complete impunity and police support, the street below. On 18 July, the mob, armed with pickaxes, sticks, knives and handguns, entered the building and forcibly removed the 31 workers sequestered inside. Three Noticias employees were beaten severely, two more have disappeared. Noticias has been largely critical of the governor and his heavy-handed methods of rule, as well as of the paramilitaries who have been terrorizing communities throughout the state. During the month-long standoff, Noticias continued producing the paper from their blockaded building. At first, they attempted to use their printing press to produce the daily. The papers were thrown out the windows to vendors below who were then beaten by paramilitary forces and plain clothed police. Noticias then began printing from a press in the town of Tuxtepec. Vendors in Oaxaca City have reported that police were offering bribes to stop selling the papers, while threatening those who continued distributing the paper. One vendor reported that his stand was burned down the night after he refused a pay-off from the police. Also, thousands of copies were outright stolen by police officers (over 10,000 alone on 29 June; half of the newspaper’s overall circulation of 20,000). During the siege on the 18th of July, the intersections surrounding the Noticias office were blockaded by municipal and State Preventative Police. The two ends of the block where the office is located were blockaded by crowd control fences, paramilitaries, riot police, and government agents. An Indymedia reporter gained access to the roof of Noticias´ office the night of the siege and filmed broken windows and men occupying the building. Another Indymedia reporter was given access to an executive of Noticias who explained the situation and presented their thorough documentation of paramilitary and police cooperation throughout the month long ordeal. [ We have translated and published the lead article from Noticias de Oaxaca the day after the siege of the headquarters, 19 July, 2005 [ Despojan NOTICIAS a sangre y fuego Español and English | Indymedia México report | Committee to Protect Journalists | Governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz v. Civil Society On July 11, 2005, indigenous communities throughout the state of Oaxaca begin to mobilize to Mexico City to protest against state sponsored repression and the revocation of their constitutional rights. One such caravan was stopped on the highway by more than 300 heavily armed riot police. The riot police searched the caravan, stole money from the peasant farmworkers, took their buses, beat 3 men publicly, and told the peasants to walk back home. It seems that Governor Ruiz chose to give these peasants one more violent act of repression to protest about. The irony of the situation is that this took place on the eve of the state’s nationally recognized, indigenous, cultural expression festival, the Guelaguetza. [ On 14 July, members of COMPA (Oaxacan Antineoliberal Popular Magónista Coordination) met with Governor Ruiz who officially agreed on a number of the organization’s demands. COMPA also blanketed and brought the demands of a number of other groups to the discussions, forming the Promotora por la Unidad Nacional contra el Neoliberalismo, which included Noticias, the FPR (Popular Revolutionary Front) and the radical teacher’s union called Seccion 22. The highly unusual meeting with the governor assured COMPA that three demands would be met. First, that there would be respect for dialogue with the Promotora, a dialogue which may have never been realized had it not been for the growing popular power of COMPA throughout the state. Next, it was agreed that there would be an unconditional release of all Promotora affiliated political prisoners. Lastly, a new dialogue would be setup to discuss community demands in exchange for putting off the Jornada de Lucha, or Days of Struggle, which were scheduled to take place during the widely popular Guelaguetza festival (coincidentally the siege of Noticias´ offices in downtown Oaxaca occurred directly after the Guelaguetza wrapped up). Originally, Governor Ruiz would not meet with the Promotora if Noticias was to be present, however, the Promotora brought their demands to the table, and the governor agreed to address the issue in a timely fashion. Governor Ruiz allowed the siege and shutdown of Oaxaca’s largest newspaper. PRI Police and Paramilitaries in Oaxaca: from Santiago Xanica to San Isidro Vista Hermosa Upon taking power, Governor Ruiz began imposing municipal presidents (mayors) in autonomous communities that have, because of widespread corruption and government support for paramilitaries, banned all political parties. One example of overt corruption is the diversion of federal and state funded municipal grants to party affiliates only. Non-party affiliates consistently do not receive Ramo-28 and Ramo-33 funds for schools, roadways, clinics and municipal development programs, a violation of the Mexican Constitution. Thanks to the help of organizations such as CODEP (Committee Organized in Defense of the Rights of the People), OIDHO (Oaxacan Indigenous Human Rights Organization), and COMPA, such municipal funds are demanded through the letter of the law, and then, if that fails, through escalating public demonstrations. Many of these communities have returned, or are fighting to return, to traditional means of self-organization called Uses and Customs, which demands horizontal organizing outside of the corrupt party system. Santiago Xanica is one such community that has expelled political parties. Upon the imposition of a PRI mayor by Governor Ruiz, community members refused to participate with “their” mayor in mandatory communal work days (called tequios) and chose to organize the construction of a communal home autonomously. In an attempt to violently quell opposition to his party’s rule, Ruiz sent militarized State Preventative Police to suppress resistance to his imposed mayor’s authority. State Preventative Police surrounded community member who were participating in their communal work day, and attempted to massacre them. The massacre was astonishingly thwarted by rocks, sticks and courage. In the ordeal police shot three community members, who were also members of COMPA, and arrested them (they have come to be known as the Xanica 3—political prisoners who Ruiz agreed to release by mid December in the 14 July agreement). After the attempted Xanica massacre COMPA mobilized two permanent sit-ins, one in Oaxaca City, and one in Mexico City. At the sit-in in Mexico City, COMPA members approached the president of the National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) Jose Soberanes, (who then promised COMPA a commission of three human rights observers to join them in a meeting with Governor Ulises Ruiz on 3 February, 2005. A delegation of COMPA organizers made their way back to Oaxaca City for the meeting. On 3 February they received a phone call from the Sub-Secretary of Governance, Joaquin Palacios who then invited the COMPA commission to a 1pm appointment to set the agenda for the meeting with the governor later that day. Directly after this meeting, in the parking lot of the hotel in which they met, the three members of the COMPA commission were detained by State Preventative Police, all in the presence of the three CNDH observers. Two of the COMPA members were released within hours, and a third, Alejandro Cruz, of the Zapatista Magonista Alliance, was kept prisoner. Within hours of this incident two other CODEP organizers, Samuel Hernandez and Jaquelina Lopez were detained in the offices of CODEP in the presence of one of the CNDH observers. Under the auspices of Governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz and the General Secretary of Governance Jorge Franco Vargas (also known as “chuckie” from when he was an urban paramilitary in his college days), the puppet Sub- Secretary of Governance Joaquin Palacios now has a record of backstabbing social organizations during dialogues. Indymedia reporters have uncovered more evidence of collusion between paramilitaries in Oaxaca and the state PRI government. On 4 July, 2005 the small town of San Isidro Vista Hermosa was invaded by a paramilitary force numbering over 500 individuals, mostly men from a neighboring town called Santa Cruz Nundaco. Vista Hermosa is a sub-community of Nundaco and subject to its rule. For the last 50 years Vista Hermosa has been trying to de-annex itself from Santa Cruz Nundaco. This attempted separation and independence has resulted in years of violent disputes between the communities For the last 50 years Nundaco has provoked violence in the region in order to demand Vista Hermosa’s continued membership in their community. The most recent provocation came in the form of a false road construction project which would rip through the community of Vista Hermosa. This project is both a fraud and a provocation for the following reasons: One: Nundaco did not discuss the road construction with Vista Hermosa what so ever, and began excavating with a bulldozer the land without permission. Two: Vista Hermosa is actually interested in a route to the otherwise inaccessible community of Rio Brillante, and would have helped plan the project. Third: The roadway that Nundaco began to build leads to an impassible precipice, in other words, to nowhere, as documented by IMC reporters. On 3 July, under orders of Arturo Pimentel Salas members of the paramilitary group FNIC (National Indigenous Farmworker Front) from the community of Nundaco, moved a large bulldozer into Villa Hermosa and began ripping through their land. Vista Hermosa community members contacted the Sub-Secretary of Governance Joaquin Palacios and the State Preventative Police to halt the un-permitted road construction. Palacios invited a commission of community members from Vista Hermosa to a dialogue in Oaxaca City on 4 July. While in the dialogue, during which Palacios assured the safety of their community, cell phone calls came in describing a paramilitary force of over 500 people entering the community of Vista Hermosa with high power rifles, handguns, sticks and machetes. The last cell phone call received described the kidnapping of several community members; later to be confirmed as 39 members of five families. The 5 families have now been released but they have also been displaced from their community, and have sought refuge in a COMPA safe house. FNIC brandishes protection from Governor Ulises Ruiz, General Secretary of Governance Jorge Franco Vargas, and their puppet Sub-Secretary of Governance Joaquin Palacios. IMC reporters have conducted interviews with victims of the Nundaco paramilitary attack and visited the ravaged municipality. [ Terms COMPA (Oaxacan Anti-neoliberal Popular Magonista Coordination) was created in the summer of 2002 in response to the from the community of Las Huertas Santo Domingo Teojomulco, accused of the massacre of 26 indigenous workers from the community of Santiago Xochitltepec. The massacre of the 26 indigenous people took place on 31 May, 2002 in a place known as Agua Fria. The 26 indigenous workers were being transported in the back of a dump truck when stopped by 5 masked men with high-powered rifles in Agua Fria. The 5 paramilitaries opened fire into the bed of the truck and then ordered the driver to dump the bodies into the road. At which time, the killers opened fire once again. Among the 17 detained Teojomulco prisoners were two grade-school children, 2 middle-school children, and a 69 year old woman. Teojomulco was a PRI community which, then governor, Jose Murat expected to fall through the cracks. However, the community was able to count on the support of a popular power organization known as the Sierra Sur Front, which then mobilized the otherwise apolitical community to a permanent sit-in at the Oaxacan state capital. At the sit-in, the FSS was approached by other organizations such as CODEP (Committee in Defense of the Rights of the People), the UCP (Union of Poor Farmworkers), AMZ (the Magonista/ Zapatista Alliance), OIDHO (the Oaxacan Indigenous Human Rights Organization), and other organizations. Put together, they decided to create COMPA. Over the last 3 years, right up until the last days of Murat’s governorship, COMPA demanded the release of all Teojomulco prisoners; the last 4 of whom were released on the last day of Murat’s term. COMPA effectively used escalating, direct-action strategies, over the course of the last 3 years, to gain freedom for the prisoners. Today, COMPA’s political prowess is the driving force behind the Promotora National (the National Promotional Body against Neoliberalism). CODEP-ONPP (Committee Organized in Defense of the Rights of the People-National Organization for Popular Power) was founded in Putla, Villa de Guerrero, Oaxaca over 13 years ago. CODEP is a social organization fighting for the rights of indigenous people, farm workers, teachers, workers, students, and poor people in general. CODEP follows the letter of the law to demand municipal services for communities which do not espouse to any of the 3 political parties (the PRI, the PAN, and the PRD). When legal means are exhausted CODEP initiates escalating, direct-action strategies to demand their peoples’ rights as stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ONPP is the national version of CODEP. Promotora por la Unidad Nacional contra el Neoliberalism (National Promotion for Unity against Neoliberalism) is a coalition created in order to address the issues of state sponsored repression and the revocation of constitutional rights in the state of Oaxaca. It has forced the state government into a dialogue by threat of direct actions. Jornada de Lucha has become a tradition in the state of Oaxaca during different state sponsored events, which occur four times a year. Part of an escalating direct action campaign in order to demand justice and dignity in the state. COMPA and other organizations employ Jornadas de Lucha in order to effectively have their demands met by the state by threatening direct actions which would impede said state sponsored events from happening without a hitch. The Guelaguetza is a state sponsored, nationally revered, indigenous cultural expression festival held in the state of Oaxaca; Guela, meaning cultural expression and guetza, meaning gathering. However, the Guelaguetza is nothing more than a Walt Disney version of indigenousness in that, young, meztiso performers parade into the city of Oaxaca to celebrate the wealth of indigenous culture while simultaneously the indigenous communities of Oaxaca suffer miserable conditions and are exposed to state sponsored repression on a daily basis. There are 2 types of paramilitaries. In the global north, paramilitaries are understood to be militarized police (in violation of such constitutional amendments as possi cometatus- meaning the military and the police must be separate). In the global south however, since the early 60s paramilitaries have come to be known as militarized civilians who execute deniable atrocities for the state and its economic interests. The purpose of paramilitaries is to give the illusion of plausible deniability in acts of state sponsored repression. This strategy of low-intensity warfare was created by the Pentagon and the CIA (the training manual for these practices can be found at the School of the Americans/ Western Hemispheric Institute for Security Cooperation in Fort Benning, Georgia) |
Facts are important
so is accuracy 01.Aug.2005 04:59
While I can sincerely respect the effort made by Austin Indymedia to report on a grave situation that hasn't received much coverage at the international level, I feel that this report falls short of the mark for a number of reasons.
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/ismaelsanmartin--director_editorial_noticias__19jul05.mp3
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/genaroaltamirano_subdirectornoticias__19jul05.mp3
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/octaviovelez_reporteronoticias__19jul05.mp3
http://www.noticias-oax.com.mx
http://mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca
http://www.oloramitierra.com.mx/
http://www.periodistadigital.com/periodismo/object.php?o=128151
First, it is too heavy on the sensationalism. While the situation is indeed grave, the information isn't conveyed accurately in this report.
Second, there are a number of factual errors present in the text. This is particularly unsettling because, given that it was published in the center column of indymedia.org, the incorrect information circled the globe and was picked up by local indymedias before the basic facts were even checked. This amounts to spreading misinformation.
Here are a few examples from the introduction:
1. Ulises Ruiz Ortiz was sworn into office on DECEMBER 1, 2004 - NOT on January 1, 2005. Look it up.
2. While it is true (backed up by press accounts) that over 20 political activist leaders were imprisoned shortly after Ruiz Ortiz took office, can you please provide a citation or evidence of orders to arrest over 150 activists and organizers?
3. It's an exaggeration to write that massacres are "commonplace". If you disagree, please document the 3 most recent examples of homicides involving more than 5 people, along with their dates.
Okay, and that's just the introductory paragraph.
Here are more examples of inaccuracies and misinformation from the first section of the report (dealing with the NOTICIAS newspaper standoff).
ATX Indymedia Action News Team wrote: "On 17 June, 2005 an armed mob calling themselves an industrial union (CROC) employed by the paper gathered outside the offices of Noticias de Oaxaca ."
FACT: The CROC (Confederacion Revolucionaria de Obreros y Campesinos) IS a labor organization that is, and always has been, dominated by the PRI. The CROC claims negotiation rights for the collective bargaining contracts of a number of factory workers, taxi drivers, street vendors, etc. The CROC is NOT "employed by the paper".
Also, the newspaper's correct name is: "NOTICIAS, Voz e Imagen de Oaxaca" - not "Noticias de Oaxaca".
ATX wrote that the CROC is "comprised of paramilitary forces". It seems like there is a confusion of the concepts of "porro" and "golpeador" with "paramilitar" Just because some thug is armed and hired to carry out a political vendetta, doesn't automatically make him a paramilitary. The term "paramilitary" implies some sort of military training and discipline. The case of the blockade at NOTICIAS was more along the lines of "Hey taxi driver, I'll give you 50 bucks to take this metal pipe and sit your fat ass in front of this building and look intimidating. I'll be back with the liquor at sundown. If anyone asks, just tell them you're on strike and give them a mean stare,".
Besides, the NOTICIAS workers themselves who were involved in the 31-day standoff used the terms "porros" and "golpeadores" to describe the crowd blockading them inside of their building. They never used the term "paramilitary".
This conceptual error of who qualifies as "paramilitary" is repeated throughout the report.
ATX wrote: "only a small handful of the numerous CROC “strikers” actually worked for the paper."
FACT: Not even ONE of the newspaper's 102 unionized employees participated in the blockade. Implying otherwise is just echoing the misinformation spread by the CROC leadership.
ATX wrote: "On 18 July, the mob, armed with pickaxes, sticks, knives and handguns, entered the building and forcibly removed the 31 workers sequestered inside."
FACT: According to testimony made by the workers, the weapons used were, brand-new pickax HANDLES, bats, sticks, metal rods, and a few had pistols. I heard no mention of knives, nor of pickaxes. You can listen to the audio testimony of three of the workers at:
ATX wrote: "Three Noticias employees were beaten severely, two more have disappeared."
FACT: Several of the NOTICIAS employees were handled roughly and a few were hit and scraped, but none were "beaten severely" or ended up in the hospital. Although at an initial headcount after their violent removal from the building, two printing press workers were missing, they both showed up less than 24 hours later (i.e. WAY before this report was published). They basically had just layed low until they were sure it was safe to go back to their families. Ask the NOTICIAS staff if you're still in Oaxaca.
ATX wrote: "During the month-long standoff, Noticias continued producing the paper from their blockaded building. At first, they attempted to use their printing press to produce the daily. The papers were thrown out the windows to vendors below who were then beaten by paramilitary forces and plain clothed police. Noticias then began printing from a press in the town of Tuxtepec."
FACT: The NOTICIAS building was blockaded on June 17. The paper began to be printed in Tuxtepec on June 18th. Unless the anecdote about throwing papers out of the window refers to day the building was blockaded, I'm skeptical about its authenticity (which is what happens when a text has so many errors).
ATX wrote: "One vendor reported that his stand was burned down the night after he refused a pay-off from the police."
FACT: When was this? Perhaps ATX is referring to a politically-motivated series of arsons that came in response to vendors' refusal to stop selling NOTICIAS. A total of four newspaper stands were incinerated on OCTOBER 18, 2004. There has been no other case of a newspaper stand being burnt down since then. If I'm wrong, please provide documentary evidence. Otherwise, placing this event in the context of June-July gives the wrong idea.
ATX wrote: "Also, thousands of copies were outright stolen by police officers (over 10,000 alone on 29 June; half of the newspaper’s overall circulation of 20,000).
FACT: While 10,000 copies (along with the 2 trucks transporting them) were stolen on June 29th and taken to the State Attorney General's office, it's also worth mentioning that this was the THIRD incident of this sort. The first occuring on June 20th (in which the entirety of the print run was confiscated) and the second on June 22 (in which a number of newspaper vendors were threatened at gunpoint).
Some of the photos published depict the incident of the June 29th hijacking, but are incorrectly identified.
ATX wrote: Video 1 This video includes a clandestine interview with an anonymous Noticias executive from the night that he and 30 others were violently evicted from the paper´s office by paramilitaries after a 30 day siege.
FACT: The seige lasted 31 days, not 30. Not one of the newspaper's management has acted in a clandestine way throughout the seige. To the contrary, they have always been very up front with their names and job titles PRECISELY because the CROC had been arguing that the people inside of the building were not newspaper workers. Professional journalists who sign their articles every day do not hide their identity, particularly when they are trying to call international attention to a situation that directly affects them. It is sensationalist to imply that an upfront "I am recording you with your consent" interview was "clandestine" and that the same executive that gave dozens of interviews to any press that bothered to ask is "anonymous". Did he specifically say something to the degree of "please hide my identity"? Or did someone just forget to ask his name?
CONCLUSION: The errors referred to here are only from the introductory paragraph and the first section of the "ATX Indymedia Action News Team" report from Oaxaca. I don't have enough time or ganas to get into the rest, but you get the idea. Although I salute their effort, there needs to be some serious reflection on their part regarding the exercise of the basic elements of investigative journalism; accuracy, speaking to multiple sources, researching background information, and cross-checking the facts.
Facts are important.
For on-the-ground coverage of the situation in Oaxaca, check:
and also...
To Fact Checker
ATX IMCISTA 02.Aug.2005 00:15
I can only speculate as to "Fact Checkers" identity, or status. However, I would venture to assume that "Fact Checker" has an expensive degree as well, and is probably gathering all of his/her information from the internet and books, like a good little academic.
What I do know for a fact, is that ATX IMC reporters were in Oaxaca, City the night of the violent eviction of 31 Noticias employees, and because of ATX's personal relationship with The Promotora, and COMPA, which has been built upon for over four years, they were granted a personal interview with some of those in the siege. ATX IMCistas were also granted several other amazing interviews and access to situations.
I also know that ATX IMCistas risked their lives, limbs, equipment, and freedom to get footage of CROC paramilitaries working in collaboration with the Oaxacan, State preventative police and other official agencies.
I also know that ATX IMCistas know the difference between a "Porro", ( an urban paramilitary)a "Golpeador" (a hired thug) and a paramilitary, (a civilian armed and protected by the government or local land/business barrons) from personal experiences with each. Throughout the Noticias siege, and eventual eviction, all three of these types of agents were utilized. In one scene, in the second Noticias video, filmed from the top of Noticias, by ATX IMCistas you can see paramilitaries, i.e. older men from CROC, and "porros" young men from the local university present, working together.
ATX IMCistas are clearly amateurs, and young, and they do not pretend to be anything but. ATX is learning and teaching in this situation. I want to give "fact checker" a couple more facts he or she may not be aware of.
ATX IMC was also in Yolomecatl, to interview a COMPA organizer about the state sponsored repression suffered that day en route to Mexico City. This interview was conducted about 500 meters away from 40 pick-up trucks holding over 100 Oaxacan Special forces troops awaiting the order to put down the COMPA sit-in.
ATX IMC went to San Isidro Vista Hermosa to conduct interviews with residents, and document a FNIC paramilitary attack of that community only 14 days after the attack had taken place. Vista Hermosa residents snook IMCistas into the community while paramilitaries were at the market that saturday.
ATX IMCistas conducted their Noticias interviews inside of those people's safe house the very night that they were violently pulled out of their newspaper's installations.
Can "Fact Checker" even fathom the level of trust built in order to do all these things?
I can't imagine so, because "fact checker" doesn't sound like he or she spends as much time doing the work of building trust in a given community, as he or she does splitting hairs about someone else's work.
Sounds to me, and I cannot confirm, that fact checker is one of the many jealous academics in our community that can't stand it when punk asses like ATX IMCistas out do all their book-work, with some real live action reporting and risk taking.
Sounds to me like "fact-checker" has a personal problem with ATX IMCistas, and thats o.k., but until fact checker starts doing some real work for him or herself than he or she will continue cowardly posting anonymously on this site to gain some sort of recompense for a complete lack of creativity and ovaries.
ATX IMCistas however have done video, radio, and internet publishing workshops with COMPA youth so that they can do this work themselves as you will se published late tommorrow night..... and I assure you "fact checker", that they too will make mistakes, because the only type of person who doesn't make mistakes is the kind of person that sits there and never does anything at all.
Thanks for your not so constructive criticisms, but maybe you should spend a little bit more time checking yourself or at least helping us in the only way you really can... through your support.
Thank you,
el pinche simon,
atx imcista punk ass
What Academics Can Do To HELP The Situation In Oaxaca
ATX IMCista 02.Aug.2005 01:04
Dear Mr. Ruiz Ortiz,
I have received reports from the Oaxacan organization COMPA about
recent
events in Oaxaca that are very disturbing. These concern suspension of
constitutional rights and illegal detention of activists and
organizers,
police attacks against peaceful assemblies, support for paramilitary
violence and destruction, and other highly improper actions that appear
to
be serious violations of international humanitarian law and treaties to
which the Mexican government is a party. I would like to join those
who
are urging that the federal and state authorities take urgent action to
investigate these charges thoroughly and to ensure that civil and human
rights are accorded full respect and protection.
Sincerely,
Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor
MIT
about those errors...
fact checker 03.Aug.2005 06:24
Rather than speculate about my identity, background, status, motivations, etc. - Why doesn't the ATX indy crew visiting Oaxaca just CORRECT the factual errors in their report?
I'm not here to discredit the report. That would be far less time consuming than fact-checking. I'm simply pointing out information that I know not to be true so as to limit the spread of false information.
I wouldn't take the time to write if I felt those who wrote the report were a lost cause. I believe there were heartfelt, good intentions BUT the situation in Oaxaca is too delicate to oversimplify with exaggerations, sensationalism, and outright misinformation. It's crucial to get your facts straight if you're going to try to report on this topic.
Failure to do so calls into question the validity of what is being reported and does no justice to the people who are actually living in the situation.
If people are going to spend the time and money to travel from Austin to Oaxaca, isn't it worth taking the time to cross-check facts and carry out at least some sort of cursory research before publishing to a website where the misinformation is likely to circle the globe without much scrutiny?
The question is:
Do you want to be a RELIABLE source of information?
There are examples cited in my first post where multiple errors are present in a single sentence. Actually, there were only a handful of sentences that didn't contain some sort of error, misrepresentation, or inaccuracy.
If it bothers the "ATX Indymedia Action News Team" that someone is able to point out so many factual errors in their report on Oaxaca, why not just make corrections?
Pointing out that a "porro" is not a paramilitary is not splitting hairs. A "porro" is typically a member of a university-based shock group. "Porros" are cocky little punk-asses that will do politically-motivated dirty deeds in exchange for the promise of getting a job at an exclusive law firm after graduating.
Paramilitaries receive military training and armaments. They know how to clean and take apart their high-caliber rifles after systematically carrying out a massacre. "Porros" don't have the training or the weaponry to qualify as paramilitaries (urban or not).
It's like calling some shitkicker frat boy a plainclothes Green Beret.
Again, not even the sequestered NOTICIAS workers referred to the crowd outside of their building as "paramilitaries" - and that includes when they were referring to the CROC's henchmen.
While I appreciate the effort made, I think that those involved in elaborating the report need to take a critical look at their work, to ask themselves: "Am I sure about this (name/date/assertation/whatever)? "Have I cross-checked this information with someone who isn't a member of COMPA or CODEP?" "Should I really use an anonymous source when there's the option of interviewing others on-the-record who have lived through the same experience?" "Have I gone directly to the source to verify, or am I repeating something that is 2nd or 3rd hand information?" "Am I missing something that is contextually essential to understanding this situation?"
Having passion and good intentions is not an excuse for getting the facts wrong again and again and again when the goal is (?) to call attention to a human rights disaster zone.
ACCURACY IS IMPORTANT. FACTS ARE CRUCIAL.
The best way to demonstrate solidarity with a community as a journalist or media activist is to get the story right. And if there are mistakes, then to have the humility and integrity to correct them.
Pointing out fundamental flaws in what had the potential, given the subject matter, to be a hard-hitting piece of journalistic source material is not an act of splitting hairs. If the report's authors feel that I was mistaken in any of corrections of factual errors pointed out in my original post, I ask that they list them and provide documentation to the contrary. I backed up my corrections by citations, links to 1st hand documentation, or by giving specific information like dates and figures that can be easily researched by checking the links at the bottom of my original post.
In response, I've only read speculations about me or suggestions that the topic be changed to discuss media theory or strategy.
The bedrock of effective media strategy is to base your work on accuracy and fact and always be able to back up your assertations with documentation.
On the note of building community, I'd like to ask the "ATX Indymedia Action News Team" why they didn't collaborate with their counterparts in IndyOax when drafting and editing the feature about Oaxaca that was published to indymedia.org. It certainly would have cut down (or eliminated) the reams of errors present in the report.
That's one of the differences between community-based reporting and parachute journalism.
Photos Of Victims of San Isidro Vista Hermosa Paramilitary Atack
el pinche simon 03.Aug.2005 20:13
Aqui se ven fotos de las victimas del ataque paramilitar en la comunidad de San Isidro Vista Hermosa.
http://austin.indymedia.org/newswire/index.php
Estas imagenes claramente demuestran el nivel de violencia que se lleva al cabo por grupos paramilitares en Oaxaca.
Here are some pictures of the victims of the San Isidro Vista Hermosa paramilitary attack.
These images clearly illustrate the violence that paramilitaries in oaxaca are willing to perpetrate.
Para ver mas de estas imagenes aga clic en la siguiente liga:
To see more images click on the following link:
Sorry bad link
el pinche 03.Aug.2005 20:32
To see more Photos check out this story on www.austin.indymedia.org
Here is the Photo Links / Aqui esta la liga a las fotos
el pinche simon 04.Aug.2005 00:42
who decides what the facts are?
kanga 04.Aug.2005 01:10
to fact checker, i am not an austin imcista, but i have been to oaxaca and i have talked to people and seen alot of the same kinds of things happening that this article is tryiong to convieve. I feel like your argument if the kind that was used argainst rigoberta Menchu when her autobiography was attempted to be discredited because some of the things didn't happen to her they happened to her family, her friends, her people. This does not make her story any less true or any less valid neither does it make this one such, there is no sensationalism going on, these things happened, are happening and will happen again unless the global community gets this information and decides to act upon it to put pressure on the government.
Your splitting hairs and being devisive and really not adding anything to the debate and yes sometimes a "shitkicker frat boy is the same as a plainclothes Brown shirt."
are the facts what the media decides? what gets printed in the history books? What you see on tv? what the government tells you? or for that matter what any tells you? I encourage people to do their own research, to gain some knowledge and understand the situation, all I can add is after my experience in oaxaca this is the best information about whats going on coming from there from people who have seen it and talked to people who have lived it.
last time
fact checker 05.Aug.2005 05:11
This is not comparable to the case of Rigoberta Menchu's autobiography. Menchu was writing a collective history of herself, her family and her people.
This is a case of a group of outsiders visiting a human rights disaster zone and then publishing a report filled with errors and misinformation.
Like I said before, the best way to demonstrate solidarity with a community as a journalist or media activist is to get the story right - details and all. That way, reports can be used as a tool for mobilizing public opinion within the global community, precisely because the information is accurate and reliable.
That's been my point all along, but it seems like people posting here are missing this point. So, I'm not going to waste any more time or effort on this thread. If people want to find out more about what's going on Oaxaca, they'll find a way.
last time
fact checker 06.Aug.2005 06:05
This is not comparable to the case of Rigoberta Menchu's autobiography. Menchu was writing a collective history of herself, her family and her people.
This is a case of a group of outsiders visiting a human rights disaster zone and then publishing a report filled with errors and misinformation.
Like I said before, the best way to demonstrate solidarity with a community as a journalist or media activist is to get the story right - details and all. That way, reports can be used as a tool for mobilizing public opinion within the global community, precisely because the information is accurate and reliable.
That's been my point all along, but it seems like people posting here are missing this point. So, I'm not going to waste any more time or effort on this thread. If people want to find out more about what's going on Oaxaca, they'll find a way.
Checking Out
fact checker 07.Aug.2005 13:55
This is not comparable to the case of Rigoberta Menchu's autobiography. Menchu was writing a collective history of herself, her family and her people.
This is a case of a group of outsiders visiting a human rights disaster zone and then publishing a report filled with errors and misinformation.
Like I said before, the best way to demonstrate solidarity with a community as a journalist or media activist is to get the story right - details and all. That way, reports can be used as a tool for mobilizing public opinion within the global community, precisely because the information is accurate and reliable.
That's been my point all along, but it seems like people posting here are missing this point. So, I'm not going to waste any more time or effort on this thread. If people want to find out more about what's going on Oaxaca, they'll find a way.
correccion
Luis 09.Dec.2005 05:33
La Guelaguetza es un evento patrocinado por el estado de Oaxaca, tanto reconocido a nivel nacional, como la celebración más grande de indígenas en el país. Guela significa expresión cultural y guetza significa reunión de regiones
de la manera mas atenta suplico que se informen acerca del significado de la palabra guelaguetza, si van a dar informacion den una que sea la correcta, que penaa