WE, THE PEOPLE v PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!Ms. Cris Ericson, 879 Church Street, Chester, Vermont U.S.A. 08 Feb 2009 08:47 GMT
FEBRUARY 8, 2009
WE, THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v President Barack Hussein Obama, seek material facts which he has a duty to disclose to determine if he really is a natural born citizen ,and if he is really qualified to hold the Office of President of the United States of America.
President Barack Hussein Obama has nominated several politicians who recently admitted that they were not qualified for the nominations because they had committed wrongful acts.
The quality of the people who President Obama nominates are closely related to the type of person he is; and the people he nominates reflect, just like a mirror, that he may be no more trustworthy than the people he nominates.
Because President Barack Hussein Obama has nominated people for top positions in his administration, who voluntarily decided to decline the nominations when records of their past wrongful behaviour were revealed after they were nominated, we must now undertake a more careful scrutiny of President Barack Hussein Obama's actual qualifications to be President of the United States of America, because the people who nominated him may not have been any more trustworthy than the untrustworthy people he nominated.
Because President Barack Hussein Obama nominated people who turned out to be untrustworthy, we may want to investigate him because the people who nominated him may also be equally untrustworthy.
While campaigning, Barack Hussein Obama released a "Certification of Live Birth" on the internet. He alleged that this was all the information that people needed to be certain that he is a natural born citizen, which is required to be President of the United States of America.
It is not true that a "Certification of Live Birth" gives all of the information necessary to prove a person is a natural born citizen.
On the Certification of Live Birth" which Barack Hussein Obama issued during his campaign, instead of a regular long form birth certificate, there are three legal notices:
(1) Date of Birth August 4, 1961 and Date filed with Registrar August 8, 1961. This alleges that there were four days between the date of birth and the date the birth was reported. Where was Barack Hussein Obama's mother during those four days? What was she doing during those four days? There is no name of any doctor. There is no name of any midwife. There is no name of any hospital. There is no name of any ship or boat or ocean liner that he may have been born on. If he was born at sea, it is important to know if he was born in international waters, or in waters within the borders of the United States of America. Was he born in a Taxi Cab on the way to the hospital? Was he born in a house or in an apartment or on a farm or in a barn? Because he refuses to tell us, he wants us to think he is "the One". He wants to be so mysterious so that some people may come to the conclusion that he may have been born in a manger.
On the "Certification of Live Birth" that Barack Hussein Obama issued during his political campaign in 2008, instead of a regular, normal long form birth certificate, there is another legal notice:
(Rev. 11/01) LASER
This legal notice of 11/01 means November 2001 and that means that Barack Hussein Obama did not receive this "Certification of Live Birth" (rather than a normal long form birth certificate) until after he was over 40 years old, and after the terrorist attack on the United States of America on September 11, 2001. Why did Barack Hussein Obama receive a "Certification of Live Birth: (rather than a long form birth certicate) in November 2001 (Rev. 11/01) after 9/11?
The third legal notice on the "Certification of Live Birth" (rather than a long form birth certificate) of Barack Hussein Obama states:
[HRS 338-13(b), 338-19]
HRS are Hawaii Revised Statutes http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov Click on Hawaii Revised Statutes on the right of the Hawaii State government website.
HRS 338-19 is for certificates based on information that is so old or otherwise in such condition that its use to certify is subject to judicial oversight.
HRS 338-13(b) is subject to the requirements of HRS 338-16, HRS 338-17 and HRS 338-18 and these are statutes that are for birth certificates given to a person born in a foreign country, and for birth certificates that have been altered, and for birth certificates that have had the facts changed, and these statutes allow the original birth certificate to be sealed and a new one issued. These statutes allow for judicial proceedings to determine if the actual facts are correct so that the "Certification of Live Birth" may be protested in court because it may be fraudulent.
In the following court case cite there is proof that the people have a right to take the issue of the material facts of President Barack Hussein Obama's birth and birth place and proof of his biological parents to court for a judicial determination if he is a natural born citizen:
"District Court did not abuse its discretion in applying Federal Rules of Evidence rather than Hawaii Health Department Rules in finding results of intoxilizer test admissible under public records and reports exception to hearsay rule of Rule 803(6)(8). United States v De Water (1998, CA9 HAWAII) 846 F 2d 528, 25 Fed Rules Evid Serv 748."
There have been other previous cases filed in state and federal courts to try to prove that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen and is not qualified to hold the Office of President of the United States of America; and they have been dismissed.
This NEW legal proposal presents a different jurisdiction, a different legal standing and a different cause of action, and a different proof of legal duty. For more information about this NEW proposal please visit
http://crisericson.com Cris Ericson PROPOSED CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA FOR ALLEGED FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS HE HAS A DUTY TO REVEAL.